Table 9
Reasons why households with a non-municipal water
supply treated their tap water before using it, by province
Archived Content
Information identified as archived is provided for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It is not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards and has not been altered or updated since it was archived. Please "contact us" to request a format other than those available.
Treated water prior to consumption 1 | Reasons for treating 2 | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
To improve appearance, taste or odour | To remove water treatment chemicals such as chlorine | To soften the water | To remove metals or minerals other than hard water | To remove possible bacterial contamination | Due to a boil water advisory | Because treatment device was already installed or pre-existing | Other reasons | ||
percent | |||||||||
Canada | 49 | 44 | 11 | 31 | 41 | 33 | 5 E | 4 E | 9 |
Newfoundland and Labrador | F | F | F | F | F | F | F | F | F |
Prince Edward Island | 37 | F | F | F | F | F | F | F | F |
Nova Scotia | 51 | 41 | F | 27 E | 45 | 29 | F | F | F |
New Brunswick | 52 | 39 | F | 26 E | 43 | 24 E | F | F | F |
Quebec | 41 | 45 | F | 42 | 43 | 31 E | F | F | F |
Ontario | 55 | 39 | 7 E | 32 | 37 | 36 | F | F | 9 E |
Manitoba | 54 | 53 E | F | 37 E | F | F | F | F | F |
Saskatchewan | F | F | F | F | F | F | F | F | F |
Alberta | 47 | 70 | F | F | F | F | F | F | F |
British Columbia | 52 | 38 E | F | F | 41 E | 43 E | F | F | F |
As a percentage of households with a non-municipal
water supply reporting that tap water was used.
Relates only to households reporting that tap
water was used.
Source(s):
Statistics Canada, Environment Accounts and Statistics Division, CANSIM
table 153-0066.
- Date modified: