References
1. Shin HR, Curado MP, Ferlay J, et al. Comparability and quality of data. In: Curado MP, Edwards B, Shin HR, et al., eds. Cancer Incidence in Five Continents, Vol. IX. IARC Scientific Publications, No. 160. Lyon: IARC Scientific Publications, 2007.
2. Schmidtmann I, Blettner M.How do cancer registries in Europe estimate completeness of registration. Methods of Information in Medicine 2009; 48(3): 267-71.
3. Crocetti E, Miccinesi G, Paci E, Zappa M. An application of the two-source capture-recapture method to estimate the completeness of the Tuscany Cancer Registry, Italy. European Journal of Cancer Prevention 2001; 10: 417-23.
4. Parkin DM, Bray F. Evaluation of data quality in the cancer registry: principles and methods. Part II: completeness. European Journal of Cancer 2009; 45(5): 756-64.
5. Schmidtmann I. Estimating completeness in cancer registries – comparing capture-recapture methods in a simulation study. Biometrical Journal 2008; 50: 1077-92.
6. Tilling K. Capture-recapture methods—useful or misleading? International Journal of Epidemiology 2001; 30: 12-4.
7. Bullard J, Coleman MP, Robinson D, et al. Completeness of cancer registrations: a new method for routine use. British Journal of Cancer 2000; 82(5): 1111-6.
8. Silcocks PBS, Robinson D. Simulation modelling to validate the flow method for estimating completeness of case ascertainment by cancer registries. Journal of Public Health 2007; 29(4): 455-62.
9. Hofferkamp J, ed. Standards for Cancer Registries Volume III: Standards for Completeness, Quality, Analysis, Management, Security and Confidentiality of Data. Springfield, Illinois: North American Association of Central Cancer Registries, 2008.
10. Fulton JP, Howe HL. Evaluating the use of incidence–mortality ratios in estimating the completeness of cancer registration. In: Howe HL, ed. Cancer Incidence in North America, 1988-1991. Sacramento, California: North American Association of Central Cancer Registries, 1995: VI-1-VI-9.
11. Ross F. Quality control of cancer registry data. In: Hutchison CL, Menck HR, Burch M, Gottschalk R, eds. Cancer Registry Management Principles and Practice, Second Edition. Dubuque, Iowa: Kendall/Hunt Publishing Company, 2004: 199-208.
12. NAACCR Method to Estimate Completeness Workbook (version 2.2b). Available at: http://www.naaccr.org/Research/DataAnalysisTools.aspx. Accessed July 9, 2012.
13. De Angelis R, Francisci S, Baili P, et al. The EUROCARE-4 database on cancer survival in Europe: data standardisation, quality control and methods of statistical analysis. European Journal of Cancer 2009; 45(6): 909-30.
14. Coleman MP, Quaresma M, Berrino F, et al. Cancer survival in five continents: a worldwide population-based study (CONCORD). Lancet Oncology 2008; 9: 730-56.
15. Swerdlow AJ. Data quality in vital and health statistics. In: Armitage P, Colton T, eds. Encyclopedia of Biostatistics, Second Edition. New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc., 2005.
16. Curado MP, Voti L, Sortino-Rachou AM. Cancer registration data and quality indicators in low and middle income countries: their interpretation and potential use for the improvement of cancer care. Cancer Causes and Control 2009; 20(5): 751-6.
17. Bray F, Parkin DM. Evaluation of data quality in the cancer registry: principles and methods. Part I: comparability, validity and timeliness. European Journal of Cancer 2009; 45(5): 747-55.
18. Copeland G, Lake A, Firth R, et al., eds. Cancer in North America: 2005-2009. Volume One: Combined Cancer Incidence for the United States, Canada and North America. Springfield, Illinois: North American Association of Central Cancer Registries, Inc., 2012.
19. Statistics Canada. Canadian Cancer Registry, July 2011 Version. Available at : http://www23.statcan.gc.ca/imdb/p2SV.pl?Function=getSurvey&SDDS=3207&lang=en&db=imdb&adm=8&dis=2.
20. Statistics Canada. Canadian Vital Statistics Death Database, 2003 to 2007. Available at: http://www23.statcan.gc.ca/imdb/p2SV.pl?Function=getSurvey&SDDS=3233&lang=en&db=imdb&adm=8&dis=2.
21. Statistics Canada. CANSIM Table 051-0001. Estimates of population, by age group and sex for July 1, Canada, provinces and territories, annual (persons unless otherwise noted). Released September 29, 2010.
22. Fay MP, Feuer EJ. Confidence intervals for directly standardized rates: a method based on the gamma distribution. Statistics in Medicine 1997; 16: 791-801.
23. Armitage P, Berry G, Matthews JNS. Statistical Methods in Medical Research. Fourth Edition. Oxford: Blackwell Science, 2002.
24. Das B, Clegg LX, Feuer EJ. A new method to evaluate the completeness of case ascertainment by a cancer registry. Cancer Causes Control 2008; 19: 515-25.
25. Howell DC. Alternative correlational techniques. In: Crockett C, ed. Statistical Methods for Psychology, Fifth Edition. Pacific Grove, California: Wadsworth, 2002.
26. SAS Institute Inc. SAS/STAT® 9.2 User’s Guide. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc., 2008.
27. Statistics Canada. Cancer Incidence in Canada, 2008 and 2009 (Catalogue 82-231-X) Ottawa: Minister of Industry, 2011.
28. Brisson J, Major D, Pelletier E. Evaluation of the completeness of the Fichier des Tumeurs du Québec. Québec: Institut National de Santé Publique du Québec, 2003.
29. Brenner H, Stegmaier C, Ziegler H. Estimating completeness of cancer registration: an empirical evaluation of the two source capture-recapture approach in Germany. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 1995; 49: 426-30.
30. Hook EB, Regal RR. Capture-recapture methods in epidemiology: methods and limitations. Epidemiologic Reviews 1995; 17(2): 243-64.
31. Robles SC, Marrett LD, Clarke EA, Risch HA. An application of capture-recapture methods to the estimation of completeness of cancer registration. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 1988; 41(5): 495-501.
32. Schouten LJ, Straatman H, Kiemeney LALM, et al. The capture-recapture method for estimation of cancer registry completeness: a useful tool? International Journal of Epidemiology 1994; 23(6): 1111-6.
- Date modified: