Local polynomial estimation for a small area mean under informative sampling
Section 6. Concluding remarks
In this paper,
we studied the estimation of a small area mean under informative sampling by
using an augmented model approach where the augmenting variable is a smooth
function
of the
selection probability
Our
augmented model is semi-parametric. It
differs from Verret et al. (2015), in that nothing was assumed about the
augmenting function
We proposed a three-step
procedure to estimate the augmented semi-parametric
model. Firstly, local polynomial fits were estimated for each unit of the
population (sampled and non-sampled). Secondly, given these local fits a new
dependent variable was defined to obtain global estimators of the regression
parameters and the small area effects.
The resulting estimators were used to compute the predicted values of the
dependent variable,
for all
non-sampled units. Finally, using the observed sample values of
and the
predicted values of
we
computed the local polynomial estimator
for the
small area mean
We adopted the conditional parametric bootstrap
method to estimate the mean squared error of the newly proposed estimator. The
conditional bootstrap is a modified version of the parametric bootstrap
estimator method of Hall and Maiti (2006).
We carried out a simulation study to compare
the bias and mean squared error performance of the usual EBLUP,
the
augmented EBLUP of Verret et al. (2015),
and the
proposed local polynomial estimator,
As
expected,
exhibited large bias under informative
sampling. The new estimator
had
equal or smaller MSE than
when the
sample design was highly informative. If the sample design is less informative,
it is better to use one of the two estimators in Verret et al. (2015):
that is, augment the basic model with
either
or
Note
that in doing so, the gains are very small. If the sampling design is very
slightly or not at all informative, then estimator
based on
the population model should be used.
We also evaluated the performance of the mean
squared error bootstrap estimation for the estimators
and
in
terms of average absolute relative bias
and
average confidence level
The
conditional bootstrap provides a good way to estimate the mean squared errors.
The advantage of the local polynomial approach
is that it provides an automatic way of augmenting the model when the design is
informative. Its biggest disadvantage is its computational burden both in terms
of parameter estimation and associated reliability. The procedure outlined in Section 5.3
suggests a way to determine whether it is worth using it or not. An alternative
approach is to augment the unit level model with a P-spline term of selection
probabilities to account for the informativeness of the sampling design. This
approach has been recently studied by Chatrchi (2018).
Acknowledgements
We
would like to thank J.N.K. Rao for suggesting the conditional bootstrap for
estimating the mean squared error of the polynomial estimator, and commenting
on the article. We would also like to thank the Associate Editor and a referee
for their constructive comments that have improved the paper.
References
Asparouhov, T. (2006). General multi-level modelling with sampling weights. Communication in Statistics, Theory and
Methods, 439-460.
Battese, G.E., Harter, R.M. and Fuller, W.A. (1988). An
error component model for prediction of county crop areas using survey and
satellite data. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 83,
28-36.
Breidt, F.J., and
Opsomer, J.D. (2000). Local polynomial regression estimators in survey
sampling. Annals of Statistics, 28,
4, 1026-1053.
Breidt, F.J., Opsomer, J.D., Johnson, A.A. and Ranalli,
M.G. (2007). Semiparametric model-assisted estimation for natural resource
surveys. Survey Methodology, 33, 1,
35-44. Paper available at https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/pub/12-001-x/2007001/article/9850-eng.pdf.
Chatrchi, G. (2018). Small Area Estimation:
Informative Sampling and Two-Fold Models. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis,
Carleton
University
,
Ottawa
,
Canada
.
Fan, J., and Gijbels,
I.
(1996). Local Polynomial Modelling and its Applications. London: Chapman
and Hall.
González-Manteiga, W., Lombardia, M.J., Molina,
I.
, Morales, D. and Santamaria, L. (2008). Bootstrap mean squared error of a
small area EBLUP. Journal of Statistical
Computation and Simulation, 78, 5, 443-462.
Hall, P., and Maiti, T. (2006). On parametric bootstrap
methods for small area prediction. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series
B: Statistical Methodology, 68, 221-238.
Opsomer, J.D., Claeskens, G., Ranalli, M.G., Kauermann,
G. and Breidt, F.J. (2008). Nonparametric small area estimation using penalized
spline regression. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B
(Statistical Methodology), 70(1),
265-286.
Pfeffermann, D., and Sverchkov, M. (2007). Small-area
estimation under informative probability sampling of areas and within the
selected areas. Journal of the American
Statistical Association, 102, 480, 1427-1439.
Prasad, N.G.N., and Rao, J.N.K. (1990). The estimation
of the mean squared error of small area estimators. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 85, 409, 163-171.
Rao, J.N.K., and Molina,
I.
(2015). Small Area Estimation. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley &
Sons, Inc.
Rao, J.N.K., Sinha, S.K. and Dumitrescu, L. (2014).
Robust small area estimation under semi-parametric mixed models. The Canadian Journal of Statistics, 42,
126-141.
Ruppert, D., and Matteson, D.E. (2015). Statistics and Data Analysis for Financial
Engineering with R Examples: 2nd Ed.,
New York
: Springer.
Tillé,
Y. (2006). Sampling Algorithms:
New York
:
Springer.
Verret,
F., Rao, J.N.K. and Hidiroglou, M.A. (2015). Model-based small area
estimation under informative sampling. Survey
Methodology, 41, 2, 333-347. Paper available at https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/pub/12-001-x/2015002/article/14248-eng.pdf.
Wu, H., and Zhang, J.T. (2002). Local polynomial
mixed-effects models for longitudinal data. Journal
of the American Statistical Association, 97, 459, 883-897.
ISSN : 1492-0921
Editorial policy
Survey Methodology publishes articles dealing with various aspects of statistical development relevant to a statistical agency, such as design issues in the context of practical constraints, use of different data sources and collection techniques, total survey error, survey evaluation, research in survey methodology, time series analysis, seasonal adjustment, demographic studies, data integration, estimation and data analysis methods, and general survey systems development. The emphasis is placed on the development and evaluation of specific methodologies as applied to data collection or the data themselves. All papers will be refereed. However, the authors retain full responsibility for the contents of their papers and opinions expressed are not necessarily those of the Editorial Board or of Statistics Canada.
Submission of Manuscripts
Survey Methodology is published twice a year in electronic format. Authors are invited to submit their articles in English or French in electronic form, preferably in Word to the Editor, (statcan.smj-rte.statcan@canada.ca, Statistics Canada, 150 Tunney’s Pasture Driveway, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, K1A 0T6). For formatting instructions, please see the guidelines provided in the journal and on the web site (www.statcan.gc.ca/SurveyMethodology).
Note of appreciation
Canada owes the success of its statistical system to a long-standing partnership between Statistics Canada, the citizens of Canada, its businesses, governments and other institutions. Accurate and timely statistical information could not be produced without their continued co-operation and goodwill.
Standards of service to the public
Statistics Canada is committed to serving its clients in a prompt, reliable and courteous manner. To this end, the Agency has developed standards of service which its employees observe in serving its clients.
Copyright
Published by authority of the Minister responsible for Statistics Canada.
© Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada as represented by the Minister of Industry, 2020
Use of this publication is governed by the Statistics Canada Open Licence Agreement.
Catalogue No. 12-001-X
Frequency: Semi-annual
Ottawa