Table 18-3
Gallbladder — Five-year relative survival ratios, October 2011 CCR file, by sex, population aged 15 to 99, 3 years of cases, selected provinces1,2

Warning View the most recent version.

Archived Content

Information identified as archived is provided for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It is not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards and has not been altered or updated since it was archived. Please "contact us" to request a format other than those available.

Archived

This page has been archived on the Web.

PDF | Symbols Next Previous

Five-year relative survival ratios, October 2011 CCR file, by sex, population aged 15 to 99, 3 years of cases, selected provinces


Table summary
This table displays the results of five-year relative survival ratios. The information is grouped by primary site of cancer (appearing as row headers), 3 years of cases, both sexes, males, females, relative survival ratio, 95% confidence interval and low, calculated using low, high and percent units of measure (appearing as column headers).
Primary site of cancer 3 years of cases
Both sexes Males Females
Relative survival ratio 95% confidence interval Relative survival ratio 95% confidence interval Relative survival ratio 95% confidence interval
Low High Low High Low High
  percent
Gallbladder (ICD-O-3: C23.9)Note 3  
Newfoundland and Labrador  
1992/1994 21Note E: Use with caution 7Note E: Use with caution 42Note E: Use with caution Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published 27Note E: Use with caution 8Note E: Use with caution 50Note E: Use with caution
1993/1995 16Note E: Use with caution 4Note E: Use with caution 37Note E: Use with caution Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published 14Note E: Use with caution 2Note E: Use with caution 36Note E: Use with caution
1994/1996 30Note E: Use with caution 7Note E: Use with caution 61Note E: Use with caution Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published 25Note E: Use with caution 4Note E: Use with caution 59Note E: Use with caution
1995/1997 29Note E: Use with caution 7Note E: Use with caution 60Note E: Use with caution Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published 25Note E: Use with caution 4Note E: Use with caution 60Note E: Use with caution
1996/1998 29Note E: Use with caution 7Note E: Use with caution 60Note E: Use with caution Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published 34Note E: Use with caution 8Note E: Use with caution 68Note E: Use with caution
1997/1999 9Note E: Use with caution 1Note E: Use with caution 36Note E: Use with caution Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published 11Note E: Use with caution 1Note E: Use with caution 41Note E: Use with caution
1998/2000 8Note E: Use with caution 1Note E: Use with caution 30Note E: Use with caution Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published 10Note E: Use with caution 1Note E: Use with caution 36Note E: Use with caution
1999/2001 38Note E: Use with caution 14Note E: Use with caution 64Note E: Use with caution Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published 45Note E: Use with caution 16Note E: Use with caution 71Note E: Use with caution
2000/2002 49Note E: Use with caution 23Note E: Use with caution 73Note E: Use with caution Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published 62Note E: Use with caution 29Note E: Use with caution 85Note E: Use with caution
2001/2003 49Note E: Use with caution 23Note E: Use with caution 73Note E: Use with caution Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published 57Note E: Use with caution 26Note E: Use with caution 80Note E: Use with caution
Prince Edward Island  
1992/1994 Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published
1993/1995 Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published
1994/1996 Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published
1995/1997 Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published
1996/1998 Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published
1997/1999 Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published
1998/2000 Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published
1999/2001 Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published
2000/2002 Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published
2001/2003 Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note ..: not available for a specific reference period Note ..: not available for a specific reference period Note ..: not available for a specific reference period Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published
Nova Scotia  
1992/1994 16 6 31 25 6 54 10 2 28
1993/1995 15 5 31 27 7 57 6 0 25
1994/1996 8 1 23 10 1 38 6 0 24
1995/1997 16 5 34 24 6 52 8 1 33
1996/1998 12 4 26 15 2 39 10 2 29
1997/1999 22 9 39 23 4 57 21 7 42
1998/2000 19 7 36 Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published 27 10 48
1999/2001 23 9 41 0 Note ..: not available for a specific reference period Note ..: not available for a specific reference period 34 14 57
2000/2002 19 8 35 0 Note ..: not available for a specific reference period Note ..: not available for a specific reference period 30 12 52
2001/2003 12 4 26 0 Note ..: not available for a specific reference period Note ..: not available for a specific reference period 16 5 34
New Brunswick  
1992/1994 25 9 47 Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published 19 5 43
1993/1995 23 8 44 Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published 19 5 42
1994/1996 20 6 41 Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published 21 5 46
1995/1997 20 6 40 Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published 8 1 33
1996/1998 18 4 39 Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published 10 1 37
1997/1999 15 4 34 Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published 8 1 30
1998/2000 5 0 21 Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published 0 Note ..: not available for a specific reference period Note ..: not available for a specific reference period
1999/2001 6 0 26 Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published 0 Note ..: not available for a specific reference period Note ..: not available for a specific reference period
2000/2002 6 0 25 Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published 0 Note ..: not available for a specific reference period Note ..: not available for a specific reference period
2001/2003 7 0 27 Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published 8 1 32
Ontario  
1992/1994 13 10 17 14 9 22 12 8 17
1993/1995 14 11 18 14 9 22 14 10 19
1994/1996 15 12 19 14 8 21 16 11 21
1995/1997 14 10 18 12 7 19 15 11 20
1996/1998 14 11 18 17 10 25 13 9 18
1997/1999 14 10 18 18 11 26 13 9 17
1998/2000 16 12 20 23 15 33 13 9 18
1999/2001 17 13 21 22 14 32 14 10 19
2000/2002 21 17 25 28 19 38 18 14 23
2001/2003 22 18 27 22 15 30 22 17 28
Manitoba  
1992/1994 19 10 29 0 Note ..: not available for a specific reference period Note ..: not available for a specific reference period 25 14 38
1993/1995 20 11 31 0 Note ..: not available for a specific reference period Note ..: not available for a specific reference period 25 14 38
1994/1996 13 6 22 0 Note ..: not available for a specific reference period Note ..: not available for a specific reference period 17 8 28
1995/1997 8 2 17 8 1 32 8 2 19
1996/1998 7 2 18 14 2 38 3 0 15
1997/1999 5 1 15 17 3 45 0 Note ..: not available for a specific reference period Note ..: not available for a specific reference period
1998/2000 5 1 15 8 1 31 4 0 16
1999/2001 7 2 16 8 1 33 6 1 18
2000/2002 9 3 21 18 3 46 6 1 19
2001/2003 8 2 19 21 3 53 3 0 15
Saskatchewan  
1992/1994 6 1 19 9 1 36 5 0 20
1993/1995 13 5 26 15 2 39 12 3 28
1994/1996 18 8 31 9 1 33 21 8 38
1995/1997 16 7 29 9 1 33 19 8 34
1996/1998 11 3 23 0 Note ..: not available for a specific reference period Note ..: not available for a specific reference period 15 5 32
1997/1999 3 0 12 0 Note ..: not available for a specific reference period Note ..: not available for a specific reference period 4 0 17
1998/2000 6 1 19 9 1 34 5 0 21
1999/2001 9 2 23 11 1 40 9 2 25
2000/2002 17 7 30 27 7 58 12 4 26
2001/2003 15 6 28 29 7 62 9 2 22
Alberta  
1992/1994 9 4 16 13 3 30 7 3 15
1993/1995 10 5 17 9 2 27 10 4 18
1994/1996 8 4 16 10 2 29 8 3 16
1995/1997 10 4 18 6 0 25 11 4 21
1996/1998 8 3 16 6 0 24 9 3 19
1997/1999 9 4 17 7 0 29 10 4 19
1998/2000 10 4 19 19 5 43 7 2 16
1999/2001 18 11 28 23 9 45 16 8 27
2000/2002 20 12 30 19 7 37 21 12 33
2001/2003 23 14 33 19 8 34 26 15 39
British Columbia  
1992/1994 12 6 19 3 0 15 16 9 26
1993/1995 6 3 11 2 0 10 8 3 15
1994/1996 8 4 13 2 0 10 10 5 17
1995/1997 11 7 17 9 3 19 13 7 20
1996/1998 13 8 19 10 3 21 14 8 22
1997/1999 12 7 19 9 3 19 14 7 24
1998/2000 14 8 22 11 4 21 17 9 28
1999/2001 18 12 27 15 7 28 21 11 32
2000/2002 20 13 28 19 9 33 20 12 30
2001/2003 17 11 24 17 7 32 17 10 26
.. not available for a specific reference period
E use with caution
F too unreliable to be published
Note 1.

Data from Quebec have been excluded because of issues in correctly ascertaining the vital status of cases.

Note 2.

In the years under study, there was a known under reporting of cancer cases in Newfoundland and Labrador. There is likely to be some overestimation of survival for this province as the survival of such "missed" cases is generally less favourable than that of cases in the registry population. As such, survival estimates from the province of Newfoundland and Labrador should be treated with caution.

Note 3.

Excluding morphology types M-9050 to M-9055; M-9140; M-9590 to M-9989.

Note(s): See "Data quality, concepts and methodology — Footnotes" section. Please note that CANSIM tables also provide the number of cases on which analyses were based, the number of deaths within the first five years of follow-up, as well as estimates of observed survival and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals. Survival estimates based on cases from individual years are available through CANSIM tables.
Source(s): Statistics Canada, Canadian Cancer Registry (CCR), Canadian Vital Statistics (Death Database) and life tables (CANSIM table "/n1/en/cansim/103-1574" title="CANSIM table 103-1574">103-1574).
1.
Data from Quebec have been excluded because of issues in correctly ascertaining the vital status of cases.
2.
In the years under study, there was a known under reporting of cancer cases in Newfoundland and Labrador. There is likely to be some overestimation of survival for this province as the survival of such "missed" cases is generally less favourable than that of cases in the registry population. As such, survival estimates from the province of Newfoundland and Labrador should be treated with caution.
3.
Excluding morphology types M-9050 to M-9055; M-9140; M-9590 to M-9989.
Note(s):
See "Data quality, concepts and methodology — Footnotes" section. Please note that CANSIM tables also provide the number of cases on which analyses were based, the number of deaths within the first five years of follow-up, as well as estimates of observed survival and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals. Survival estimates based on cases from individual years are available through CANSIM tables.
Source(s):
Statistics Canada, Canadian Cancer Registry (CCR), Canadian Vital Statistics (Death Database) and life tables (CANSIM table 103-1574).
Date modified: