Table 49-3
Acute lymphocytic leukemia — Five-year relative survival ratios, October 2011 CCR
file, by sex, population aged 15 to 99, 3 years of
cases, selected provinces1,2
Archived Content
Information identified as archived is provided for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It is not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards and has not been altered or updated since it was archived. Please "contact us" to request a format other than those available.
| Primary site of cancer | 3 years of cases | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Both sexes | Males | Females | |||||||
| Relative survival ratio | 95% confidence interval | Relative survival ratio | 95% confidence interval | Relative survival ratio | 95% confidence interval | ||||
| Low | High | Low | High | Low | High | ||||
| percent | |||||||||
| Acute lymphocytic leukemia (ICD-O-3: M-9826, M-9835-M-9837) |
|||||||||
| Newfoundland and Labrador | |||||||||
| 1992/1994 | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published |
| 1993/1995 | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published |
| 1994/1996 | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published |
| 1995/1997 | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published |
| 1996/1998 | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published |
| 1997/1999 | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published |
| 1998/2000 | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published |
| 1999/2001 | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published |
| 2000/2002 | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published |
| 2001/2003 | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published |
| Prince Edward Island | |||||||||
| 1992/1994 | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published |
| 1993/1995 | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published |
| 1994/1996 | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published |
| 1995/1997 | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published |
| 1996/1998 | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published |
| 1997/1999 | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published |
| 1998/2000 | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published |
| 1999/2001 | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published |
| 2000/2002 | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published |
| 2001/2003 | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note ..: not available for a specific reference period | Note ..: not available for a specific reference period | Note ..: not available for a specific reference period |
| Nova Scotia | |||||||||
| 1992/1994 | 50 | 19 | 76 | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published |
| 1993/1995 | 37 | 11 | 63 | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published |
| 1994/1996 | 28 | 7 | 56 | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published |
| 1995/1997 | 43 | 16 | 68 | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published |
| 1996/1998 | 52 | 19 | 78 | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published |
| 1997/1999 | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published |
| 1998/2000 | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published |
| 1999/2001 | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published |
| 2000/2002 | 37 | 11 | 63 | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published |
| 2001/2003 | 42 | 16 | 68 | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published |
| New Brunswick | |||||||||
| 1992/1994 | 34 | 10 | 60 | 31 | 7 | 59 | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published |
| 1993/1995 | 28 | 7 | 55 | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published |
| 1994/1996 | 31 | 7 | 59 | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published |
| 1995/1997 | 19 | 3 | 45 | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published |
| 1996/1998 | 30 | 7 | 59 | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published |
| 1997/1999 | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published |
| 1998/2000 | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published |
| 1999/2001 | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published |
| 2000/2002 | 51 | 19 | 77 | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published |
| 2001/2003 | 48 | 20 | 72 | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published |
| Ontario | |||||||||
| 1992/1994 | 25 | 19 | 32 | 25 | 17 | 33 | 26 | 17 | 36 |
| 1993/1995 | 28 | 22 | 35 | 27 | 19 | 36 | 29 | 19 | 39 |
| 1994/1996 | 32 | 25 | 39 | 29 | 21 | 38 | 36 | 26 | 47 |
| 1995/1997 | 33 | 27 | 39 | 31 | 23 | 39 | 37 | 26 | 48 |
| 1996/1998 | 30 | 24 | 36 | 29 | 21 | 37 | 32 | 23 | 42 |
| 1997/1999 | 26 | 20 | 32 | 26 | 19 | 34 | 25 | 17 | 35 |
| 1998/2000 | 28 | 22 | 34 | 27 | 19 | 36 | 29 | 19 | 38 |
| 1999/2001 | 30 | 24 | 37 | 28 | 20 | 36 | 34 | 23 | 46 |
| 2000/2002 | 32 | 25 | 39 | 27 | 19 | 36 | 40 | 28 | 52 |
| 2001/2003 | 35 | 28 | 42 | 34 | 26 | 43 | 36 | 24 | 48 |
| Manitoba | |||||||||
| 1992/1994 | 33 | 16 | 51 | 44 | 18 | 68 | 18 | 3 | 45 |
| 1993/1995 | 23 | 8 | 43 | 24 | 6 | 49 | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published |
| 1994/1996 | 22 | 8 | 41 | 19 | 5 | 42 | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published |
| 1995/1997 | 19 | 5 | 41 | 25 | 6 | 51 | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published |
| 1996/1998 | 27 | 10 | 48 | 28 | 9 | 51 | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published |
| 1997/1999 | 32 | 12 | 55 | 38 | 12 | 65 | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published |
| 1998/2000 | 27 | 10 | 48 | 26 | 6 | 53 | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published |
| 1999/2001 | 24 | 7 | 45 | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published |
| 2000/2002 | 26 | 11 | 45 | 15 | 3 | 39 | 40 | 12 | 67 |
| 2001/2003 | 28 | 12 | 48 | 17 | 3 | 42 | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published |
| Saskatchewan | |||||||||
| 1992/1994 | 30 | 11 | 52 | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published |
| 1993/1995 | 21 | 7 | 41 | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | 20 | 3 | 48 |
| 1994/1996 | 21 | 5 | 45 | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published |
| 1995/1997 | 14 | 2 | 37 | 23 | 4 | 55 | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published |
| 1996/1998 | 30 | 7 | 60 | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published |
| 1997/1999 | 28 | 7 | 55 | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published |
| 1998/2000 | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published |
| 1999/2001 | 51 | 21 | 75 | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published |
| 2000/2002 | 41 | 17 | 64 | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published |
| 2001/2003 | 46 | 24 | 66 | 48 | 20 | 72 | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published |
| Alberta | |||||||||
| 1992/1994 | 34 | 20 | 49 | 36 | 19 | 54 | 28 | 7 | 55 |
| 1993/1995 | 46 | 29 | 62 | 42 | 23 | 61 | 55 | 23 | 79 |
| 1994/1996 | 47 | 31 | 62 | 46 | 25 | 65 | 47 | 23 | 69 |
| 1995/1997 | 40 | 26 | 54 | 36 | 19 | 54 | 45 | 22 | 66 |
| 1996/1998 | 26 | 15 | 39 | 28 | 13 | 45 | 23 | 8 | 42 |
| 1997/1999 | 22 | 11 | 35 | 24 | 11 | 40 | 19 | 5 | 41 |
| 1998/2000 | 30 | 18 | 44 | 33 | 16 | 50 | 27 | 10 | 48 |
| 1999/2001 | 39 | 26 | 52 | 39 | 23 | 55 | 39 | 19 | 60 |
| 2000/2002 | 45 | 32 | 58 | 45 | 27 | 61 | 46 | 26 | 63 |
| 2001/2003 | 39 | 26 | 52 | 37 | 20 | 54 | 43 | 23 | 62 |
| British Columbia | |||||||||
| 1992/1994 | 22 | 12 | 33 | 28 | 14 | 44 | 13 | 3 | 30 |
| 1993/1995 | 28 | 16 | 40 | 29 | 14 | 45 | 26 | 9 | 46 |
| 1994/1996 | 27 | 16 | 40 | 23 | 10 | 38 | 36 | 15 | 58 |
| 1995/1997 | 35 | 23 | 49 | 26 | 12 | 42 | 51 | 28 | 71 |
| 1996/1998 | 35 | 22 | 47 | 26 | 12 | 43 | 45 | 25 | 63 |
| 1997/1999 | 36 | 24 | 48 | 35 | 19 | 52 | 37 | 19 | 56 |
| 1998/2000 | 37 | 24 | 50 | 42 | 25 | 58 | 29 | 12 | 49 |
| 1999/2001 | 34 | 22 | 46 | 42 | 25 | 58 | 22 | 8 | 41 |
| 2000/2002 | 42 | 30 | 55 | 39 | 23 | 55 | 47 | 27 | 65 |
| 2001/2003 | 38 | 26 | 50 | 29 | 15 | 45 | 49 | 30 | 66 |
|
.. not available for a specific reference period F too unreliable to be published
Source(s): Statistics Canada, Canadian Cancer Registry (CCR), Canadian Vital Statistics (Death Database) and life tables (CANSIM table "/n1/en/cansim/103-1574" title="CANSIM table 103-1574">103-1574). |
|||||||||
Data from Quebec have been excluded because
of issues in correctly ascertaining the vital status of cases.
In the years under study, there was a known
under reporting of cancer cases in Newfoundland and Labrador. There is likely
to be some overestimation of survival for this province as the survival of
such "missed" cases is generally less favourable than that of cases in the
registry population. As such, survival estimates from the province of Newfoundland
and Labrador should be treated with caution.
Note(s):
See "Data quality, concepts and methodology — Footnotes" section. Please note that CANSIM
tables also provide the number of cases on which analyses were based, the
number of deaths within the first five years of follow-up, as well as estimates
of observed survival and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals.
Survival estimates based on cases from individual years are available through
CANSIM tables.
Source(s):
Statistics Canada, Canadian Cancer Registry (CCR), Canadian Vital
Statistics (Death Database) and life tables (CANSIM table 103-1574).
- Date modified: