Text box 2 table
Multivariate analysis models (logistic regression): Feeling unsafe when walking alone in one’s neighborhood after dark, Canada, 2014
Sociodemographic characteristics | Women | Men | Total population |
---|---|---|---|
odds ratio | |||
Age group (years) | |||
15 to 24 | 1.5Note *** | 1.3Note *** | 1.4Note *** |
25 and older | Reference category | Reference category | Reference category |
Sex | |||
Female | Note ...: not applicable | Note ...: not applicable | 3.5Note *** |
Male | Note ...: not applicable | Note ...: not applicable | Reference category |
Retired | |||
Yes | n.s. | 1.6Note *** | 1.4Note *** |
No | n.s. | Reference category | Reference category |
Level of education | |||
No university diploma | n.s. | 1.2Note * | n.s. |
University diploma | n.s. | Reference category | n.s. |
Visible minority status | |||
Visible minority | n.s. | 1.5Note *** | 1.3Note ** |
Non-visible minority | n.s. | Reference category | Reference category |
Religion | |||
Christian religion | 1.5Note *** | 1.4Note *** | 1.4Note *** |
Non-Christian religion (religious minority) | 1.2 | 1.8Note *** | 1.5Note *** |
No religion | Reference category | Reference category | Reference category |
Physical or mental disability (activity limitation) | |||
Yes | 1.2Note * | 1.2Note * | 1.2Note *** |
No | Reference category | Reference category | Reference category |
Victimization characteristics | |||
Most serious victimization incident in the previous 12 months | |||
Sexual assault | 1.5 | n.s. | n.s. |
Break and enter | 2.1Note ** | n.s. | n.s. |
Other crime | 1.2 | n.s. | n.s. |
Was not a victim | Reference category | n.s. | n.s. |
Victim of discrimination over the previous five years | |||
Yes | 1.2Note * | n.s. | 1.1Note * |
No | Reference category | n.s. | Reference category |
Neighbourhood characteristics | |||
Location of dwellingText box Note 1 | |||
Census metropolitan area (CMA) | 1.9Note *** | 1.6Note *** | 1.7Note *** |
Census agglomeration (CA) | 1.6Note *** | 1.3Note ** | 1.5Note *** |
Rural areas or small towns (non-CMA/CA) | Reference category | Reference category | Reference category |
Knowledge of the residents in the neighbourhood | |||
Knows some, few or no residents | 1.3Note ** | n.s. | n.s. |
Knows many residents | 1.2Note * | n.s. | n.s. |
Knows most of the neighbourhood's residents | Reference category | n.s. | n.s. |
Neighbours are trustworthy | |||
No | 1.7Note *** | 1.9Note *** | 1.8Note *** |
Somewhat | 1.4Note *** | 1.5Note *** | 1.5Note *** |
Yes | Reference category | Reference category | Reference category |
Sense of belonging to the community | |||
Weak | 1.4Note *** | 1.7Note *** | 1.6Note *** |
Moderate | 1.6Note *** | 1.7Note *** | 1.7Note *** |
Strong | Reference category | Reference category | Reference category |
Neighbours would call the police if they witnessed what seemed like criminal behaviour | |||
More or less likely | 1.3Note *** | 1.3Note *** | 1.3Note *** |
Very likely | Reference category | Reference category | Reference category |
Confidence in the police | |||
Some or little confidence | 1.4Note *** | 1.3Note *** | 1.3Note *** |
A great deal of confidence | Reference category | Reference category | Reference category |
Presence of social disorder perceived in the neighbourhood | |||
Yes | 1.6Note *** | 1.8Note *** | 1.7Note *** |
No | Reference category | Reference category | Reference category |
Crime level in the neighbourhood | |||
Higher than elsewhere in Canada | 2.6Note *** | 2.8Note *** | 2.7Note *** |
About the same as elsewhere in Canada | 2.2Note *** | 2.0Note *** | 2.1Note *** |
Lower than elsewhere in Canada | Reference category | Reference category | Reference category |
Proportion of the neighbourhood population who immigrated over the past decade | |||
High | 1.3Note *** | n.s. | 1.2Note ** |
Medium or low | Reference category | n.s. | Reference category |
Proportion of lone-parent family households in the neighbourhood | |||
High | n.s. | 1.3Note *** | 1.2Note *** |
Medium or low | n.s. | Reference category | Reference category |
Proportion of owner-households in the neighbourhood | |||
High | n.s. | 0.8Note *** | n.s. |
Medium or low | n.s. | Reference category | n.s. |
Proportion of apartments among all dwellings in the neighbourhood | |||
Low | 0.8Note *** | n.s. | 0.8Note *** |
Medium to high | Reference category | n.s. | Reference category |
... not applicable
Note: For more information, see the “Methods for multivariate analysis” section. Source: Statistics Canada, General Social Survey. |
Report a problem on this page
Is something not working? Is there information outdated? Can't find what you're looking for?
Please contact us and let us know how we can help you.
- Date modified: