Analysis
Filter results by
Search HelpKeyword(s)
Year of publication
Author(s)
Results
All (12)
All (12) (0 to 10 of 12 results)
- Articles and reports: 11-522-X202200100005Description: Sampling variance smoothing is an important topic in small area estimation. In this paper, we propose sampling variance smoothing methods for small area proportion estimation. In particular, we consider the generalized variance function and design effect methods for sampling variance smoothing. We evaluate and compare the smoothed sampling variances and small area estimates based on the smoothed variance estimates through analysis of survey data from Statistics Canada. The results from real data analysis indicate that the proposed sampling variance smoothing methods work very well for small area estimation.Release date: 2024-03-25
- Articles and reports: 12-001-X202100200007Description:
In this paper, we consider the Fay-Herriot model for small area estimation. In particular, we are interested in the impact of sampling variance smoothing and modeling on the model-based estimates. We present methods of smoothing and modeling for the sampling variances and apply the proposed models to a real data analysis. Our results indicate that sampling variance smoothing can improve the efficiency and accuracy of the model-based estimator. For sampling variance modeling, the HB models of You (2016) and Sugasawa, Tamae and Kubokawa (2017) perform equally well to improve the direct survey estimates.
Release date: 2022-01-06 - Articles and reports: 11-522-X202100100008Description:
Non-probability samples are being increasingly explored by National Statistical Offices as a complement to probability samples. We consider the scenario where the variable of interest and auxiliary variables are observed in both a probability and non-probability sample. Our objective is to use data from the non-probability sample to improve the efficiency of survey-weighted estimates obtained from the probability sample. Recently, Sakshaug, Wisniowski, Ruiz and Blom (2019) and Wisniowski, Sakshaug, Ruiz and Blom (2020) proposed a Bayesian approach to integrating data from both samples for the estimation of model parameters. In their approach, non-probability sample data are used to determine the prior distribution of model parameters, and the posterior distribution is obtained under the assumption that the probability sampling design is ignorable (or not informative). We extend this Bayesian approach to the prediction of finite population parameters under non-ignorable (or informative) sampling by conditioning on appropriate survey-weighted statistics. We illustrate the properties of our predictor through a simulation study.
Key Words: Bayesian prediction; Gibbs sampling; Non-ignorable sampling; Statistical data integration.
Release date: 2021-10-29 - Articles and reports: 12-001-X201600114540Description:
In this paper, we compare the EBLUP and pseudo-EBLUP estimators for small area estimation under the nested error regression model and three area level model-based estimators using the Fay-Herriot model. We conduct a design-based simulation study to compare the model-based estimators for unit level and area level models under informative and non-informative sampling. In particular, we are interested in the confidence interval coverage rate of the unit level and area level estimators. We also compare the estimators if the model has been misspecified. Our simulation results show that estimators based on the unit level model perform better than those based on the area level. The pseudo-EBLUP estimator is the best among unit level and area level estimators.
Release date: 2016-06-22 - Articles and reports: 12-001-X201600114542Description:
The restricted maximum likelihood (REML) method is generally used to estimate the variance of the random area effect under the Fay-Herriot model (Fay and Herriot 1979) to obtain the empirical best linear unbiased (EBLUP) estimator of a small area mean. When the REML estimate is zero, the weight of the direct sample estimator is zero and the EBLUP becomes a synthetic estimator. This is not often desirable. As a solution to this problem, Li and Lahiri (2011) and Yoshimori and Lahiri (2014) developed adjusted maximum likelihood (ADM) consistent variance estimators which always yield positive variance estimates. Some of the ADM estimators always yield positive estimates but they have a large bias and this affects the estimation of the mean squared error (MSE) of the EBLUP. We propose to use a MIX variance estimator, defined as a combination of the REML and ADM methods. We show that it is unbiased up to the second order and it always yields a positive variance estimate. Furthermore, we propose an MSE estimator under the MIX method and show via a model-based simulation that in many situations, it performs better than other ‘Taylor linearization’ MSE estimators proposed recently.
Release date: 2016-06-22 - 6. On the performance of self benchmarked small area estimators under the Fay-Herriot area level model ArchivedArticles and reports: 12-001-X201300111830Description:
We consider two different self-benchmarking methods for the estimation of small area means based on the Fay-Herriot (FH) area level model: the method of You and Rao (2002) applied to the FH model and the method of Wang, Fuller and Qu (2008) based on augmented models. We derive an estimator of the mean squared prediction error (MSPE) of the You-Rao (YR) estimator of a small area mean that, under the true model, is correct to second-order terms. We report the results of a simulation study on the relative bias of the MSPE estimator of the YR estimator and the MSPE estimator of the Wang, Fuller and Qu (WFQ) estimator obtained under an augmented model. We also study the MSPE and the estimators of MSPE for the YR and WFQ estimators obtained under a misspecified model.
Release date: 2013-06-28 - 7. Hierarchical Bayes small area estimation under a spatial model with application to health survey data ArchivedArticles and reports: 12-001-X201100111445Description:
In this paper we study small area estimation using area level models. We first consider the Fay-Herriot model (Fay and Herriot 1979) for the case of smoothed known sampling variances and the You-Chapman model (You and Chapman 2006) for the case of sampling variance modeling. Then we consider hierarchical Bayes (HB) spatial models that extend the Fay-Herriot and You-Chapman models by capturing both the geographically unstructured heterogeneity and spatial correlation effects among areas for local smoothing. The proposed models are implemented using the Gibbs sampling method for fully Bayesian inference. We apply the proposed models to the analysis of health survey data and make comparisons among the HB model-based estimates and direct design-based estimates. Our results have shown that the HB model-based estimates perform much better than the direct estimates. In addition, the proposed area level spatial models achieve smaller CVs than the Fay-Herriot and You-Chapman models, particularly for the areas with three or more neighbouring areas. Bayesian model comparison and model fit analysis are also presented.
Release date: 2011-06-29 - 8. An integrated modeling approach to unemployment rate estimation for sub-provincial areas of Canada ArchivedArticles and reports: 12-001-X200800110614Geography: CanadaDescription:
The Canadian Labour Force Survey (LFS) produces monthly estimates of the unemployment rate at national and provincial levels. The LFS also releases unemployment estimates for sub-provincial areas such as Census Metropolitan Areas (CMAs) and Urban Centers (UCs). However, for some sub-provincial areas, the direct estimates are not reliable since the sample size in some areas is quite small. The small area estimation in LFS concerns estimation of unemployment rates for local sub-provincial areas such as CMA/UCs using small area models. In this paper, we will discuss various models including the Fay-Herriot model and cross-sectional and time series models. In particular, an integrated non-linear mixed effects model will be proposed under the hierarchical Bayes (HB) framework for the LFS unemployment rate estimation. Monthly Employment Insurance (EI) beneficiary data at the CMA/UC level are used as auxiliary covariates in the model. A HB approach with the Gibbs sampling method is used to obtain the estimates of posterior means and posterior variances of the CMA/UC level unemployment rates. The proposed HB model leads to reliable model-based estimates in terms of CV reduction. Model fit analysis and comparison of the model-based estimates with the direct estimates are presented in the paper.
Release date: 2008-06-26 - Articles and reports: 12-001-X20060019263Description:
In small area estimation, area level models such as the Fay - Herriot model (Fay and Herriot 1979) are widely used to obtain efficient model-based estimators for small areas. The sampling error variances are customarily assumed to be known in the model. In this paper we consider the situation where the sampling error variances are estimated individually by direct estimators. A full hierarchical Bayes (HB) model is constructed for the direct survey estimators and the sampling error variances estimators. The Gibbs sampling method is employed to obtain the small area HB estimators. The proposed HB approach automatically takes account of the extra uncertainty of estimating the sampling error variances, especially when the area-specific sample sizes are small. We compare the proposed HB model with the Fay - Herriot model through analysis of two survey data sets. Our results have shown that the proposed HB estimators perform quite well compared to the direct estimates. We also discussed the problem of priors on the variance components.
Release date: 2006-07-20 - 10. Estimating fixed effects and variance components in a random intercept model using survey data ArchivedArticles and reports: 11-522-X20030017705Description:
This paper develops an iterative weighted estimating equations (IWEE) to estimate the fixed effects and the variance components in the random intercept model using sampling weights.
Release date: 2005-01-26
Stats in brief (0)
Stats in brief (0) (0 results)
No content available at this time.
Articles and reports (12)
Articles and reports (12) (0 to 10 of 12 results)
- Articles and reports: 11-522-X202200100005Description: Sampling variance smoothing is an important topic in small area estimation. In this paper, we propose sampling variance smoothing methods for small area proportion estimation. In particular, we consider the generalized variance function and design effect methods for sampling variance smoothing. We evaluate and compare the smoothed sampling variances and small area estimates based on the smoothed variance estimates through analysis of survey data from Statistics Canada. The results from real data analysis indicate that the proposed sampling variance smoothing methods work very well for small area estimation.Release date: 2024-03-25
- Articles and reports: 12-001-X202100200007Description:
In this paper, we consider the Fay-Herriot model for small area estimation. In particular, we are interested in the impact of sampling variance smoothing and modeling on the model-based estimates. We present methods of smoothing and modeling for the sampling variances and apply the proposed models to a real data analysis. Our results indicate that sampling variance smoothing can improve the efficiency and accuracy of the model-based estimator. For sampling variance modeling, the HB models of You (2016) and Sugasawa, Tamae and Kubokawa (2017) perform equally well to improve the direct survey estimates.
Release date: 2022-01-06 - Articles and reports: 11-522-X202100100008Description:
Non-probability samples are being increasingly explored by National Statistical Offices as a complement to probability samples. We consider the scenario where the variable of interest and auxiliary variables are observed in both a probability and non-probability sample. Our objective is to use data from the non-probability sample to improve the efficiency of survey-weighted estimates obtained from the probability sample. Recently, Sakshaug, Wisniowski, Ruiz and Blom (2019) and Wisniowski, Sakshaug, Ruiz and Blom (2020) proposed a Bayesian approach to integrating data from both samples for the estimation of model parameters. In their approach, non-probability sample data are used to determine the prior distribution of model parameters, and the posterior distribution is obtained under the assumption that the probability sampling design is ignorable (or not informative). We extend this Bayesian approach to the prediction of finite population parameters under non-ignorable (or informative) sampling by conditioning on appropriate survey-weighted statistics. We illustrate the properties of our predictor through a simulation study.
Key Words: Bayesian prediction; Gibbs sampling; Non-ignorable sampling; Statistical data integration.
Release date: 2021-10-29 - Articles and reports: 12-001-X201600114540Description:
In this paper, we compare the EBLUP and pseudo-EBLUP estimators for small area estimation under the nested error regression model and three area level model-based estimators using the Fay-Herriot model. We conduct a design-based simulation study to compare the model-based estimators for unit level and area level models under informative and non-informative sampling. In particular, we are interested in the confidence interval coverage rate of the unit level and area level estimators. We also compare the estimators if the model has been misspecified. Our simulation results show that estimators based on the unit level model perform better than those based on the area level. The pseudo-EBLUP estimator is the best among unit level and area level estimators.
Release date: 2016-06-22 - Articles and reports: 12-001-X201600114542Description:
The restricted maximum likelihood (REML) method is generally used to estimate the variance of the random area effect under the Fay-Herriot model (Fay and Herriot 1979) to obtain the empirical best linear unbiased (EBLUP) estimator of a small area mean. When the REML estimate is zero, the weight of the direct sample estimator is zero and the EBLUP becomes a synthetic estimator. This is not often desirable. As a solution to this problem, Li and Lahiri (2011) and Yoshimori and Lahiri (2014) developed adjusted maximum likelihood (ADM) consistent variance estimators which always yield positive variance estimates. Some of the ADM estimators always yield positive estimates but they have a large bias and this affects the estimation of the mean squared error (MSE) of the EBLUP. We propose to use a MIX variance estimator, defined as a combination of the REML and ADM methods. We show that it is unbiased up to the second order and it always yields a positive variance estimate. Furthermore, we propose an MSE estimator under the MIX method and show via a model-based simulation that in many situations, it performs better than other ‘Taylor linearization’ MSE estimators proposed recently.
Release date: 2016-06-22 - 6. On the performance of self benchmarked small area estimators under the Fay-Herriot area level model ArchivedArticles and reports: 12-001-X201300111830Description:
We consider two different self-benchmarking methods for the estimation of small area means based on the Fay-Herriot (FH) area level model: the method of You and Rao (2002) applied to the FH model and the method of Wang, Fuller and Qu (2008) based on augmented models. We derive an estimator of the mean squared prediction error (MSPE) of the You-Rao (YR) estimator of a small area mean that, under the true model, is correct to second-order terms. We report the results of a simulation study on the relative bias of the MSPE estimator of the YR estimator and the MSPE estimator of the Wang, Fuller and Qu (WFQ) estimator obtained under an augmented model. We also study the MSPE and the estimators of MSPE for the YR and WFQ estimators obtained under a misspecified model.
Release date: 2013-06-28 - 7. Hierarchical Bayes small area estimation under a spatial model with application to health survey data ArchivedArticles and reports: 12-001-X201100111445Description:
In this paper we study small area estimation using area level models. We first consider the Fay-Herriot model (Fay and Herriot 1979) for the case of smoothed known sampling variances and the You-Chapman model (You and Chapman 2006) for the case of sampling variance modeling. Then we consider hierarchical Bayes (HB) spatial models that extend the Fay-Herriot and You-Chapman models by capturing both the geographically unstructured heterogeneity and spatial correlation effects among areas for local smoothing. The proposed models are implemented using the Gibbs sampling method for fully Bayesian inference. We apply the proposed models to the analysis of health survey data and make comparisons among the HB model-based estimates and direct design-based estimates. Our results have shown that the HB model-based estimates perform much better than the direct estimates. In addition, the proposed area level spatial models achieve smaller CVs than the Fay-Herriot and You-Chapman models, particularly for the areas with three or more neighbouring areas. Bayesian model comparison and model fit analysis are also presented.
Release date: 2011-06-29 - 8. An integrated modeling approach to unemployment rate estimation for sub-provincial areas of Canada ArchivedArticles and reports: 12-001-X200800110614Geography: CanadaDescription:
The Canadian Labour Force Survey (LFS) produces monthly estimates of the unemployment rate at national and provincial levels. The LFS also releases unemployment estimates for sub-provincial areas such as Census Metropolitan Areas (CMAs) and Urban Centers (UCs). However, for some sub-provincial areas, the direct estimates are not reliable since the sample size in some areas is quite small. The small area estimation in LFS concerns estimation of unemployment rates for local sub-provincial areas such as CMA/UCs using small area models. In this paper, we will discuss various models including the Fay-Herriot model and cross-sectional and time series models. In particular, an integrated non-linear mixed effects model will be proposed under the hierarchical Bayes (HB) framework for the LFS unemployment rate estimation. Monthly Employment Insurance (EI) beneficiary data at the CMA/UC level are used as auxiliary covariates in the model. A HB approach with the Gibbs sampling method is used to obtain the estimates of posterior means and posterior variances of the CMA/UC level unemployment rates. The proposed HB model leads to reliable model-based estimates in terms of CV reduction. Model fit analysis and comparison of the model-based estimates with the direct estimates are presented in the paper.
Release date: 2008-06-26 - Articles and reports: 12-001-X20060019263Description:
In small area estimation, area level models such as the Fay - Herriot model (Fay and Herriot 1979) are widely used to obtain efficient model-based estimators for small areas. The sampling error variances are customarily assumed to be known in the model. In this paper we consider the situation where the sampling error variances are estimated individually by direct estimators. A full hierarchical Bayes (HB) model is constructed for the direct survey estimators and the sampling error variances estimators. The Gibbs sampling method is employed to obtain the small area HB estimators. The proposed HB approach automatically takes account of the extra uncertainty of estimating the sampling error variances, especially when the area-specific sample sizes are small. We compare the proposed HB model with the Fay - Herriot model through analysis of two survey data sets. Our results have shown that the proposed HB estimators perform quite well compared to the direct estimates. We also discussed the problem of priors on the variance components.
Release date: 2006-07-20 - 10. Estimating fixed effects and variance components in a random intercept model using survey data ArchivedArticles and reports: 11-522-X20030017705Description:
This paper develops an iterative weighted estimating equations (IWEE) to estimate the fixed effects and the variance components in the random intercept model using sampling weights.
Release date: 2005-01-26
Journals and periodicals (0)
Journals and periodicals (0) (0 results)
No content available at this time.
- Date modified: