Table 6-2
Labour force characteristics — by territories, unadjusted for seasonality, 3 month moving average ending in November 2012 and November 2013

Warning View the most recent version.

Archived Content

Information identified as archived is provided for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It is not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards and has not been altered or updated since it was archived. Please "contact us" to request a format other than those available.

Archived

This page has been archived on the Web.

PDF Symbols  Next table  Previous table

Labour force characteristics — by territories, unadjusted for seasonality, 3 month moving average ending in November 2012 and November 2013
Table summary
This table displays the labour force characteristics by territory. The data in this table is unadjusted for seasonality, three-month moving average. The row headers provide information for the territories for the current month and the same month last year. The column headers provide information for the labour force characteristics in thousands.
  Population Labour force Participation rate Unemployment rate Employment rate
Labour force Employment Unemployment
         in thousands percent
Yukon 1  
2012 27.1 19.9 18.9 1.1 73.4 5.5 69.7
2013 27.7 20.2 19.2 1.0 72.9 5.0 69.3
Northwest Territories 2  
2012 32.1 24.7 23.0 1.7 76.9 6.9 71.7
2013 31.9 24.2 22.1 2.1 75.9 8.7 69.3
Nunavut 3  
2012 21.3 13.7 11.9 1.8 64.6 13.4 55.9
2013 22.1 14.7 12.4 2.3 66.6 15.5 56.3
1.
Since 1992, the Labour force survey (LFS) has been conducted in the Yukon, using an alternative methodology that accommodates some of the operational difficulties inherent to remote locales. These estimates are not included in the national totals. In 1995, the LFS in the Yukon underwent a sample redesign. One result of the redesign was that the covered population increased from 85% to 92%, which is reflected by the sharp increase in the three month moving averages estimates of January, February and March of 1995 for all the level estimates. Users are therefore warned to be cautious when comparing estimates before January 1995 to estimates for January 1995 and forward.
2.
Since 2001, the Labour force survey (LFS) has been administered in the Northwest Territories, using an alternative methodology that accommodates some of the operational difficulties inherent to remote locales. These estimates are not included in national totals.
3.
Since 2004, the Labour force survey (LFS) has been administered in Nunavut, using an alternative methodology that accommodates some of the operational difficulties inherent to remote locales. These estimates are 3-month moving averages and are not included in national totals. From January 2004 to December 2007, estimates represent about 70% of all Nunavut residents aged 15 and over. Starting in January 2008, coverage was extended to 92%, so that by March 2008, the 3-month moving average is completely based on the extended coverage. Because of the large difference in coverage, users are recommended not to compare estimates prior to January 2008 with data afterwards. The January and February 2008 3-month moving average estimates are based on a mix of both coverages, since the extended coverage was introduced in January 2008. Estimates from January 2004 to December 2007 are based on the 10 largest communities in Nunavut: Iqaluit, Rankin Inlet, Cambridge Bay, Kugluktuk, Baker Lake, Arviat, Pond Inlet, Cape Dorset, Pangnirtung, Igloolik. Estimates from March 2008 to present cover the above communities as well as: Taloyoak, Gjoa Haven, Kugaaruk, Coral Harbour, Repulse Bay, Qikiqtarjuaq, Arctic Bay, Hall Beach, Clyde River.
Note(s):
Related CANSIM table 282-0100.
Date modified: