Table 3
Perceptions of neighbourhood disorder, by type of disorder and census metropolitan area, 2014 Table 3
Perceptions of neighbourhood disorder, by type of disorder and census metropolitan area, 2014

Archived Content

Information identified as archived is provided for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It is not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards and has not been altered or updated since it was archived. Please "contact us" to request a format other than those available.

Table 3
Perceptions of neighbourhood disorder, by type of disorder and census metropolitan area, 2014
Table summary
This table displays the results of Perceptions of neighbourhood disorder. The information is grouped by Census metropolitan area (appearing as row headers), 2014, Physical, Social and Total, calculated using percent units of measure (appearing as column headers).
Census metropolitan area	2014
	Physical^Note 1	Social^Note 2	Total^Note 3
	percent
St. John's	11^Note *	18	24
Halifax	14	17	24
Moncton	5^Note *^{Note E: Use with caution}	11^Note *^{Note E: Use with caution}	12^Note *^{Note E: Use with caution}
Saint John	10^Note *	13^Note *	18^Note *
Saguenay	7^Note *^{Note E: Use with caution}	24	25
Québec	9^Note *	18	21
Sherbrooke	Note F: too unreliable to be published	13^Note *^{Note E: Use with caution}	19^{Note E: Use with caution}
Trois-Rivières	11^{Note E: Use with caution}	12^{Note E: Use with caution}	16^Note *^{Note E: Use with caution}
Montréal	16^Note *	24^Note *	30^Note *
Gatineau	12^{Note E: Use with caution}	18	24
Ottawa	9^Note *	14^Note *	18^Note *
Kingston	Note F: too unreliable to be published	Note F: too unreliable to be published	14^Note *^{Note E: Use with caution}
Peterborough	9^{Note E: Use with caution}	15^{Note E: Use with caution}	17^{Note E: Use with caution}
Oshawa	12^{Note E: Use with caution}	14^{Note E: Use with caution}	20^{Note E: Use with caution}
Toronto	13	18	24
Hamilton	12	14^Note *	19^Note *
St. Catharines-Niagara	10^{Note E: Use with caution}	14^Note *^{Note E: Use with caution}	17^Note *
Kitchener-Cambridge-Waterloo	11^{Note E: Use with caution}	16	21
Brantford	18^{Note E: Use with caution}	14^{Note E: Use with caution}	22^{Note E: Use with caution}
Guelph	Note F: too unreliable to be published	Note F: too unreliable to be published	20^{Note E: Use with caution}
London	13	14^Note *	20
Windsor	10^{Note E: Use with caution}	9^Note *^{Note E: Use with caution}	16^Note *^{Note E: Use with caution}
Barrie	Note F: too unreliable to be published	25^{Note E: Use with caution}	29^{Note E: Use with caution}
Greater Sudbury	24^{Note E: Use with caution}	16^{Note E: Use with caution}	32^{Note E: Use with caution}
Thunder Bay	15^{Note E: Use with caution}	22^{Note E: Use with caution}	30^{Note E: Use with caution}
Winnipeg	19^Note *	18	26
Regina	16	17	24
Saskatoon	11	16	21
Calgary	16	17	25
Edmonton	16	17	24
Kelowna	5^Note *^{Note E: Use with caution}	13^{Note E: Use with caution}	15^Note *^{Note E: Use with caution}
Abbotsford-Mission	16^{Note E: Use with caution}	28^{Note E: Use with caution}	34
Vancouver	16	23^Note *	28^Note *
Victoria	9^Note *^{Note E: Use with caution}	13^Note *	18^Note *
Total - census metropolitan areas^Note †	14	18	24
E use with caution F too unreliable to be published Note * significant difference from reference category (p < 0.05) Return to note * referrer Note † reference category Return to note † referrer Note 1. Includes all respondents who indicated that vandalism, graffiti, or other damage to property or vehicles or garbage or litter lying around were big or moderate problems. Return to note 1 referrer Note 2. Includes all respondents who indicated that noisy neighbours or loud parties, people hanging around on the streets, people using or dealing drugs, people being drunk or rowdy in public places, or people being attacked due to their skin colour, ethnicity, or religion were big or moderate problems. Return to note 2 referrer Note 3. Includes all respondents who indicated that at least one physical or social disorder was a big or moderate problem in their neighbourhood. Return to note 3 referrer Note: Responses of don't know/not stated are excluded from the calculation of percentages. Source: Statistics Canada, General Social Survey on Victimization,2014.

Date modified:: 2016-03-02

Language selection

Search and menus

Search

Table 3
Perceptions of neighbourhood disorder, by type of disorder and census metropolitan area, 2014 Table 3
Perceptions of neighbourhood disorder, by type of disorder and census metropolitan area, 2014

Archived Content

Table 3Perceptions of neighbourhood disorder, by type of disorder and census metropolitan area, 2014 Table 3Perceptions of neighbourhood disorder, by type of disorder and census metropolitan area, 2014

Archived Content

Note of appreciation

Standards of service to the public

Copyright

Table 3
Perceptions of neighbourhood disorder, by type of disorder and census metropolitan area, 2014 Table 3
Perceptions of neighbourhood disorder, by type of disorder and census metropolitan area, 2014