Economic and Social Reports
International students as a source of labour supply: Engagement in the labour market after graduation

Release date: January 18, 2022

DOI: https://doi.org/10.25318/36280001202101200002-eng

Skip to text

Text begins

Abstract

This study examines the extent to which international students are engaged in the labour market through the Post-Graduation Work Permit Program (PGWPP) after having held a study permit at the postsecondary level (yet before immigration). The number of international students participating in the PGWPP after their studies has increased markedly, driven by increasing numbers of international students in Canada and larger shares of international student graduates obtaining a post-graduation work permit (PGWP). The labour market participation of PGWP holders (defined as the share of PGWP holders with positive T4 earnings) remained fairly stable from 2008 to 2018, with roughly three-quarters reporting T4 earnings annually. With rising numbers of PGWP holders, this equated to the number of PGWP holders with T4 earnings growing more than 13 times in size, from 10,300 in 2008 to 135,100 in 2018. Median annual earnings received by PGWP holders with employment income also rose over this period, from $14,500 (in 2018 dollars) in 2008 to $26,800 in 2018, suggesting an increase in the average amount of labour input. Almost three-quarters of all PGWP holders became permanent residents within five years of having obtained their PGWP. Through participation in the PGWPP and subsequent transition to permanent residence, international students have provided a growing source of labour for the Canadian labour market that extends well beyond their periods of study.

Authors

Eden Crossman is with the Research and Evaluation Branch at Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada. Yuqian Lu and Feng Hou are with the Social Analysis and Modelling Division, Analytical Studies and Modelling Branch, at Statistics Canada.

Acknowledgements

This study was conducted in collaboration with Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada. The authors would like to thank Cédric de Chardon, Marc Frenette, Rebeka Lee, Katherine Wall and Linda Wang for their advice and comments on an earlier version of this paper.

Introduction

The number of international students has grown considerably worldwide, primarily from developing countries to Western developed countries. In recent years, Canada has led other major Western countries in the growth of international students. For instance, from 2008 to 2019, the number of permits issued to tertiary-level international students increased 2.8 times from 45,900 to 173,000 in Canada, compared with a growth of 7% from 340,700 to 364,000 in the United States, 50% from 249,000 to 374,000 in the United Kingdom, and 52% from 114,400 to 173,400 in Australia (OECD 2020). The faster growth in the inflows of international students in Canada is likely related to both the changing reception environment in other major receiving countries (particularly the United States, where the new admission of tertiary-level international students declined 23% from 2016 to 2019Note ) and concrete measures adopted by the Canadian government to attract international students.Note 

The opportunity for international students to work in Canada after graduation and to potentially become permanent residents, and ultimately Canadian citizens, is considered a draw factor for prospective international students. When international students decide to stay and work in Canada after graduation, one of the main avenues to do so is through the Post-Graduation Work Permit Program (PGWPP). The PGWPP is a temporary worker program that provides labour market opportunities for international student graduates of public postsecondary and private degree-granting educational institutions. On the one hand, the PGWPP allows international students who have graduated from a recognized Canadian postsecondary institution to gain work experience in Canada and can provide the necessary job experience required to apply for some permanent residence streams. On the other hand, the PGWPP facilitates international students’ contribution to the Canadian labour market, increases the pool of qualified candidates for eventual immigration and serves to make Canada a more attractive destination of study (CIC 2010).

The PGWPP started in 2003 as a pilot program in selected provinces and expanded nationwide in 2005. Further enhancements in 2008 allowed recent graduates to obtain an open work permit for up to three years (depending on the length of their program of study) with no restrictions on location of work, employer, occupation or requirement of a job offer. With a post-graduation work permit (PGWP), as with all open work permits, graduates can work full time, work part time and be self-employed (CIC 2010). In 2014, international student program regulatory changes took effect and included amendments that extended to the period after graduation (Government of Canada 2014). Before 2014, study permit holders were not authorized to work after the completion of their studies while awaiting approval of their PGWP. With the changes, eligible international graduates are authorized to work full time after their studies are completed until a decision is made on their application for a PGWP.

Currently, to obtain a PGWP, the applicant must have graduated from an eligible designated learning institution. They must also have completed an academic, vocational or professional training program at an eligible institution in Canada that is at least eight months in duration leading to a degree, diploma or certificate. They had to have maintained full-time student status in Canada during each academic session of the program or programs of study they have completed. Students are ineligible for a PGWP if they have completed an English or French as a second language course or program of study, general interest or self-improvement courses, or a course or program of study at a private career college. Applicants can receive only one PGWP in their lifetime.

Little research has been done to examine how international students have taken advantage of the PGWPP by obtaining the PGWP, finding employment and transitioning to permanent residency. To fill this knowledge gap, this article assesses the extent to which international students are engaged in the labour market through the PGWPP after having held a study permit at the postsecondary level. This article is part of a series that provides a broad overview of international students as a source of labour in Canada. It seeks to better understand the activities of international students in the labour market after their period of study (yet before immigration).Note  Specifically, this article examines the trends in the number and share of international students participating in the PGWPP and the share of PGWP holders with employment income and their earnings levels. The transitions of PGWP holders to permanent residency are also examined.

The analysis is based on international students who held a study permit at the postsecondary education level between 2004 and 2018 and on those who subsequently obtained a PGWP over the period from 2008 to 2018.Note  For aspects of the analysis that look at study permits, information comes from the first study permit issued (and before the PGWP) and includes study permit holders who were aged 15 to 59 in the signing year.Note  One PGWP is attributed to an individual, keeping the first one issued. This study relies on data from the Longitudinal Immigration Database that were integrated with T4 National Accounts Longitudinal Microdata File tax files.

The number of new post-graduation work permit holders has increased, with the largest gains occurring among those from India and those intending to work in Ontario

The number of international students participating in the PGWPP after their studies has increased markedly, alongside increasing numbers of international students in Canada. The number of first-time study permit holders has increased fairly steadily since the mid-2000s (when this number was roughly 75,000), accelerating notably after 2015 and reaching 250,000 in 2019 (Crossman, Choi and Hou 2021). At the same time, larger shares of international students are obtaining a PGWP after graduation. Chart 1 shows the cumulative rate of international students who obtained a PGWP by years after their first study permit expired. More recent cohorts of international students (defined by their first study permit expiration year) tended to have higher shares of students obtaining a PGWP. One year after their study permits had expired, 16% of international students with a study permit that expired in 2008 had obtained a PGWP; this compares with 43% of those with a study permit that expired in 2017. Five years after their first study permits had expired, 29% of the 2008 international student cohort had obtained a PGWP, compared with 48% of the 2012 cohort.

Chart 1 Cumulative rate of international students obtaining a post-graduation work permit by expiration year (cohort) of study permit

Data table for Chart 1 
Data table Chart 1
Table summary
This table displays the results of Data table Chart 1 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5, calculated using percent units of measure (appearing as column headers).
1 2 3 4 5
percent
2008 Cohort 16 20 24 27 29
2009 Cohort 18 23 28 32 34
2010 Cohort 20 26 31 35 36
2011 Cohort 25 32 36 39 41
2012 Cohort 33 39 42 46 48
2013 Cohort 37 42 47 50 52
2014 Cohort 37 45 49 52 Note ...: not applicable
2015 Cohort 36 43 48 Note ...: not applicable Note ...: not applicable
2016 Cohort 34 42 Note ...: not applicable Note ...: not applicable Note ...: not applicable
2017 Cohort 43 Note ...: not applicable Note ...: not applicable Note ...: not applicable Note ...: not applicable

From 2008 to 2018, the annual number of new PGWP holders grew more than six times in size, from 10,300 to 64,700 (Table 1). While this increase occurred for both men and women, the share of male PGWP holders was consistently larger than that of female PGWP holders throughout the period. By age, the share of PGWPs obtained by those aged 24 and younger has trended upwards over time, and made up almost half (49%) of all PGWPs signed in 2018. In contrast, the share signed by those aged 25 to 34 trended downwards, falling from 56% in 2008 to 46% in 2018, although their number rose continuously from 5,800 to 29,400.

The large majority of PGWP holders came from two source countries, India and China. Together, these two source countries comprised 66% of all PGWPs issued in 2018, up from 51% in 2008. The share of PGWPs obtained by international students from India grew more than four times in size from 10% in 2008 to 46% in 2018. The trend was reversed for the share obtained by international students from China, falling from 41% to 20%. Over this period, international students from India intending to study at the postsecondary level increased much faster than those from China (Crossman, Choi and Hou 2021).

The large majority of PGWP holders intended to work in Ontario, followed by those intending to work in British Columbia and Quebec. For PGWPs obtained in 2018, 56% were for those intending to work in Ontario (up from 44% in 2008); these shares were 16% for British Columbia and 11% for Quebec (down from 19% and 13%, respectively, in 2008).


Table 1
Post-graduation work permit holders by sign year, 2008 to 2018
Table summary
This table displays the results of Post-graduation work permit holders by sign year Post-graduation work permit signing year, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017 and 2018, calculated using percent and number units of measure (appearing as column headers).
Post-graduation work permit signing year
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
percent
Sex
Male 54 55 56 57 59 57 58 57 55 55 56
Female 46 45 44 43 41 43 42 43 45 45 44
Age group at PGWP signing year
Younger than 25 41 42 45 46 47 45 44 43 42 46 49
25 to 34 56 55 52 51 50 52 53 54 54 49 46
35 and older 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 5 5
Top source country (2018 PGWP ranking)
India 10 10 16 25 32 32 32 28 23 32 46
China 41 36 33 29 27 30 30 33 33 27 20
France 3 5 5 4 4 4 4 4 5 4 3
South Korea 4 4 4 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
Brazil 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 2 2
Nigeria 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 2
Iran 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1
Vietnam 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
United States 5 5 4 4 3 3 2 2 2 2 1
Pakistan 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1
Other countries 31 33 32 28 24 22 21 22 24 23 19
Intended destination
Newfoundland and Labrador 1 1 1 1 1 1 Note ...: not applicable Note ...: not applicable Note ...: not applicable Note ...: not applicable 0
Prince Edward Island 0 0 0 0 0 0 Note ...: not applicable Note ...: not applicable Note ...: not applicable Note ...: not applicable 0
Nova Scotia 3 3 3 3 3 3 Note ...: not applicable 0 0 0 2
New Brunswick 2 2 2 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1
Quebec 13 17 17 16 14 14 2 4 1 1 11
Ontario 44 42 45 46 48 48 0 3 2 3 56
Manitoba 5 4 4 3 4 3 0 0 0 0 4
Saskatchewan 2 2 3 6 6 3 Note ...: not applicable 0 0 0 2
Alberta 10 9 8 8 9 10 0 0 0 0 6
British Columbia 19 19 17 16 15 16 2 2 2 2 16
Territories Note ...: not applicable Note ...: not applicable Note ...: not applicable Note ...: not applicable Note ...: not applicable 0 Note ...: not applicable Note ...: not applicable Note ...: not applicable Note ...: not applicable 0
Not stated Note ...: not applicable Note ...: not applicable Note ...: not applicable Note ...: not applicable Note ...: not applicable 0 95 90 94 94 1
number
Total 10,300 11,800 13,500 18,100 23,000 29,500 32,100 27,200 33,300 44,800 64,700

The share of post-graduation work permit holders reporting earnings has remained fairly stable but differs by source country

The number of PGWP holders with positive T4 earnings rose more than 13 times in size from 10,300 in 2008 to 135,100 in 2018 (Table 2). This equated to roughly three-quarters of PGWP holders with T4 earnings in each year over the period.Note  The share of PGWP holders reporting earnings provides a measure of their participation in the labour market. In this sense, their labour market participation rate has remained fairly stable over the period.

Although the proportions of male and female PGWP holders reporting employment earnings were roughly similar in the 2017 and 2018 tax years, the share for men was generally higher throughout the period (with the exception of 2008 and 2009). There was little difference by age in the share of PGWP holders reporting earnings.

Nigeria was the source country with the highest share of PGWP holders reporting earnings in 2018 (95%), followed by Brazil (91%), Vietnam (88%), and Iran and Pakistan (at 86% each). The major source country associated with the lowest share reporting earnings in this same year was China (62%), followed by the United States (67%), India (75%) and France (76%).

By destination, the highest share of PGWP holders reporting earnings in 2018 was for those intending to work in the territories (95%), followed by Newfoundland and Labrador (87%) and New Brunswick (86%). The intended destinations with the lowest shares of PGWPs reporting earnings in 2018 were Ontario (72%), British Columbia (75%) and Nova Scotia (76%). Some of the lowest shares of PGWP holders reporting earnings therefore occurred for destinations with the largest shares of PGWP holders, namely Ontario, British Columbia and Quebec.


Table 2
Percentage of valid post-graduation work permit holders with T4 earnings, tax years 2008 to 2018
Table summary
This table displays the results of Percentage of valid post-graduation work permit holders with T4 earnings Tax year, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017 and 2018, calculated using percent and number units of measure (appearing as column headers).
Tax year
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
percent
Sex
Male 77 73 70 69 73 75 76 76 75 75 75
Female 79 73 68 66 68 69 71 71 71 73 73
Age group in the tax year
Younger than 25 78 72 69 69 73 73 75 75 75 76 73
25 to 34 79 74 69 67 70 72 73 73 73 73 75
35 and older 75 71 68 68 69 71 72 72 74 77 81
Top source country (2018 PGWP ranking)
India 86 84 83 84 87 87 87 87 86 84 75
China 73 67 61 57 58 60 61 61 61 60 62
France 82 72 72 71 70 67 69 71 72 74 76
South Korea 72 65 58 58 62 65 69 71 72 76 80
Brazil 74 73 69 73 65 68 76 78 84 89 91
Nigeria 94 88 81 81 80 83 86 90 92 94 95
Iran 80 80 79 80 80 82 78 78 80 83 86
Vietnam 87 80 68 67 68 73 79 81 84 83 88
United States 82 74 68 63 63 63 61 62 62 66 67
Pakistan 86 78 78 77 83 83 83 84 83 85 86
Other countries 81 76 73 70 71 71 74 75 75 78 82
Intended destination of PGWP
Newfoundland and Labrador 81 83 75 72 75 76 73 65 55 77 87
Prince Edward Island 88 88 81 70 78 67 63 64 48 Note ...: not applicable 82
Nova Scotia 79 73 69 67 63 64 62 57 49 73 76
New Brunswick 84 76 72 69 70 75 75 78 70 85 86
Quebec 74 70 68 67 69 67 67 62 59 67 78
Ontario 75 71 67 67 70 72 74 70 64 73 72
Manitoba 82 74 74 72 78 79 78 69 61 89 81
Saskatchewan 87 81 79 85 87 85 79 63 56 80 82
Alberta 90 86 80 78 82 84 82 75 71 82 80
British Columbia 80 73 67 61 63 66 66 62 58 68 75
Territories Note ...: not applicable Note ...: not applicable Note ...: not applicable 91 Note ...: not applicable 91 87 71 Note ...: not applicable Note ...: not applicable 95
Not stated Note ...: not applicable Note ...: not applicable Note ...: not applicable Note ...: not applicable Note ...: not applicable 75 76 78 76 75 74
Total 78 73 69 68 71 72 74 74 74 74 74
number
Total number of PGWP holders with T4 earnings 10,300 20,300 28,900 40,300 50,500 64,900 77,800 83,500 92,900 104,700 135,100

Median earnings of post-graduation work permit holders have risen over the past decade

While Table 2 quantifies the percentage of PGWP holders who have employment income in a given tax year, Table 3 shows the median annual earnings of those who have employment income. Changes in earnings levels over time can provide an indication of changes in intensity of labour market engagement by PGWP holders who have paid employment. Over the past decade, the median earnings received by PGWP holders with employment income rose from $14,500 (in 2018 dollars) in 2008 to $26,800 in 2018, indicative of increased labour market engagement (e.g., hours worked during the tax year).

Earnings of male PGWP holders were consistently higher than those of their female counterparts. While earnings of PGWP holders were generally highest at the older end of the age spectrum, earnings growth was stronger for the younger age groups from 2008 to 2018.

In 2018, PGWP holders from Iran had the highest median earnings, followed by those from Nigeria and Pakistan. In contrast, earnings were lowest for those from China, followed by those from the United States and Vietnam. Over the period, earnings increased most among those from the United States, France and South Korea.

In 2018, the highest median earnings were reported by PGWP holders working in the territories, followed by those employed in Alberta and Saskatchewan. The lowest earnings were reported by those employed in Quebec, Nova Scotia and Prince Edward Island. From 2008 to 2018, growth in earnings was highest among PGWP holders employed in Newfoundland and Labrador, followed by Quebec and New Brunswick. Growth was lowest among those working in Alberta, Prince Edward Island and Manitoba.

In 2018, median earnings were highest for those PGWP holders employed in mining and oil and gas extraction, utilities, and public administration. In contrast, the lowest earnings amounts were reported by those employed in educational services; administrative and support, waste management and remediation services; accommodation and food services; and retail trade. These differences across sectors are consistent with the general pattern among all Canadian workers. Earnings growth over the 2008-to-2018 period was highest for those PGWP holders working in accommodation and food services, retail trade, real estate and rental and leasing, and educational services.


Table 3
Median earnings among valid post-graduation work permit holders with positive T4 earnings, tax years 2008 to 2018
Table summary
This table displays the results of Median earnings among valid post-graduation work permit holders with positive T4 earnings Tax year, 2008, 2010, 2012, 2014, 2016 and 2018, calculated using 2018 constant dollars units of measure (appearing as column headers).
Tax year
2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018
2018 constant dollars
Sex
Male 15,900 20,000 23,000 25,200 29,300 28,100
Female 13,500 17,100 19,400 20,300 23,700 25,300
Age at tax year
Younger than 25 12,800 14,100 16,600 18,600 21,800 23,500
25 to 34 16,000 21,600 24,300 25,600 29,000 28,800
35 and older 17,300 20,800 24,000 25,200 27,300 29,000
Top source countries (2018 PGWP ranking)
India 16,100 18,000 22,100 26,300 31,600 27,500
China 13,800 17,400 18,200 18,900 21,900 23,100
France 13,800 18,400 23,600 22,400 22,600 27,100
South Korea 13,500 18,700 21,400 20,600 24,500 25,700
Brazil 17,600 21,600 26,600 25,000 25,300 28,800
Nigeria 19,600 22,300 25,200 24,700 27,900 31,900
Iran 22,000 18,800 24,000 22,700 26,900 32,100
Vietnam 17,400 23,700 25,000 21,000 23,900 25,300
United States 11,500 17,400 18,500 19,800 21,800 24,200
Pakistan 17,300 28,100 28,900 27,800 32,400 31,300
Other 15,400 19,500 22,600 22,600 24,700 27,500
Province of employment in the tax yearTable 3 Note 1
Newfoundland and Labrador 10,100 15,700 19,000 21,900 27,300 26,300
Prince Edward Island 15,300 25,600 17,200 19,900 21,400 24,000
Nova Scotia 12,400 17,100 17,400 19,800 26,600 23,400
New Brunswick 13,400 20,200 23,000 24,800 28,800 27,800
Quebec 10,600 13,500 17,400 16,500 19,400 23,200
Ontario 13,300 19,200 20,000 21,400 26,000 26,000
Manitoba 15,700 19,300 15,400 23,500 24,100 25,200
Saskatchewan 16,900 14,300 26,100 32,300 32,300 30,400
Alberta 24,000 27,300 30,600 30,100 33,900 32,000
British Columbia 14,700 18,200 20,600 21,700 27,800 28,400
Industry of employment in the tax yearTable 3 Note 2
Agriculture, forestry, fishing and hunting 15,800 17,600 19,400 23,200 29,600 29,900
Mining and oil and gas extraction 45,900 52,400 52,800 49,300 41,400 47,600
Utilities 33,600 45,000 44,800 47,100 48,900 42,300
Construction 22,900 24,500 27,000 28,900 32,000 32,000
Manufacturing 22,000 29,900 30,600 31,200 36,200 33,600
Wholesale trade 15,900 22,000 25,800 27,300 31,000 30,500
Retail trade 9,100 13,700 16,900 19,200 21,700 22,800
Transportation and warehousing 17,300 21,800 26,300 31,000 32,700 31,700
Information and cultural industries 19,700 25,500 27,100 30,300 37,300 32,800
Finance and insurance 20,900 29,500 32,100 33,300 36,000 35,500
Real estate and rental and leasing 12,400 20,500 22,000 23,300 27,400 29,000
Professional, scientific, and technical services 22,200 28,100 32,600 32,400 34,900 33,900
Management of companies and enterprises 20,100 25,800 29,800 29,900 32,600 31,000
Administrative and support, waste management and remediation services 11,900 14,800 15,300 17,200 20,500 22,100
Education services 8,600 10,900 11,100 12,300 15,300 19,500
Health care and social assistance 17,500 25,400 26,100 27,500 31,000 30,300
Arts, entertainment and recreation 11,200 13,000 18,000 19,200 20,500 23,000
Accommodation and food services 8,800 11,000 15,900 17,000 20,100 22,200
Other services (except public administration) 14,300 17,300 19,000 20,900 24,300 25,900
Public administration 25,300 35,000 39,000 41,000 46,200 40,000
Overall 14,500 18,700 21,500 23,100 26,800 26,800

The number of post-graduation work permit holders transitioning to permanent residency is increasing, particularly among those with a study permit at the college or master’s degree level

A previous study shows that among international students who arrived in the 2000s, about 3 in 10 became landed immigrants within 10 years of their arrival (Choi, Crossman and Hou 2021). It is expected the PGWP holders would have high transition rates, because Canadian work experience would improve their chance to be selected as economic immigrants, and because they may have stronger motivation to seek permanent residency than those who did not apply for a PGWP.

The overall cumulative share of transitions of PGWP holders to permanent residents by years since PGWP signing year (to immigration year) for PGWPs signed from 2008 to 2016 are shown in Chart 2. Overall, the rate of transition to permanent residency among PGWP holders remained consistently high across cohorts of PGWPs signed from 2008 to 2016. For cohorts from 2008 to 2012, almost three-quarters of PGWP holders became permanent residents within five years of having signed their PGWP, with little increase in this share in subsequent years. For the 2008 cohort, by the 10th year, 73% had become permanent residents.Note 

Chart 2 Cumulative rate of transition to permanent residency among post-graduation work permit holders, by years since signing year (to immigration year), post-graduation work permits signed from 2008 to 2016

Data table for Chart 2 
Data table Chart 2
Table summary
This table displays the results of Data table Chart 2. The information is grouped by PGWP signed in...
Overall (appearing as row headers), Years since post-graduation work permit signed, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10, calculated using percent units of measure (appearing as column headers).
  Years since post-graduation work permit signed
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
percent
2008 Cohort 16 36 53 64 68 70 71 72 72 73
2010 Cohort 7 29 50 64 68 70 71 72 Note ...: not applicable Note ...: not applicable
2012 Cohort 8 33 54 67 73 75 Note ...: not applicable Note ...: not applicable Note ...: not applicable Note ...: not applicable
2014 Cohort 7 22 53 70 Note ...: not applicable Note ...: not applicable Note ...: not applicable Note ...: not applicable Note ...: not applicable Note ...: not applicable
2016 Cohort 8 34 Note ...: not applicable Note ...: not applicable Note ...: not applicable Note ...: not applicable Note ...: not applicable Note ...: not applicable Note ...: not applicable Note ...: not applicable

Differences in the transition to permanent residency among PGWP holders were evident by level of study. The cumulative transitions of PGWP holders to permanent residents by selected level of study and by years since PGWP signing year (to immigration year) for PGWPs signed from 2008 to 2016 are shown in Table 4. Generally speaking, when levels of study are compared, the rate of transition to permanent residency appears highest among those who held a study permit at the master’s degree level, followed by those at the college level. For both of these groups, there is also a trend towards increased transition rates across cohorts, with more recent cohorts having higher rates of transition at similar points in time, relative to earlier cohorts. While those who held a study permit at the bachelor’s degree level had the next highest rates of transition to permanent residency, these shares were more stable across cohorts. PGWP holders who held a study permit at the doctoral level had the lowest transition rates relative to other levels of study. However, some of the more recent cohorts had higher transition rates at similar points in time relative to earlier cohorts.


Table 4
Cumulative rate of transition to permanent residency among post-graduation work permit holders by selected level of study at last study permit, by years since signing year, post-graduation work permits signed from 2008 to 2016
Table summary
This table displays the results of Cumulative rate of transition to permanent residency among post-graduation work permit holders by selected level of study at last study permit. The information is grouped by PGWP signing year (appearing as row headers), Years since PGWP signing year, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10, calculated using percent units of measure (appearing as column headers).
PGWP signing year Years since PGWP signing year
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
percent
Non-university postsecondary programs
2008 12 31 49 62 67 70 72 72 73 74
2009 7 24 47 57 64 66 68 68 69 Note ...: not applicable
2010 4 30 50 66 70 72 74 74 Note ...: not applicable Note ...: not applicable
2011 4 34 62 72 77 79 80 Note ...: not applicable Note ...: not applicable Note ...: not applicable
2012 5 32 57 72 78 81 Note ...: not applicable Note ...: not applicable Note ...: not applicable Note ...: not applicable
2013 5 21 44 67 76 Note ...: not applicable Note ...: not applicable Note ...: not applicable Note ...: not applicable Note ...: not applicable
2014 3 16 52 74 Note ...: not applicable Note ...: not applicable Note ...: not applicable Note ...: not applicable Note ...: not applicable Note ...: not applicable
2015 4 29 61 Note ...: not applicable Note ...: not applicable Note ...: not applicable Note ...: not applicable Note ...: not applicable Note ...: not applicable Note ...: not applicable
2016 7 33 Note ...: not applicable Note ...: not applicable Note ...: not applicable Note ...: not applicable Note ...: not applicable Note ...: not applicable Note ...: not applicable Note ...: not applicable
University—bachelor's degree
2008 15 36 53 63 67 69 70 71 71 72
2009 9 26 47 58 64 66 67 68 68 Note ...: not applicable
2010 6 26 46 60 65 67 68 69 Note ...: not applicable Note ...: not applicable
2011 7 26 48 59 64 66 67 Note ...: not applicable Note ...: not applicable Note ...: not applicable
2012 8 27 44 58 64 66 Note ...: not applicable Note ...: not applicable Note ...: not applicable Note ...: not applicable
2013 5 20 38 55 62 Note ...: not applicable Note ...: not applicable Note ...: not applicable Note ...: not applicable Note ...: not applicable
2014 6 17 45 60 Note ...: not applicable Note ...: not applicable Note ...: not applicable Note ...: not applicable Note ...: not applicable Note ...: not applicable
2015 5 25 49 Note ...: not applicable Note ...: not applicable Note ...: not applicable Note ...: not applicable Note ...: not applicable Note ...: not applicable Note ...: not applicable
2016 6 29 Note ...: not applicable Note ...: not applicable Note ...: not applicable Note ...: not applicable Note ...: not applicable Note ...: not applicable Note ...: not applicable Note ...: not applicable
University—master's degree
2008 25 46 62 71 73 75 76 76 76 77
2009 17 34 55 64 69 70 71 72 72 Note ...: not applicable
2010 11 37 60 71 74 75 75 76 Note ...: not applicable Note ...: not applicable
2011 15 43 66 74 77 78 79 Note ...: not applicable Note ...: not applicable Note ...: not applicable
2012 17 46 67 75 78 79 Note ...: not applicable Note ...: not applicable Note ...: not applicable Note ...: not applicable
2013 13 43 65 75 79 Note ...: not applicable Note ...: not applicable Note ...: not applicable Note ...: not applicable Note ...: not applicable
2014 15 40 69 80 Note ...: not applicable Note ...: not applicable Note ...: not applicable Note ...: not applicable Note ...: not applicable Note ...: not applicable
2015 11 48 74 Note ...: not applicable Note ...: not applicable Note ...: not applicable Note ...: not applicable Note ...: not applicable Note ...: not applicable Note ...: not applicable
2016 16 51 Note ...: not applicable Note ...: not applicable Note ...: not applicable Note ...: not applicable Note ...: not applicable Note ...: not applicable Note ...: not applicable Note ...: not applicable
University—doctoral degree
2008 21 32 42 49 52 55 56 57 58 58
2009 29 42 50 56 60 60 61 63 63 Note ...: not applicable
2010 16 34 51 59 63 64 66 67 Note ...: not applicable Note ...: not applicable
2011 20 37 47 56 59 60 61 Note ...: not applicable Note ...: not applicable Note ...: not applicable
2012 22 44 57 67 68 70 Note ...: not applicable Note ...: not applicable Note ...: not applicable Note ...: not applicable
2013 20 44 57 67 70 Note ...: not applicable Note ...: not applicable Note ...: not applicable Note ...: not applicable Note ...: not applicable
2014 21 41 55 64 Note ...: not applicable Note ...: not applicable Note ...: not applicable Note ...: not applicable Note ...: not applicable Note ...: not applicable
2015 15 38 63 Note ...: not applicable Note ...: not applicable Note ...: not applicable Note ...: not applicable Note ...: not applicable Note ...: not applicable Note ...: not applicable
2016 12 42 Note ...: not applicable Note ...: not applicable Note ...: not applicable Note ...: not applicable Note ...: not applicable Note ...: not applicable Note ...: not applicable Note ...: not applicable

Conclusion

This study examined the extent to which international students are engaged in the labour market through the Post-Graduation Work Permit Program (PGWPP) after having held a study permit at the postsecondary level (yet before immigration). The number of international students participating in the PGWPP after their studies has increased markedly, driven by increasing numbers of international students in Canada and larger shares of international student graduates obtaining a post-graduation work permit (PGWP).

The labour market participation of PGWP holders (defined as the share of PGWP holders with positive T4 earnings) remained fairly stable from 2008 to 2018, with roughly three-quarters of PGWP holders reporting T4 earnings annually. With the rise in the number of PGWP holders, the number of PGWP holders with T4 earnings grew more than 13 times, from 10,300 in 2008 to 135,100 in 2018. Median annual earnings received by PGWP holders with employment income also rose over this period, from $14,500 (in 2018 dollars) in 2008 to $26,800 in 2018.

Almost three-quarters of all PGWP holders became permanent residents within five years of having obtained their PGWP. When levels of study are compared, the rates of transition to permanent residency were highest among those who held a study permit for college- and master’s-level programs. Both of these education groups showed a trend towards increased transition rates across cohorts, with more recent cohorts having higher rates of transition at similar points in time relative to earlier cohorts.

In sum, increasing numbers of international students have meant that increasing numbers of PGWP holders have engaged in the Canadian labour market over the past decade. Through participation in the PGWPP and subsequent transition to permanent residency for many, international students provided a growing source of labour for the Canadian labour market that extended well beyond their periods of study.

References

Choi, Y., E. Crossman, and F. Hou. 2021. “International students as a source of labour supply: Transition to permanent residence.” Economic and Social Reports 1 (6): 1–10. Statistics Canada Catalogue no. 36-28-0001.

CIC (Citizenship and Immigration Canada). 2010. Evaluation of the International Student Program. Evaluation Division. Ottawa: CIC.

Crossman, E., Y. Choi, and F. Hou. 2021. “International students as a source of labour supply: The growing number of international students and their changing sociodemographic characteristics.” Economic and Social Reports 1 (7): 1–11. Statistics Canada Catalogue no. 36-28-0001.

Government of Canada. 2014. “Immigration and Refugee Protection Act: Regulations Amending the Immigration and Refugee Protection Regulations.” Canada Gazette Part II, 148 (4). Available at: https://gazette.gc.ca/rp-pr/p2/2014/2014-02-12/html/sor-dors14-eng.html.

Israel, E., and J. Batalova. 2021. International Students in the United States. Migration Policy Institute. Available at: https://www.migrationpolicy.org/article/international-students-united-states-2020.

OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development). 2020. International Migration Outlook 2020. Paris: OECD Publishing. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1787/ec98f531.

Date modified: