Table 46-3
Hodgkin lymphoma — Five-year relative survival ratios, October 2011 CCR file, by sex, population aged 15 to 99, 3 years of cases, selected provinces¹^,²

Archived Content

Information identified as archived is provided for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It is not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards and has not been altered or updated since it was archived. Please "contact us" to request a format other than those available.

PDF | Symbols Next Previous

Five-year relative survival ratios, October 2011 CCR file, by sex, population aged 15 to 99, 3 years of cases, selected provinces

Table summary
This table displays the results of five-year relative survival ratios. The information is grouped by primary site of cancer (appearing as row headers), 3 years of cases, both sexes, males, females, relative survival ratio, 95% confidence interval and low, calculated using low, high and percent units of measure (appearing as column headers).
Primary site of cancer	3 years of cases
	Both sexes			Males			Females
	Relative survival ratio	95% confidence interval		Relative survival ratio	95% confidence interval		Relative survival ratio	95% confidence interval
	Relative survival ratio	Low	High	Relative survival ratio	Low	High	Relative survival ratio	Low	High
	percent
Hodgkin lymphoma (ICD-O-3: M-9650-M-9667)
Newfoundland and Labrador
1992/1994	93^{Note E: Use with caution}	70^{Note E: Use with caution}	100^{Note E: Use with caution}	94^{Note E: Use with caution}	56^{Note E: Use with caution}	102^{Note E: Use with caution}	92^{Note E: Use with caution}	49^{Note E: Use with caution}	101^{Note E: Use with caution}
1993/1995	92^{Note E: Use with caution}	68^{Note E: Use with caution}	101^{Note E: Use with caution}	98^{Note E: Use with caution}	66^{Note E: Use with caution}	103^{Note E: Use with caution}	Note F: too unreliable to be published	Note F: too unreliable to be published	Note F: too unreliable to be published
1994/1996	83^{Note E: Use with caution}	63^{Note E: Use with caution}	94^{Note E: Use with caution}	81^{Note E: Use with caution}	51^{Note E: Use with caution}	95^{Note E: Use with caution}	85^{Note E: Use with caution}	53^{Note E: Use with caution}	99^{Note E: Use with caution}
1995/1997	79^{Note E: Use with caution}	60^{Note E: Use with caution}	91^{Note E: Use with caution}	80^{Note E: Use with caution}	55^{Note E: Use with caution}	94^{Note E: Use with caution}	77^{Note E: Use with caution}	44^{Note E: Use with caution}	95^{Note E: Use with caution}
1996/1998	84^{Note E: Use with caution}	66^{Note E: Use with caution}	94^{Note E: Use with caution}	81^{Note E: Use with caution}	53^{Note E: Use with caution}	95^{Note E: Use with caution}	87^{Note E: Use with caution}	59^{Note E: Use with caution}	98^{Note E: Use with caution}
1997/1999	92^{Note E: Use with caution}	75^{Note E: Use with caution}	99^{Note E: Use with caution}	98^{Note E: Use with caution}	70^{Note E: Use with caution}	103^{Note E: Use with caution}	84^{Note E: Use with caution}	48^{Note E: Use with caution}	96^{Note E: Use with caution}
1998/2000	95^{Note E: Use with caution}	76^{Note E: Use with caution}	100^{Note E: Use with caution}	96^{Note E: Use with caution}	65^{Note E: Use with caution}	101^{Note E: Use with caution}	93^{Note E: Use with caution}	57^{Note E: Use with caution}	100^{Note E: Use with caution}
1999/2001	86^{Note E: Use with caution}	65^{Note E: Use with caution}	96^{Note E: Use with caution}	90^{Note E: Use with caution}	62^{Note E: Use with caution}	99^{Note E: Use with caution}	Note F: too unreliable to be published	Note F: too unreliable to be published	Note F: too unreliable to be published
2000/2002	82^{Note E: Use with caution}	58^{Note E: Use with caution}	94^{Note E: Use with caution}	79^{Note E: Use with caution}	48^{Note E: Use with caution}	94^{Note E: Use with caution}	Note F: too unreliable to be published	Note F: too unreliable to be published	Note F: too unreliable to be published
2001/2003	74^{Note E: Use with caution}	47^{Note E: Use with caution}	89^{Note E: Use with caution}	76^{Note E: Use with caution}	42^{Note E: Use with caution}	93^{Note E: Use with caution}	Note F: too unreliable to be published	Note F: too unreliable to be published	Note F: too unreliable to be published
Prince Edward Island
1992/1994	Note F: too unreliable to be published	Note F: too unreliable to be published	Note F: too unreliable to be published	Note F: too unreliable to be published	Note F: too unreliable to be published	Note F: too unreliable to be published	Note F: too unreliable to be published	Note F: too unreliable to be published	Note F: too unreliable to be published
1993/1995	Note F: too unreliable to be published	Note F: too unreliable to be published	Note F: too unreliable to be published	Note F: too unreliable to be published	Note F: too unreliable to be published	Note F: too unreliable to be published	Note F: too unreliable to be published	Note F: too unreliable to be published	Note F: too unreliable to be published
1994/1996	Note F: too unreliable to be published	Note F: too unreliable to be published	Note F: too unreliable to be published	Note F: too unreliable to be published	Note F: too unreliable to be published	Note F: too unreliable to be published	Note F: too unreliable to be published	Note F: too unreliable to be published	Note F: too unreliable to be published
1995/1997	Note F: too unreliable to be published	Note F: too unreliable to be published	Note F: too unreliable to be published	Note F: too unreliable to be published	Note F: too unreliable to be published	Note F: too unreliable to be published	Note F: too unreliable to be published	Note F: too unreliable to be published	Note F: too unreliable to be published
1996/1998	85	49	97	Note F: too unreliable to be published	Note F: too unreliable to be published	Note F: too unreliable to be published	Note F: too unreliable to be published	Note F: too unreliable to be published	Note F: too unreliable to be published
1997/1999	92	48	100	Note F: too unreliable to be published	Note F: too unreliable to be published	Note F: too unreliable to be published	Note F: too unreliable to be published	Note F: too unreliable to be published	Note F: too unreliable to be published
1998/2000	92	48	101	Note F: too unreliable to be published	Note F: too unreliable to be published	Note F: too unreliable to be published	Note F: too unreliable to be published	Note F: too unreliable to be published	Note F: too unreliable to be published
1999/2001	92	48	100	Note F: too unreliable to be published	Note F: too unreliable to be published	Note F: too unreliable to be published	Note F: too unreliable to be published	Note F: too unreliable to be published	Note F: too unreliable to be published
2000/2002	92	48	100	Note F: too unreliable to be published	Note F: too unreliable to be published	Note F: too unreliable to be published	Note F: too unreliable to be published	Note F: too unreliable to be published	Note F: too unreliable to be published
2001/2003	103	Note ..: not available for a specific reference period	Note ..: not available for a specific reference period	Note F: too unreliable to be published	Note F: too unreliable to be published	Note F: too unreliable to be published	Note F: too unreliable to be published	Note F: too unreliable to be published	Note F: too unreliable to be published
Nova Scotia
1992/1994	72	60	82	70	54	82	75	55	88
1993/1995	80	67	88	77	59	89	83	63	93
1994/1996	81	68	89	77	59	89	85	65	95
1995/1997	88	75	95	81	60	93	93	76	100
1996/1998	89	78	95	87	71	95	91	73	98
1997/1999	93	84	98	94	79	101	93	77	98
1998/2000	91	80	97	94	79	100	87	67	96
1999/2001	90	78	96	89	70	97	91	73	98
2000/2002	80	68	89	78	60	90	83	65	93
2001/2003	82	71	89	81	64	91	83	67	92
New Brunswick
1992/1994	84	71	92	76	57	88	95	73	101
1993/1995	85	71	93	75	56	88	99	74	103
1994/1996	88	72	97	77	54	91	105	Note ..: not available for a specific reference period	Note ..: not available for a specific reference period
1995/1997	91	76	99	82	60	94	106	Note ..: not available for a specific reference period	Note ..: not available for a specific reference period
1996/1998	85	68	94	73	50	87	105	Note ..: not available for a specific reference period	Note ..: not available for a specific reference period
1997/1999	86	72	94	79	60	91	96	68	101
1998/2000	73	58	84	69	49	83	78	55	92
1999/2001	78	64	88	80	60	91	76	51	91
2000/2002	77	63	87	76	54	90	78	58	91
2001/2003	86	72	94	92	71	100	79	56	91
Ontario
1992/1994	84	81	86	82	78	86	86	82	89
1993/1995	82	79	85	83	79	86	81	77	85
1994/1996	83	81	86	85	82	89	81	77	85
1995/1997	83	81	86	84	80	87	83	79	87
1996/1998	83	80	86	83	79	86	84	79	87
1997/1999	82	79	84	80	76	84	83	79	87
1998/2000	82	79	84	81	77	85	83	78	86
1999/2001	83	81	86	83	79	86	84	80	88
2000/2002	84	81	86	84	80	87	83	79	87
2001/2003	84	81	86	83	79	86	84	80	87
Manitoba
1992/1994	81	69	89	82	66	91	80	59	93
1993/1995	77	65	86	79	63	89	75	54	89
1994/1996	76	64	85	76	59	87	76	56	89
1995/1997	76	64	85	68	51	80	88	69	97
1996/1998	81	69	89	70	53	83	92	76	99
1997/1999	85	74	92	78	61	90	92	76	99
1998/2000	86	75	93	85	68	95	88	70	96
1999/2001	87	75	94	92	78	99	78	59	91
2000/2002	84	73	91	87	73	95	78	56	91
2001/2003	78	66	86	82	68	91	69	49	84
Saskatchewan
1992/1994	84	74	91	82	67	92	87	70	95
1993/1995	84	74	91	79	64	90	89	73	96
1994/1996	82	73	89	75	60	86	90	76	97
1995/1997	82	71	90	79	62	90	85	69	94
1996/1998	84	73	91	84	66	93	84	67	93
1997/1999	90	79	96	89	72	98	90	73	99
1998/2000	89	78	96	89	72	97	89	71	98
1999/2001	86	76	93	86	70	95	86	70	96
2000/2002	81	70	88	80	64	91	81	66	90
2001/2003	82	71	89	77	61	87	87	72	95
Alberta
1992/1994	84	78	89	81	72	88	87	79	93
1993/1995	86	80	90	83	73	89	89	80	94
1994/1996	86	80	91	84	74	91	89	80	94
1995/1997	86	81	91	89	81	95	83	74	89
1996/1998	86	81	91	88	79	93	85	76	91
1997/1999	84	78	88	84	75	90	84	76	90
1998/2000	86	80	90	82	73	88	91	83	95
1999/2001	86	80	90	82	74	88	92	84	96
2000/2002	89	84	93	87	80	92	91	82	96
2001/2003	86	80	90	85	77	91	87	78	92
British Columbia
1992/1994	85	79	89	85	76	91	85	76	91
1993/1995	85	79	89	83	75	88	88	80	94
1994/1996	85	80	89	84	76	90	87	79	93
1995/1997	86	80	90	86	78	91	85	77	91
1996/1998	86	80	90	87	80	92	84	76	90
1997/1999	88	83	92	90	83	94	85	76	91
1998/2000	87	82	91	86	79	91	89	80	94
1999/2001	89	84	93	87	80	92	92	84	97
2000/2002	89	84	93	87	80	92	92	85	97
2001/2003	89	84	92	86	79	91	92	85	96
.. not available for a specific reference period ^E use with caution F too unreliable to be published Note 1. Data from Quebec have been excluded because of issues in correctly ascertaining the vital status of cases. Note 2. In the years under study, there was a known under reporting of cancer cases in Newfoundland and Labrador. There is likely to be some overestimation of survival for this province as the survival of such "missed" cases is generally less favourable than that of cases in the registry population. As such, survival estimates from the province of Newfoundland and Labrador should be treated with caution. Note(s): See "Data quality, concepts and methodology — Footnotes" section. Please note that CANSIM tables also provide the number of cases on which analyses were based, the number of deaths within the first five years of follow-up, as well as estimates of observed survival and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals. Survival estimates based on cases from individual years are available through CANSIM tables. Source(s): Statistics Canada, Canadian Cancer Registry (CCR), Canadian Vital Statistics (Death Database) and life tables (CANSIM table "/n1/en/cansim/103-1574" title="CANSIM table 103-1574">103-1574).

Data from Quebec have been excluded because of issues in correctly ascertaining the vital status of cases.

In the years under study, there was a known under reporting of cancer cases in Newfoundland and Labrador. There is likely to be some overestimation of survival for this province as the survival of such "missed" cases is generally less favourable than that of cases in the registry population. As such, survival estimates from the province of Newfoundland and Labrador should be treated with caution.

Note(s):

See "Data quality, concepts and methodology — Footnotes" section. Please note that CANSIM tables also provide the number of cases on which analyses were based, the number of deaths within the first five years of follow-up, as well as estimates of observed survival and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals. Survival estimates based on cases from individual years are available through CANSIM tables.

Source(s):

Statistics Canada, Canadian Cancer Registry (CCR), Canadian Vital Statistics (Death Database) and life tables (CANSIM table 103-1574).

Date modified:: 2015-11-27

Language selection

Search and menus

Search

Table 46-3
Hodgkin lymphoma — Five-year relative survival ratios, October 2011 CCR file, by sex, population aged 15 to 99, 3 years of cases, selected provinces¹^,²

Archived Content

Table 46-3Hodgkin lymphoma — Five-year relative survival ratios, October 2011 CCR file, by sex, population aged 15 to 99, 3 years of cases, selected provinces1,2

Archived Content

Table 46-3
Hodgkin lymphoma — Five-year relative survival ratios, October 2011 CCR file, by sex, population aged 15 to 99, 3 years of cases, selected provinces¹^,²