Education, learning and training: Research Paper Series
Postsecondary students receiving payments from the Canada Emergency Response Benefit (CERB) and the Canada Emergency Student Benefit (CESB) in 2020

Release date: January 16, 2023

Skip to text

Text begins

In 2020, the federal government implemented the Canada Emergency Response Benefit (CERB) and the Canada Emergency Student Benefit (CESB) to provide financial support to employees, self-employed individuals and students directly affected by COVID-19.

The CERB was available for individuals who stopped working or were working reduced hours because of COVID-19, and who met various other eligibility criteria.Note  CERB applicants received $2,000 for an initial four-week period and could reapply for additional periods, eventually extending to 28 weeks, for a maximum benefit of $14,000. The benefit covered the period from March 15 to September 26, 2020.

The CESB was available to students enrolled in a postsecondary educational program leading to a degree, diploma, or certificate, who were ineligible for the CERB or EI benefits, but met various other eligibility criteria.Note  The benefit was active between May 10 and August 29, 2020. Eligible CESB applicants received $1,250 for an initial four-week period and could reapply for additional periods, up to 16 weeks, for a maximum benefit of $5,000. Additionally, applicants with a disability or dependant(s) could receive a benefit top-up, in which case they were eligible to receive $2,000 every four weeks, up to a maximum benefit of $8,000.

The CESB addressed a gap left by the CERB, which excluded students who were not employed at the start of the pandemic but would typically be looking for work during the summer of 2020. In 2019, for example, the Labour Force Survey showed that 69% of persons aged 20 to 24 who were full-time students in March 2019 and planned on returning to school in the fall were employed in August 2019.

This paper provides insights into the differences in the rate of receipt of CERB and CESB of postsecondary students who received emergency benefit payments in 2020. Emergency benefit receipt is examined along various educational and socio-demographic characteristics to highlight some of the key differences. The analysis is limited to Canadian citizens and permanent residents who were enrolled full-time or part-time in a public postsecondary institution in the fall of 2019 in a program leading to a degree, diploma, or certificate.Note 

In this paper, “emergency benefits” is the general term to refer to either CERB, CESB, or both.

The majority of postsecondary students received emergency benefits

Almost two-thirds of postsecondary students (65.4%) received emergency benefits. This is likely because, at the start of the pandemic, students worked in industry sectors that were heavily impacted, and, by the summer, these industries had not sufficiently recovered so as to allow students to find summer jobs. The number of students aged 20 to 24 who were employed in May 2020 (276,200) was 42.3% lower than in May 2019 (478,600).

More students received CERB (41.9%) than CESB (28.7%), due, in part, to the fact that one of the eligibility requirements for CESB was that the individual could not apply for, receive, or qualify for CERB during the same eligibility period, but could qualify for different types of benefits in different eligibility periods. Therefore, only those students who were ineligible for CERB could apply for CESB. It was uncommon (5.2%) for students to receive both benefits.

Chart 1

Data table for Chart 1 
Data table for chart 1
Table summary
This table displays the results of Data table for chart 1. The information is grouped by Type of emergency benefits received (appearing as row headers), Number of individuals, calculated using count units of measure (appearing as column headers).
Type of emergency benefits received Number of individuals
count
CERB Only 564,200
CESB Only 362,010
Both 80,090
Neither CERB nor CESB 533,000

For those who received CESB, the average amount ($4,200) corresponds to students receiving CESB benefits for between three and four of the four CESB eligibility periods. For those who received CERB, the average amount ($8,200) corresponds to students receiving CERB benefits for between four and five of the seven eligibility periods. As shown in Table 1, on average, students who only received CERB received twice as much ($8,800) as students only having received CESB ($4,400).


Table 1
Average amount of emergency benefit received by postsecondary students enrolled during the fall of 2019, by type of benefit
Table summary
This table displays the results of Average amount of emergency benefit received by postsecondary students enrolled during the fall of 2019. The information is grouped by Grouping (appearing as row headers), Individuals, Average amount of CERB received and Average amount of CESB received , calculated using number, percent of total and dollars units of measure (appearing as column headers).
Grouping Individuals Average amount of CERB received Average amount of CESB received
number percent of total dollars
All students enrolled during the fall of 2019 1,539,300 100 Note ...: not applicable Note ...: not applicable
Students who received emergency benefits (CERB, CESB, or both) 1,006,300 65.4 5,300 1,900
Students who received CERB 644,280 41.9 8,200 400
Students who only received CERB 564,200 36.7 8,800 Note ...: not applicable
Students who received both CESB and CERB 80,090 5.2 4,000 3,500
Students who received CESB 442,100 28.7 700 4,200
Students who only received CESB 362,010 23.5 Note ...: not applicable 4,400
Students who received both CESB and CERB 80,090 5.2 4,000 3,500
Students who received CESB disability or dependant top-up amount for at least one eligibility period 58,980 3.8 1,000 6,500
Students who did not receive emergency benefits 533,000 34.6 Note ...: not applicable Note ...: not applicable

Women received CERB more than men, but men received CESB more than women

A higher percentage of female postsecondary students received CERB (43.0%) than their male counterparts (40.3%). By contrast, a higher percentage of male postsecondary students received CESB (30.6%) than their female counterparts (27.4%). This may be due to women having been more severely affected by employment losses in the service sector than men during the COVID-19 pandemic; therefore, more likely to be eligible for CERB.

Additionally, according to the Labour Force Survey, younger workers were hit harder during the early stages of the pandemic. As shown in Chart 2, younger students were more likely to receive emergency benefits. This may be partly due to older students having had a stronger attachment to the labour market and being less likely to have had their employment status affected by the pandemic.

Chart 2

Data table for Chart 2 
Data table for chart 2
Table summary
This table displays the results of Data table for chart 2. The information is grouped by Grouping (appearing as row headers), CERB and CESB, calculated using percent units of measure (appearing as column headers).
Grouping CERB CESB
percent
Man 40.3 30.6
Woman 43.0 27.4
15 to 24 years 45.2 33.3
25 years and over 33.8 17.7

Students in graduate-level degree programs were less likely to receive emergency benefits

For all selected educational qualifications,Note  except for doctoral degrees, students received CERB payments at higher rates than CESB payments. Graduate-level degree program (master’s and doctoral degrees) students were less likely to receive emergency benefits than students enrolled in an undergraduate degree or a college-level program. However, students in graduate-level degree programs received CESB at a higher rate than students enrolled in college-level certificate programs. Undergraduate degree students received CESB payments at the highest rate (34.4%), while college-level diploma students received CERB payments at the highest rate (48.3%). A recent study demonstrated similar trends for CERB payments by educational qualification for recent graduates.

Chart 3

Data table for Chart 3 
Data table for chart 3
Table summary
This table displays the results of Data table for chart 3. The information is grouped by Educational qualification (appearing as row headers), CERB and CESB, calculated using percent units of measure (appearing as column headers).
Educational qualification CERB CESB
percent
College-level certificate 43.8 17.1
College-level diploma 48.3 24.4
Undergraduate degree 43.1 34.4
Master's degree 25.0 19.1
Doctoral degree 19.0 19.1

Since college-level diplomas and undergraduate degrees represent the most numerous of all educational qualifications in Canada, and since students pursuing these educational qualifications accessed emergency benefits at the highest rates, the remainder of the analysis focuses on students enrolled in these two educational qualifications during the fall of 2019.

A higher percentage of postsecondary students received CERB than CESB in all provinces of study and for nearly all fields of study

For all provinces and territories, students in a college-level diploma or an undergraduate degree were more likely to receive CERB than CESB. The percentage of students receiving emergency benefits varied by the province of their educational institution. For both educational qualifications, students attending postsecondary institutions in Prince Edward Island received CERB at the highest rates. Individuals pursuing undergraduate degrees in Ontario received CESB at higher rates than students attending institutions in other provinces and territories. The differences between provinces may be due to differences in public health measures or differences in job opportunities in different parts of the country at specific points during the pandemic. Statistics Canada has developed the COVID-19 Restrictions Index to measure the stringency of the public health measures by province. The index reveals that Prince Edward Island had among the most stringent public health measures at the initial onset of the pandemic, which overlaps with the first two eligibility periods for CERB. Additionally, during part of the summer of 2020, when students were able to apply for CESB, the COVID-19 Restrictions Index was the highest in Ontario.

Chart 4

Data table for Chart 4 
Data table for chart 4
Table summary
This table displays the results of Data table for chart 4. The information is grouped by Province of educational institution (appearing as row headers), Educational qualification, CERB and CESB, calculated using percent units of measure (appearing as column headers).
Province of educational institution Educational qualification CERB CESB
percent
Newfoundland and Labrador College-level diploma Note x: suppressed to meet the confidentiality requirements of the Statistics Act Note x: suppressed to meet the confidentiality requirements of the Statistics Act
Newfoundland and Labrador Undergraduate degree 44.3 33.5
Prince Edward Island College-level diploma 58.4 24.8
Prince Edward Island Undergraduate degree 57.1 23.8
Nova Scotia College-level diploma 45.1 30.7
Nova Scotia Undergraduate degree 45.4 35.2
New Brunswick College-level diploma 43.9 32.8
New Brunswick Undergraduate degree 52.0 30.2
Quebec College-level diploma 45.6 19.5
Quebec Undergraduate degree 44.1 24.5
Ontario College-level diploma 50.5 25.8
Ontario Undergraduate degree 42.2 39.9
Manitoba College-level diploma 40.0 25.2
Manitoba Undergraduate degree 43.9 26.5
Saskatchewan College-level diploma 38.6 33.2
Saskatchewan Undergraduate degree 41.9 30.9
Alberta College-level diploma 47.9 25.7
Alberta Undergraduate degree 44.5 32.5
British Columbia College-level diploma 45.9 26.4
British Columbia Undergraduate degree 41.9 33.5
Territories College-level diploma 42.9 28.6
Territories Undergraduate degree 33.3 22.2

Students pursuing college-level diplomas were more likely to receive CERB than CESB for all fields of study. For undergraduate degrees, students were more likely to receive CERB than CESB, except for those pursuing studies in “physical and life sciences and technologies”, “mathematics, computer and information sciences”, and “architecture, engineering, and related technologies”.

Students enrolled in undergraduate degree programs received CESB payments at a higher rate than college-level diploma students for all fields of study.

Chart 5

Data table for Chart 5 
Data table for chart 5
Table summary
This table displays the results of Data table for chart 5. The information is grouped by Field of study (appearing as row headers), Educational qualification, CERB and CESB, calculated using percent units of measure (appearing as column headers).
Field of study Educational qualification CERB CESB
percent
Education College-level diploma 46.5 15.2
Education Undergraduate degree 58.6 21.2
Visual and performing arts, and communications technologies College-level diploma 45.5 33.4
Visual and performing arts, and communications technologies Undergraduate degree 48.4 37.2
Humanities College-level diploma 51.2 23.0
Humanities Undergraduate degree 45.4 33.7
Social and behavioural sciences and law College-level diploma 55.4 23.9
Social and behavioural sciences and law Undergraduate degree 49.7 32.2
Business, management and public administration College-level diploma 52.1 22.3
Business, management and public administration Undergraduate degree 45.5 29.0
Physical and life sciences and technologies College-level diploma 42.3 31.2
Physical and life sciences and technologies Undergraduate degree 37.9 45.9
Mathematics, computer and information sciences College-level diploma 38.4 30.9
Mathematics, computer and information sciences Undergraduate degree 29.6 40.8
Architecture, engineering, and related technologies College-level diploma 47.4 26.7
Architecture, engineering, and related technologies Undergraduate degree 33.3 40.2
Agriculture, natural resources and conservation College-level diploma 41.8 20.7
Agriculture, natural resources and conservation Undergraduate degree 40.0 28.7
Health and related fields College-level diploma 43.9 22.9
Health and related fields Undergraduate degree 38.9 33.3
Personal, protective and transportation services College-level diploma 54.0 20.9
Personal, protective and transportation services Undergraduate degree 47.6 25.6
Other College-level diploma 40.2 34.8
Other Undergraduate degree 41.8 38.1

Conclusion

Among students enrolled in postsecondary studies during the fall of 2019, almost two-thirds (65.4%) received emergency benefits in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. This is due in part to the difficulties they experienced in the labour market. Students were more likely to receive CERB than CESB, regardless of gender, age group, and the province of study. Of the selected educational qualifications, students in college-level diploma programs were the most likely to receive CERB payments while doctoral degree students were the least likely. Additionally, CESB payments were received at the highest rate by undergraduate degree students and the lowest rate by students in college-level certificate programs. The rate of received CERB payments was comparatively high in Prince Edward Island. Future research could attempt to further understand why the identified groups accessed emergency benefits at different rates than others.

Melissa Van Bussel, George Marshall and Eric Fecteau are analysts with the Canadian Centre for Education Statistics at Statistics Canada.

Notes to readers

This report uses the Education and Labour Market Longitudinal Platform (ELMLP), which is an environment where the administrative data from the Canada Emergency Student Benefit (CESB) and the Canada Emergency Response Benefit (CERB) can be integrated with the Postsecondary Student Information System (PSIS). The CESB data used in this release come from the 2020 T4A slip from Canada Revenue Agency (CRA). The CERB data used in this release come from Employment and Social Development Canada (ESDC) and contain information on initial payments from both streams of the program, one administered by ESDC and the other by CRA on its behalf.

The study population is restricted to: “Canadian citizens” and “permanent residents”;Note  students who were enrolled full-time or part-time in a public postsecondary institution in the fall of 2019;Note  students in a program that leads to a degree, diploma, or certificate;Note  and students not in a “basic education” or “apprenticeship” program. Individuals with insufficient information to create an anonymous key to integrate the CERB and CESB data to PSIS were removed from the analysis.

Only one record was retained for each individual. Since students can be enrolled in multiple programs at once, a set of sequential rules were applied in the following order to choose the most relevant record to retain for the analysis: 1) keep the record with a graduation flag (i.e., prioritise graduation over enrolments); 2) keep the record with the highest program type (e.g., graduate program level is retained over undergraduate level); 3) if program types are the same, then keep the record with the highest credential type (e.g., degree is retained over diploma). If after this process an individual still had multiple records, one record was selected randomly.


Date modified: