Table 3-3
Tongue — Five-year relative survival ratios, October 2011 CCR file, by sex, population aged 15 to 99, 3 years of cases, selected provinces1,2

Warning View the most recent version.

Archived Content

Information identified as archived is provided for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It is not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards and has not been altered or updated since it was archived. Please "contact us" to request a format other than those available.

Archived

This page has been archived on the Web.

PDF | Symbols Next Previous

Five-year relative survival ratios, October 2011 CCR file, by sex, population aged 15 to 99, 3 years of cases, selected provinces


Table summary
This table displays the results of five-year relative survival ratios. The information is grouped by primary site of cancer (appearing as row headers), 3 years of cases, both sexes, males, females, relative survival ratio, 95% confidence interval and low, calculated using low, high and percent units of measure (appearing as column headers).
Primary site of cancer 3 years of cases
Both sexes Males Females
Relative survival ratio 95% confidence interval Relative survival ratio 95% confidence interval Relative survival ratio 95% confidence interval
Low High Low High Low High
  percent
Tongue (ICD-O-3: C01.9-C02.9)Note 3  
Newfoundland and Labrador  
1992/1994 47Note E: Use with caution 23Note E: Use with caution 70Note E: Use with caution 47Note E: Use with caution 17Note E: Use with caution 75Note E: Use with caution Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published
1993/1995 51Note E: Use with caution 28Note E: Use with caution 71Note E: Use with caution 58Note E: Use with caution 29Note E: Use with caution 81Note E: Use with caution Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published
1994/1996 60Note E: Use with caution 36Note E: Use with caution 79Note E: Use with caution 65Note E: Use with caution 35Note E: Use with caution 87Note E: Use with caution Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published
1995/1997 72Note E: Use with caution 46Note E: Use with caution 91Note E: Use with caution 76Note E: Use with caution 46Note E: Use with caution 97Note E: Use with caution Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published
1996/1998 61Note E: Use with caution 34Note E: Use with caution 84Note E: Use with caution 62Note E: Use with caution 33Note E: Use with caution 85Note E: Use with caution Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published
1997/1999 49Note E: Use with caution 26Note E: Use with caution 71Note E: Use with caution 46Note E: Use with caution 23Note E: Use with caution 69Note E: Use with caution Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published
1998/2000 37Note E: Use with caution 18Note E: Use with caution 57Note E: Use with caution 34Note E: Use with caution 14Note E: Use with caution 56Note E: Use with caution Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published
1999/2001 35Note E: Use with caution 17Note E: Use with caution 55Note E: Use with caution 34Note E: Use with caution 14Note E: Use with caution 56Note E: Use with caution Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published
2000/2002 41Note E: Use with caution 20Note E: Use with caution 61Note E: Use with caution 40Note E: Use with caution 18Note E: Use with caution 63Note E: Use with caution Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published
2001/2003 53Note E: Use with caution 31Note E: Use with caution 72Note E: Use with caution 49Note E: Use with caution 26Note E: Use with caution 71Note E: Use with caution Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published
Prince Edward Island  
1992/1994 Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published
1993/1995 Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published
1994/1996 Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published
1995/1997 66 28 91 Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published
1996/1998 82 53 97 80 44 98 Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published
1997/1999 72 41 92 65 27 90 Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published
1998/2000 77 39 96 Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published
1999/2001 Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published
2000/2002 Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published
2001/2003 Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published
Nova Scotia  
1992/1994 54 37 69 53 34 70 55 23 84
1993/1995 38 24 52 42 26 59 24 6 51
1994/1996 44 29 58 42 26 58 49 20 77
1995/1997 35 22 49 33 18 49 42 17 68
1996/1998 50 35 64 42 25 59 65 37 86
1997/1999 50 34 64 47 28 65 54 28 77
1998/2000 55 40 68 50 32 66 65 37 86
1999/2001 55 41 68 51 35 66 69 38 89
2000/2002 56 42 69 54 38 69 62 33 85
2001/2003 60 45 73 64 46 78 49 22 73
New Brunswick  
1992/1994 40 22 57 42 23 60 Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published
1993/1995 49 28 68 48 25 69 Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published
1994/1996 45 27 61 42 23 60 Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published
1995/1997 48 30 64 43 23 62 58 24 83
1996/1998 50 31 68 44 23 63 Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published
1997/1999 38 20 57 37 15 60 41 13 71
1998/2000 39 22 57 44 23 65 Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published
1999/2001 45 30 60 47 27 64 42 17 66
2000/2002 53 38 67 52 34 68 56 27 77
2001/2003 52 37 66 48 29 64 63 33 83
Ontario  
1992/1994 51 47 56 47 41 52 60 52 67
1993/1995 51 46 55 46 40 51 59 51 66
1994/1996 50 46 54 47 42 52 56 48 63
1995/1997 52 47 56 49 44 54 56 49 63
1996/1998 54 50 58 53 48 58 57 50 64
1997/1999 58 53 62 57 52 62 58 51 64
1998/2000 62 57 65 61 56 65 63 56 70
1999/2001 62 58 65 61 56 66 62 55 68
2000/2002 60 56 64 59 54 64 62 55 69
2001/2003 60 56 64 60 55 65 60 53 66
Manitoba  
1992/1994 54 41 67 59 42 74 47 27 66
1993/1995 61 47 73 68 49 84 50 29 70
1994/1996 60 46 72 65 47 80 51 29 70
1995/1997 58 44 71 64 46 78 48 26 69
1996/1998 62 48 74 60 44 74 65 37 87
1997/1999 61 47 74 58 41 73 67 40 88
1998/2000 62 48 74 59 42 72 70 40 92
1999/2001 57 45 68 53 38 67 65 42 83
2000/2002 57 45 68 54 40 67 62 42 80
2001/2003 55 43 65 52 38 65 58 39 76
Saskatchewan  
1992/1994 48 30 65 28 10 50 69 40 90
1993/1995 46 30 62 36 17 57 57 32 78
1994/1996 42 27 56 45 27 63 35 14 59
1995/1997 43 28 58 54 34 72 24 8 47
1996/1998 50 35 64 53 32 72 47 25 67
1997/1999 55 38 70 54 31 74 56 31 76
1998/2000 49 34 64 43 24 61 58 34 79
1999/2001 44 29 58 43 23 64 44 23 65
2000/2002 45 30 59 47 27 65 42 22 63
2001/2003 49 34 63 58 36 75 39 20 59
Alberta  
1992/1994 44 34 54 45 32 58 42 28 57
1993/1995 45 35 55 44 31 57 45 31 60
1994/1996 41 31 51 40 28 52 42 27 58
1995/1997 40 30 50 39 26 52 41 25 58
1996/1998 41 31 50 43 31 55 36 21 52
1997/1999 42 33 51 46 34 58 35 21 50
1998/2000 49 40 57 48 37 58 49 36 62
1999/2001 49 41 57 49 39 60 48 36 60
2000/2002 51 43 59 48 38 57 57 44 68
2001/2003 54 46 61 52 43 61 56 43 68
British Columbia  
1992/1994 48 40 55 45 36 53 54 41 66
1993/1995 51 44 58 50 40 58 54 41 66
1994/1996 56 49 63 51 42 60 67 53 78
1995/1997 53 46 60 48 39 56 62 50 73
1996/1998 53 46 60 48 39 57 62 49 73
1997/1999 52 44 59 51 41 60 53 42 63
1998/2000 51 43 57 51 41 60 50 40 60
1999/2001 55 48 61 56 47 65 53 42 63
2000/2002 56 49 62 57 48 65 55 44 65
2001/2003 59 52 65 60 52 67 57 45 67
E use with caution
F too unreliable to be published
Note 1.

Data from Quebec have been excluded because of issues in correctly ascertaining the vital status of cases.

Note 2.

In the years under study, there was a known under reporting of cancer cases in Newfoundland and Labrador. There is likely to be some overestimation of survival for this province as the survival of such "missed" cases is generally less favourable than that of cases in the registry population. As such, survival estimates from the province of Newfoundland and Labrador should be treated with caution.

Note 3.

Excluding morphology types M-9050 to M-9055; M-9140; M-9590 to M-9989.

Note(s): See "Data quality, concepts and methodology — Footnotes" section. Please note that CANSIM tables also provide the number of cases on which analyses were based, the number of deaths within the first five years of follow-up, as well as estimates of observed survival and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals. Survival estimates based on cases from individual years are available through CANSIM tables.
Source(s): Statistics Canada, Canadian Cancer Registry (CCR), Canadian Vital Statistics (Death Database) and life tables (CANSIM table "/n1/en/cansim/103-1574" title="CANSIM table 103-1574">103-1574).
1.
Data from Quebec have been excluded because of issues in correctly ascertaining the vital status of cases.
2.
In the years under study, there was a known under reporting of cancer cases in Newfoundland and Labrador. There is likely to be some overestimation of survival for this province as the survival of such "missed" cases is generally less favourable than that of cases in the registry population. As such, survival estimates from the province of Newfoundland and Labrador should be treated with caution.
3.
Excluding morphology types M-9050 to M-9055; M-9140; M-9590 to M-9989.
Note(s):
See "Data quality, concepts and methodology — Footnotes" section. Please note that CANSIM tables also provide the number of cases on which analyses were based, the number of deaths within the first five years of follow-up, as well as estimates of observed survival and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals. Survival estimates based on cases from individual years are available through CANSIM tables.
Source(s):
Statistics Canada, Canadian Cancer Registry (CCR), Canadian Vital Statistics (Death Database) and life tables (CANSIM table 103-1574).
Date modified: