Annual Demographic Estimates: Subprovincial Areas, July 1, 2017
Section 1: Census metropolitan areas

Warning View the most recent version.

Archived Content

Information identified as archived is provided for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It is not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards and has not been altered or updated since it was archived. Please "contact us" to request a format other than those available.

Start of text box

For the rest of this analysis, a growth rate higher than -1 per thousand and lower than 1 per thousand is considered to be nil or low. Rates are based on the ratio of the number of events during the period (t, t+x) to the average of the populations at the beginning and end of the period. Five-year rates are annualized. Preliminary postcensal estimates are subject to revision. Future updates could affect trend analysis.

End of text box

CMA growth unequal from east to west

Atlantic provinces

Quebec

Ontario

Prairies

British Columbia

Chart 1.1 Population growth rates by census metropolitan area, Canada

Data table for Chart 1.1
Data table for Chart 1.1
Table summary
This table displays the results of Data table for Chart 1.1. The information is grouped by Census metropolitan areas (appearing as row headers), 2015/2016 and 2016/2017, calculated using rate per thousand units of measure (appearing as column headers).
Census metropolitan areas 2015/2016 2016/2017
rate per thousand
Canada 12.0 12.2
All census metropolitan areas 15.2 15.2
Saskatoon 31.5 28.3
Regina 27.1 24.1
Guelph 21.1 21.7
Ottawa-Gatineau, Ontario part 17.4 21.5
Toronto 17.4 19.4
Ottawa-Gatineau 16.1 19.0
Winnipeg 21.0 18.1
Edmonton 20.7 18.0
Oshawa 17.3 18.0
Calgary 21.2 17.6
Kitchener-Cambridge-Waterloo 15.8 17.4
Barrie 16.1 17.0
London 14.3 16.6
Halifax 19.3 15.8
Moncton 17.0 14.2
Kingston 10.5 14.1
Kelowna 21.2 13.5
Windsor 11.4 13.1
Peterborough 11.1 12.5
Brantford 10.7 12.5
Victoria 16.1 12.3
Abbotsford-Mission 23.6 12.1
Hamilton 10.3 11.9
Montréal 10.8 11.8
Sherbrooke 13.3 11.8
Ottawa-Gatineau, Quebec part 12.3 11.5
Vancouver 12.8 11.3
St. Catharines-Niagara 8.9 10.6
St. John's 14.3 7.3
Trois-Rivières 6.5 7.2
Québec 7.1 6.8
Saint John 6.5 3.8
Greater Sudbury -0.7 0.8
Thunder Bay -2.7 -1.0
Saguenay -2.7 -1.8

Population growth of CMAs stimulated by international migration

Atlantic provinces

Quebec

Ontario

Prairies

British Columbia

Chart 1.2 Factors of population growth by census metropolitan area, Canada, 2016/2017

Data table for Chart 1.2
Data table for Chart 1.2
Table summary
This table displays the results of Data table for Chart 1.2. The information is grouped by Census metropolitan areas (appearing as row headers), Natural increase, International migratory increase, Interprovincial migratory increase, Intraprovincial migratory increase and Population growth, calculated using rate per thousand units of measure (appearing as column headers).
Census metropolitan areas Natural increase International migratory increase Interprovincial migratory increase Intraprovincial migratory increase Population growth
rate per thousand
Canada 3.1 9.1 0.0 0.0 12.2
Saskatoon 6.7 18.6 -5.5 8.6 28.3
Regina 5.7 20.7 -6.3 4.0 24.1
Guelph 3.9 7.8 1.8 8.3 21.7
Ottawa-Gatineau, Ontario part 4.4 9.3 6.0 1.8 21.5
Toronto 5.1 18.0 2.1 -5.8 19.4
Ottawa-Gatineau 4.4 8.5 4.3 1.8 19.0
Winnipeg 3.8 20.4 -6.3 0.1 18.1
Edmonton 7.0 8.7 -1.8 4.1 18.0
Oshawa 3.8 2.8 -0.5 11.8 18.0
Calgary 8.3 11.2 -3.1 1.2 17.6
Kitchener-Cambridge-Waterloo 4.3 7.3 1.9 3.9 17.4
Barrie 3.2 2.7 -0.6 11.7 17.0
London 2.0 8.3 1.8 4.5 16.6
Halifax 1.9 10.6 0.1 3.1 15.8
Moncton 1.9 8.5 -1.5 5.3 14.2
Kingston 0.4 3.6 4.4 5.6 14.1
Kelowna -0.9 2.0 10.1 6.2 13.5
Windsor 1.6 8.9 2.9 -0.2 13.1
Peterborough -1.2 2.6 0.3 10.8 12.5
Brantford 1.6 3.0 0.3 7.6 12.5
Victoria -1.2 3.0 7.2 5.5 12.3
Abbotsford-Mission 3.8 7.3 2.3 8.4 12.1
Hamilton 1.3 7.2 0.8 2.6 11.9
Montréal 3.6 12.7 -2.0 -2.5 11.8
Sherbrooke 1.9 9.0 -1.5 2.4 11.8
Ottawa-Gatineau, Quebec part 4.5 6.1 -1.0 1.9 11.5
Vancouver 3.0 12.3 1.8 -3.9 11.3
St. Catharines-Niagara -2.1 4.2 0.1 8.4 10.6
St. John's 2.1 4.9 -5.8 6.1 7.3
Trois-Rivières -0.7 3.0 -0.5 5.5 7.2
Québec 2.2 4.4 -1.3 1.4 6.8
Saint John 0.0 8.3 -3.5 -0.9 3.8
Greater Sudbury -0.5 2.8 0.8 -2.3 0.8
Thunder Bay -1.3 1.1 -0.7 -0.1 -1.0
Saguenay 0.4 0.4 -0.6 -2.1 -1.8

Of Canada’s three largest CMAs, Toronto had the strongest population growth

Montréal CMA

Toronto CMA

Vancouver CMA

Chart 1.3 Population growth rates of the three largest census metropolitan areas, Canada

Data table for Chart 1.3
Data table for Chart 1.3
Table summary
This table displays the results of Data table for Chart 1.3. The information is grouped by Census metropolitan areas (appearing as row headers), 2006/2007, 2007/2008, 2008/2009, 2009/2010, 2010/2011, 2011/2012, 2012/2013, 2013/2014, 2014/2015, 2015/2016 and 2016/2017, calculated using rate per thoudand units of measure (appearing as column headers).
Census metropolitan areas 2006/2007 2007/2008 2008/2009 2009/2010 2010/2011 2011/2012 2012/2013 2013/2014 2014/2015 2015/2016 2016/2017
rate per thoudand
Montréal 8.3 9.6 12.3 12.0 11.1 12.6 10.7 9.7 7.4 10.8 11.8
Toronto 15.5 15.9 15.6 16.1 15.4 17.1 16.5 13.9 10.8 17.4 19.4
Vancouver 13.3 16.2 20.7 18.4 12.2 16.0 14.2 15.4 10.5 12.8 11.3

Start of text box

For the purposes of this article, various indicators will be used to measure the aging of a population. The distribution of the population aged 0 to 14 years and 65 years and over and the median age will be the indicators considered. The median age is the age “x” that divides the population into two equal groups, one containing only individuals older than “x” and the other those younger than “x.”

End of text box

The population of CMAs younger than in the rest of Canada

CMAs vs. non-CMAs

Figure 1.1 Age pyramid for CMA and non-CMA population for July 1, 2017

Description for Figure 1.1

This stacked column graph or age pyramid compares the age structure of the CMA and the non-CMA population for July 1, 2017 in relative value.

The left side shows males and the right side shows females.

The horizontal axis shows the population in relative value and the vertical axis shows age.

Data table for figure 1.1
Table summary
This table displays the results of Data table for figure 1.1 . The information is grouped by Age (appearing as row headers), Non-CMA, CMA, Males and Females, calculated using per thousand units of measure (appearing as column headers).
Age Non-CMA CMA
Males Females Males Females
per thousand
0 5.5 5.2 5.4 5.1
1 5.5 5.2 5.4 5.1
2 5.6 5.3 5.4 5.1
3 5.6 5.3 5.4 5.1
4 5.6 5.3 5.5 5.2
5 5.6 5.4 5.5 5.2
6 5.7 5.4 5.5 5.2
7 5.8 5.5 5.5 5.3
8 5.8 5.5 5.6 5.3
9 5.8 5.5 5.6 5.3
10 5.7 5.4 5.5 5.2
11 5.5 5.2 5.3 5.1
12 5.5 5.1 5.2 5.0
13 5.5 5.2 5.3 5.0
14 5.4 5.2 5.2 4.9
15 5.5 5.2 5.3 5.0
16 5.6 5.3 5.5 5.1
17 5.8 5.4 5.7 5.4
18 5.8 5.4 6.0 5.7
19 5.9 5.6 6.6 6.1
20 6.0 5.6 6.9 6.4
21 6.2 5.8 7.1 6.7
22 6.3 5.8 7.3 6.9
23 6.3 5.8 7.4 7.0
24 6.2 5.8 7.5 7.2
25 6.2 5.7 7.5 7.5
26 6.1 5.7 7.7 7.6
27 6.0 5.6 7.7 7.8
28 5.6 5.3 7.5 7.6
29 5.5 5.2 7.3 7.4
30 5.5 5.4 7.3 7.5
31 5.7 5.5 7.5 7.6
32 5.8 5.7 7.5 7.6
33 5.8 5.8 7.5 7.5
34 5.8 5.8 7.4 7.5
35 5.9 5.8 7.4 7.5
36 6.0 5.9 7.4 7.5
37 5.9 5.8 7.3 7.4
38 5.8 5.7 7.0 7.2
39 5.8 5.6 6.9 7.0
40 5.8 5.7 6.8 7.0
41 5.7 5.6 6.8 6.9
42 5.7 5.6 6.8 6.9
43 5.6 5.5 6.6 6.7
44 5.7 5.5 6.6 6.7
45 5.8 5.7 6.6 6.7
46 6.1 6.0 6.9 7.0
47 6.1 6.0 6.8 6.9
48 6.2 6.0 6.7 6.8
49 6.2 6.1 6.6 6.7
50 6.5 6.4 6.6 6.6
51 6.9 6.8 6.9 6.9
52 7.6 7.5 7.3 7.3
53 7.9 7.9 7.5 7.4
54 8.1 8.0 7.5 7.4
55 8.1 8.0 7.2 7.2
56 8.3 8.2 7.2 7.2
57 8.2 8.1 7.0 7.1
58 8.1 8.1 6.7 6.8
59 8.2 8.0 6.6 6.7
60 8.0 7.9 6.4 6.5
61 7.8 7.7 6.1 6.3
62 7.7 7.7 6.0 6.2
63 7.5 7.5 5.6 5.9
64 7.2 7.1 5.3 5.6
65 6.9 6.8 5.1 5.4
66 6.7 6.7 4.9 5.3
67 6.6 6.5 4.7 5.1
68 6.5 6.4 4.6 5.0
69 6.4 6.3 4.5 5.0
70 6.3 6.3 4.4 4.9
71 5.4 5.4 3.8 4.2
72 4.9 5.0 3.4 3.9
73 4.7 4.8 3.2 3.7
74 4.4 4.6 3.1 3.6
75 4.0 4.2 2.8 3.3
76 3.7 4.0 2.6 3.1
77 3.3 3.6 2.4 2.9
78 3.1 3.4 2.2 2.8
79 2.8 3.2 2.1 2.6
80 2.6 3.0 1.9 2.5
81 2.4 2.9 1.8 2.4
82 2.1 2.6 1.7 2.2
83 1.9 2.4 1.5 2.1
84 1.8 2.3 1.4 2.0
85 1.6 2.2 1.3 1.9
86 1.4 2.1 1.2 1.8
87 1.2 1.9 1.0 1.6
88 1.0 1.6 0.8 1.4
89 0.9 1.5 0.7 1.3
90 0.7 1.3 0.6 1.1
91 0.5 1.1 0.5 1.0
92 0.4 0.9 0.4 0.9
93 0.3 0.8 0.3 0.7
94 0.2 0.6 0.2 0.6
95 0.2 0.5 0.2 0.5
96 0.1 0.4 0.1 0.3
97 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.2
98 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.2
99 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1
100 and over 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.2

The CMAs with the youngest populations are in western Canada

CMAs with the youngest populations

CMAs with the oldest populations

Chart 1.4 Median age by census metropolitan area, Canada, July 1, 2017

Data table for Chart 1.4
Data table for Chart 1.4
Table summary
This table displays the results of Data table for Chart 1.4. The information is grouped by Census metropolitan areas (appearing as row headers), Median age (appearing as column headers).
Census metropolitan areas Median age
Canada 40.6
All census metropolitan areas 39.4
Saskatoon 34.9
Regina 36.2
Edmonton 36.3
Calgary 36.8
Winnipeg 38.1
Kitchener-Cambridge-Waterloo 38.2
Abbotsford-Mission 38.8
Toronto 38.8
Guelph 39.0
Ottawa-Gatineau, Ontario part 39.1
Ottawa-Gatineau 39.3
St. John's 39.4
Halifax 39.6
Oshawa 39.7
Barrie 39.9
London 40.0
Vancouver 40.0
Montréal 40.0
Ottawa-Gatineau, Quebec part 40.0
Brantford 41.0
Hamilton 41.1
Moncton 41.3
Kingston 41.3
Windsor 41.3
Sherbrooke 41.9
Québec 42.5
Greater Sudbury 42.7
Saint John 43.2
Victoria 43.8
Thunder Bay 44.2
Peterborough 44.6
Kelowna 44.6
St. Catharines-Niagara 45.9
Saguenay 46.2
Trois-Rivières 46.3

Chart 1.5 Distribution of population by age group and census metropolitan area, Canada, July 1, 2017

Data table for Chart 1.5
Data table for Chart 1.5
Table summary
This table displays the results of Data table for Chart 1.5. The information is grouped by Census metropolitan areas (appearing as row headers), 0 to 14 years, 15 to 64 years and 65 years and older, calculated using percentage units of measure (appearing as column headers).
Census metropolitan areas 0 to 14 years 15 to 64 years 65 years and older
percentage
Canada 16.0 67.1 16.9
All census metropolitan areas 15.9 68.6 15.5
Trois-Rivières 13.6 63.5 22.9
Peterborough 13.9 64.2 21.8
St. Catharines-Niagara 14.0 64.2 21.8
Saguenay 14.1 64.3 21.6
Kelowna 13.6 65.1 21.3
Victoria 12.6 66.3 21.1
Thunder Bay 14.0 66.1 19.9
Sherbrooke 15.3 64.9 19.8
Québec 14.8 65.5 19.7
Kingston 13.5 67.9 18.6
Greater Sudbury 14.7 67.0 18.3
Saint John 15.6 66.4 18.1
Hamilton 15.5 66.9 17.5
Brantford 16.9 65.8 17.3
Windsor 15.9 66.8 17.3
London 15.6 67.4 17.0
Moncton 15.4 67.6 16.9
Montréal 16.2 67.6 16.3
Abbotsford-Mission 17.8 66.2 16.0
Vancouver 14.2 70.1 15.7
Halifax 14.2 70.5 15.3
Ottawa-Gatineau, Ontario part 15.7 69.1 15.2
Guelph 16.0 69.0 15.1
Winnipeg 16.6 68.4 15.0
Ottawa-Gatineau 16.1 68.9 15.0
St. John's 15.1 70.1 14.8
Oshawa 17.2 68.2 14.6
Toronto 15.8 69.7 14.5
Barrie 16.4 69.1 14.4
Ottawa-Gatineau, Quebec part 17.3 68.4 14.3
Kitchener-Cambridge-Waterloo 16.8 68.9 14.3
Regina 18.1 68.9 13.0
Edmonton 17.7 70.1 12.3
Saskatoon 18.0 69.9 12.1
Calgary 17.9 70.9 11.1

CMA with the youngest population and CMA with the oldest population

Figure 1.2 Age pyramid for the CMA with the highest proportion of persons aged 65 and older (Trois-Rivières, Quebec) and the CMA with the highest proportion of persons aged 0 to 14 years (Regina, Saskatchewan) for July 1, 2017

Description for Figure 1.2

This stacked column graph or age pyramid compares the age structure of the CMA of Trois-Rivières (Quebec) and the CMA of Regina (Saskatchewan) for July 1, 2017 in relative value.

The left side shows males and the right side shows females.

The horizontal axis shows the population in relative value and the vertical axis shows age.

Data table for figure 1.2
Table summary
This table displays the results of Data table for figure 1.2. The information is grouped by Age (appearing as row headers), Regina (Sask.), Trois-Rivières (Que.), Males and Females, calculated using per thousand units of measure (appearing as column headers).
Age Regina (Sask.) Trois-Rivières (Que.)
Males Females Males Females
per thousand
0 6.4 6.2 4.8 4.3
1 6.4 6.1 4.8 4.5
2 6.4 6.1 4.8 4.3
3 6.4 6.2 4.8 4.5
4 6.5 6.2 5.0 4.6
5 6.3 6.3 5.0 4.6
6 6.3 6.1 5.0 4.4
7 6.3 5.9 4.9 4.6
8 6.4 6.0 4.8 4.6
9 6.5 6.1 4.8 4.5
10 6.2 5.7 4.8 4.3
11 5.9 5.5 4.3 4.1
12 5.6 5.2 4.4 4.1
13 5.8 5.4 4.1 3.9
14 5.5 5.1 4.3 3.8
15 5.6 5.2 4.4 4.2
16 5.5 5.1 4.4 4.1
17 5.9 5.4 4.5 4.3
18 5.7 5.5 4.7 4.5
19 6.2 5.7 5.2 5.2
20 6.7 5.7 5.4 5.8
21 6.9 6.0 5.6 6.4
22 6.9 6.4 6.2 6.5
23 7.4 6.7 6.6 6.4
24 7.9 7.3 6.7 6.5
25 8.0 7.8 7.1 6.7
26 8.4 8.8 7.5 6.7
27 9.2 9.2 6.9 6.4
28 8.7 9.3 6.3 6.0
29 9.0 8.8 6.0 5.9
30 9.0 9.0 6.0 5.5
31 9.0 8.8 5.9 6.1
32 8.9 8.6 6.4 6.0
33 9.1 8.6 6.3 5.8
34 8.6 8.7 6.2 6.2
35 8.3 7.8 6.8 6.0
36 8.1 7.8 7.3 6.1
37 7.9 7.6 6.5 6.1
38 7.7 7.5 6.5 6.2
39 7.5 6.9 6.2 5.9
40 7.3 7.0 5.8 5.6
41 7.2 6.9 5.8 5.5
42 6.8 6.6 5.9 5.4
43 6.7 6.1 5.1 5.1
44 6.5 6.4 4.8 4.8
45 6.3 6.1 4.9 4.9
46 6.2 6.1 5.1 5.3
47 6.1 5.9 5.2 5.6
48 6.0 5.7 5.2 5.5
49 6.1 5.5 5.9 5.5
50 5.7 5.5 6.1 6.4
51 6.0 6.0 6.6 6.8
52 6.6 6.6 7.1 7.2
53 6.8 6.6 7.5 7.6
54 7.1 6.7 7.5 8.0
55 6.8 6.6 7.9 8.0
56 6.7 6.5 8.0 8.0
57 6.8 6.3 8.0 8.4
58 6.4 6.4 8.0 8.4
59 6.1 6.0 8.1 8.5
60 5.9 6.2 8.0 8.2
61 5.8 6.0 7.7 7.8
62 6.0 6.0 8.2 7.9
63 5.2 5.4 7.4 8.0
64 4.7 5.1 7.3 7.8
65 4.6 4.7 7.1 7.4
66 4.3 4.6 7.0 7.0
67 4.1 4.2 6.8 7.1
68 3.9 4.1 6.9 7.1
69 3.7 4.2 6.3 6.8
70 3.6 4.1 6.2 6.6
71 3.0 3.3 5.8 6.4
72 2.7 3.1 5.4 5.9
73 2.5 2.9 5.0 6.1
74 2.4 2.9 4.7 5.4
75 2.1 2.8 4.3 5.3
76 2.1 2.6 4.2 5.0
77 1.8 2.4 3.4 4.4
78 1.8 2.5 3.2 4.2
79 1.8 2.3 2.8 3.8
80 1.6 2.3 2.5 3.4
81 1.5 2.2 2.3 3.3
82 1.2 2.1 2.3 3.5
83 1.2 2.0 2.2 3.4
84 1.1 1.8 1.8 3.0
85 0.9 1.8 1.9 3.1
86 1.0 1.5 1.7 2.7
87 0.7 1.4 1.6 2.8
88 0.6 1.3 1.3 2.5
89 0.6 1.0 1.0 2.4
90 0.5 0.9 0.8 1.9
91 0.4 0.9 0.6 1.8
92 0.4 0.8 0.4 1.6
93 0.3 0.6 0.3 1.2
94 0.1 0.7 0.3 1.0
95 0.1 0.4 0.2 0.8
96 0.1 0.3 0.1 0.5
97 0.0 0.3 0.1 0.4
98 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.3
99 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1
100 and over 0.0 0.2 0.1 0.2

Fastest-aging CMAs in Quebec and Ontario

CMAs with the fastest-aging populations

CMAs with the slowest-aging populations


Date modified: