Table 2
Perceptions of neighbourhood disorder, by type of disorder and province, 2004, 2009, and 2014 Table 2
Perceptions of neighbourhood disorder, by type of disorder and province, 2004, 2009, and 2014

Archived Content

Information identified as archived is provided for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It is not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards and has not been altered or updated since it was archived. Please "contact us" to request a format other than those available.

Table 2
Perceptions of neighbourhood disorder, by type of disorder and province, 2004, 2009, and 2014
Table summary
This table displays the results of Perceptions of neighbourhood disorder. The information is grouped by Province (appearing as row headers), 2004, 2009, 2014, Physical, Social and Total, calculated using percent units of measure (appearing as column headers).
Province	2004			2009			2014
	Physical^Note 1	Social^Note 2	Total^Note 3	Physical^Note 1	Social^Note 2	Total^Note 3	Physical^Note 1	Social^Note 2	Total^Note 3
	percent
Newfoundland and Labrador	6^Note ***	16^Note ***	17^Note ***	7^Note ***	18	20^Note ***	10^Note *	21	25
Prince Edward Island	7^Note *^{Note E: Use with caution}	15^Note *	19^Note *	8^Note *^{Note E: Use with caution}	13^Note *	16^Note *	8^Note *	15	21
Nova Scotia	14	21^Note **	25	13	21	25	13	18	24
New Brunswick	8^Note *	20^Note **	22^Note **	9^Note *	21^Note **	24^Note **	8^Note *	14^Note *	19^Note *
Quebec	12^Note *	21	25	13	20	24	12	20^Note *	25^Note *
Ontario	12^Note *	19^Note ***	23^Note ***	12^Note *	18^Note ***	22^Note *	12^Note *	16^Note *	22^Note *
Manitoba	17^Note *	20	26	21^Note ***	22^Note **	31^Note ***	16^Note *	18	25
Saskatchewan	13	20	25	14	19	24	13	19	24
Alberta	15^Note *	22^Note **	27^Note *	15^Note *	21	26	16^Note *	19	26^Note *
British Columbia	16^Note ***	25^Note ***	29^Note ***	15^Note **	23^Note ***	28^Note ***	13	20^Note *	25
Total - Canada's provinces^Note †	13	21^Note **	25^Note **	13	20^Note **	24^Note **	13	18	23
E use with caution Note * significant difference from reference category only (p < 0.05) Return to note * referrer Note significant difference from 2014 only (p < 0.05) Return to note referrer Note * significant difference from reference category (p < 0.05) and 2014 (p < 0.05) Return to note * referrer Note † reference category Return to note † referrer Note 1. Includes all respondents who indicated that vandalism, graffiti, or other damage to property or vehicles or garbage or litter lying around were big or moderate problems. Return to note 1 referrer Note 2. Includes all respondents who indicated that noisy neighbours or loud parties, people hanging around on the streets, people using or dealing drugs, people being drunk or rowdy in public places, or people being attacked due to their skin colour, ethnicity, or religion were big or moderate problems. Return to note 2 referrer Note 3. Includes all respondents who indicated that at least one physical or social disorder was a big or moderate problem in their neighbourhood. Return to note 3 referrer Note: Responses of don't know/not stated are excluded from the calculation of percentages. Source: Statistics Canada, General Social Survey on Victimization, 2004, 2009, 2014.

Date modified:: 2016-03-02

Language selection

Search and menus

Search

Table 2
Perceptions of neighbourhood disorder, by type of disorder and province, 2004, 2009, and 2014 Table 2
Perceptions of neighbourhood disorder, by type of disorder and province, 2004, 2009, and 2014

Archived Content

Table 2Perceptions of neighbourhood disorder, by type of disorder and province, 2004, 2009, and 2014 Table 2Perceptions of neighbourhood disorder, by type of disorder and province, 2004, 2009, and 2014

Archived Content

Note of appreciation

Standards of service to the public

Copyright

Table 2
Perceptions of neighbourhood disorder, by type of disorder and province, 2004, 2009, and 2014 Table 2
Perceptions of neighbourhood disorder, by type of disorder and province, 2004, 2009, and 2014