Survey design

Skip to filters. View results.
View results
Sort Help
entries

Results

All (266)

All (266) (80 to 90 of 266 results)

  • 81. Determining the optimum strata boundary points using dynamic programming Archived
    Articles and reports: 12-001-X200800210761
    Description:

    Optimum stratification is the method of choosing the best boundaries that make strata internally homogeneous, given some sample allocation. In order to make the strata internally homogenous, the strata should be constructed in such a way that the strata variances for the characteristic under study be as small as possible. This could be achieved effectively by having the distribution of the main study variable known and create strata by cutting the range of the distribution at suitable points. If the frequency distribution of the study variable is unknown, it may be approximated from the past experience or some prior knowledge obtained at a recent study. In this paper the problem of finding Optimum Strata Boundaries (OSB) is considered as the problem of determining Optimum Strata Widths (OSW). The problem is formulated as a Mathematical Programming Problem (MPP), which minimizes the variance of the estimated population parameter under Neyman allocation subject to the restriction that sum of the widths of all the strata is equal to the total range of the distribution. The distributions of the study variable are considered as continuous with Triangular and Standard Normal density functions. The formulated MPPs, which turn out to be multistage decision problems, can then be solved using dynamic programming technique proposed by Bühler and Deutler (1975). Numerical examples are presented to illustrate the computational details. The results obtained are also compared with the method of Dalenius and Hodges (1959) with an example of normal distribution.

    Release date: 2008-12-23
  • 82. Multi-objective optimisation for optimum allocation in multivariate stratified sampling Archived
    Articles and reports: 12-001-X200800210762
    Description:

    This paper considers the optimum allocation in multivariate stratified sampling as a nonlinear matrix optimisation of integers. As a particular case, a nonlinear problem of the multi-objective optimisation of integers is studied. A full detailed example including some of proposed techniques is provided at the end of the work.

    Release date: 2008-12-23
  • 83. A balanced sampling approach for multi-way stratification designs for small area estimation Archived
    Articles and reports: 12-001-X200800210763
    Description:

    The present work illustrates a sampling strategy useful for obtaining planned sample size for domains belonging to different partitions of the population and in order to guarantee the sampling errors of domain estimates be lower than given thresholds. The sampling strategy that covers the multivariate multi-domain case is useful when the overall sample size is bounded and consequently the standard solution of using a stratified sample with the strata given by cross-classification of variables defining the different partitions is not feasible since the number of strata is larger than the overall sample size. The proposed sampling strategy is based on the use of balanced sampling selection technique and on a GREG-type estimation. The main advantages of the solution is the computational feasibility which allows one to easily implement an overall small area strategy considering jointly the sampling design and the estimator and improving the efficiency of the direct domain estimators. An empirical simulation on real population data and different domain estimators shows the empirical properties of the examined sample strategy.

    Release date: 2008-12-23
  • 84. Simulation-based randomized systematic PPS sampling under substitution of units Archived
    Articles and reports: 11-522-X200600110424
    Description:

    The International Tobacco Control (ITC) Policy Evaluation China Survey uses a multi-stage unequal probability sampling design with upper level clusters selected by the randomized systematic PPS sampling method. A difficulty arises in the execution of the survey: several selected upper level clusters refuse to participate in the survey and have to be replaced by substitute units, selected from units not included in the initial sample and once again using the randomized systematic PPS sampling method. Under such a scenario the first order inclusion probabilities of the final selected units are very difficult to calculate and the second order inclusion probabilities become virtually intractable. In this paper we develop a simulation-based approach for computing the first and the second order inclusion probabilities when direct calculation is prohibitive or impossible. The efficiency and feasibility of the proposed approach are demonstrated through both theoretical considerations and numerical examples. Several R/S-PLUS functions and codes for the proposed procedure are included. The approach can be extended to handle more complex refusal/substitution scenarios one may encounter in practice.

    Release date: 2008-06-26
  • 85. A noninformative Bayesian approach to finite population sampling using auxiliary variables Archived
    Articles and reports: 12-001-X200800110611
    Description:

    In finite population sampling prior information is often available in the form of partial knowledge about an auxiliary variable, for example its mean may be known. In such cases, the ratio estimator and the regression estimator are often used for estimating the population mean of the characteristic of interest. The Polya posterior has been developed as a noninformative Bayesian approach to survey sampling. It is appropriate when little or no prior information about the population is available. Here we show that it can be extended to incorporate types of partial prior information about auxiliary variables. We will see that it typically yields procedures with good frequentist properties even in some problems where standard frequentist methods are difficult to apply.

    Release date: 2008-06-26
  • 86. Simulation-based randomized systematic PPS sampling under substitution of units Archived
    Articles and reports: 12-001-X200800110613
    Description:

    The International Tobacco Control (ITC) Policy Evaluation Survey of China uses a multi-stage unequal probability sampling design with upper level clusters selected by the randomized systematic PPS sampling method. A difficulty arises in the execution of the survey: several selected upper level clusters refuse to participate in the survey and have to be replaced by substitute units, selected from units not included in the initial sample and once again using the randomized systematic PPS sampling method. Under such a scenario the first order inclusion probabilities of the final selected units are very difficult to calculate and the second order inclusion probabilities become virtually intractable. In this paper we develop a simulation-based approach for computing the first and the second order inclusion probabilities when direct calculation is prohibitive or impossible. The efficiency and feasibility of the proposed approach are demonstrated through both theoretical considerations and numerical examples. Several R/S-PLUS functions and codes for the proposed procedure are included. The approach can be extended to handle more complex refusal/substitution scenarios one may encounter in practice.

    Release date: 2008-06-26
  • 87. Optimal sample allocation for design-consistent regression in a cancer services survey when design variables are known for aggregates Archived
    Articles and reports: 12-001-X200800110615
    Description:

    We consider optimal sampling rates in element-sampling designs when the anticipated analysis is survey-weighted linear regression and the estimands of interest are linear combinations of regression coefficients from one or more models. Methods are first developed assuming that exact design information is available in the sampling frame and then generalized to situations in which some design variables are available only as aggregates for groups of potential subjects, or from inaccurate or old data. We also consider design for estimation of combinations of coefficients from more than one model. A further generalization allows for flexible combinations of coefficients chosen to improve estimation of one effect while controlling for another. Potential applications include estimation of means for several sets of overlapping domains, or improving estimates for subpopulations such as minority races by disproportionate sampling of geographic areas. In the motivating problem of designing a survey on care received by cancer patients (the CanCORS study), potential design information included block-level census data on race/ethnicity and poverty as well as individual-level data. In one study site, an unequal-probability sampling design using the subjectss residential addresses and census data would have reduced the variance of the estimator of an income effect by 25%, or by 38% if the subjects' races were also known. With flexible weighting of the income contrasts by race, the variance of the estimator would be reduced by 26% using residential addresses alone and by 52% using addresses and races. Our methods would be useful in studies in which geographic oversampling by race-ethnicity or socioeconomic characteristics is considered, or in any study in which characteristics available in sampling frames are measured with error.

    Release date: 2008-06-26
  • 88. Balancing sample design goals for the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey Archived
    Articles and reports: 12-001-X200800110618
    Description:

    The National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) is one of a series of health-related programs sponsored by the United States National Center for Health Statistics. A unique feature of NHANES is the administration of a complete medical examination for each respondent in the sample. To standardize administration, these examinations are carried out in mobile examination centers. The examination includes physical measurements, tests such as eye and dental examinations, and the collection of blood and urine specimens for laboratory testing. NHANES is an ongoing annual health survey of the noninstitutionalized civilian population of the United States. The major analytic goals of NHANES include estimating the number and percentage of persons in the U.S. population and in designated subgroups with selected diseases and risk factors. The sample design for NHANES must create a balance between the requirements for efficient annual and multiyear samples and the flexibility that allows changes in key design parameters to make the survey more responsive to the needs of the research and health policy communities. This paper discusses the challenges involved in designing and implementing a sample selection process that satisfies the goals of NHANES.

    Release date: 2008-06-26
  • 89. Variable selection models for weight trimming Archived
    Articles and reports: 11-522-X200600110409
    Description:

    In unequal-probability-of-selection sample, correlations between the probability of selection and the sampled data can induce bias. Weights equal to the inverse of the probability of selection are often used to counteract this bias. Highly disproportional sample designs have large weights, which can introduce unnecessary variability in statistics such as the population mean estimate. Weight trimming reduces large weights to a fixed cutpoint value and adjusts weights below this value to maintain the untrimmed weight sum. This reduces variability at the cost of introducing some bias. Standard approaches are not "data-driven": they do not use the data to make the appropriate bias-variance tradeoff, or else do so in a highly inefficient fashion. This presentation develops Bayesian variable selection methods for weight trimming to supplement standard, ad-hoc design-based methods in disproportional probability-of-inclusion designs where variances due to sample weights exceeds bias correction. These methods are used to estimate linear and generalized linear regression model population parameters in the context of stratified and poststratified known-probability sample designs. Applications will be considered in the context of traffic injury survey data, in which highly disproportional sample designs are often utilized.

    Release date: 2008-03-17
  • 90. Wireless substitution in the U.S. and Canada: prevalence and impact on random-digit-dialed health surveys Archived
    Articles and reports: 11-522-X200600110420
    Description:

    Most major survey research organizations in the United States and Canada do not include wireless telephone numbers when conducting random-digit-dialed (RDD) household telephone surveys. In this paper, we offer the most up-to-date estimates available from the U.S. National Center for Health Statistics and Statistics Canada concerning the prevalence and demographic characteristics of the wireless-only population. We then present data from the U.S. National Health Interview Survey on the health and health care access of wireless-only adults, and we examine the potential for coverage bias when health research is conducted using RDD surveys that exclude wireless telephone numbers.

    Release date: 2008-03-17
Data (0)

Data (0) (0 results)

No content available at this time.

Analysis (266)

Analysis (266) (40 to 50 of 266 results)

  • 41. Integer programming formulations applied to optimal allocation in stratified sampling Archived
    Articles and reports: 12-001-X201500214249
    Description:

    The problem of optimal allocation of samples in surveys using a stratified sampling plan was first discussed by Neyman in 1934. Since then, many researchers have studied the problem of the sample allocation in multivariate surveys and several methods have been proposed. Basically, these methods are divided into two classes: The first class comprises methods that seek an allocation which minimizes survey costs while keeping the coefficients of variation of estimators of totals below specified thresholds for all survey variables of interest. The second aims to minimize a weighted average of the relative variances of the estimators of totals given a maximum overall sample size or a maximum cost. This paper proposes a new optimization approach for the sample allocation problem in multivariate surveys. This approach is based on a binary integer programming formulation. Several numerical experiments showed that the proposed approach provides efficient solutions to this problem, which improve upon a ‘textbook algorithm’ and can be more efficient than the algorithm by Bethel (1985, 1989).

    Release date: 2015-12-17
  • 42. Estimation methods on multiple sampling frames in two-stage sample designs Archived
    Articles and reports: 12-001-X201400214090
    Description:

    When studying a finite population, it is sometimes necessary to select samples from several sampling frames in order to represent all individuals. Here we are interested in the scenario where two samples are selected using a two-stage design, with common first-stage selection. We apply the Hartley (1962), Bankier (1986) and Kalton and Anderson (1986) methods, and we show that these methods can be applied conditional on first-stage selection. We also compare the performance of several estimators as part of a simulation study. Our results suggest that the estimator should be chosen carefully when there are multiple sampling frames, and that a simple estimator is sometimes preferable, even if it uses only part of the information collected.

    Release date: 2014-12-19
  • 43. Fractional hot deck imputation for robust inference under item nonresponse in survey sampling Archived
    Articles and reports: 12-001-X201400214091
    Description:

    Parametric fractional imputation (PFI), proposed by Kim (2011), is a tool for general purpose parameter estimation under missing data. We propose a fractional hot deck imputation (FHDI) which is more robust than PFI or multiple imputation. In the proposed method, the imputed values are chosen from the set of respondents and assigned proper fractional weights. The weights are then adjusted to meet certain calibration conditions, which makes the resulting FHDI estimator efficient. Two simulation studies are presented to compare the proposed method with existing methods.

    Release date: 2014-12-19
  • 44. Chi-squared tests in dual frame surveys Archived
    Articles and reports: 12-001-X201400214096
    Description:

    In order to obtain better coverage of the population of interest and cost less, a number of surveys employ dual frame structure, in which independent samples are taken from two overlapping sampling frames. This research considers chi-squared tests in dual frame surveys when categorical data is encountered. We extend generalized Wald’s test (Wald 1943), Rao-Scott first-order and second-order corrected tests (Rao and Scott 1981) from a single survey to a dual frame survey and derive the asymptotic distributions. Simulation studies show that both Rao-Scott type corrected tests work well and thus are recommended for use in dual frame surveys. An example is given to illustrate the usage of the developed tests.

    Release date: 2014-12-19
  • 45. Optimal solutions in controlled selection problems with two-way stratification Archived
    Articles and reports: 12-001-X201400214119
    Description:

    When considering sample stratification by several variables, we often face the case where the expected number of sample units to be selected in each stratum is very small and the total number of units to be selected is smaller than the total number of strata. These stratified sample designs are specifically represented by the tabular arrays with real numbers, called controlled selection problems, and are beyond the reach of conventional methods of allocation. Many algorithms for solving these problems have been studied over about 60 years beginning with Goodman and Kish (1950). Those developed more recently are especially computer intensive and always find the solutions. However, there still remains the unanswered question: In what sense are the solutions to a controlled selection problem obtained from those algorithms optimal? We introduce the general concept of optimal solutions, and propose a new controlled selection algorithm based on typical distance functions to achieve solutions. This algorithm can be easily performed by a new SAS-based software. This study focuses on two-way stratification designs. The controlled selection solutions from the new algorithm are compared with those from existing algorithms using several examples. The new algorithm successfully obtains robust solutions to two-way controlled selection problems that meet the optimality criteria.

    Release date: 2014-12-19
  • 46. Requirement: Collect less. Our mission: Do the best we can. Archived
    Articles and reports: 11-522-X201300014276
    Description:

    In France, budget restrictions are making it more difficult to hire casual interviewers to deal with collection problems. As a result, it has become necessary to adhere to a predetermined annual work quota. For surveys of the National Institute of Statistics and Economic Studies (INSEE), which use a master sample, problems arise when an interviewer is on extended leave throughout the entire collection period of a survey. When that occurs, an area may cease to be covered by the survey, and this effectively generates a bias. In response to this new problem, we have implemented two methods, depending on when the problem is identified: If an area is ‘abandoned’ before or at the very beginning of collection, we carry out a ‘sub-allocation’ procedure. The procedure involves interviewing a minimum number of households in each collection area at the expense of other areas in which no collection problems have been identified. The idea is to minimize the dispersion of weights while meeting collection targets. If an area is ‘abandoned’ during collection, we prioritize the remaining surveys. Prioritization is based on a representativeness indicator (R indicator) that measures the degree of similarity between a sample and the base population. The goal of this prioritization process during collection is to get as close as possible to equal response probability for respondents. The R indicator is based on the dispersion of the estimated response probabilities of the sampled households, and it is composed of partial R indicators that measure representativeness variable by variable. These R indicators are tools that we can use to analyze collection by isolating underrepresented population groups. We can increase collection efforts for groups that have been identified beforehand. In the oral presentation, we covered these two points concisely. By contrast, this paper deals exclusively with the first point: sub-allocation. Prioritization is being implemented for the first time at INSEE for the assets survey, and it will be covered in a specific paper by A. Rebecq.

    Release date: 2014-10-31
  • 47. Study of the “product” sampling scheme as illustrated by the ELFE survey Archived
    Articles and reports: 11-522-X201300014286
    Description:

    The Étude Longitudinale Française depuis l’Enfance (ELFE) [French longitudinal study from childhood on], which began in 2011, involves over 18,300 infants whose parents agreed to participate when they were in the maternity hospital. This cohort survey, which will track the children from birth to adulthood, covers the many aspects of their lives from the perspective of social science, health and environmental health. In randomly selected maternity hospitals, all infants in the target population, who were born on one of 25 days distributed across the four seasons, were chosen. This sample is the outcome of a non-standard sampling scheme that we call product sampling. In this survey, it takes the form of the cross-tabulation between two independent samples: a sampling of maternity hospitals and a sampling of days. While it is easy to imagine a cluster effect due to the sampling of maternity hospitals, one can also imagine a cluster effect due to the sampling of days. The scheme’s time dimension therefore cannot be ignored if the desired estimates are subject to daily or seasonal variation. While this non-standard scheme can be viewed as a particular kind of two-phase design, it needs to be defined within a more specific framework. Following a comparison of the product scheme with a conventional two-stage design, we propose variance estimators specially formulated for this sampling scheme. Our ideas are illustrated with a simulation study.

    Release date: 2014-10-31
  • 48. Weighted estimation and bootstrap variance estimation for analyzing survey data: How to implement in selected software Archived
    Articles and reports: 12-002-X201400111901
    Description:

    This document is for analysts/researchers who are considering doing research with data from a survey where both survey weights and bootstrap weights are provided in the data files. This document gives directions, for some selected software packages, about how to get started in using survey weights and bootstrap weights for an analysis of survey data. We give brief directions for obtaining survey-weighted estimates, bootstrap variance estimates (and other desired error quantities) and some typical test statistics for each software package in turn. While these directions are provided just for the chosen examples, there will be information about the range of weighted and bootstrapped analyses that can be carried out by each software package.

    Release date: 2014-08-07
  • 49. The influence of sampling method and interviewers on sample realization in the European Social Survey Archived
    Articles and reports: 12-001-X201400114001
    Description:

    This article addresses the impact of different sampling procedures on realised sample quality in the case of probability samples. This impact was expected to result from varying degrees of freedom on the part of interviewers to interview easily available or cooperative individuals (thus producing substitutions). The analysis was conducted in a cross-cultural context using data from the first four rounds of the European Social Survey (ESS). Substitutions are measured as deviations from a 50/50 gender ratio in subsamples with heterosexual couples. Significant deviations were found in numerous countries of the ESS. They were also found to be lowest in cases of samples with official registers of residents as sample frame (individual person register samples) if one partner was more difficult to contact than the other. This scope of substitutions did not differ across the ESS rounds and it was weakly correlated with payment and control procedures. It can be concluded from the results that individual person register samples are associated with higher sample quality.

    Release date: 2014-06-27
  • 50. A nonparametric method to generate synthetic populations to adjust for complex sampling design features Archived
    Articles and reports: 12-001-X201400114003
    Description:

    Outside of the survey sampling literature, samples are often assumed to be generated by simple random sampling process that produces independent and identically distributed (IID) samples. Many statistical methods are developed largely in this IID world. Application of these methods to data from complex sample surveys without making allowance for the survey design features can lead to erroneous inferences. Hence, much time and effort have been devoted to develop the statistical methods to analyze complex survey data and account for the sample design. This issue is particularly important when generating synthetic populations using finite population Bayesian inference, as is often done in missing data or disclosure risk settings, or when combining data from multiple surveys. By extending previous work in finite population Bayesian bootstrap literature, we propose a method to generate synthetic populations from a posterior predictive distribution in a fashion inverts the complex sampling design features and generates simple random samples from a superpopulation point of view, making adjustment on the complex data so that they can be analyzed as simple random samples. We consider a simulation study with a stratified, clustered unequal-probability of selection sample design, and use the proposed nonparametric method to generate synthetic populations for the 2006 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS), and the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS), which are stratified, clustered unequal-probability of selection sample designs.

    Release date: 2014-06-27
Reference (1)

Reference (1) ((1 result))

  • 1. Content of the Survey of Labour and Income Dynamics Part B - Income and Wealth Content Archived
    Surveys and statistical programs – Documentation: 75F0002M1992001
    Description:

    Starting in 1994, the Survey of Labour and Income Dynamics (SLID) will follow individuals and families for at least six years, tracking their labour market experiences, changes in income and family circumstances. An initial proposal for the content of SLID, entitled "Content of the Survey of Labour and Income Dynamics : Discussion Paper", was distributed in February 1992.

    That paper served as a background document for consultation with and a review by interested users. The content underwent significant change during this process. Based upon the revised content, a large-scale test of SLID will be conducted in February and May 1993.

    The present document outlines the income and wealth content to be tested in May 1993. This document is really a continuation of SLID Research Paper Series 92-01A, which outlines the demographic and labour content used in the January /February 1993 test.

    Release date: 2008-02-29
Report a problem or mistake on this page
Date modified:

Search help

How do I use the filters and the search box?

  • You can initiate a search by entering keywords or selecting filters (e.g., under Subject, Geography, etc.) on the left side of the page.

  • Filters can be used together or in any combination. Each time you select a filter, the results on the page are updated.

  • To start a new search, click on the Clear all button above the search box or deselect each filter.

  • Specified keywords and filters appear above the search box. You can deselect any or all the tags to refine or clear your search.

How do I refine my search?

  • You can enter keywords in the search box. It is not necessary to use “+” or “, “ or “AND”.

  • You can delete some or all of the keywords from your search string.

  • Quotes around keywords limit the search to a specific phrase.

    • For example, “labour force survey” will limit results to products containing this phrase.

  • Use “or” between keywords to obtain results that contain one or more search terms.

    • For example, labour or­ force or survey will limit results to products containing any or all of these words.

How does the search work?

  • This search looks for results that have your query term in the title, description, subject, geography, product number or other information about the product.

    • For example, when searching the term ‘Diseases’, all results with the word ‘Diseases’ in the title, description or tagged the subject appear.

  • The text within an article or publication are not searched. For full text searching of articles, use the site search.

Sort help

How are the results ordered?

The Sort by feature provides three options:

  • By date – sorts results by product release date starting with the most recent.
  • By relevance is only needed or beneficial when you use the search box and submit a search query. Results are ordered by a combination of where the search term appears in the content, e.g., if it appears in the title, it likely means the product is more relevant to your search; how up to date or new the content in the product is; how popular the product is; and other factors.
  • By title – sorts results alphabetically.

Sort help

How are the results ordered?

The Sort by feature provides four options:

  • By date – sorts results by product release date starting with the most recent.
  • By most popular – gives priority to results that are most frequently selected by users, followed by the most recent.
  • By relevance is only needed or beneficial when you use the search box and submit a search query. Results are ordered by a combination of where the search term appears in the content, e.g., if it appears in the title, it likely means the product is more relevant to your search; how up to date or new the content in the product is; how popular the product is; and other factors.
  • By title – sorts results alphabetically.