Economic and Social Reports
The net impact of telework on restaurant revenues in Canada

Release date: October 23, 2024

DOI: https://doi.org/10.25318/36280001202401000003-eng

Skip to text

Text begins

Abstract

Using monthly provincial data that cover the period from March 2020 to July 2022, this study quantifies the association between work from home and revenues in the food services and drinking places subsector. Controlling for changes in COVID-19 restrictions and Canadians’ health concerns, the study estimates that an increase of 1 percentage point in the monthly incidence of work from home was associated with a 0.55 percentage point reduction in the monthly growth rate of receipts in food services and drinking places in a given province during that period. Simple calculations based on these estimates suggest that the increase in work from home observed from February 2020 to April 2020 accounted for about one-third of the drop in revenues observed in this subsector between these two months.

Keywords: work from home, telework, restaurants, food services and drinking places, COVID-19 pandemic

Authors

Tahsin Mehdi and René Morissette are with the Social Analysis and Modelling Division, Analytical Studies and Modelling Branch, at Statistics Canada.

Introduction

In April 2020, total receipts in the food services and drinking places subsector fell dramatically, reaching $2.5 billion, down from $5.7 billion in February 2020 (Statistics Canada Table 21-10-0019-01). Two years later, in February 2022, total receipts in this subsector amounted to $5.3 billion, still below pre-pandemic levels. To what extent, if any, can these changes be associated with work from home, whose incidence increased from 7% before the COVID-19 pandemic to 41% in April 2020?

Answering this question is challenging for several reasons. The increase in work from home observed during the first half of 2020 occurred as governments implemented lockdowns and certain restrictions and as Canadians became increasingly concerned about contracting the COVID-19 virus in public places, such as restaurants and bars. In 2021, inflation started rising, increasing the costs of shelter and food purchased from stores, possibly reducing Canadians’ demand for food services from restaurants and food counters. Starting in March 2021, employers’ recruitment difficulties—proxied by job vacancy rates—surged in the accommodation and food services sector, possibly constraining the supply of food services.

Fortunately, Statistics Canada compiled monthly provincial data on various restrictions imposed by public health authorities during the COVID-19 pandemic up until July 2022. The Labour Force Survey (LFS) collected data on Canadians’ health concerns from October 2020 to June 2021 and started collecting data on work from home in April 2020. Statistics Canada publishes monthly data on food price inflation, shelter cost inflation, and revenues in food services and drinking places at the provincial level. As will be shown below, nationwide increases in employers’ recruitment difficulties can be considered in multivariate analyses.

By combining these sources of information, it is possible to examine the association between the growth in telework and changes in receipts in food services and drinking places while controlling for the potential confounders mentioned above. To do so, this study takes advantage of the fact that, during a given month of the COVID-19 pandemic, different provinces sometimes experienced changes in work from home of different magnitudes while undergoing similar changes in COVID-19 restrictions.Note

Assessing the degree to which, if any, the increase in work from home observed since early 2020 has affected revenues in food services and drinking places is important for a variety of reasons.

Such an assessment helps in understanding the numerous ramifications of work from home. The growth in work from home has potentially important implications for the housing market, office rental space and economic activity in downtown areas, productivity, wage growth, worker turnover, family–work balance and childcare, commuting, public transit, and greenhouse gas emissions. The relationship between the growth in work from home and revenues in the food services and drinking places subsector is one of these ramifications.

Such an assessment also highlights the fact that while some flexible work arrangements—for example, choosing the start and end hours of one’s workday—are likely to have no intersectoral linkages, other flexible work arrangements, when applied on a large scale, may potentially affect sectors such as retail trade and subsectors such as food services and drinking places, and real estate. In other words, the degree to which flexible work arrangements affect other sectors and subsectors of the economy depends on the nature and the scale of implementation of these work arrangements.

This study conducts the assessment using monthly provincial data from numerous surveys. It examines the degree to which monthly increases in work from home were negatively associated with the monthly growth rates of receipts in the food services and drinking places subsector from March 2020 to July 2022.Note

The increase in work from home may have reduced the revenues of businesses in food services and drinking places by decreasing demand for lunch meals in restaurants and at food counters near offices and by reducing the number of after-work gatherings where workers periodically meet with colleagues or customers to consume food and beverages. Conversely, individuals who started working from home may have spent more money for lunch in cafés and at food counters near their home than they did when they worked mainly onsite. Therefore, telework growth may have led to a spatial reallocation of the demand for food services and drinking places within cities (Alipour et al. 2022; De Fraja et al. 2021, 2022). The magnitude of the net effect at the provincial level remains unknown, and quantifying it is the objective of this study.

Background

From March 2020 to July 2022, monthly provincial increases in the percentage of workers working most of their hours from home were associated with decreases in the monthly provincial growth rates of receipts in food services and drinking places (Figure 1). Monthly changes in the incidence of work from home predicted 64% of the variation in monthly growth rates of receipts observed during that period.

Monthly changes in the overall COVID-19 Restriction Index published by Statistics Canada, which measured various restrictions imposed by public health authorities, were also strongly associated with decreases in the monthly growth rates of receipts (Figure 2). Monthly changes in the overall COVID-19 Restriction Index accounted for almost two-thirds of the variation in the monthly growth rates of receipts.

Other changes took place during the period from March 2020 to July 2022. In September 2021, the inflation of prices for food purchased from stores began to rise, reaching almost 10% by July 2022 (Chart 1). Earlier that year, the inflation of shelter costs also began to rise. Both increases may have led Canadians to reduce their food consumption in restaurants. From March 2021 onwards, job vacancy rates in the accommodation and food services sector increased substantially, possibly constraining the supply of food services by restaurants and food counters (Chart 2).

These changes took place in a context where many Canadians were concerned about contracting the COVID-19 virus in public places, such as restaurants and bars, and where these concerns were unevenly distributed across provinces. For example, 60% of Ontario workers aged 15 to 69 years reported being concerned about contracting COVID-19 in a public place in January 2021, compared with 43% of Quebec workers.

Alongside the rise in work from home, heightened health concerns among Canadians, increased COVID-19 restrictions implemented by public health authorities, growth in food price inflation and shelter costs, and increased recruitment difficulties in the accommodation and food services sector may all have contributed to the decline in revenues for businesses in the food services and drinking places subsector during the observation period. To quantify the contribution of increases in work from home, these factors must be considered in a multivariate analysis.

Figure 1: Monthly provincial changes in the incidence of work from home and monthly provincial growth rates of revenues in food services and drinking places, March 2020 to July 2022

Description for Figure 1

Figure 1 is a scatter plot that examines the degree to which greater monthly increases in the percentage of workers working most of their hours from home are associated with lower monthly growth rates of revenues in the food services and drinking places subsector. Both statistics are measured at the provincial level. The period covered is March 2020 to July 2022.

The horizontal axis measures monthly changes in the percentage of workers working most of their hours from home in a given province while the vertical axis measures monthly growth rates of revenues in the food services and drinking places subsector in that province.

For example, the data show that the percentage of workers working most of their hours from home increased by 11.4 percentage points from March 2020 to April 2020 in Newfoundland and Labrador. During that period, revenues in the food services and drinking places subsector fell by approximately 41% (or -0.41 in logarithmic terms). From April 2020 to May 2020, the percentage of workers working most of their hours from home increased by 1.0 percentage point in Newfoundland and Labrador while revenues in food services and drinking places and drinking places increased by approximately 36% (or 0.36 in logarithmic terms) during that period.

Likewise, the data show that the percentage of workers working most of their hours from home increased by 14.1 percentage points from March 2020 to April 2020 in British Columbia. During that period, revenues in the food services and drinking places subsector fell by approximately 51% (or -0.51 in logarithmic terms). From April 2020 to May 2020, the percentage of workers working most of their hours from home fell by 1.2 percentage points in British Columbia while revenues in food services and drinking places and drinking places increased by approximately 33% (or 0.33 in logarithmic terms) during that period.

Figure 1 also includes a regression line, i.e. the line that provides the best fit to the data. The regression line has an R-squared statistic (R2) equal to 0.63, thereby indicating that variation in the monthly provincial changes in the incidence of work from home account for 63% of the variation in the monthly provincial growth rates of revenues in the food services and drinking places subsector.

Data on revenue growth in food services and drinking places are not available in Prince Edward Island for March, April and May 2020. As a result, statistics for Prince Edward Island for these months do not appear in Figure 1.

Figure 2:

Description for Figure 2

Figure 2 is a scatter plot that examines the degree to which greater monthly increases in the overall COVID-19 restriction index are associated with lower monthly growth rates of revenues in the food services and drinking places subsector. Both statistics are measured at the provincial level. The period covered is March 2020 to July 2022.

The horizontal axis measures monthly changes in the overall COVID-19 restriction index in a given province while the vertical axis measures monthly growth rates of revenues in the food services and drinking places subsector in that province.

For example, the data show that the overall COVID-19 restriction index increased by 46.00 from March 2020 to April 2020 in Newfoundland and Labrador. During that period, revenues in the food services and drinking places subsector fell by approximately 41% (or -0.41 in logarithmic terms). From April 2020 to May 2020, the overall COVID-19 restriction index fell by 8.32 in Newfoundland and Labrador while revenues in food services and drinking places and drinking places increased by approximately 36% (or 0.36 in logarithmic terms) during that period.

Likewise, the data show that the overall COVID-19 restriction index increased by 25.72 from March 2020 to April 2020 in British Columbia. During that period, revenues in the food services and drinking places subsector fell by approximately 51% (or -0.51 in logarithmic terms). From April 2020 to May 2020, the overall COVID-19 restriction index fell by 6.23 in British Columbia while revenues in food services and drinking places and drinking places increased by approximately 33% (or 0.33 in logarithmic terms) during that period.

Figure 2 also includes a regression line, i.e. the line that provides the best fit to the data. The regression line has an R-squared statistic (R2) equal to 0.66, thereby indicating that variation in the monthly provincial changes in the overall COVID-19 restriction index account for 66% of the variation in the monthly provincial growth rates of revenues in the food services and drinking places subsector.

Data on revenue growth in food services and drinking places are not available in Prince Edward Island for March, April and May 2020. As a result, statistics for Prince Edward Island for these months do not appear in Figure 2.

Chart 1: Year-to-year changes in shelter costs and in the price of food purchased from stores, March 2020 to July 2022

Data table for Chart 1
Data table for chart 1 Table summary
This table displays the results of Data table for chart 1 Shelter and Food purchased from stores, calculated using percent units of measure (appearing as column headers).
  Food purchased from stores Shelter
percent
Note: Data are not seasonally adjusted.
Source: Statistics Canada, table 18-10-0004-01.
2020  
March 2.4 1.9
April 4.0 1.3
May 3.5 1.0
June 3.0 1.7
July 2.4 1.5
August 1.6 1.5
September 1.3 1.7
October 2.3 1.8
November 1.6 1.9
December 0.5 1.6
2021  
January 0.1 1.4
February 1.3 1.4
March 1.3 2.4
April 0.1 3.2
May 0.9 4.2
June 0.7 4.4
July 1.0 4.8
August 2.6 4.8
September 4.2 4.8
October 3.9 4.8
November 4.7 4.8
December 5.7 5.4
2022  
January 6.5 6.2
February 7.4 6.6
March 8.7 6.8
April 9.7 7.4
May 9.7 7.4
June 9.4 7.1
July 9.9 7.0

Chart 2: Job vacancy rates in accommodation and food services, March 2020 to July 2022

Data table for Chart 2
Data table for chart 2 Table summary
This table displays the results of Data table for chart 2 , calculated using (appearing as column headers).
  Percent

... not applicable

Notes: Data were not collected from April 2020 to September 2020. Data are not seasonally adjusted.
Source: Statistics Canada, table 14-10-0372-01.
2020  
March 4.9
April ... not applicable
May ... not applicable
June ... not applicable
July ... not applicable
August ... not applicable
September ... not applicable
October 4.7
November 4.0
December 4.5
2021  
January 3.4
February 4.6
March 7.7
April 6.7
May 7.8
June 12.2
July 12.0
August 12.9
September 14.0
October 11.5
November 10.2
December 10.8
2022  
January 7.6
February 9.9
March 12.3
April 11.8
May 12.2
June 12.1
July 10.3

Multivariate analysis

The multivariate analysis conducted in this study starts with the following equation:

Δln_ R pmt =  θ mt  + β 1 *ΔWF H pmt + λ*ΔREST R pmt + Δ X pmt *δ+ u pmt (1)   MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aqatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9 vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=x fr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaaeaaaaaaaaa8 qacqqHuoarcaWGSbGaamOBaiaac+facaWGsbWdamaaBaaaleaapeGa amiCaiaad2gacaWG0baapaqabaGcpeGaeyypa0JaaiiOaiabeI7aX9 aadaWgaaWcbaWdbiaad2gacaWG0bGaaiiOaaWdaeqaaOWdbiabgUca Riabek7aI9aadaWgaaWcbaWdbiaaigdaa8aabeaak8qacaGGQaGaeu iLdqKaam4vaiaadAeacaWGibWdamaaBaaaleaapeGaamiCaiaad2ga caWG0baapaqabaGcpeGaey4kaSIaaiiOaiabeU7aSjaacQcacqqHuo arcaWGsbGaamyraiaadofacaWGubGaamOua8aadaWgaaWcbaWdbiaa dchacaWGTbGaamiDaaWdaeqaaOWdbiabgUcaRiaacckacqqHuoarca WGybWdamaaBaaaleaapeGaamiCaiaad2gacaWG0baapaqabaGcpeGa aiOkaiabes7aKjabgUcaRiaadwhapaWaaSbaaSqaa8qacaWGWbGaam yBaiaadshaa8aabeaak8qacaGGGcaaaa@6EEF@

Where Δln_ R pmt MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aqatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9 vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=x fr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaaeaaaaaaaaa8 qacqqHuoarcaqGSbGaaeOBaiaac+facaWGsbWdamaaBaaaleaapeGa amiCaiaad2gacaWG0baapaqabaaaaa@3E51@ equals the monthly growth rate of receipts in food services and drinking places in a given province from month m-1 to month m (approximated by changes in the natural logarithm of receipts from month m-1 to month m) in year t and where ΔWF H pmt MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aqatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9 vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=x fr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaaeaaaaaaaaa8 qacqqHuoarcaWGxbGaamOraiaadIeapaWaaSbaaSqaa8qacaWGWbGa amyBaiaadshaa8aabeaaaaa@3D2B@ measures monthly changes in the percentage of workers aged 15 to 69 years working most of their hours from home in a given province in year t.

The term ΔREST R pmt MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aqatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9 vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=x fr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaaeaaaaaaaaa8 qacqqHuoarcaWGsbGaamyraiaadofacaWGubGaamOua8aadaWgaaWc baWdbiaadchacaWGTbGaamiDaaWdaeqaaaaa@3EE0@ captures monthly changes in the COVID-19 Restriction Index at the provincial level. Three versions of ΔREST R pmt MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aqatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9 vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=x fr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaaeaaaaaaaaa8 qacqqHuoarcaWGsbGaamyraiaadofacaWGubGaamOua8aadaWgaaWc baWdbiaadchacaWGTbGaamiDaaWdaeqaaaaa@3EE0@ are considered. The first version captures monthly changes in the index measuring restrictions for in-person dining in restaurants, while the second version measures monthly changes in the overall index. The third version measures monthly changes for each of the 15 different restriction indexes for which data have been collected.Note It leads to the most flexible version of equation (1), which is the focus of the remainder of this article.

The term Δ X pmt MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aqatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9 vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=x fr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaaeaaaaaaaaa8 qacqqHuoarcaWGybWdamaaBaaaleaapeGaamiCaiaad2gacaWG0baa paqabaaaaa@3B94@ includes the following set of control variables, defined as the monthly provincial growth rates of (1) the price of food purchased from stores (to account for food price inflation); (2) shelter costs; (3) employment in sectors other than the accommodation and food services or the arts, entertainment and recreation sectors; and (4) real minimum wages.

The term θ mt MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aqatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9 vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=x fr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaaeaaaaaaaaa8 qacqaH4oqCpaWaaSbaaSqaa8qacaWGTbGaamiDaaWdaeqaaaaa@3A12@ is a vector of unrestricted month-by-year effects. It captures seasonal effects and nationwide factors that may affect revenue growth in the food services and drinking places subsector. These factors include national increases in monthly job vacancy rates (Chart 2), nationwide changes in Canadians’ health concerns about COVID-19 and national changes in monthly family income. The term u pmt MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aqatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9 vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=x fr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaaeaaaaaaaaa8 qacaWG1bWdamaaBaaaleaapeGaamiCaiaad2gacaWG0baapaqabaaa aa@3A4B@ is an error term.

The inclusion of θ mt MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aqatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9 vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=x fr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaaeaaaaaaaaa8 qacqaH4oqCpaWaaSbaaSqaa8qacaWGTbGaamiDaaWdaeqaaaaa@3A12@ in equation (1) implies that β 1 MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aqatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9 vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=x fr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaaeaaaaaaaaa8 qacqaHYoGypaWaaSbaaSqaa8qacaaIXaaapaqabaaaaa@38CD@ is identified from the cross-provincial variation in changes in work from home and in revenue growth occurring in a given month in a given year. In other words, equation (1) answers the following question: considering a given month in a given year, did the provinces with greater increases in work from home experience on average, all else equal, smaller revenue growth in food services and drinking places than other provinces?Note

Equation (1) is first estimated from March 2020 to July 2022, and the results are shown in the first section of Table 1. The most flexible version of equation (1) indicates that, all else equal, a monthly increase of 1 percentage point in work from home during that period was associated with a 0.55 percentage point reduction in the growth rate of receipts in food services and drinking places in a given province. This means that if receipts were stable before this hypothetical increase in work from home, they would end up falling by 0.55% in the month during which this increase in telework took place. As the percentage of workers working mainly from home in Ontario increased by about 20 percentage points from March 2020 (27%) to April 2020 (47%), this finding suggests that this increase in telework reduced the growth rate of receipts in the subsector in Ontario by 11 percentage points from March 2020 to April 2020. This finding holds in the second and third sections of Table 1, which show results for two periods—March 2020 to July 2022 and May 2020 to July 2022—from a balanced panel of nine provinces (excluding Prince Edward Island) that have complete information on all the variables for the 29 months considered.Note

Table 1
Monthly changes in the percentage of workers working most of their hours from home and monthly growth rates of receipts in food services and drinking places, 2020 to 2022 Table summary
This table displays the results of Monthly changes in the percentage of workers working most of their hours from home and monthly growth rates of receipts in food services and drinking places, 2020 to 2022 Overall COVID-19 Restriction Index, All 15 restriction indexes and In-person dining in restaurants, calculated using parameter estimates units of measure (appearing as column headers).
  In-person dining in restaurants Overall COVID-19 Restriction Index All 15 restriction indexes
parameter estimates
Note 

significantly different from zero (p< 0.10)

Return to note  referrer

Note *

significantly different from zero (p < 0.05)

Return to note * referrer

Note **

significantly different from zero (p < 0.01)

Return to note ** referrer

Note ***

significantly different from zero (p < 0.001)

Return to note *** referrer

Notes: Along with controls for changes in COVID-19 restrictions, all regressions include a vector of month-by-year indicators and monthly growth rates of (1) employment in sectors other than accommodation and food services and arts, entertainment and recreation; (2) real minimum wages; (3) the price of food purchased in stores; and (4) shelter costs. The data are not seasonally adjusted. Robust standard errors are used. Results hold when allowing for first-order serial correlation that is common across provinces. Real receipts are deflated by the Consumer Price Index for food purchased from restaurants.
Sources: Statistics Canada, Survey of Employment, Payrolls and Hours; Labour Force Survey; Monthly Survey of Food Services and Drinking Places; table 33-10-0497-01; and table 18-10-0004-01.
Controls for COVID-19 restrictions  
1. March 2020 to July 2022 (N=287)  
Monthly growth rates of receipts -0.0100 Table 1  Note *** -0.0069 Table 1  Note *** -0.0055 Table 1  Note **
Monthly growth rates of real receipts -0.0101 Table 1  Note *** -0.0070 Table 1  Note *** -0.0055 Table 1  Note **
2. March 2020 to July 2022, excluding Prince Edward Island (N=261)  
Monthly growth rates of receipts -0.0098 Table 1  Note *** -0.0067 Table 1  Note *** -0.0060 Table 1  Note ***
Monthly growth rates of real receipts -0.0098 Table 1  Note *** -0.0069 Table 1  Note *** -0.0061 Table 1  Note ***
3. May 2020 to July 2022, excluding Prince Edward Island (N=243)  
Monthly growth rates of receipts -0.0085 Table 1  Note *** -0.0050 Table 1  Note ** -0.0052 Table 1  Note **
Monthly growth rates of real receipts -0.0085 Table 1  Note *** -0.0051 Table 1  Note ** -0.0053 Table 1  Note **
4. March 2020 to March 2021, excluding Prince Edward Island (N=117)  
Monthly growth rates of receipts -0.0110 Table 1  Note *** -0.0060 Table 1  Note * -0.0068 Table 1  Note *
Monthly growth rates of real receipts -0.0109 Table 1  Note *** -0.0061 Table 1  Note *** -0.0070 Table 1  Note *
5. November 2020 to June 2021 with controls for monthly changes in health concerns (N=80)  
Monthly growth rates of receipts -0.0129 Table 1  Note *** -0.0076 Table 1  Note * -0.0101 Table 1  Note ***
Monthly growth rates of real receipts -0.0127 Table 1  Note *** -0.0074 Table 1  Note * -0.0098 Table 1  Note ***

One concern with this finding is that while equation (1) controls for monthly changes in family income at the national level (through θ mt MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aqatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9 vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=x fr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaaeaaaaaaaaa8 qacqaH4oqCpaWaaSbaaSqaa8qacaWGTbGaamiDaaWdaeqaaaaa@3A12@ ), it does not control for monthly provincial changes in family income. If provincial family income fell more in provinces that experienced relatively large increases in work from home in a given month, the estimates of β 1 MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aqatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9 vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=x fr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaaeaaaaaaaaa8 qacqaHYoGypaWaaSbaaSqaa8qacaaIXaaapaqabaaaaa@38CD@ reported in Table 1 might be biased upwards in absolute value.

One strategy to minimize these concerns is to estimate equation (1) for a period during which family income grew and concerns regarding food price inflation had not yet emerged. During such a period, family income is unlikely to be a significant determinant of the decline in revenues experienced by the food services and drinking places subsector.

As the period from March 2020 to March 2021 satisfies these conditions,Note the fourth section of Table 1 shows results for this period. These results indicate that, all else equal, a monthly increase of 1 percentage point in work from home was, during that period, associated with a 0.68 percentage point reduction in the growth rate of receipts in food services and drinking places in a given province. This estimate is similar to that obtained in the first three sections of Table 1. It suggests that the omission of monthly changes in provincial family income from equation (1) is unlikely to account for the results obtained in the first three sections of Table 1.

A second issue is that while equation (1) controls for provincial changes in COVID-19 restrictions and national changes in health concerns (through θ mt MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aqatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9 vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=x fr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaaeaaaaaaaaa8 qacqaH4oqCpaWaaSbaaSqaa8qacaWGTbGaamiDaaWdaeqaaaaa@3A12@ ), it does not control for provincial changes in Canadians’ concerns about contracting the COVID-19 virus in public places such as restaurants. The fifth section of Table 1 deals with this issue and adds a control variable for monthly provincial changes in health concerns on this issue for a shorter period: November 2020 to June 2021. The results indicate that a monthly increase of 1 percentage point in work from home was, during that period, associated with a 1.01 percentage point reduction in the growth rate of receipts in food services and drinking places in a given province.

Robustness checks

The results shown in Table 1 relate contemporaneous changes in the incidence of work from home to contemporaneous growth rates of revenues. They assume that past changes in work from home do not affect current revenue growth. This assumption will be violated if increases in work from home trigger a dynamic adjustment response from households in terms of food consumption in restaurants and at food counters, leading, for example, teleworkers to eventually start eating in cafés and at food counters near home (or to start ordering food from third-party delivery services) after a few months of eating solely at home.

The results shown in Table 1 also assume that past changes in COVID-19 restrictions do not affect current revenue growth. This assumption will not hold if the lifting of restrictions on in-person dining brings back customers to restaurants with a certain lag.

To account for these dynamic responses, Table 2 uses a more flexible version of equation (1) that adds three lags to ΔWF H pmt MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aqatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9 vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=x fr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaaeaaaaaaaaa8 qacqqHuoarcaWGxbGaamOraiaadIeapaWaaSbaaSqaa8qacaWGWbGa amyBaiaadshaa8aabeaaaaa@3D2B@ and the first two versions of ΔREST R pmt MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aqatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9 vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=x fr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaaeaaaaaaaaa8 qacqqHuoarcaWGsbGaamyraiaadofacaWGubGaamOua8aadaWgaaWc baWdbiaadchacaWGTbGaamiDaaWdaeqaaaaa@3EE0@ . The resulting estimates cover the period from May 2020 to July 2022 and use data for all provinces except Prince Edward Island.

Table 2
Monthly changes in the percentage of workers working most of their hours from home and monthly growth rates of receipts in food services and drinking places, 2020 to 2022 Table summary
This table displays the results of Monthly changes in the percentage of workers working most of their hours from home and monthly growth rates of receipts in food services and drinking places, 2020 to 2022 Overall COVID-19 Restriction Index and In-person dining in restaurants, calculated using parameter estimates units of measure (appearing as column headers).
  In-person dining in restaurants Overall COVID-19 Restriction Index
parameter estimates
Note 

significantly different from zero (p< 0.10)

Return to note  referrer

Note *

significantly different from zero (p < 0.05)

Return to note * referrer

Note **

significantly different from zero (p < 0.01)

Return to note ** referrer

Note ***

significantly different from zero (p < 0.001)

Return to note *** referrer

Notes: Along with controls for changes in COVID-19 restrictions, all regressions include a vector of month-by-year indicators and monthly growth rates of (1) employment in sectors other than accommodation and food services and arts, entertainment and recreation; (2) real minimum wages; (3) the price of food purchased in stores; and (4) shelter costs. The data are not seasonally adjusted. Robust standard errors are used. The results hold when allowing for first-order serial correlation that is common across provinces.
Sources: Statistics Canada, Survey of Employment, Payrolls and Hours; Labour Force Survey; Monthly Survey of Food Services and Drinking Places; table 33-10-0497-01; and table 18-10-0004-01.
Controls for COVID-19 restrictions  
1. May 2020 to July 2022, excluding Prince Edward Island (N=243)  
Contemporaneous value of ΔWFH_pmt -0.0085 Table 2  Note *** -0.0050 Table 2  Note **
2. May 2020 to July 2022, excluding Prince Edward Island, three lags for changes in COVID-19 restrictions and changes in the incidence of work from home (N=243)  
Contemporaneous value of ΔWFH_pmt -0.0079 Table 2  Note *** -0.0051 Table 2  Note *
One-month lagged value 0.0005 -0.0007
Two-month lagged value 0.0015 0.0009
Three-month lagged value 0.0012 0.0001
3. March 2020 to July 2022, excluding Prince Edward Island (N=261), allowing COVID-19 restrictions to have a different effect after the summer of 2021  
Contemporaneous value of ΔWFH_pmt -0.0094 Table 2  Note *** -0.0067 Table 2  Note ***
4. March 2020 to July 2022, excluding Prince Edward Island (N=261), allowing COVID-19 restrictions to have a different effect across provinces  
Contemporaneous value of ΔWFH_pmt -0.0095 Table 2  Note *** -0.0069 Table 2  Note ***

The results indicate that adding three lags to ΔWF H pmt MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aqatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9 vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=x fr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaaeaaaaaaaaa8 qacqqHuoarcaWGxbGaamOraiaadIeapaWaaSbaaSqaa8qacaWGWbGa amyBaiaadshaa8aabeaaaaa@3D2B@ and the first two versions of ΔREST R pmt MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aqatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9 vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=x fr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaaeaaaaaaaaa8 qacqqHuoarcaWGsbGaamyraiaadofacaWGubGaamOua8aadaWgaaWc baWdbiaadchacaWGTbGaamiDaaWdaeqaaaaa@3EE0@ has virtually no effect on β 1 MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aqatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9 vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=x fr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaaeaaaaaaaaa8 qacqaHYoGypaWaaSbaaSqaa8qacaaIXaaapaqabaaaaa@38CD@ , the parameter estimate for contemporaneous changes in the incidence of work from home. For example, when the second version of ΔREST R pmt MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aqatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9 vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=x fr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaaeaaaaaaaaa8 qacqqHuoarcaWGsbGaamyraiaadofacaWGubGaamOua8aadaWgaaWc baWdbiaadchacaWGTbGaamiDaaWdaeqaaaaa@3EE0@ is used (overall COVID-19 Restriction Index), this parameter estimate changes from 0.0050 without lags to 0.0051 when lags are introduced.Note

Additional robustness checks are conducted in the last two sections of Table 2 for the first two versions of ΔREST R pmt MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aqatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9 vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=x fr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaaeaaaaaaaaa8 qacqqHuoarcaWGsbGaamyraiaadofacaWGubGaamOua8aadaWgaaWc baWdbiaadchacaWGTbGaamiDaaWdaeqaaaaa@3EE0@ . The third section allows the effect of COVID-19 restrictions to differ after the summer of 2021, compared with previous months. The fourth section allows the effect of COVID-19 restrictions to differ across provinces.Note Neither change yields parameter estimates that differ markedly from those shown in the second section of Table 1.

To what extent can the decline in revenues in food services and drinking places observed during the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic be accounted for by the increase in telework? Simple calculations based on the first section of Table 1 (third column) suggest that the increase in work from home from February 2020 to April 2020 accounted for about one-third of the $3.2 billion drop in revenues observed during that period.Note

Conclusion

Controlling for changes in COVID-19 restrictions and Canadians’ health concerns, this article finds a robust negative association between monthly increases in work from home during the pandemic and the monthly growth rates of receipts in the food services and drinking places subsector.

Several limitations are worth noting. The sample sizes used for measuring health concerns are relatively small and may lead to measurement error in this variable. Second, these health concerns are not measured over the entire observation period. Lastly, the multivariate analyses controlled for nationwide increases in employers’ recruitment difficulties but did not account for province-specific changes in such difficulties. These data limitations may potentially affect the parameter estimates shown in this study.

Despite these limitations, the study adds to a growing body of evidence suggesting that the increase in work from home triggered by the COVID-19 pandemic affected several aspects of the Canadian economy.Note

References

Alipour, J.V., O. Falck, S. Kraus, C. Krolage and S. Wichert. 2022. “The Future of Work and Consumption in Cities after the Pandemic: Evidence from Germany.” CESifo Working Paper, 10000.

Clarke, S., J. Dekker, N. Habli, R. Macdonald and C. McCormack. 2022. “Measuring the correlation between COVID-19 restrictions and economic activity.” Analytical Studies: Methods and References, Statistics Canada Catalogue no. 11-633-X, No. 040.

De Fraja, G., J. Matheson, P. Mizen, J.C. Rockey, S. Taneja and G. Thwaites. 2021. “Covid Reallocation of Spending: The Effect of Remote Working on the Retail and Hospitality Sector.” SSRN Working Paper, 3982122:1–48.

De Fraja, G., J. Matheson, P. Mizen, J. Rockey and S. Taneja. 2022. “Remote Working and the New Geography of Local Service Spending.” CEPR Discussion Paper, 17431:1–38.

Morissette, R., V. Hardy and V. Zolkiewski. 2022. “Work from home: new estimates for January to April 2022.” Analytical Studies Branch Research Paper No. 472, Statistics Canada Catalogue no. 11F0019M.

Statistics Canada. 2024. “Research to insights: working from home in Canada.” Catalogue no. 11-631-X2024001.

Date modified: