Table 2
Canadian Armed Forces Primary Reserve members who were sexually assaulted in the past 12 months, by gender and selected characteristics, 2016 and 2018

Warning View the most recent version.

Archived Content

Information identified as archived is provided for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It is not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards and has not been altered or updated since it was archived. Please "contact us" to request a format other than those available.

Archived

This page has been archived on the Web.


Table 2
Canadian Armed Forces Primary Reserve members who were sexually assaulted in the past 12 months, by gender and selected characteristics, 2016 and 2018
Table summary
This table displays the results of Canadian Armed Forces Primary Reserve members who were sexually assaulted in the past 12 months. The information is grouped by Selected characteristics of victims (appearing as row headers), 2018, 2016, Male victims, Female victims and Total victims, calculated using percent and number units of measure (appearing as column headers).
Selected characteristics of victims 2018 2016
Male victims Female victims Total victimsTable 2 Note 1 Male victims Female victims Total victimsTable 2 Note 1
percent number percent percent number percent
Environmental command
Canadian ArmyTable 2 Note † 1.2 9.3Note ** 430 2.2 1.5 8.5Note ** 440 2.4
Royal Canadian Navy 2.4Note E: Use with caution Note * 6.0Note E: Use with caution Note ***Table 2 Note # 120 3.6Note * Note F: too unreliable to be published 11 120 4.0Note *
Royal Canadian Air Force Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published 20Note E: Use with caution 1.1Note E: Use with caution Note *
Military Personnel Command Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published 7.8Note E: Use with caution 70Note E: Use with caution 3.7Note E: Use with caution
Other Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published
Indigenous identityTable 2 Note 2
Indigenous (First Nations, Métis, Inuit) person Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published 70Note E: Use with caution 6.1Note E: Use with caution Note * 5.3Note E: Use with caution Note * Note F: too unreliable to be published 70Note E: Use with caution 8.1Note E: Use with caution Note *
Non-Indigenous personTable 2 Note † 1.1 6.7Note ** 540 2.0 1.3 7.8Note ** 610 2.4
Persons with disabilities
Persons with disabilities Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published 40Note E: Use with caution 5.6Note E: Use with caution Note *
Persons without disabilitiesTable 2 Note † 1.2 6.8Note ** 570 2.1 1.4 8.1Note ** 640 2.5
Visible minority
Visible minority Note F: too unreliable to be published 11Note E: Use with caution Note * 100Note E: Use with caution 2.4Note E: Use with caution Note F: too unreliable to be published 11Note E: Use with caution 50Note E: Use with caution 1.7Note E: Use with caution Note *
Non-visible minorityTable 2 Note † 1.3 6.3Note **Table 2 Note # 500 2.2Table 2 Note # 1.6 8.0Note ** 620 2.7
Rank
Junior Non-Commissioned MemberTable 2 Note † 1.5 8.2Note ** 480 2.6Table 2 Note # 1.9 10Note ** 570 3.3
Senior Non-Commissioned Member 0.9Note E: Use with caution Note * Note F: too unreliable to be published 50 1.3Note * 0.7Note E: Use with caution Note * Note F: too unreliable to be published 40Note E: Use with caution 0.9Note E: Use with caution Note *
Junior Officer Note F: too unreliable to be published 5.6Note E: Use with caution 50Note E: Use with caution 1.6Note E: Use with caution Note * Note F: too unreliable to be published 6.0Note E: Use with caution Note * 50Note E: Use with caution 1.6Note E: Use with caution Note *
Senior Officer Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published 20Note E: Use with caution 1.2Note E: Use with caution Note *
Age group
24 years and younger 1.2Note E: Use with caution 12Note **Table 2 Note # 260 2.8Note *Table 2 Note # 1.8Note E: Use with caution 18Note ** 340 4.0
25 to 29 years 2.2Note E: Use with caution 7.8Note E: Use with caution Note ** 160 3.1Note * 2.7Note E: Use with caution 6.1Note E: Use with caution Note ** 180 3.4
30 to 34 years 1.5Note E: Use with caution 6.3Note E: Use with caution Note ** 80Note E: Use with caution 2.4Note E: Use with caution Note * Note F: too unreliable to be published 5.7Note E: Use with caution 60 2.0
35 to 39 years Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published 40Note E: Use with caution 1.7Note E: Use with caution Note F: too unreliable to be published 7.2Note E: Use with caution Note * 40 1.9
40 to 44 years Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published 20Note E: Use with caution 1.2Note E: Use with caution
45 to 49 yearsTable 2 Note † Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published 30Note E: Use with caution 1.4Note E: Use with caution Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published
50 years and older Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published 20 0.6
Total 1.2 7.0Note ** 600 2.2 1.4 8.2Note ** 680 2.6
E use with caution
F too unreliable to be published
Note *

significantly different from reference category only (p < 0.05)

Return to note * referrer

Note **

significantly different from male victims only (p < 0.05)

Return to note ** referrer

Note ***

significantly different from reference category (p < 0.05) and male victims (p < 0.05)

Return to note *** referrer

Note #

significantly different from 2016 (p < 0.05)

Return to note # referrer

Note †

reference category

Return to note † referrer

Note 1

For 2018, includes gender diverse individuals and those whose gender was not stated. For 2016, includes members whose sex was not stated.

Return to note 1 referrer

Note 2

The specific survey question asked “Are you an Aboriginal person, that is, First Nations, Métis, or Inuk (Inuit)?”.

Return to note 2 referrer

Note: Includes sexual assaults which occurred in the military workplace and outside the military workplace involving military members (Canadian Armed Forces or foreign) and/or Department of National Defence civilians or contractors. All estimates of numbers have been rounded to the nearest 10. Estimates are rounded independently; therefore, the sum of the rounded categories may not equal the rounded total. Percent calculations are based on unrounded estimates and exclude missing responses.
Source: Statistics Canada, Survey on Sexual Misconduct in the Canadian Armed Forces, 2016 and 2018.
Date modified: