Skip to main content
Skip to "About this site"

Table 2
Log binomial modelling of association between out-of-pocket spending on drugs and pharmaceutical products at 5% and 3% of household income and cost-related prescription non-adherence, household population age 40 or older with cardiovascular-related conditions, Manitoba, Saskatchewan, Alberta, and British Columbia, 2012 Table 2
Log binomial modelling of association between out-of-pocket spending on drugs and pharmaceutical products at 5% and 3% of household income and cost-related prescription non-adherence, household population age 40 or older with cardiovascular-related conditions, Manitoba, Saskatchewan, Alberta, and British Columbia, 2012

Table 2
Log binomial modelling of association between out-of-pocket spending on drugs and pharmaceutical products at 5% and 3% of household income and cost-related prescription non-adherence, household population age 40 or older with cardiovascular-related conditions, Manitoba, Saskatchewan, Alberta, and British Columbia, 2012
Table summary
This table displays the results of Log binomial modelling of association between out-of-pocket spending on drugs and pharmaceutical products at 5% and 3% of household income and cost-related prescription non-adherence. The information is grouped by Out-of-pocket spending on drugs and pharmaceutical products as % of household income (appearing as row headers), Cost-related prescription non-adherence, Prevalence, Prevalence rate ratio, %, 95% confidence interval, Unadjusted and Age- /Sex-adjusted , calculated using from, to and Sensitivity analysis units of measure (appearing as column headers).
Out-of-pocket spending on drugs and pharmaceutical products as % of household income	Cost-related prescription non-adherence
	Prevalence			Prevalence rate ratio
	%	95% confidence interval		Unadjusted	95% confidence interval		Age- /Sex-adjusted	95% confidence interval
	%	from	to	Unadjusted	from	to	Age- /Sex-adjusted	from	to
Overall	4.1^{Note E: Use with caution}	2.6	6.3	Note ...: not applicable	Note ...: not applicable	Note ...: not applicable	Note ...: not applicable	Note ...: not applicable	Note ...: not applicable
0%	0.0	Note ...: not applicable	Note ...: not applicable	Note ...: not applicable	Note ...: not applicable	Note ...: not applicable	Note ...: not applicable	Note ...: not applicable	Note ...: not applicable
More than 0% to less than 5%^Note ‡	5.2^{Note E: Use with caution}	3.1	8.5	1.0	Note ...: not applicable	Note ...: not applicable	1.0	Note ...: not applicable	Note ...: not applicable
5% or more	<21.5^Note †			2.2	0.8	5.6	2.6^Note *	1.0	6.4
	Sensitivity analysis
More than 0% to less than 3%^Note ‡	4.9^{Note E: Use with caution}	2.7	8.6	1.0	Note ...: not applicable	Note ...: not applicable	1.0	Note ...: not applicable	Note ...: not applicable
3% or more	8.2^{Note E: Use with caution}	4.9	13.7	1.7	0.7	4.0	2.0	0.9	4.9
... not applicable ^E use with caution Note * significantly different from reference category (p < 0.05) Return to note * referrer Note † upper bound of confidence interval that is reportable when number of observations exceeds 10, but coefficient of variation is greater than 33.3% Return to note † referrer Note ‡ reference category Return to note ‡ referrer Source: 2012 Barriers to Care for People with Chronic Health Conditions Survey.

Date modified:: 2017-07-12