Survey Methodology
Linearization versus bootstrap for variance estimation of the change between Gini indexes
Archived Content
Information identified as archived is provided for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It is not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards and has not been altered or updated since it was archived. Please "contact us" to request a format other than those available.
by Guillaume Chauvet and Camelia GogaNote 1
- Release date: June 21, 2018
Abstract
This paper investigates the linearization and bootstrap variance estimation for the Gini coefficient and the change between Gini indexes at two periods of time. For the one-sample case, we use the influence function linearization approach suggested by Deville (1999), the without-replacement bootstrap suggested by Gross (1980) for simple random sampling without replacement and the with-replacement of primary sampling units described in Rao and Wu (1988) for multistage sampling. To obtain a two-sample variance estimator, we use the linearization technique by means of partial influence functions (Goga, Deville and Ruiz-Gazen, 2009). We also develop an extension of the studied bootstrap procedures for two-dimensional sampling. The two approaches are compared on simulated data.
Key Words: Composite estimator; Horvitz-Thompson estimator; Influence function; Intersection estimator; Replication weights; Two-sample survey; Two-dimensional sampling design; Union estimator; Variance estimation.Table of contents
- Section 1. Introduction
- Section 2. One sample case
- Section 3. Two-sample case
- Section 4. Simulation study
- Section 5. Conclusion
- Acknowledgements
- Appendix
- References
How to cite
Chauvet, G., and Goga, C. (2018). Linearization versus bootstrap for variance estimation of the change between Gini indexes. Survey Methodology, Statistics Canada, Catalogue No. 12-001-X, Vol. 44, No. 1. Paper available at https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/pub/12-001-x/2018001/article/54926-eng.htm.
Note
- Date modified: