Table 2
Factors involved in tanning equipment use, household population aged 12 or older, Canada excluding territories, 2014
| Factor | % | 95% confidence interval | |
|---|---|---|---|
| from | to | ||
| Reasons for useTable 2 Note † | |||
| Get base tan | 62.0 | 57.3 | 66.6 |
| Aesthetic | 21.0 | 17.2 | 24.8 |
| Relax/Feel better | 15.8 | 12.4 | 19.2 |
| Boost immune system | 8.9Note E: Use with caution | 5.9 | 12.0 |
| Treat skin condition | 4.3Note E: Use with caution | 2.8 | 5.9 |
| Prevent cancer | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published |
| Other | 6.6Note E: Use with caution | 4.2 | 9.1 |
| Frequency of use (per year) | |||
| Periodic (fewer than 10 sessions) | 73.4 | 69.2 | 77.6 |
| Regular (10 or more sessions) | 26.5 | 22.2 | 30.7 |
| Frequency of use in last month (regular users) | |||
| 1 to 10 sessions | 69.9 | 60.7 | 79.1 |
| 11 to 31 sessions | 24.9Note E: Use with caution | 16.0 | 33.8 |
| Not available/Don't know/Refusal/Not stated | 5.2Note E: Use with caution | 2.0 | 8.4 |
| Wore eye protection | |||
| Yes | 84.5 | 80.5 | 88.5 |
| No | 14.0 | 10.1 | 17.8 |
| Read warning labels each session in past year | |||
| Yes | 51.7 | 46.8 | 56.5 |
| No | 48.1 | 43.2 | 52.9 |
| Reasons for not reading warning labelsTable 2 Note † | |||
| Read in past | 61.4 | 54.4 | 68.3 |
| Not important | 16.2Note E: Use with caution | 9.7 | 22.8 |
| Did not notice labels | 12.9Note E: Use with caution | 8.7 | 17.1 |
| Given oral instructions by attendant | 7.2Note E: Use with caution | 3.8 | 10.6 |
| No warning labels | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published |
| Didn't have time | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published |
| Unreadable | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published |
| Other | 5.6Note E: Use with caution | 3.2 | 7.9 |
| Followed exposure schedule in past year | |||
| Yes | 80.2 | 75.8 | 84.7 |
| No | 18.4 | 14.0 | 22.8 |
| Reasons for not following exposure scheduleTable 2 Note † | |||
| Followed first time | 23.8Note E: Use with caution | 11.0 | 36.6 |
| No exposure schedule | 22.3Note E: Use with caution | 12.1 | 32.6 |
| Given different exposure schedule by attendant | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published |
| Forgot | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published |
| Other | 44.7 | 32.3 | 57.2 |
| Discomfort/Injury to skin in past year | |||
| Yes | 10.4 | 7.5 | 13.2 |
| No | 89.6 | 86.7 | 92.5 |
| Number of episodes of discomfort/injury to skin in past year | |||
| 1 | 56.3 | 41.4 | 71.3 |
| 2 to 12 | 41.7Note E: Use with caution | 26.8 | 56.7 |
| Not applicable/Don't know/Refused/Not stated | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published |
| Number of days discomfort/injury lasted | |||
| 2 or fewer | 69.7 | 55.4 | 84 |
| More than 2 | 28.1Note E: Use with caution | 13.6 | 42.6 |
| Not applicable/Don't know/Refused/Not stated | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published | Note F: too unreliable to be published |
|
E use with caution F too unreliable to be published
|
|||
- Date modified: