Table 3
Financial assistance for implementing beneficial management
practices on Canadian farms1,2—Provinces
and region
Archived Content
Information identified as archived is provided for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It is not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards and has not been altered or updated since it was archived. Please "contact us" to request a format other than those available.
Financial assistance to offset beneficial management practice costs | ||
---|---|---|
Yes | No | |
percent | ||
Canada | 39 | 60 |
Atlantic region | 39 | 60 |
Quebec | 22 | 77 |
Ontario | 48 | 50 |
Manitoba | 49 | 51 |
Saskatchewan | 53 | 46 |
Alberta | 34 | 66 |
British Columbia | 45 | 53 |
Percent of farms that received financial assistance
to offset the costs for implementation of the beneficial management practices
identified in the environmental farm plan.
Excludes farms that do not have either an established
environmental farm plan, or an environmental farm plan that is under review.
Note(s):
Percentages may not add up to 100, due to rounding and/or non-response.
Source(s):
Statistics Canada, 2013, Environment Accounts and Statistics
Division, 2011 Farm Environmental Management Survey (survey number 5044).
- Date modified: