Table 2
Factors involved in tanning equipment use, household population aged 12 or older, Canada excluding territories, 2014

Table 2
Factors involved in tanning equipment use, household population aged 12 or older, Canada excluding territories, 2014
Table summary
This table displays the results of Factors involved in tanning equipment use. The information is grouped by Factor (appearing as row headers), % and 95% confidence interval, calculated using from and to units of measure (appearing as column headers).
Factor % 95% confidence interval
from to
Reasons for useTable 2 Note   
Get base tan 62.0 57.3 66.6
Aesthetic 21.0 17.2 24.8
Relax/Feel better 15.8 12.4 19.2
Boost immune system 8.9Note E: Use with caution 5.9 12.0
Treat skin condition 4.3Note E: Use with caution 2.8 5.9
Prevent cancer Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published
Other 6.6Note E: Use with caution 4.2 9.1
Frequency of use (per year)  
Periodic (fewer than 10 sessions) 73.4 69.2 77.6
Regular (10 or more sessions) 26.5 22.2 30.7
Frequency of use in last month (regular users)  
1 to 10 sessions 69.9 60.7 79.1
11 to 31 sessions 24.9Note E: Use with caution 16.0 33.8
Not available/Don't know/Refusal/Not stated 5.2Note E: Use with caution 2.0 8.4
Wore eye protection  
Yes 84.5 80.5 88.5
No 14.0 10.1 17.8
Read warning labels each session in past year  
Yes 51.7 46.8 56.5
No 48.1 43.2 52.9
Reasons for not reading warning labelsTable 2 Note   
Read in past 61.4 54.4 68.3
Not important 16.2Note E: Use with caution 9.7 22.8
Did not notice labels 12.9Note E: Use with caution 8.7 17.1
Given oral instructions by attendant 7.2Note E: Use with caution 3.8 10.6
No warning labels Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published
Didn't have time Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published
Unreadable Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published
Other 5.6Note E: Use with caution 3.2 7.9
Followed exposure schedule in past year  
Yes 80.2 75.8 84.7
No 18.4 14.0 22.8
Reasons for not following exposure scheduleTable 2 Note   
Followed first time 23.8Note E: Use with caution 11.0 36.6
No exposure schedule 22.3Note E: Use with caution 12.1 32.6
Given different exposure schedule by attendant Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published
Forgot Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published
Other 44.7 32.3 57.2
Discomfort/Injury to skin in past year  
Yes 10.4 7.5 13.2
No 89.6 86.7 92.5
Number of episodes of discomfort/injury to skin in past year  
1 56.3 41.4 71.3
2 to 12 41.7Note E: Use with caution 26.8 56.7
Not applicable/Don't know/Refused/Not stated Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published
Number of days discomfort/injury lasted  
2 or fewer 69.7 55.4 84
More than 2 28.1Note E: Use with caution 13.6 42.6
Not applicable/Don't know/Refused/Not stated Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published
Date modified: