Canadian Survey on Disability Reports
Workplace accommodations for employees with disabilities in Canada, 2017
by Stuart Morris
Abstract
Workplace accommodations such as flexible work schedules or workstation modifications can play an important role in creating an inclusive and accessible work environment for many employees with disabilities. This fact sheet presents findings from the 2017 Canadian Survey on Disability (CSD) on requirements and access to workplace accommodations for employees with disabilities aged 25 to 64 years. It explores: the different types and number of accommodations commonly required in the workplace; whether those needs were met; and, the reasons why, in some instances, needs for accommodations went unmet. The key findings are:
- Of employees with disabilities aged 25 to 64 years, more than 1 in 3 (37%) required at least one workplace accommodation to be able to work. This represented just over 772,000 Canadians.
- The most commonly required type of workplace accommodations were flexible work arrangements (27%), workstation modifications (15%), and human or technical supports (6%).
- Employees with “more severe” disabilities (62%) were twice as likely to require workplace accommodations compared to those with “less severe” disabilities (29%).
- Of those who required workplace accommodations: 59% had all of their needs met, 19% had some of their needs met, and 21% had none of their needs met.
- The more workplace accommodations required, the less likely all needs were met. Of those who required only one accommodation, 75% had their need met; however, this drops to 36% when they required three or more.
- Of those with at least one unmet need for workplace accommodations: 69% said that they did not make the request for them to their employer or supervisor. Of these, 36% said their employer or supervisor was already aware they needed them.
- Of those with at least one unmet need for workplace accommodations: 25% said they did make a request for them to their employer or supervisor. However, 40% were refused their request.
Types of Workplace Accommodations
Three out of the five top required WPA were related to flexible work arrangements
Workplace accommodations (WPA) such as flexible work schedules, assistive devices, or ergonomic workstations can play an important role for employees with disabilities by helping mitigate some of the barriers they may face in the workplace (e.g., Lindsay et al. 2018, Padkapayeva et al. 2017, Soloveiva et al. 2011). While not all employees with disabilities will require WPA to be able to do their work, a sizeable number do. According to the 2017 CSD, just over 772,000 employees with disabilities aged 25 to 64 years required at least one WPA to be able to work (see Table 1). This represented 37% of employed persons with disabilities in Canada. The most frequently required WPA was flexible work schedules in the form of modified hours or days or reduced work hours (19%), and it was made available or the need was met for 74% of employees who required it. A computer or tablet with specialized software, on the other hand, was one of the least likely WPA to be made available to employees who required it where the need was met in less than half of the cases (45%).
Table 1 start
Type of workplace accommodation | Require | Needs met | |
---|---|---|---|
number | percent | ||
One or more workplace accommodations | 772,110 | 37.3 | Note ...: not applicable |
Modified hours or days or reduced work hours | 393,410 | 19.0 | 73.7 |
Modified or different duties | 278,870 | 13.5 | 66.1 |
Special chair or back support | 232,470 | 11.2 | 61.0 |
Modified or ergonomic workstation | 215,720 | 10.4 | 60.3 |
Working from home | 171,850 | 8.3 | 69.6 |
Computer, laptop or tablet with specialized software | 65,280 | 3.2 | 45.4 |
Human support | 55,280 | 2.7 | 56.6 |
Adapted or accessible parking | 51,440 | 2.5 | 58.0 |
Technical aids | 35,070Note E: Use with caution | 1.7Note E: Use with caution | 44.5Note E: Use with caution |
Accessible elevators | 34,520 | 1.7 | 62.3 |
Handrails, ramps, widened doorways or hallways | 23,690 | 1.1 | 63.4 |
Communication aids | 23,240Note E: Use with caution | 1.1Note E: Use with caution | 41.3Note E: Use with caution |
Adapted washroom | 17,760Note E: Use with caution | 0.9Note E: Use with caution | 74.6 |
Specialized transportation | 12,170Note E: Use with caution | 0.6Note E: Use with caution | 46.8Note E: Use with caution |
Other equipment, help, or work arrangement | 47,960 | 2.3 | 57.6 |
... not applicable E use with caution Notes: Requirements for workplace accommodations are represented as a percentage of the total population of employees with disabilities and employees may require more than one type. A need is met if the workplace accommodation required by employees with disabilities to be able to do their work was also made available to them. Source: Statistics Canada, Canadian Survey on Disability, 2017. |
Table 1 end
Start of text box 1
Text box 1
Global Severity Class
A global severity score was developed for the CSD, which took into account the number of disability types that a person has, the level of difficulty experienced in performing certain tasks, and the frequency of activity limitations. To simplify the concept of severity, four severity classes were established: mild, moderate, severe, and very severe. It is important to understand, however, that the name assigned to each class is simply intended to facilitate use of the severity score and is not a label or judgement concerning the person’s level of disability. In this fact sheet, mild and moderate classes were collapsed into “less severe” and severe and very severe classes were collapsed into “more severe”.
End of text box 1
The severity of employees’ disabilities affects the likelihood of requiring WPA. As can be seen in the top most frequently required WPA presented in Chart 1, employees with “more severe” disabilities were significantly more likely to require them in each instance compared to those with “less severe” disabilities. For example, employees with “more severe” disabilities (29%) were 3.5 times more likely to require modified or different duties compared to those with “less severe” disabilities (8%).
Chart 1 start
Data table for Chart 1
Disability - more severe | Disability - less severe (reference) | |
---|---|---|
percent | ||
Modified hours or days or reduces work hours | 35.4Note * | 13.7 |
Modified or different duties | 29.2Note * | 8.4 |
Modified or ergonometric workstation | 17.5Note * | 8.1 |
Working from home | 14.7Note * | 6.2 |
|
Chart 1 end
Despite variations in requirements by severity of disability, as presented in Chart 1, there were no statistically significant differences found by severity of disability when it comes to percentage with needs met for WPA. The exception to this was “working from home”. In this instance, employees with “more severe” disabilities (61%) were less likely to have their need met compared to employees with “less severe” disabilities (76%).
Start of text box 2
Text box 2
Defining level of needs met for workplace accommodations
A ‘need’ is considered ‘met’ if the WPA required by employees with disabilities to be able to do their job was made available to them. Since employees vary in terms of the number of WPA they required as well as how many of those were actually made available to them, a three level classification system was developed for “needs met”. This classification is based on questions EMO_Q05 (Because of your condition, do you require any of the following to be able to work…?) and EMO_Q10 (Which of the following have been made available to you…?), where each lists the same 15 WPA options.
Provided that at least one WPA was required, respondents were classified into one of three levels of needs met. Respondents were classified as having “all of their needs met” if all required WPA options selected in EMO_Q05 were also all selected as being made available to them in EMO_Q10. Respondents were classified as having “some of their needs met” if some, but not all, of the required WPA options selected in EMO_Q05 were selected as being made available to them in EMO_Q10. To be eligible for this classification, respondents needed to have selected at least two required WPA in EMO_Q05. And finally, respondents were classified as having “none of their needs met” if none of the 15 WPA options selected as required in EMO_Q05 were selected as being made available to them in EMO_Q10.
End of text box 2
Employees were almost twice as likely to have no WPA made available to them for human or technical supports (44%) compared to flexible work arrangements (23%)
As a groupNote , the most commonly required WPA were flexible work arrangements (27%), workstation modifications (15%), and human or technical supports (6%) – see Table 2. When it comes to flexible work arrangements: 69% had all of their needs met, 8% had some of their needs met, and 23% had none of their needs met. Women and those with “more severe” disabilities were more likely to require flexible work arrangements relative to their counterparts. However, in terms of level of needs met, there were no statistically significant differences by sex or severity of disability for either “none” or “all” of their needs met relative to their counterparts. Women and those with “more severe” disabilities were, however, more likely to have “some” of their needs met relative to their counterparts.
Table 2 start
Grouped workplace accommodations | Require | Level of needs met | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
All | Some | None | ||
percent | ||||
Flexible work arrangements | ||||
Total - aged 25 to 64 years | 27.1 | 68.8 | 7.7 | 23.2 |
Sex | ||||
Men (reference) | 22.7 | 69.9 | 5.0Note E: Use with caution | 24.6 |
Women | 31.0Note * | 68.2 | 9.5Note * | 22.3 |
Severity of disability | ||||
Less severe (reference) | 20.1 | 71.8 | 3.9Note E: Use with caution | 24.0 |
More severe | 48.5Note * | 65.1 | 12.6Note * | 22.2 |
Workstation modifications | ||||
Total - aged 25 to 64 years | 14.8 | 57.1 | 6.3Note E: Use with caution | 36.5 |
Sex | ||||
Men (reference) | 10.3 | 58.6 | Note F: too unreliable to be published | 37.4 |
Women | 18.7Note * | 56.3 | 7.5Note E: Use with caution | 36.1 |
Severity of disability | ||||
Less severe (reference) | 11.4 | 60.9 | 5.7Note E: Use with caution | 33.4 |
More severe | 25.3Note * | 51.9 | 7.2Note E: Use with caution | 40.8 |
Human or technical supports | ||||
Total - aged 25 to 64 years | 6.1 | 49.9 | 5.6Note E: Use with caution | 43.8 |
E use with caution F too unreliable to be published
Flexible work arrangements includes: a) modified or different duties, b) working from home, and/or c) modified hours or days or reduced work hours. Workstation modifications includes: a) modified or ergonomic workstation and/or b) special chair or back support. Human or technical support includes: a) human support such as reader or sign language interpreter, b) technical aids such as infrared system or portable note-taker, c) computer, laptop or tablet with specialized software or other adaptations, and/or d) communication aids such as Braille or recording equipment. Source: Statistics Canada, Canadian Survey on Disability, 2017. |
Table 2 end
When it comes to workstation modifications: 57% had all of their needs met, 6%E had some of their needs met, and 37% had none of their needs met. Women and those with “more severe” disabilities were more likely to require workstation modifications relative to their counterparts. However no statistically significant differences were found with regards to their level of needs being met.
And finally, in the case of WPA related to human or technical supportsNote : 50% had all of their needs met, 6%E had some of their needs met, and 44% had none of their needs met.
Number of Workplace Accommodations
Of employees who required WPA: 45% required one, 28% required two and 27% required three or more
In addition to requiring different types of WPA, employees with disabilities also varied in terms of the number of WPA they required to be able to do their job. Employees were more likely to require only one WPA if they: a) were men, b) had a “less severe” disability, c) had just one disability type, or d) were in trades and manufacturing or sales and customer service occupations (see Table 3). Age did not have a significant effect, with requirements for one, two, or three or more WPA being similarly distributed for younger (25 to 44 years) and older (45 to 64 years) employees. Women were more likely to require three or more WPA as were those with “more severe” or four or more disability types relative to their respective counterparts.
Table 3 start
Select characteristics | Require | ||
---|---|---|---|
One | Two | Three or more | |
percent | |||
Total - aged 25 to 64 years | 44.9 | 27.9 | 27.2 |
25 to 44 years (reference) | 45.6 | 28.0 | 26.4 |
45 to 64 years | 44.3 | 27.9 | 27.8 |
Sex | |||
Men (reference) | 51.8 | 25.8 | 22.4 |
Women | 40.4Note * | 29.3 | 30.3Note * |
Severity of disability | |||
Less severe (reference) | 52.3 | 28.1 | 19.6 |
More severe | 34.1Note * | 27.7 | 38.2Note * |
Number of disability types | |||
1 (reference) | 56.3 | 27.2 | 16.5 |
2 or 3 | 49.4 | 28.1 | 22.5 |
4 or more | 30.0Note * | 28.3 | 41.7Note * |
Occupation | |||
Management and finance | 37.9Note * | 32.5Note * | 29.6 |
Professional occupations in applied sciences, health, education, law, and sport | 41.0Note * | 28.6 | 30.4 |
Sales and customer service | 50.4 | 26.8 | 22.8 |
Trades, transportation, natural resources, manufacturing, utilities, and related (reference) | 57.7 | 20.6Note E: Use with caution | 21.7Note E: Use with caution |
E use with caution
Source: Statistics Canada, Canadian Survey on Disability, 2017. |
Table 3 end
Of employees who required two or more WPA, eight in ten had at least some of their needs met
The finding that certain subgroups of employees with disabilities were likely to require more WPA compared to their counterparts is important because, as can be seen in Chart 2, the number of WPA impacted the likelihood of having all their needs met. When looking at the overall picture of those who required at least one WPA: 59% had all of their needs met, 19% had some of their needs met, and 21% had none of their needs met. However, when broken down by the actual number of WPA required by employees, the percent who had all of their needs met goes down from 75% for those with one need, to 57% for those with two needs, and to 36% for those with three or more needs. No statistically significant differences were found among the percent of employees who had none of their needs met, which remained somewhat stable at around 20% - regardless of the number of WPA they required.
Chart 2 start
Data table for Chart 2
None needs met | Some needs met | All needs met | |
---|---|---|---|
percent | |||
Require 1 or more accommodations | 21.1 | 19.0 | 59.3 |
Require 1 | 23.8 | 0.0Note * | 75.3Note * |
Require 2 | 18.7 | 24.1Note * | 56.6Note * |
Require 3 or more (reference) | 19.2 | 45.1 | 35.7 |
Source: Statistics Canada, Canadian Survey on Disability, 2017. |
Chart 2 end
Requirements and Needs Met for Workplace Accommodations: By Select Characteristics
22% of employees with one disability type required WPA versus 63% with four or more disability types
Table 4 shows that requirements for WPA were highest among those who: a) had “more severe” disabilities, b) had multiple or co-occurring disability types, c) were women, or d) were in management or professional occupations. No statistically significant differences were found in WPA requirements either by size of company or by “years spent in the same company”. However, significant differences were found when it comes to the percentage of employees having all of their needs met for WPA. Employees in small size companies (less than 20 people) were more likely to have all of their needs met for WPA compared to those in large companies (100 or more people). This may be due, in part, to the finding that they were also more likely to require only one WPA, which tends to increase the likelihood of having those needs met. Employees who were new to a company (2 years or less) were less likely to have all of their needs met for WPA compared to those who have been with the company longer (3 years or more). No significant differences were found between employees with one versus two or three disability types in terms of percent with all of their needs met (around 64%); but it was significantly lower for employees with four or more disability types (49%). And finally, employees in trades and manufacturing occupations were more likely to have none of their needs met compared to those in management or professional occupations. This finding is noteworthy because those in trades and manufacturing were also more likely to require only one WPA.
Table 4 start
Select characteristics | Require | Level of needs met | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
All | Some | None | ||
percent | ||||
Sex | ||||
Men (reference) | 31.6 | 62.4 | 14.6 | 22.6 |
Women | 42.3Note * | 57.3 | 21.9Note * | 20.2 |
Severity of disability | ||||
Less severe (reference) | 29.2 | 63.2 | 14.9 | 21.6 |
More severe | 62.0Note * | 53.7Note * | 24.8Note * | 20.5 |
Number of disability types | ||||
1 (reference) | 21.9 | 64.8 | 12.3Note E: Use with caution | 22.9 |
2 or 3 | 41.3Note * | 64.1 | 16.9 | 17.8 |
4 or more | 63.2Note * | 48.6Note * | 27.0Note * | 24.3 |
Occupation | ||||
Management and finance | 43.8Note * | 63.6 | 17.4 | 18.9Note * |
Professional occupations in applied sciences, health, education, law, and sport | 39.4Note * | 54.8 | 26.8Note * | 18.3Note * |
Sales and customer service | 34.0 | 60.3 | 14.7 | 22.8 |
Trades, transportation, natural resources, manufacturing, utilities, and related (reference) | 30.7 | 59.6 | 12.0Note E: Use with caution | 28.3 |
Size of company or organization | ||||
Less than 20 people (reference) | 32.4 | 64.7 | 16.5 | 18.7 |
100 or more people | 36.7 | 53.9Note * | 23.3 | 22.3 |
Years at same company or organization | ||||
0-2 years (reference) | 34.2 | 47.1 | 20.6 | 32.2 |
3 or more years | 36.3 | 60.5Note * | 20.8 | 17.9Note * |
E use with caution
Source: Statistics Canada, Canadian Survey on Disability, 2017 |
Table 4 end
Reasons for Unmet Needs for Workplace Accommodations
Of employees who did not make a WPA request, 36% said their employer or supervisor was already aware they need them
Two in five (40%) employees with disabilities who required WPA had at least one unmet need. Of these, half had no WPA made available them. With so many employees not receiving all the work supports they required, it is important to gain a better understanding of the possible reasons why needs may go unmet for WPA.
The findings show that only one in four (25%)Note employees with disabilities who have an unmet need for WPA actually made the request to their employer or supervisor for it, with women (29%) being more likely to ask than men (17%E). The severity of employees’ disabilities did not significantly affect the likelihood of making a request for an unmet WPA. However, of those who did ask their employer or supervisor, 40% were refused their requestNote .
Of the 69%Note who said they did not ask their employer or supervisor for the WPA they required, 36% said their employer or supervisor was already aware they needed it. However, 41% believed that their employer or supervisor was, in fact, unaware they required a WPA, while 22% said that they didn’t know if their employer or supervisor knew. The most common reasons given for not making the employer or supervisor aware of their needs revolved around the employees’ levels of comfort with asking for the WPA (42%) as well as fear of negative outcomes (34%) – see Chart 3Note .
Chart 3 start
Data table for Chart 3
Percent | |
---|---|
Uncomfortable asking | 41.9 |
Fear of negative outcomes | 33.5 |
Conditions is not severe enough | 31.6 |
Did not want to disclose need for WPA | 30.0 |
Source: Statistics Canada, Canadian Survey on Disability, 2017. |
Chart 3 end
Conclusion
For employees with disabilities, WPA can help mitigate some of the barriers they may face in the workplace. Research shows that there are a number of benefits to both the employee and employer including increased employability and income (Padkapayeva et al. 2017), greater productivity and company loyalty (Soloveiva et al. 2011), and creation of a more inclusive work culture and environment (Lindsay et al. 2018).
The findings from this fact sheet show that 37% of employees with disabilities required at least one WPA to be able to do their work. While 59% of those employees had all their needs met, 40% still had at least one unmet need for WPA and half of those had none of their needs met. Variations in level of needs met for WPA is multifaceted and, as shown in this fact sheet, influenced by the: a) severity and number of disabilities an employee had, b) type and number of WPA required, c) nature of the work itself, d) degree of support provided by the employer or supervisor, and e) willingness of the employees themselves to ask for what they need. While a large majority did not require any WPA to be able to do their work (63%) and many who had all their needs met if they required WPA, there remains a large number of at-risk employees with disabilities who had none or, at best, only some of the prerequisite support(s) they required for a fully accessible workplace.
References
Lindsay, Sally, Elaine Cagliostro, Mikhaela Albarico, Neda Mortaji, Leora Karon. 2018. A Systematic Review of the Benefits of Hiring People with Disabilities. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation.
Solovieva I., Tatiana, Denetta L. Dowler, Richard T. Wall. 2011. Employer benefits from making workplace accommodations. Disability and Health Journal.
Padkapayeva, Kathy, Andrew Posen, Amin Yazdani, Quenby Mahood, Emile Tompa. 2017. Workplace accommodations for persons with physical disabilities: evidence synthesis of the peer-reviewed literature. Disability and Rehabilitation.
Report a problem on this page
Is something not working? Is there information outdated? Can't find what you're looking for?
Please contact us and let us know how we can help you.
- Date modified: