Table 1.6
Self-reported violent victimization, by sex of victim and province, 2009

Table 1.6 Self-reported violent victimization, by sex of victim and province, 2009
Table summary
This table displays the results of table 1.6 self-reported violent victimization. The information is grouped by province (appearing as row headers), total violent victimization (including spousal violence), female and male, calculated using number ('000) and rate units of measure (appearing as column headers).
Province Total violent victimization (including spousal violence)
Female Male
number ('000) rateNote 1 number ('000) rateNote 1
Newfoundland and Labrador 20Note E: Use with caution 91Note E: Use with caution Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published
Prince Edward Island Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published
Nova Scotia 53Note E: Use with caution 130Note E: Use with caution Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published
New Brunswick Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published 53Note E: Use with caution 172Note E: Use with caution
Quebec 324 98 314 98Note *
Ontario 541 99 685 130
Manitoba 79Note E: Use with caution 161Note E: Use with caution 90Note E: Use with caution 188Note E: Use with caution
Saskatchewan 61Note E: Use with caution 146Note E: Use with caution 70Note E: Use with caution 172Note E: Use with caution
Alberta 212 148 181Note E: Use with caution 122Note E: Use with caution
British Columbia 247Note E: Use with caution 129Note E: Use with caution 262 140
Total† 1,563 112 1,704 125
E use with caution
F too unreliable to be published
reference category
* significantly different from reference category (p < 0.05)
1. Rates are calculated per 1,000 population aged 15 years and older.
Note: Caution should be used in making comparisons between provinces as not all differences between provincial estimates are statistically significant. Data from the Northwest Territories, Yukon and Nunavut were collected using a different methodology and are therefore excluded.
Source: Statistics Canada, General Social Survey, 2009.
Date modified: