Weighting and estimation
Filter results by
Search HelpKeyword(s)
Type
Survey or statistical program
- Survey of Labour and Income Dynamics (5)
- Census of Population (5)
- Survey of Household Spending (2)
- Longitudinal and International Study of Adults (2)
- Survey of Employment, Payrolls and Hours (1)
- Canadian Cancer Registry (1)
- Canadian Community Health Survey - Annual Component (1)
- Uniform Crime Reporting Survey (1)
- Quarterly Demographic Estimates (1)
- Annual Demographic Estimates: Canada, Provinces and Territories (1)
- Estimates of the number of census families for July 1st, Canada, provinces and territories (1)
- Annual Demographic Estimates : Subprovincial Areas (1)
- Labour Force Survey (1)
- Longitudinal Administrative Databank (1)
- General Social Survey - Social Identity (1)
- Canadian Community Health Survey - Nutrition (1)
- Canadian Income Survey (1)
- Residential Property Values (1)
- Canadian Survey on Business Conditions (1)
Results
All (638)
All (638) (30 to 40 of 638 results)
- Articles and reports: 12-001-X202400200005Description: Adaptive survey designs (ASDs) tailor recruitment protocols to population subgroups that are relevant to a survey. In recent years, effective ASD optimization has been the topic of research and several applications. However, the performance of an optimized ASD over time is sensitive to time changes in response propensities. How adaptation strategies can adjust to such variation over time is not yet fully understood. In this paper, we propose a robust optimization approach in the context of sequential mixed-mode surveys employing Bayesian analysis. The approach is formulated as a mathematical programming problem that explicitly accounts for uncertainty due to time change. ASD decisions can then be made by considering time-dependent variation in conditional mode response propensities and between-mode correlations in response propensities. The approach is demonstrated using a case study: the 2014-2017 Dutch Health Survey. We evaluate the sensitivity of ASD performance to 1) the budget level and 2) the length of applicable historic time-series data. We find there is only a moderate dependence on the budget level and the dependence on historic data is moderated by the amount of seasonality during the year.Release date: 2024-12-20
- Articles and reports: 12-001-X202400200009Description: Many studies face the problem of comparing estimates obtained with different survey methodology, including differences in frames, measurement instruments, and modes of delivery. The problem arises in multimode surveys and in surveys that are redesigned. Major redesign of survey processes could affect survey estimates systematically, and it is important to quantify and adjust for such discontinuities between the designs to ensure comparability of estimates over time. We propose a small area estimation approach to reconcile two sets of survey estimates, and apply it to two surveys in the Marine Recreational Information Program (MRIP), which monitors recreational fishing along the Atlantic and Gulf coasts of the United States. We develop a log-normal model for the estimates from the two surveys, accounting for temporal dynamics through regression on population size and state-by-wave seasonal factors, and accounting in part for changing coverage properties through regression on wireless telephone penetration. Using the estimated design variances, we develop a regression model that is analytically consistent with the log-normal mean model. We use the modeled design variances in a Fay-Herriot small area estimation procedure to obtain empirical best linear unbiased predictors of the reconciled estimates of fishing effort (requiring predictions at new sets of covariates), and provide an asymptotically valid mean square error approximation.Release date: 2024-12-20
- Articles and reports: 12-001-X202400200011Description: Small area estimation (SAE) is becoming increasingly popular among survey statisticians. Since the direct estimates of small areas usually have large standard errors, model-based approaches are often adopted to borrow strength across areas. SAE models often use covariates to link different areas and random effects to account for the additional variation. Recent studies showed that random effects are not necessary for all areas, so global-local (GL) shrinkage priors have been introduced to effectively model the sparsity in random effects. The GL priors vary in tail behavior, and their performance differs under different sparsity levels of random effects. As a result, one needs to fit the model with different choices of priors and then select the most appropriate one based on the deviance information criterion or other evaluation metrics. In this paper, we propose a flexible prior for modeling random effects in SAE. The hyperparameters of the prior determine the tail behavior and can be estimated in a fully Bayesian framework. Therefore, the resulting model is adaptive to the sparsity level of random effects without repetitive fitting. We demonstrate the performance of the proposed prior via simulations and real applications.Release date: 2024-12-20
- Articles and reports: 12-001-X202400200012Description: Population surveys are nowadays rarely analysed in isolation from any auxiliary information, often in the form of population counts, totals and other summaries. Calibration, or benchmarking, by which the weighted sample totals of auxiliary variables are matched to their (known) population totals, is widely applied. Methods for adjusting the weights to satisfy these constraints involve iterative procedures with unknown finite-sample properties. We develop an alternative method in which the weights are calibrated by minimising a quadratic function, requiring no iterations and yielding a unique solution. The relative priority of each constraint is represented by a tuning parameter. The properties of the weights and of the calibration estimator, as functions of these parameters, are explored analytically and by simulations. A connection of the proposed method with ridge calibration is established.Release date: 2024-12-20
- Articles and reports: 12-001-X202400200013Description: A solution to control for nonresponse bias consists of multiplying the design weights of respondents by the inverse of estimated response probabilities to compensate for the nonrespondents. Maximum likelihood and calibration are two approaches that can be applied to obtain estimated response probabilities. We consider a common framework in which these approaches can be compared. We develop an asymptotic study of the behavior of the resulting estimator when calibration is applied. A logistic regression model for the response probabilities is postulated. Missing at random and unclustered data are supposed. Three main contributions of this work are: 1) we show that the estimators with the response probabilities estimated via calibration are asymptotically equivalent to unbiased estimators and that a gain in efficiency is obtained when estimating the response probabilities via calibration as compared to the estimator with the true response probabilities, 2) we show that the estimators with the response probabilities estimated via calibration are doubly robust to model misspecification and explain why double robustness is not guaranteed when maximum likelihood is applied, and 3) we highlight problems related to response probabilities estimation, namely existence of a solution to the estimating equations, problems of convergence, and extreme weights. We present the results of a simulation study in order to illustrate these elements.Release date: 2024-12-20
- Articles and reports: 12-001-X202400200015Description: Random forest models, which are the result of averaging the estimated values from a large number of tree models, represent a useful and flexible tool for modeling the data nonparametrically to provide accurately predicted values. There are many potential applications for these types of models when dealing with survey data. However, survey data is usually collected using an informative sample design, so it is necessary to have an algorithm for creating random forest models that account for this design during model estimation. The tree models used in the forest are typically obtained by estimating tree models on bootstrapped samples of the original data. Since the models depend on the observed data and the values observed in the sample depend on the informative sample design, the usual method for estimation is likely to lead to a biased random forest model when applied to survey data. In this article, we provide an algorithm and a set of conditions that produce consistent random forest models under an informative sample design and compare this method to the usual random forest modeling method. We show that ignoring the design can lead to biased model estimates.Release date: 2024-12-20
- Articles and reports: 75-005-M2024003Description: This document briefly describes the small area estimation methodology developed to produce monthly estimates of employment and unemployment rate for census metropolitan areas, census agglomerations, and self-contained labour areas using data from the Labour Force Survey, Employment Insurance statistics and population projections.Release date: 2024-09-17
- Articles and reports: 12-001-X202400100001Description: Inspired by the two excellent discussions of our paper, we offer some new insights and developments into the problem of estimating participation probabilities for non-probability samples. First, we propose an improvement of the method of Chen, Li and Wu (2020), based on best linear unbiased estimation theory, that more efficiently leverages the available probability and non-probability sample data. We also develop a sample likelihood approach, similar in spirit to the method of Elliott (2009), that properly accounts for the overlap between both samples when it can be identified in at least one of the samples. We use best linear unbiased prediction theory to handle the scenario where the overlap is unknown. Interestingly, our two proposed approaches coincide in the case of unknown overlap. Then, we show that many existing methods can be obtained as a special case of a general unbiased estimating function. Finally, we conclude with some comments on nonparametric estimation of participation probabilities.Release date: 2024-06-25
- Articles and reports: 12-001-X202400100002Description: We provide comparisons among three parametric methods for the estimation of participation probabilities and some brief comments on homogeneous groups and post-stratification.Release date: 2024-06-25
- Articles and reports: 12-001-X202400100003Description: Beaumont, Bosa, Brennan, Charlebois and Chu (2024) propose innovative model selection approaches for estimation of participation probabilities for non-probability sample units. We focus our discussion on the choice of a likelihood and parameterization of the model, which are key for the effectiveness of the techniques developed in the paper. We consider alternative likelihood and pseudo-likelihood based methods for estimation of participation probabilities and present simulations implementing and comparing the AIC based variable selection. We demonstrate that, under important practical scenarios, the approach based on a likelihood formulated over the observed pooled non-probability and probability samples performed better than the pseudo-likelihood based alternatives. The contrast in sensitivity of the AIC criteria is especially large for small probability sample sizes and low overlap in covariates domains.Release date: 2024-06-25
- Previous Go to previous page of All results
- 1 Go to page 1 of All results
- 2 Go to page 2 of All results
- 3 Go to page 3 of All results
- 4 (current) Go to page 4 of All results
- 5 Go to page 5 of All results
- 6 Go to page 6 of All results
- 7 Go to page 7 of All results
- ...
- 64 Go to page 64 of All results
- Next Go to next page of All results
Data (0)
Data (0) (0 results)
No content available at this time.
Analysis (610)
Analysis (610) (40 to 50 of 610 results)
- Articles and reports: 12-001-X202400100006Description: In some of non-probability sample literature, the conditional exchangeability assumption is considered to be necessary for valid statistical inference. This assumption is rooted in causal inference though its potential outcome framework differs greatly from that of non-probability samples. We describe similarities and differences of two frameworks and discuss issues to consider when adopting the conditional exchangeability assumption in non-probability sample setups. We also discuss the role of finite population inference in different approaches of propensity scores and outcome regression modeling to non-probability samples.Release date: 2024-06-25
- Articles and reports: 12-001-X202400100007Description: Pseudo weight construction for data integration can be understood in the two-phase sampling framework. Using the two-phase sampling framework, we discuss two approaches to the estimation of propensity scores and develop a new way to construct the propensity score function for data integration using the conditional maximum likelihood method. Results from a limited simulation study are also presented.Release date: 2024-06-25
- Articles and reports: 12-001-X202400100008Description: Nonprobability samples emerge rapidly to address time-sensitive priority topics in different areas. These data are timely but subject to selection bias. To reduce selection bias, there has been wide literature in survey research investigating the use of propensity-score (PS) adjustment methods to improve the population representativeness of nonprobability samples, using probability-based survey samples as external references. Conditional exchangeability (CE) assumption is one of the key assumptions required by PS-based adjustment methods. In this paper, I first explore the validity of the CE assumption conditional on various balancing score estimates that are used in existing PS-based adjustment methods. An adaptive balancing score is proposed for unbiased estimation of population means. The population mean estimators under the three CE assumptions are evaluated via Monte Carlo simulation studies and illustrated using the NIH SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence study to estimate the proportion of U.S. adults with COVID-19 antibodies from April 01-August 04, 2020.Release date: 2024-06-25
- Articles and reports: 18-001-X2024001Description: This study applies small area estimation (SAE) and a new geographic concept called Self-contained Labor Area (SLA) to the Canadian Survey on Business Conditions (CSBC) with a focus on remote work opportunities in rural labor markets. Through SAE modelling, we estimate the proportions of businesses, classified by general industrial sector (service providers and goods producers), that would primarily offer remote work opportunities to their workforce.Release date: 2024-04-22
- 45. Study: Enhancing data for rural Canada: Small area estimation of remote work opportunities ArchivedStats in brief: 11-001-X202411338008Description: Release published in The Daily – Statistics Canada’s official release bulletinRelease date: 2024-04-22
- Articles and reports: 11-522-X202200100001Description: Record linkage aims at identifying record pairs related to the same unit and observed in two different data sets, say A and B. Fellegi and Sunter (1969) suggest each record pair is tested whether generated from the set of matched or unmatched pairs. The decision function consists of the ratio between m(y) and u(y),probabilities of observing a comparison y of a set of k>3 key identifying variables in a record pair under the assumptions that the pair is a match or a non-match, respectively. These parameters are usually estimated by means of the EM algorithm using as data the comparisons on all the pairs of the Cartesian product ?=A×B. These observations (on the comparisons and on the pairs status as match or non-match) are assumed as generated independently of other pairs, assumption characterizing most of the literature on record linkage and implemented in software tools (e.g. RELAIS, Cibella et al. 2012). On the contrary, comparisons y and matching status in ? are deterministically dependent. As a result, estimates on m(y) and u(y) based on the EM algorithm are usually bad. This fact jeopardizes the effective application of the Fellegi-Sunter method, as well as automatic computation of quality measures and possibility to apply efficient methods for model estimation on linked data (e.g. regression functions), as in Chambers et al. (2015). We propose to explore ? by a set of samples, each one drawn so to preserve independence of comparisons among the selected record pairs. Simulations are encouraging.Release date: 2024-03-25
- Articles and reports: 11-522-X202200100003Description: Estimation at fine levels of aggregation is necessary to better describe society. Small area estimation model-based approaches that combine sparse survey data with rich data from auxiliary sources have been proven useful to improve the reliability of estimates for small domains. Considered here is a scenario where small area model-based estimates, produced at a given aggregation level, needed to be disaggregated to better describe the social structure at finer levels. For this scenario, an allocation method was developed to implement the disaggregation, overcoming challenges associated with data availability and model development at such fine levels. The method is applied to adult literacy and numeracy estimation at the county-by-group-level, using data from the U.S. Program for the International Assessment of Adult Competencies. In this application the groups are defined in terms of age or education, but the method could be applied to estimation of other equity-deserving groups.Release date: 2024-03-25
- 48. Labour Force Survey initiatives under Statistics Canada’s Disaggregated Data Action Plan ArchivedArticles and reports: 11-522-X202200100004Description: In accordance with Statistics Canada’s long-term Disaggregated Data Action Plan (DDAP), several initiatives have been implemented into the Labour Force Survey (LFS). One of the more direct initiatives was a targeted increase in the size of the monthly LFS sample. Furthermore, a regular Supplement program was introduced, where an additional series of questions are asked to a subset of LFS respondents and analyzed in a monthly or quarterly production cycle. Finally, the production of modelled estimates based on Small Area Estimation (SAE) methodologies resumed for the LFS and will include a wider scope with more analytical value than what had existed in the past. This paper will give an overview of these three initiatives.Release date: 2024-03-25
- 49. Application of sampling variance smoothing methods for small area proportion estimation ArchivedArticles and reports: 11-522-X202200100005Description: Sampling variance smoothing is an important topic in small area estimation. In this paper, we propose sampling variance smoothing methods for small area proportion estimation. In particular, we consider the generalized variance function and design effect methods for sampling variance smoothing. We evaluate and compare the smoothed sampling variances and small area estimates based on the smoothed variance estimates through analysis of survey data from Statistics Canada. The results from real data analysis indicate that the proposed sampling variance smoothing methods work very well for small area estimation.Release date: 2024-03-25
- 50. Measuring the number of food aid recipients ArchivedArticles and reports: 11-522-X202200100013Description: Respondents to typical household surveys tend to significantly underreport their potential use of food aid distributed by associations. This underreporting is most likely related to the social stigma felt by people experiencing great financial difficulty. As a result, survey estimates of the number of recipients of that aid are much lower than the direct counts from the associations. Those counts tend to overestimate due to double counting. Through its adapted protocol, the Enquête Aide alimentaire (EAA) collected in late 2021 in France at a sample of sites of food aid distribution associations, controls the biases that affect the other sources and determines to what extent this aid is used.Release date: 2024-03-25
- Previous Go to previous page of Analysis results
- 1 Go to page 1 of Analysis results
- 2 Go to page 2 of Analysis results
- 3 Go to page 3 of Analysis results
- 4 Go to page 4 of Analysis results
- 5 (current) Go to page 5 of Analysis results
- 6 Go to page 6 of Analysis results
- 7 Go to page 7 of Analysis results
- ...
- 61 Go to page 61 of Analysis results
- Next Go to next page of Analysis results
Reference (28)
Reference (28) (0 to 10 of 28 results)
- Surveys and statistical programs – Documentation: 11-633-X2026002Description: Recent changes in Canada’s immigration levels have heightened interest in understanding how immigration affects housing demand. This article develops a methodological framework for projecting housing use associated with permanent residents (PRs) and non-permanent residents (NPRs) under alternative immigration scenarios. The framework applies observed per capita housing use rates from the Census of Population to estimate incremental housing use by tenure over time.Release date: 2026-04-24
- Surveys and statistical programs – Documentation: 91-528-XDescription: The Technical Guide on Demographic Estimates at Statistics Canada provides detailed descriptions of the most current data sources and methods used by the Centre for demography at Statistics Canada to produce demographic estimates as part of the Demographic estimates program. They comprise postcensal and intercensal population estimates; base population; births and deaths; immigrants; emigrants; returning emigrants; non-permanent residents; interprovincial migration; subprovincial estimates of population and intraprovincial migration; population estimates by age and gender; and census family estimates. A glossary of commonly used terms is available at the end of the guide.Release date: 2025-12-17
- Surveys and statistical programs – Documentation: 98-306-XDescription:
This report describes sampling, weighting and estimation procedures used in the Census of Population. It provides operational and theoretical justifications for them, and presents the results of the evaluations of these procedures.
Release date: 2023-10-04 - Notices and consultations: 75F0002M2019006Description:
In 2018, Statistics Canada released two new data tables with estimates of effective tax and transfer rates for individual tax filers and census families. These estimates are derived from the Longitudinal Administrative Databank. This publication provides a detailed description of the methods used to derive the estimates of effective tax and transfer rates.
Release date: 2019-04-16 - 5. Revisions to 2006 to 2011 income data ArchivedSurveys and statistical programs – Documentation: 75F0002M2015003Description:
This note discusses revised income estimates from the Survey of Labour and Income Dynamics (SLID). These revisions to the SLID estimates make it possible to compare results from the Canadian Income Survey (CIS) to earlier years. The revisions address the issue of methodology differences between SLID and CIS.
Release date: 2015-12-17 - Surveys and statistical programs – Documentation: 13-605-X201500414166Description:
Estimates of the underground economy by province and territory for the period 2007 to 2012 are now available for the first time. The objective of this technical note is to explain how the methodology employed to derive upper-bound estimates of the underground economy for the provinces and territories differs from that used to derive national estimates.
Release date: 2015-04-29 - Surveys and statistical programs – Documentation: 99-002-X2011001Description:
This report describes sampling and weighting procedures used in the 2011 National Household Survey. It provides operational and theoretical justifications for them, and presents the results of the evaluation studies of these procedures.
Release date: 2015-01-28 - Surveys and statistical programs – Documentation: 99-002-XDescription: This report describes sampling and weighting procedures used in the 2011 National Household Survey. It provides operational and theoretical justifications for them, and presents the results of the evaluation studies of these procedures.Release date: 2015-01-28
- Surveys and statistical programs – Documentation: 92-568-XDescription:
This report describes sampling and weighting procedures used in the 2006 Census. It reviews the history of these procedures in Canadian censuses, provides operational and theoretical justifications for them, and presents the results of the evaluation studies of these procedures.
Release date: 2009-08-11 - Surveys and statistical programs – Documentation: 71F0031X2006003Description:
This paper introduces and explains modifications made to the Labour Force Survey estimates in January 2006. Some of these modifications include changes to the population estimates, improvements to the public and private sector estimates and historical updates to several small Census Agglomerations (CA).
Release date: 2006-01-25