Table 3
Marginal effects from a probit model of voting1,2
| marginal effects | |
|---|---|
| Sex | |
| Male | -0.02* |
| Age | |
| 18 to 24 | -0.14* |
| 25 to 34 | -0.15* |
| 35 to 44 | -0.10* |
| 45 to 54 | ref. |
| 55 to 64 | 0.10* |
| 65 to 74 | 0.19* |
| 75 and over | 0.17* |
| Education | |
| Less than high school | -0.11* |
| Some high school | -0.08* |
| High school diploma | ref. |
| Some postsecondary | 0.05* |
| Trades/certificates | 0.05* |
| University degree | 0.17* |
| Family type | |
| Married/common law with children 5 years and over or no children | ref. |
| Married/common law with at least one child under 5 | -0.02* |
| Single with children 5 years and over or no children | -0.05* |
| Single with at least one child under 5 | -0.16* |
| Divorced or separated | -0.10* |
| Widowed | -0.11* |
| Immigrant status | |
| Canadian-born | ref. |
| Established immigrant | -0.08* |
| Recent immigrant | -0.15* |
| Labour force status | |
| Employed | ref. |
| Unemployed | -0.02* |
| Not in labour force | -0.05* |
| Home ownership | |
| Owner | ref. |
| Renter | -0.11* |
| Response type | |
| Proxy response | -0.01* |
| Not a proxy response | ref. |
| Rural/urban | |
| Urban | 0.02* |
| Rural | ref. |
| Province | |
| Newfoundland and Labrador | -0.13* |
| Prince Edward Island | 0.11* |
| Nova Scotia | -0.01 |
| New Brunswick | 0.03* |
| Quebec | 0.05* |
| Ontario | ref. |
| Manitoba | -0.04* |
| Saskatchewan | 0.00 |
| Alberta | -0.03* |
| British Columbia | -0.01 |
| Number of observations | 96,127 |
| Pseudo R2 | 0.09 |
|
1. Dependent variable = 1 if the individual reported voting, 0 otherwise. 2. Marginal effect is for a discrete change in dummy variable from 0 to 1 and is calculated at the means of the independent variables. * significantly different from the reference group (ref.) at the 5% level Source: Statistics Canada, Labour Force Survey, May 2011. |
|
- Date modified: