Logo StatCan COVID-19: Data to Insights for a Better Canada Inequality in the feasibility of working from home during and after COVID-19

Warning View the most recent version.

Archived Content

Information identified as archived is provided for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It is not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards and has not been altered or updated since it was archived. Please "contact us" to request a format other than those available.

by Derek Messacar, René Morissette and Zechuan Deng

Release date: June 8, 2020 Correction date: June 23, 2020

Correction Notice

In Table 1 of the publication, the data for “ Dual-earner couples – Women” have been corrected.

Text begins

The economic lockdown to stop the spread of COVID-19 has led to steep declines in employment and hours worked for many Canadians. For workers in essential services, in jobs that can be done with proper physical distancing measures or in jobs that can be done from home, the likelihood of experiencing a work interruption during the pandemic is lower than for other workers.

Approximately 40% of Canadians are in jobs that can be done from home (Deng et al. 2020) and the likelihood of holding such a job is not the same for all Canadians. For example, fewer workers in goods-producing sectors can work from home than those in service industries (Deng et al. 2020). These differences in the feasibility of working from home are important during the pandemic because holding jobs that can be done from home reduces the likelihood of work interruptions and, thus, reduces income uncertainty. After the pandemic, holding such jobs might increase the options that Canadian families face regarding work-life balance.

To shed light on these issues, this article assesses how the feasibility of working from home varies across Canadian families. It also considers the implications of these differences for family earnings inequality.

Dual-earner families with higher earnings are more likely than lower-income families to hold jobs that can be done from home

Among dual-earner families, the feasibility of working from home varies markedly across the earnings distribution. For example, 54% of the dual-earner families who are in the top decile of the family earnings distribution hold jobs in which both husbands and wives can work from home (Chart 1). The corresponding percentage for dual-earner families who are the bottom decile is only 8%.

Chart 1 Percentage of adults in jobs that  an be done from home, by family earnings decile-dual-earner families, 2019

Data table for Chart 1 
Data table for Chart 1
Table summary
This table displays the results of Data table for Chart 1. The information is grouped by Earnings decile (appearing as row headers), Husbands, Wives and Both (appearing as column headers).
Earnings decile Husbands Wives Both
percent
All 38.0 54.4 25.4
1st (Lowest) 18.7 28.6 8.1
2nd 23.5 36.5 10.9
3rd 27.3 45.1 14.7
4th 28.3 49.9 16.3
5th 33.8 55.8 21.7
6th 38.0 57.1 24.6
7th 40.5 63.2 27.6
8th 50.7 65.9 36.9
9th 53.1 66.9 39.1
10th (Highest) 66.1 74.8 53.9

Primary earners with high levels of education are more likely to hold jobs that can be done from home

In all families, roughly four in ten primary income earners hold jobs that can be done from home (Table 1). The possibility of working from work from home rises sharply with the educational attainment of the primary income earner.  While less than 30% of primary earners with a high school diploma can work from home, roughly 66% of their counterparts with a bachelor’s degree or higher education can do so.

Women are more likely than men to hold jobs that can be done from home

Women are more likely than men to hold jobs that can be done from home. For example, 50% of unattached women can work from home, compared with 33% of unattached men (Table 1). Similar patterns are observed among dual-earner families. Sixty-two percent of women in these families hold jobs that can be done from home, compared with 38% for their male counterparts.

Since the feasibility of working from home varies substantially across industries and occupations (Deng et al. 2020), part of this gender difference is likely explained by the fact that men and women often work in different jobs. For example, male-dominant jobs such as agriculture or construction typically cannot be performed from home.


Table 1
Percentage of primary income earners holding jobs that can be done from home, by education, sex, and type of family unit, 2019
Table summary
This table displays the results of Percentage of primary income earners holding jobs that can be done from home. The information is grouped by Education level of main earner (appearing as row headers), No high school diploma, High school graduate, Post-secondary (below BA), Bachelor's degree or higher and All education levels , calculated using percent units of measure (appearing as column headers).
Education level of main earner No high school diploma High school graduate Post-secondary (below BA) Bachelor's degree or higher All education levels
percent
Unattached individuals
Both sexes 12.5 23.6 32.3 65.1 40.6
Men 10.4 16.4 24.2 65.7 33.4
Women 19.0 36.7 43.3 64.6 50.0
Lone parents
Both sexes 19.8 28.1 39.9 65.7 43.4
Men 22.2 20.5 24.4 68.5 35.0
Women 18.9 30.9 44.2 64.8 46.0
Single-earner couples
Both sexes 12.8 25.9 30.9 65.6 39.7
Men 9.4 19.0 24.2 66.1 35.4
Women 23.9 39.1 43.9 64.7 48.5
Dual-earner couples
Both sexes 13.0 29.1 33.2 67.6 45.0
Men 11.2 23.6 26.2 66.8 38.2
Women 31.6 41.8 49.8 62.1 61.6

Conclusion

On balance, households with lower levels of education and earnings are the least likely to hold jobs that can be done from home. This finding suggests that the risk of experiencing a work interruption during the pandemic might fall disproportionately on financially vulnerable families. If so, these work interruptions will likely increase family earnings inequality, at least during the pandemic and economic recovery.Note  For these reasons, the long-term impacts of the recent work interruptions on family earnings inequality will be worth monitoring after the pandemic subsides.

References

Deng, Z., D. Messacar, and R. Morissette. 2020. “Running the economy remotely: Potential for working from home during and after COVID-19.” STATCAN COVID-19: Data to Insights for a Better Canada, no. 00026. Statistics Canada Catalogue no. 45280001. Ottawa: Statistics Canada.

Statistics Canada. 2020. “Labour Force Survey, April 2020.” The Daily. Ottawa: Statistics Canada.

Related article

Running the economy remotely: Potential for working from home during and after COVID-19.

Date modified: