Prices through the supply chain: Softwood lumber

by Robert Meyer-Robinson

Release date: September 2, 2022

Skip to text

Text begins

Context

In 2021, the cost of constructing a single-detached home increased by 22.5%.Note This record annual increase in construction costs was driven by higher prices for softwood lumber. Between June 2020 and May 2021, the producer priceNote of softwood lumber more than tripled, amid various COVID-related developments in the economy. Demand for softwood lumber increased as declining interest rates and excess household savingsNote underpinned greater spending on new home construction and pandemic home-improvement projects, key downstream markets for the commodity. Domestic supply of softwood lumber declined initially amid mill closures and curtailments following the COVID-19 outbreak. Even as production picked up in the summer of 2021, longer-term supply constraints in British Columbia due to beetle infestations and wildfires limited increases in Canadian softwood lumber production.

To better understand the unprecedented volatility in lumber prices and the ensuing price transmission, this analysis evaluates the price movements across the domestic supply chain for lumber since the summer of 2020 using producer price indexes.

Highlights

  • The increase in producer prices for lumber was not passed along proportionately to consumers. This partly reflects the fact that wholesalers and retailers reduced their markups, presumably to remain competitive.
  • Even though wholesalers and retailers reduced their percentage markup on lumber, they still earned a higher gross profit on each unit of lumber sold.
  • Roughly two thirds (65%) of the record increase in construction costs for single-detached homes between the first quarter of 2020 and the first quarter of 2022 can be attributed to rising prices for wood, plastics, and composites, specifically, softwood lumber prices.

Analysis

Overview of the supply chain for softwood lumber

Figure 1 illustrates a simplified supply chain for lumber, excluding international trade. First, logs are harvested from the forests. Next, these logs are sorted for their intended end uses. Logs that are deemed suitable for dimensional lumber are transported to sawmills for processing. Producers sell their lumber to wholesalers, who distribute it to various downstream users. This includes contractors, who purchase the lumber for use, notably in residential construction, where it is used in walls, floors, and ceilings. It also includes retailers who purchase lumber for resale, at a markup, to household consumers. While lumber has other uses, this analysis focuses on its journey from log to end-use, in single-home construction and home improvement.

Forest products supply chain (excluding international trade)
Figure 1 Description

This figure illustrates the supply chain for lumber, from forest to end use in home construction and improvement. It excludes international trade.

Note: This figure was altered from the original figure to highlight a specific path, represented by the red arrows

Source: WWF Living Forests Report, 2012.
https://files.worldwildlife.org/wwfcmsprod/files/Publication/file/5ub3o4pav8_living_forests_report_ch4_forest_products
.pdf?_ga=2.97272157.354968229.1646840601-364187257.1646840600

Measuring prices across the supply chain

Figure 2 outlines the specific data used to monitor price movements along the supply chain for lumber. To begin with, the Raw Materials Price Index (RMPI) measures price changes for logs and bolts that are purchased for further processing by manufacturers operating in Canada. Moving downstream, the Industrial Product Price Index (IPPI) tracks changes in producer prices, in this case, the prices that producers receive for the sale of softwood lumber.Note The Wholesale Services Price Index (WSPI) quantifies price movements for lumber distributed to, and sold by, wholesalers. There is no retail selling price index for lumber per se. However, the Retail Services Price Index (RSPI)Note measures movements in the price that consumers pay for lumber at home centres. Finally, the Building Construction Price Index (BCPI) measures price movements for wood products used in home construction as well as aggregate price movements in construction costs for single-detached homes. The BCPI measures quarterly price changes, whereas each of the four other indexes measures monthly price changes.Note

Figure 2: From logs to single-home construction―Measuring prices along the supply chain for lumber
Figure 2 Description:

This figure illustrates the stages along the domestic supply chain for lumber. Each stage is associated with a Producer Prices Program that measures prices at the stage. In turn, an individual price series is identified under each Program that most closely tracks the path of lumber along the supply chain.

  1. NAPCS-2017
  2. NAICS-2017

Contributors to unprecedented inflation

The first significant price change in the supply chain for lumber since the start of the pandemic was captured by the IPPI. In July 2020, producer prices for softwood lumber increased 22% from the previous month. At that point, demand for lumber had begun trending upwards, mostly driven by new residential construction and spending on home improvement. Housing starts across Canada rallied in May and June, following a decline in April. As a result, housing starts in the second quarter of 2020 totalled roughly 74,600―their highest levels since the second quarter of 1987, and 35% higher than their annual average over the second quarters of the previous five years. Likewise, housing starts in the U.S., a key driver of demand for Canadian lumber, increased after an initial decline in April. In July 2020, the U.S. recorded 138,700 housing starts,Note up 21% year-over-year.

Amid the ongoing uncertainty surrounding the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic, some sawmills shut down, while others curtailed production temporarily, resulting in a dip in domestic softwood lumber production in the second quarter of 2020. Domestic lumber production increased over the following three quarters, averaging 8% higher in the first quarter of 2021 compared to the first quarter of 2020. However, demand for lumber outgrew this increase in supply.

Domestic residential construction investment, including spending on new construction and renovations, surpassed pre-COVID levels by August 2020. Thereafter, it increased steadily and peaked in April 2021, to a level 34% higher than its average level over the decade spanning from 2010 to 2019, adjusted for inflation. At the same time, U.S. housing starts increased in the third quarter of 2020 and rose even further thereafter putting significant upward pressure on lumber prices.

Other factors may have contributed to inflation across the supply chain for lumber. Indeed, during COVID-19, businesses were exposed to various forms of supply chain disruptions, such as truck driver shortages, interruptions to trade, and reduced workforce productivity. To the extent that these disruptions reduced the supply of production inputs, the relative scarcity for these goods would have created upward pressure on their prices. The ensuing increase to production costs, or a portion thereof, would have then been passed on to customers.

Against this backdrop, producer prices for softwood lumber rose steadily, increasing in eight of the ten months beginning in August 2020. Double-digit price growth was recorded in six of these eight months. Prices peaked in May 2021, 209% above their June 2020 levels. This volatility in lumber prices was unprecedented, as illustrated in Chart 1.

Chart 1

Data table for Chart 1 
Data table for chart 1
Table summary
This table displays the results of Data table for chart 1 Year-over-year percentage change in producer prices for lumber (appearing as column headers).
Year-over-year percentage change in producer prices for lumber
1957
January -8.7
February -8.7
March -8.6
April -8.6
May -10.2
June -8.6
July -7.1
August -7.3
September -5.0
October -5.8
November -4.2
December -3.4
1958
January -1.7
February -2.6
March -4.3
April -3.4
May -1.7
June -3.4
July -2.6
August 1.7
September 1.7
October 0.9
November 0.9
December 0.9
1959
January 3.5
February 5.4
March 8.0
April 8.8
May 9.7
June 9.7
July 8.8
August 6.0
September 6.0
October 7.0
November 6.1
December 7.9
1960
January 6.0
February 5.1
March 0.8
April -0.8
May -2.4
June -4.8
July -5.6
August -8.1
September -11.3
October -10.6
November -9.1
December -10.6
1961
January -11.3
February -11.3
March -8.2
April -7.4
May -6.6
June -4.2
July -2.6
August -0.9
September 1.8
October 0.0
November 2.7
December 3.6
1962
January 3.6
February 4.5
March 4.5
April 3.5
May 5.3
June 7.1
July 6.1
August 5.3
September 6.3
October 7.3
November 4.4
December 3.5
1963
January 6.1
February 7.0
March 4.3
April 5.1
May 4.2
June 4.1
July 5.8
August 6.7
September 4.2
October 4.2
November 5.1
December 5.9
1964
January 4.1
February 5.7
March 7.4
April 6.5
May 6.5
June 4.0
July 1.6
August 2.4
September 2.4
October 2.4
November 1.6
December 0.8
1965
January 4.0
February 1.5
March 0.0
April -0.8
May -0.8
June 0.0
July -1.5
August 1.5
September 3.9
October 3.2
November 3.2
December 4.8
1966
January 1.5
February 2.3
March 4.6
April 8.5
May 8.4
June 6.9
July 7.0
August 3.0
September 0.8
October 1.5
November 1.5
December 0.8
1967
January 1.5
February 3.7
March 2.2
April 0.0
May -0.7
June 1.4
July 2.9
August 4.4
September 7.5
October 7.6
November 9.1
December 11.3
1968
January 11.9
February 12.9
March 17.1
April 17.7
May 18.4
June 19.0
July 19.9
August 21.8
September 23.8
October 24.6
November 26.4
December 27.0
1969
January 27.8
February 29.7
March 32.3
April 28.9
May 21.6
June 7.1
July -1.8
August -7.5
September -10.7
October -14.7
November -15.4
December -17.6
1970
January -21.8
February -26.3
March -31.8
April -31.3
May -26.6
June -17.7
July -10.8
August -6.9
September -4.4
October 0.0
November -5.2
December -5.8
1971
January -1.3
February 6.0
March 14.2
April 15.0
May 13.4
June 18.8
July 26.4
August 28.2
September 23.2
October 19.2
November 24.0
December 24.7
1972
January 30.9
February 26.9
March 21.3
April 24.3
May 24.9
June 20.3
July 18.7
August 20.4
September 27.4
October 40.6
November 43.1
December 42.3
1973
January 38.5
February 37.4
March 43.9
April 44.8
May 40.8
June 39.4
July 28.4
August 28.3
September 26.6
October 15.4
November 10.0
December 6.6
1974
January -1.1
February -4.7
March -1.4
April -3.9
May -5.4
June -9.1
July -8.4
August -18.3
September -23.0
October -26.7
November -23.5
December -14.1
1975
January -18.0
February -15.0
March -21.3
April -15.1
May -5.3
June -2.6
July 2.7
August 9.1
September 13.9
October 18.2
November 17.0
December 12.7
1976
January 27.4
February 23.9
March 24.5
April 14.5
May 5.3
June 6.5
July 6.7
August 14.1
September 15.6
October 18.2
November 17.6
December 16.9
1977
January 11.8
February 13.6
March 14.4
April 14.8
May 15.0
June 17.1
July 23.1
August 25.0
September 25.7
October 22.4
November 21.0
December 19.2
1978
January 26.6
February 27.0
March 26.1
April 26.7
May 28.6
June 24.4
July 18.5
August 16.5
September 16.2
October 25.7
November 28.7
December 24.5
1979
January 22.3
February 22.5
March 22.6
April 19.9
May 20.8
June 22.1
July 23.7
August 24.9
September 25.5
October 15.4
November 6.4
December 0.6
1980
January -0.8
February -4.8
March -10.7
April -21.4
May -22.4
June -17.1
July -15.3
August -21.4
September -25.7
October -21.8
November -14.7
December -10.7
1981
January -15.9
February -14.6
March -11.8
April 4.9
May 6.7
June 1.9
July 0.0
August -4.2
September -9.2
October -12.5
November -15.6
December -9.9
1982
January -9.7
February -10.0
March -6.5
April -6.9
May -8.0
June -4.3
July -7.8
August -6.3
September 1.3
October 4.4
November 9.2
December 10.1
1983
January 22.3
February 22.7
March 22.6
April 23.9
May 37.5
June 41.7
July 38.2
August 25.7
September 16.3
October 17.9
November 10.5
December 10.2
1984
January 3.4
February 10.6
March 10.5
April 4.2
May -13.2
June -24.7
July -25.1
August -11.2
September -6.5
October -7.8
November -4.2
December -7.5
1985
January -5.4
February -11.4
March -12.9
April -10.6
May 2.4
June 11.4
July 14.4
August 8.6
September 11.6
October 9.7
November 5.8
December 7.6
1986
January 5.3
February 5.1
March 16.2
April 22.6
May 11.8
June 2.1
July 2.3
August 11.6
September 18.2
October 16.4
November 16.0
December 8.2
1987
January 4.6
February 8.8
March -3.7
April -9.3
May -6.7
June 2.2
July 3.9
August -0.6
September -6.0
October -5.3
November -1.6
December 2.0
1988
January 6.9
February 2.4
March 3.5
April 3.9
May 2.3
June 2.2
July 1.0
August -4.8
September -5.5
October -4.4
November -4.8
December -4.0
1989
January -4.3
February -2.9
March -2.4
April -2.6
May 0.0
June -0.6
July 0.8
August 3.9
September 4.7
October 5.7
November 2.9
December 0.8
1990
January -1.0
February 1.2
March 1.8
April 1.4
May 1.6
June -1.2
July -3.5
August -4.5
September -4.5
October -7.2
November -6.1
December -5.4
1991
January -7.2
February -10.2
March -8.5
April -4.8
May -1.0
June 8.8
July 5.2
August -1.4
September -1.2
October 0.2
November 4.3
December 6.1
1992
January 12.7
February 24.3
March 24.1
April 15.9
May 11.8
June 3.3
July 4.8
August 14.7
September 22.1
October 21.8
November 25.8
December 31.5
1993
January 48.1
February 59.9
March 68.9
April 56.8
May 28.6
June 18.4
July 17.5
August 31.8
September 32.1
October 37.7
November 47.2
December 54.8
1994
January 32.5
February 10.9
March 0.7
April 1.3
May 24.9
June 41.6
July 40.6
August 29.1
September 16.2
October 10.1
November -0.2
December -12.0
1995
January -12.1
February -10.6
March -12.9
April -11.7
May -18.9
June -29.4
July -17.2
August -21.1
September -11.4
October -14.5
November -17.7
December -16.7
1996
January -15.9
February -12.7
March -7.9
April 3.0
May 26.2
June 40.6
July 24.8
August 37.5
September 32.7
October 33.4
November 44.7
December 36.4
1997
January 34.6
February 29.8
March 26.2
April 29.3
May 8.5
June 3.3
July 3.9
August -4.9
September -11.0
October -11.3
November -18.4
December -13.9
1998
January -14.3
February -12.8
March -15.2
April -16.5
May -17.7
June -17.2
July -14.9
August -10.0
September -11.1
October -6.2
November -4.4
December -1.1
1999
January 1.8
February 0.7
March 9.8
April 6.5
May 16.0
June 28.3
July 36.4
August 16.4
September 16.4
October 6.3
November 9.2
December 8.1
2000
January 5.2
February 3.3
March -1.6
April -5.8
May -15.3
June -23.8
July -34.3
August -30.1
September -26.8
October -19.0
November -19.0
December -22.5
2001
January -26.1
February -23.5
March -20.0
April -10.6
May 13.8
June 13.0
July 12.1
August 25.6
September 20.2
October 5.1
November 4.5
December 7.2
2002
January 16.8
February 20.6
March 25.1
April 14.0
May -8.0
June -13.9
July -6.7
August -15.5
September -14.5
October -0.9
November -5.1
December -4.2
2003
January -8.3
February -11.0
March -22.7
April -23.2
May -24.5
June -14.7
July -11.5
August -5.4
September 8.1
October -3.8
November -5.3
December -4.7
2004
January 1.1
February 6.0
March 15.4
April 25.3
May 44.9
June 37.9
July 29.9
August 32.8
September 16.2
October 11.2
November 4.1
December 9.7
2005
January 6.0
February 3.2
March 1.4
April -7.1
May -19.1
June -16.2
July -17.7
August -25.9
September -22.3
October -10.7
November -1.3
December -5.7
2006
January -3.9
February -10.7
March -11.3
April -9.9
May -7.0
June -10.5
July -7.2
August -6.3
September -6.9
October -8.1
November -9.5
December -9.0
2007
January -7.1
February -8.0
March -8.6
April -7.9
May -9.4
June -4.3
July -6.6
August -3.2
September -7.8
October -9.3
November -8.9
December -9.4
2008
January -15.8
February -15.6
March -14.4
April -12.4
May -8.7
June -8.4
July -6.3
August -1.4
September 1.6
October 8.4
November 9.3
December 6.4
2009
January 4.3
February 8.8
March 8.8
April 5.6
May 0.2
June 0.3
July 1.3
August -3.7
September -4.5
October -8.0
November -6.9
December -4.3
2010
January 0.2
February 7.8
March 6.3
April 11.9
May 20.1
June 4.7
July 0.3
August 1.2
September 3.5
October 6.8
November 7.8
December 6.5
2011
January 7.6
February -3.9
March -3.1
April -9.3
May -16.0
June -4.7
July -0.8
August -1.1
September 0.8
October -1.1
November -4.4
December -3.8
2012
January -4.1
February -2.0
March 1.9
April 6.2
May 18.6
June 18.9
July 15.4
August 16.5
September 9.7
October 10.2
November 16.8
December 20.1
2013
January 27.0
February 29.8
March 30.4
April 29.6
May 13.5
June 6.1
July 7.5
August 9.4
September 15.9
October 19.3
November 18.3
December 11.9
2014
January 7.2
February 5.8
March 1.5
April -0.9
May 7.7
June 10.4
July 11.5
August 11.2
September 9.4
October 7.0
November 2.7
December 5.2
2015
January 5.4
February 5.2
March 1.9
April -1.2
May -5.1
June 1.8
July 5.8
August 3.7
September -0.6
October -2.6
November 0.6
December 1.1
2016
January 0.2
February -3.4
March 0.5
April 6.8
May 12.9
June 8.6
July 4.8
August 4.5
September 7.2
October 8.2
November 4.3
December 2.6
2017
January 1.4
February 10.1
March 13.0
April 17.2
May 13.4
June 9.4
July 9.7
August 12.6
September 14.1
October 22.8
November 28.0
December 25.1
2018
January 22.0
February 22.8
March 23.0
April 16.6
May 28.0
June 34.4
July 26.8
August 8.2
September 4.3
October -15.8
November -19.7
December -16.6
2019
January -14.7
February -14.7
March -17.5
April -20.3
May -28.9
June -29.8
July -24.7
August -16.3
September -11.6
October 2.6
November 7.0
December 5.4
2020
January 5.4
February 7.2
March 8.6
April 2.8
May 8.1
June 12.8
July 34.4
August 69.4
September 98.9
October 82.2
November 51.0
December 81.3
2021
January 104.8
February 102.7
March 115.8
April 165.9
May 226.0
June 170.0
July 47.9
August -4.5
September -20.7
October -7.6
November 13.5
December 20.0
2022
January 21.5
February 22.1
March 24.7
April -4.8
May -24.9

Most of the increase in lumber prices between June 2020 and May 2021, dissipated over the following three months. As some consumers became increasingly reluctant to pay higher prices for lumber, domestic renovation spending moderated. This decrease in demand was accompanied by higher North American lumber supply.Note In Canada, easing supply pressures for lumber were evidenced by rising inventory levels at sawmills. Overall, producer prices for lumber declined by 53% between May and August 2021, at which point prices were 44% above their levels in June 2020.

More recently, in December 2021, producer prices for lumber were trending upward again, underpinned by robust residential construction in the U.S. and supply constraints resulting from severe flooding in Vancouver. As of May 2022, producer prices were 132% above their levels in June 2020.

Price movements across the supply chain

Prices across the supply chain for lumber are interconnected. For example, the producer price for softwood lumber is influenced by upstream developments such as higher prices of logs. Rising input costs can cause lumber producers to increase their output price to remain profitable, an example of cost-push inflation. At the same time, the producer price for softwood lumber is also influenced by downstream developments. A growing number of building permits, signalling an expansion in future construction, will eventually translate into higher demand for building materials including lumber. As these building intentions materialize into supply agreements, lumber producers may increase output prices to maximize their potential earnings, an example of demand-pull inflation. Other factors such as innovations in home construction can also influence producers prices. Ultimately, prices at every stage of the supply-chain will be influenced by a unique combination of factors outlined above. However, this section focuses on describing price movements across the supply chain instead of quantifying their determinants.

Chart 2 illustrates the price changes in lumber across the supply chain since June 2020. It is interesting to note that price increases did not transmit evenly across the supply chain. For example, wholesale selling prices for lumber peaked at 132% above June 2020 levels, while retail selling prices for dimensional lumber surpassed June 2020 levels by 86%. This incomplete transfer reflects the fact that wholesalers and retailers reduced their markups.Note In other words, wholesalers did not pass on the entire cost increase from producers to retailers, nor did retailers pass on the entire cost increase from wholesalers on to consumers.

In addition, price increases did not always appear simultaneously. For example, it took five months for prices of logs and bolts to increase 5% above June 2020 levels. The remainder of this section discusses movements across the supply chain in greater detail.

Chart 2

Data table for Chart 2 
Data table for chart 2
Table summary
This table displays the results of Data table for chart 2 Logs and bolts (RMPI), Producer price for softwood lumber (IPPI), Wholesale selling price for softwood lumber (WSPI), Selling price for dimensional lumber at home centres (RSPI) and Construction costs for single-detached house (BCPI), calculated using Cumulative percentage change in prices units of measure (appearing as column headers).
Logs and bolts (RMPI) Producer price for softwood lumber (IPPI) Wholesale selling price for softwood lumber (WSPI) Selling price for dimensional lumber at home centres (RSPI) Construction costs for single-detached houseData table for chart 2 Note 1 (BCPI)
Cumulative percentage change in prices
2020
June 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
July -1.5 22.5 0.0 14.8 1.0
August -1.2 51.1 13.3 22.9 1.9
September 0.3 81.1 33.2 31.9 2.9
October 1.9 66.2 33.7 32.2 4.2
November 4.1 41.3 21.5 27.5 5.5
December 9.6 69.5 31.6 28.0 6.8
2021
January 12.1 92.7 49.3 37.9 9.0
February 13.6 105.6 60.7 42.6 11.1
March 16.7 121.9 66.8 45.5 13.3
April 22.0 147.4 98.3 65.7 16.8
May 28.6 208.6 132.2 85.7 20.4
June 39.4 170.0 112.4 84.5 24.0
July 44.4 81.2 73.1 60.1 25.9
August 44.2 44.2 59.5 44.7 27.8
September 40.1 43.7 47.9 29.5 29.7
October 42.8 53.6 44.3 38.9 31.3
November 47.8 60.4 37.5 39.2 32.9
December 55.0 103.4 47.2 51.4 34.5
2022
January 60.7 134.1 80.6 77.5 37.3
February 67.3 151.0 96.1 83.5 40.2
March 76.1 176.8 104.9 89.9 43.0

Raw materials

While prices for logs and bolts eventually rose, the transfer from producer prices for lumber was imperfect. Between June 2020 and March 2022, price movements for logs and bolts appeared to lag movements in producer prices. At the same time, the price increase for logs and bolts was more moderate compared to softwood lumber, with prices for the raw material peaking 44% above June 2020 levels in July 2021. Since then, log prices have continued to increase, reaching 76% above June 2020 levels by March 2022.

Manufacturing

As highlighted earlier, the unprecedented increase in lumber prices originated in manufacturing. Producer prices for lumber grew substantially amidst an imbalance between supply and demand for lumber that was spurred by various pandemic-related developments. Between June 2020 and May 2021, producer prices for softwood lumber increased by an average of 12% per month.

Wholesale

Between June 2020 and March 2022, wholesale selling price movements for lumber largely coincided with movements in producer prices for lumber. What is more, producer and wholesale prices peaked simultaneously, in May 2021, before moderating in unison thereafter.

Chart 3 illustrates how the prices paid by wholesalers to producers of lumber grew faster than the prices they charged retailers for it. In other words, wholesalers were not passing along the entire increase in lumber prices from their suppliers on to their customers, opting to reduce markups somewhat to stay competitive. Nonetheless, the wholesale margin price, which represents the dollar value spread between the average selling price and the average purchase price, increased. This reflects the fact that at higher prices, wholesalers pocketed a larger gross difference between the price they paid for lumber and the price at which they sold it for. A lower wholesale markup, or margin measured as a percent of the selling price, did not prevent wholesalers from earning three times as much profit per unit of lumber sold in May 2021, compared to June 2020. Chart 4 depicts a hypothetical example showing how margins can increase even as markups decline.

Chart 3

Data table for Chart 3 
Data table for chart 3
Table summary
This table displays the results of Data table for chart 3 Purchase, Selling and Margin, calculated using Wholesale price index for softwood lumber units of measure (appearing as column headers).
Purchase Selling Margin
Wholesale price index for softwood lumber
2020
June 100.0 100.0 100.0
July 102.4 100.0 101.9
August 115.4 113.3 126.9
September 137.5 133.2 133.6
October 134.2 133.7 154.1
November 116.4 121.5 181.2
December 137.2 131.6 199.0
2021
January 152.9 149.3 155.6
February 170.5 160.7 189.9
March 184.6 166.8 151.3
April 209.3 198.3 206.8
May 250.4 232.2 257.8
June 227.8 212.4 273.6
July 177.4 173.1 310.4
August 159.0 159.5 261.0
September 145.5 147.9 257.3
October 165.0 144.3 252.8
November 153.8 137.5 242.2
December 156.1 147.2 250.3
2022
January 212.4 180.6 428.1
February 205.3 196.1 355.1
March 235.8 204.9 383.8

Chart 4

Data table for Chart 4 
Data table for chart 4
Table summary
This table displays the results of Data table for chart 4 Purchase price, Margin, Selling price and Markup, calculated using dollars and percent units of measure (appearing as column headers).
Purchase price Margin Selling priceData table for chart 4 Note 1 Markup
dollars percent
Period 1 20 5 25 20Data table for chart 4 Note 2
Period 2 40 8 48 17Data table for chart 4 Note 2

Retail

At home centres, one of two important end-markets for lumber that are examined in this analysis, movements in selling prices for lumber resembled movements in wholesale selling prices over the period between June 2020 and March 2022.Note Moreover, retail prices for lumber also peaked in May 2021, before moderating thereafter.

However, in retail trade, margin increases were lower than in wholesale trade. Like wholesalers, the prices that retailers paid their suppliers for lumber grew faster than the prices they charged consumers for it. As a result, the percentage markup on each piece of lumber sold shrank. In fact, markups on dimensional lumber at home centres declined between November 2020 and March 2021, reaching their lowest levels over the history of available data, which began in 2012. Despite lowering markups, retailers still earned higher profits on each unit of lumber sold, due to higher prices. Between July 2020 and May 2021, retailers earned an average of 28% more profit per unit of lumber, compared to June 2020. (See Chart 5.)

It is interesting to note that the margin increases for retailers were noticeably lower than those for wholesalers. One reason retailers are often more limited in their ability to transfer upstream price increases to their customers is the competitive nature of their markets, in which failing to match competitor prices can result in the loss of market share.

Chart 5

Data table for Chart 5 
Data table for chart 5
Table summary
This table displays the results of Data table for chart 5 Purchase, Selling and Margin, calculated using Retail price index for dimensional lumber units of measure (appearing as column headers).
Purchase Selling Margin
Retail price index for dimensional lumber
2020
June 100.0 100.0 100.0
July 117.1 114.8 109.6
August 125.0 122.9 118.1
September 134.4 131.9 126.1
October 132.1 132.2 132.4
November 127.8 127.5 126.9
December 131.6 128.0 119.6
2021
January 144.4 137.9 122.5
February 151.3 142.6 122.1
March 157.0 145.5 118.6
April 175.9 165.7 141.9
May 191.0 185.7 173.3
June 187.2 184.5 178.3
July 152.2 160.1 178.8
August 139.3 144.7 157.5
September 127.8 129.5 133.5
October 140.3 138.9 135.8
November 140.8 139.2 135.4
December 146.0 151.4 163.9
2022
January 179.9 177.5 172.0
February 186.8 183.5 175.7
March 190.5 189.9 188.4

Home construction

The pattern for inflation in single-detached home construction does not resemble the pattern for upstream inflation in lumber prices. This may partly reflect a transmission lag due to fixed purchase agreements by contractors. Furthermore, prices to construct homes encompass more than only lumber. Unlike the first four elements of the supply chain that all represent one individual product, home construction is much more complex, involving many materials as well as labour. As such, changes to the costs to construct single-detached homes reflect more than simply changes to lumber prices.

Chart 6 shows price movements between the first quarter of 2020 and the first quarter of 2022 for the six largest cost divisions in single-detached home construction. Together these six divisions account for 77% of the cost to construct a single-family home.

Price trends for these divisions can be separated into two orders of magnitude. In the first, which includes five divisions, prices increased from a low of 9% over the reference period, for general requirements (e.g., building permit costs and general contractors fee), to a high of 27% for concrete. In the second, there is only one division―wood, plastics, and composites―where prices increased by an unparalleled 142% over the reference period. Price increases in this division were specifically driven by wood products, with contractors reporting 100% price increases for most wood products and increases as high as 186% for wood truss framing.

Chart 6

Data table for Chart 6 
Data table for chart 6
Table summary
This table displays the results of Data table for chart 6 Wood, plastics and composites, General Requirements, Thermal and moisture protection, Concrete, Openings and Finishes, calculated using Price index of key cost divisions in single-detached home construction units of measure (appearing as column headers).
Wood, plastics and composites General Requirements Thermal and moisture protection Concrete Openings Finishes
Price index of key cost divisions in single-detached home construction
2020
Q1 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0
Q2 100.8 100.2 100.5 100.8 100.3 100.5
Q3 111.3 100.3 101.3 102.2 101.1 101.2
Q4 127.0 101.4 101.8 103.3 101.4 101.7
2021
Q1 152.9 101.7 104.8 105.6 104.2 103.5
Q2 191.6 102.7 110.8 111.1 110.0 108.7
Q3 208.3 103.9 114.7 115.5 113.6 112.5
Q4 218.2 106.1 119.1 119.9 118.1 117.6
2022
Q1 242.4 108.7 126.0 127.0 124.3 123.3

Based on product level data collected through the Building Construction Price Index, wood, plastics, and composites accounted for 65% of the increase in the cost to construct a single-detached home between the first quarter of 2020 and the first quarter of 2022. Put differently, the share of costs in single-detached home constructionNote attributed to wood, plastics, and composites rose from an average of 21.6% in 2019 to 31.3% by the first quarter of 2022. (See Chart 7.)

Chart 7

Data table for Chart 7 
Data table for chart 7
Table summary
This table displays the results of Data table for chart 7 Wood, plastics, and composites percent share of single-detached home construction costs (appearing as column headers).
Wood, plastics, and composites percent share of single-detached home construction costs
2017
Q1 20.1
Q2 20.1
Q3 20.4
Q4 21.2
2018
Q1 21.2
Q2 21.4
Q3 21.7
Q4 21.8
2019
Q1 21.8
Q2 21.6
Q3 21.6
Q4 21.5
2020
Q1 21.4
Q2 21.4
Q3 21.5
Q4 23.1
2021
Q1 23.1
Q2 26.2
Q3 30.0
Q4 31.2
2022
Q1 31.3

Conclusion

There are various takeaways from this analysis. Firstly, strong increases in demand for softwood lumber coupled with domestic supply constraints contributed to record lumber prices, which peaked in May 2021. Secondly, the transmission of prices throughout the supply chain for lumber was imperfect. Notably, wholesalers and retailers reduced their markups, likely to remain competitive. Consequently, the increase in producer prices was not passed along proportionately to consumers. Finally, higher prices for softwood lumber drove the unprecedented increase in construction costs for single-detached homes in 2021. In fact, two thirds of the increase in the cost to produce a single-detached home since the start of 2020 can be attributed to only one division—wood, plastics, and composites. Detailed product data within this division points towards wood products as the dominant driver behind this inflation.


Date modified: