Economic and Social Reports
Foreign workers in Canada: Differences in the transition to permanent residency across work permit programs

Release date: June 26, 2024

DOI: https://doi.org/10.25318/36280001202400600001-eng

Skip to text

Text begins

Obtaining a work permit enables foreign nationals to work in Canada temporarily, and for many individuals, this serves as a stepping stone toward obtaining permanent residency (PR). Previous studies have highlighted significant variations in the likelihood of transitioning to PR across different work permit programs (Haan & Li, 2023; Lu & Hou, 2017, 2019; Prokopenko & Hou, 2018). However, this understanding of the PR transition rate was primarily based on snapshot analyses of temporary foreign workers (TFWs) who arrived in Canada before the mid-2010s. In recent years, the total number of TFWs has seen a substantial increase, and the composition of work permit types has also undergone significant changes (Lu & Hou, 2023). Having updated information on the disparities in the PR transition rate by work permit type can help assess the fairness and effectiveness of work permit programs in attracting TFWs and addressing labour shortages in specific industrial sectors.

This article examines the recent changes in the transition to PR across work permit programs and immigration pathways for individuals who have made the transition. The analysis focuses on work permit holders who are in Canada for work purposes under either the Temporary Foreign Worker Program (TFWP) or the International Mobility Program (IMP).Note 

This article is the fifth in a series that presents statistics and insights on TFWs in Canada. Previous articles in the series explored commonly used data sources for TFW statistics, the evolving composition of TFWs and their employment levels, degree of employment engagement and industrial distribution (Lu & Hou, 2023a, 2023b, 2023c; Lu & Picot, 2024).

Transition to permanent residency increased across arrival cohorts of work permit holders

To simplify the presentation, permit holders are grouped into five-year arrival cohorts based on the year they received their first work permit for work purposes. Table 1 shows the transition rates at the 2nd, 5th and 10th years after the issuance of the first work permit, wherever years of observation are available.


Table 1
Transition to permanent residency among holders of work permits for work purposes, by first permit issue year and program type
Table summary
This table displays the results of Transition to permanent residency among holders of work permits for work purposes 2006 to 2010 , 2011 to 2015, 2016 to 2020, Number, Transition rate, 2nd year, 5th year and 10th year, calculated using count and percent units of measure (appearing as column headers).
2006 to 2010 2011 to 2015 2016 to 2020
Number Transition rate Number Transition rate Number Transition rate
2nd year 5th year 10th year 2nd year 5th year 2nd year
count percent count percent count percent
All work permit holders for work purposes
Total work permit holders for work purposes 632,000 9.4 26.7 34.5 763,100 11.7 34.3 1,048,600 23.2
Temporary Foreign Worker Program (TFWP)
Agricultural programs 30,400 2.6 10.3 15.6 28,400 1.7 9.1 50,300 1.3
Live-in caregiver programs 49,800 0.9 55.6 92.2 26,900 7.5 84.0 14,500 15.1
Other higher-skilled TFWP 105,600 9.6 25.8 31.3 71,100 13.2 32.2 51,200 23.9
Other lower-skilled TFWP 48,400 9.3 36.7 55.1 40,900 7.4 46.4 16,000 8.7
Other TFWP without a skill level 1,100 14.2 31.9 36.5 1,300 13.1 34.2 1,100 39.0
Subtotal 235,300 6.8 32.4 47.1 168,500 8.9 40.0 133,100 12.7
International Mobility Program for work purposes
International free trade agreements 46,600 2.1 5.5 7.0 57,300 1.4 5.0 40,000 3.3
Other international agreements or arrangements 8,300 34.2 42.8 45.3 14,400 32.9 48.7 15,400 58.2
Intra-company transferees 22,900 4.9 19.2 23.8 36,600 6.6 25.2 40,900 21.9
International Experience Canada 175,400 3.7 10.8 14.3 220,400 3.9 14.7 235,000 6.4
Spouses or common-law partners of skilled workers 34,200 28.8 53.0 58.5 47,700 31.2 56.8 72,100 39.9
Spouses or common-law partners of students 7,700 24.6 56.5 66.5 14,000 12.4 54.0 52,200 14.6
Post-grad employment 51,500 34.9 69.1 73.6 138,700 28.0 72.9 378,100 40.1
Other programs for Canadian interests 50,100 4.0 10.4 13.3 65,500 3.4 10.5 81,800 5.1
Subtotal 396,700 10.9 23.4 27.0 594,600 12.5 32.7 915,500 24.7

Across successive arrival cohorts, the transition rate has increased. For example, five years after obtaining the first work permit, 27% of TFWs in the 2006-to-2010 cohort made the transition, and this rate increased to 34% for the 2011-to-2015 cohort. Similarly, two years after obtaining the first work permit, the transition rate rose from 12% for the 2011-to-2015 cohort to 23% for the 2016-to-2020 cohort.

The overall increases in transition rates across cohorts could be attributed to two factors: an increase in the rate for some work permit programs and changes in the composition of work programs, specifically if programs with high transition rates expanded their shares. From the 2006-to-2010 cohort to the 2011-to-2015 cohort, most (77%) of the overall increase in the five-year transition rate was driven by the higher transition rates in certain work programs, particularly the live-in caregiver programs (with a 28 percentage point increase), other international agreements or arrangementsNote (with a 6 percentage point increase), and other lower-skilled TFWP.Note  Three groups experienced a decrease in their transition rates, and two of them had the lowest transition rates in both arrival cohorts. The remaining increase (23%) in the overall transition rate was related to changes in the composition of work programs. During this period, the share of the Post-Graduation Work Permit (PGWP) Program among work permit holders rose from 8% to 18%, and this program had one of the highest transition rates in both arrival cohorts.

Similarly, the increase in transition rates among certain work permit programs accounted for the majority (55%) of the overall increase in the two-year transition rate from the 2011-to-2015 cohort to the 2016-to-2020 cohort. Notably, the transition rate increased considerably (ranging from 9 to 26 percentage points) in six major programs, while it decreased slightly for agriculture programs. Additionally, changes in the composition of work permit programs, particularly the substantial increase in the share of PGWPs from 18% in the 2011-to-2015 cohort to 36% in the 2016-to-2020 cohort, contributed to 45% of the overall increase in the transition rates between these two arrival cohorts.

The disparity in the transition rate across work permit programs has increased. Compared with the PGWP Program, agriculture programs saw the gap in the five-year transition rate widen from 59 percentage points in the 2006-to-2010 cohort to 64 percentage points in the 2011-to-2015 cohort. Additionally, the gap in the two-year transition rate expanded from 26 percentage points in the 2011-to-2015 cohort to 39 percentage points in the 2016-to-2020 cohort. Similar expansions in gaps were also observed for international free trade agreements and the International Experience Canada (IEC) program.

Within a cohort, the disparity in transition rates between groups with low and high rates tended to grow with more years after the first work permit. For example, in the 2006-to-2010 cohort, the difference in the transition rate between the IEC (the largest work permit program in the 2006-to-2010 and 2011-to-2015 cohorts) and the PGWP Program (the largest program in the 2016-to-2020 cohort) widened from 31 percentage points 2 years after obtaining the first work permit to 58 percentage points in the 5th year, and further increased to 59 percentage points in the 10th year.

The Provincial Nominee Program and Canadian Experience Class have become the main immigration pathways for work permit holders

By the end of 2022, over 955,000 individuals holding work permits for work purposes who obtained their first work permits from 2006 to 2020 had transitioned to PR in Canada. Most of these individuals, increasing from 86% in the 2006-to-2010 cohort to 93% in the 2016-to-2020 cohort, achieved PR through the economic class (Table 2). However, it is important to note that because more recent cohorts were still in the early stages of transition, the distribution of immigration classes may not be entirely comparable across cohorts. Furthermore, the immigration pathways of the 2016-to-2020 cohort were likely influenced by special measures adopted during the COVID-19 pandemic, when economic immigration was primarily processed through the Canadian Experience Class (CEC).


Table 2
Composition of immigration category among work permit holders for work purposes who landed by 2022
Table summary
This table displays the results of Composition of immigration category among work permit holders for work purposes who landed by 2022 Persons , Economic class, Family, Other classes, FSWP, PNP, CEC and Other , calculated using count and percent units of measure (appearing as column headers).
Persons Economic class Family Other classes
FSWP PNP CEC Other
count percent
2006-to-2010 arrivals
Total work permit holders for work purposes 223,100 13.7 28.5 14.7 29.4 12.5 1.1
Temporary Foreign Worker Program (TFWP)
Agricultural programs 5,200 2.1 53.6 4.1 3.7 32.5 4.2
Live-in caregiver programs 46,500 0.3 0.6 0.1 94.7 3.6 0.6
Other higher-skilled TFWP 33,800 21.8 42.4 16.5 7.8 10.1 1.4
Other lower-skilled TFWP 27,500 6.4 62.9 10.1 3.0 15.2 2.5
Other TFWP without a skill level 400 19.8 33.5 10.5 19.8 10.8 5.6
Subtotal 113,500 8.3 30.7 7.6 42.1 9.7 1.5
International Mobility Program for work purposes
International free trade agreements 3,400 17.6 20.0 24.8 6.7 30.3 0.6
Other international agreements or arrangements 3,800 3.7 82.3 4.2 6.2 3.1 0.6
Intra-company transferees 5,600 27.4 13.1 37.6 13.6 8.1 0.3
International Experience Canada 26,200 6.3 18.3 11.7 27.6 35.8 0.3
Spouses or common-law partners of skilled workers 20,300 28.6 42.1 17.6 9.4 1.1 1.2
Spouses or common-law partners of students 5,200 44.8 20.5 17.0 14.8 1.5 1.6
Post-grad employment 38,300 19.4 22.6 32.0 13.4 12.0 0.6
Other programs for Canadian interests 7,000 23.6 16.6 19.9 21.3 15.9 2.8
Subtotal 109,700 19.2 26.2 22.1 16.2 15.5 0.8
2011-to-2015 arrivals
Total work permit holders for work purposes 295,200 5.7 34.3 25.6 21.7 11.8 1.0
TFWP
Agricultural programs 3,900 0.7 42.3 7.3 7.2 37.1 5.4
Live-in caregiver programs 25,200 0.1 0.7 0.2 95.8 2.8 0.5
Other higher-skilled TFWP 25,400 7.7 37.6 27.2 19.6 6.7 1.1
Other lower-skilled TFWP 24,000 1.8 67.1 8.3 4.9 15.7 2.3
Other TFWP without a skill level 500 8.6 36.1 23.7 14.5 13.6 3.4
Subtotal 79,000 3.1 35.0 11.8 38.8 9.8 1.5
International Mobility Program for work purposes
International free trade agreements 3,500 Note x: suppressed to meet the confidentiality requirements of the Statistics Act 18.6 41.4 5.4 26.7 Note x: suppressed to meet the confidentiality requirements of the Statistics Act
Other international agreements or arrangements 7,400 Note x: suppressed to meet the confidentiality requirements of the Statistics Act 79.4 8.4 4.8 4.1 Note x: suppressed to meet the confidentiality requirements of the Statistics Act
Intra-company transferees 10,700 11.4 14.9 57.8 11.2 4.6 0.2
International Experience Canada 40,200 4.4 18.6 23.2 23.2 30.3 0.3
Spouses or common-law partners of skilled workers 29,300 9.1 39.0 35.3 14.3 1.1 1.2
Spouses or common-law partners of students 9,800 13.9 37.9 25.9 17.2 1.6 3.5
Post-grad employment 106,400 5.6 38.8 30.7 13.7 10.6 0.6
Other programs for Canadian interests 9,000 8.4 19.4 34.3 20.6 15.1 2.2
Subtotal 216,200 6.6 34.1 30.6 15.4 12.5 0.8
2016-to-2020 arrivals
Total work permit holders for work purposes 437,000 2.5 24.1 42.8 23.7 6.5 0.4
TFWP
Agricultural programs 3,000 Note x: suppressed to meet the confidentiality requirements of the Statistics Act 23.4 7.2 32.6 34.1 Note x: suppressed to meet the confidentiality requirements of the Statistics Act
Live-in caregiver programs 7,500 Note x: suppressed to meet the confidentiality requirements of the Statistics Act 0.5 Note x: suppressed to meet the confidentiality requirements of the Statistics Act 93.0 5.8 0.6
Other higher-skilled TFWP 23,100 4.8 34.1 35.1 22.1 3.5 0.4
Other lower-skilled TFWP 4,300 Note x: suppressed to meet the confidentiality requirements of the Statistics Act 59.3 Note x: suppressed to meet the confidentiality requirements of the Statistics Act 30.8 7.1 0.8
Other TFWP without a skill level 600 Note x: suppressed to meet the confidentiality requirements of the Statistics Act 38.8 45.9 8.6 3.3 Note x: suppressed to meet the confidentiality requirements of the Statistics Act
Subtotal 38,500 2.9 29.7 22.6 37.5 6.7 0.6
International Mobility Program for work purposes
International free trade agreements 2,900 Note x: suppressed to meet the confidentiality requirements of the Statistics Act 15.0 57.9 7.6 16.1 Note x: suppressed to meet the confidentiality requirements of the Statistics Act
Other international agreements or arrangements 10,300 Note x: suppressed to meet the confidentiality requirements of the Statistics Act 83.6 2.6 12.9 0.7 Note x: suppressed to meet the confidentiality requirements of the Statistics Act
Intra-company transferees 15,500 Note x: suppressed to meet the confidentiality requirements of the Statistics Act 9.2 80.2 4.9 2.1 Note x: suppressed to meet the confidentiality requirements of the Statistics Act
International Experience Canada 39,900 2.5 12.6 34.7 26.0 23.9 0.2
Spouses or common-law partners of skilled workers 42,900 2.7 33.3 44.9 17.0 1.6 0.5
Spouses or common-law partners of students 25,700 4.4 26.7 34.7 31.6 1.2 1.4
Post-grad employment 252,300 2.1 22.0 46.5 23.7 5.4 0.4
Other programs for Canadian interests 9,100 4.8 18.1 51.0 15.0 9.7 1.4
Subtotal 398,600 2.4 23.5 44.8 22.4 6.5 0.4

Within the economic class, the Provincial Nominee Program (PNP) and the CEC have emerged as the primary immigration pathways for work permit holders, while the Federal Skilled Worker Program (FSWP) and “other economic programs” (e.g., caregivers and Quebec selection) have diminished in importance. Notably, 43% of work permit holders in the 2006-to-2010 cohort transitioned to PR through the PNP and CEC, compared with 60% in the 2011-to-2015 cohort and 67% in the 2016-to-2020 cohort.

The overall trend mentioned above was primarily influenced by the PGWP Program, spouses or common-law partners of skilled workers, and spouses or common-law partners of students, all of whom followed a similar trend. Their shares among work permit holders transitioning to PR increased significantly, from 29% in the 2006-to-2010 cohort to 73% in the 2016-to-2020 cohort. However, different trends were observed for other programs. In the case of live-in caregiver programs, nearly all participants made the transition through their designated pathway. For agricultural programs, the majority of the 2006-to-2010 cohort transitioned through the PNP (54%), while in the 2016-to-2020 cohort, the share through the PNP decreased (23%). For other higher-skilled TFWP holders, the shares of transition through the FSWP and PNP decreased, while the share through the CEC increased. By contrast, the majority of other lower-skilled TFWP holders relied on the PNP and “other economic classes” to obtain PR.

In summary, since the mid-2000s, proportionately more individuals holding work permits for work purposes have transitioned to PR in Canada. While the transition rates have increased or remained high for most work permit programs, they have stayed low or decreased among certain others. Consequently, the disparity between programs with high and low transition rates has widened over time. The transition to PR was achieved predominantly through the economic class, and this trend has become more pronounced across arrival cohorts. Within the economic class, the PNP and the CEC have emerged as the primary transition pathways, driven primarily by the substantial expansion of the PGWP Program, spouses or common-law partners of skilled workers, and spouses or common-law partners of students. These factors have contributed significantly to the changing landscape of PR transitions among work permit holders in Canada.

Data and definitions

This article used a data linkage between the Non-permanent Resident File and the Longitudinal Immigration Database. The analysis focused on work permit holders whose initial work permit was for work purposes. Individuals who obtained PR in the same year their work permit was issued were excluded from the analysis. Each work permit holder was counted only once. In situations where individuals had multiple work permits in a single year, priority was given to the TFWP over the IMP for the analysis.

Authors

Yuqian Lu and Feng Hou are with the Social Analysis and Modelling Division, Analytical Studies and Modelling Branch, at Statistics Canada.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank René Morissette for advice and comments on an earlier version of this paper.

References

Haan, M. & Li, Y. (2023). From temporary foreign workers to permanent residents: Differences in transition rates among work permit categories. Canadian Ethnic Studies, 55(2), 125-157.

Lu, Y., & Hou, F. (2017). Transition from temporary foreign workers to permanent residents, 1990 to 2014 (Catalogue no. 11F0019M – No. 389). Statistics Canada.
https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/pub/11f0019m/11f0019m2017389-eng.pdf.

Lu, Y., & Hou, F. (2019). Temporary foreign workers in the Canadian labour force: Open versus employer-specific work permits (Catalogue no. 11-626-X-2019016 - No. 102). Statistics Canada.

Lu, Y. & Hou, F. (2023a). Foreign workers in the labour force: Changing composition and employment incidences of work permit holders. Economic and Social Reports 3(10), 1-6.

Lu, Y. & Hou, F. (2023b). Foreign workers in Canada: Changing composition and employment incidences of work permit holders (statcan.gc.ca). Economic and Social Reports 3(10), 1-7.

Lu, Y. & Hou, F. (2023c). Foreign workers in Canada: Distribution of paid employment by industry (statcan.gc.ca) Economic and Social Reports 3(12), 1-7.

Lu, Y. & Picot, G. (2024). Foreign workers in Canada: Labour force attachment among temporary residents with paid employment in 2019 (statcan.gc.ca) 4(3), 1-6.

Prokopenko, E., and Hou, F. (2018). How temporary were Canada’s temporary foreign workers? Population and Development Review, 44(2), 257–280.

Date modified: