Survey Methodology
Comments by Eric RancourtNote 1 on “Progress in survey science and practice: Yesterday-today-tomorrow”
- Release date: June 30, 2025
Abstract
In his paper, Särndal is reviewing the scientific aspects of the development of the survey sampling theory. In light of multiple changes in this field, some have called for a new paradigm. Upon careful analysis, Särndal lands on saying that there has been a strong research tradition which is anchored on assumptions about finite populations and feasibility of characterizing them with only a sample. With this framework, there can still be research and change, but the paradigm would essentially remain. In my discussion of this article, after providing precisions on the context of National Statistical Offices (mainly about Statistics Canada), I agree on many points and wonder if it is not a change in methodological paradigm rather than statistical paradigm that we are witnessing and point to some possible ways forward.
Key Words: Admin 1st; Data source; Inference; Non-survey data; Response rate.
Table of contents
- Section 1. Introduction
- Section 2. The context of National Statistical Offices
- Section 3. Paradigm or tradition or model?
- Section 4. Särndal’s foundational assumptions
- Section 5. Conclusion
- Acknowledgements
- References
How to cite
Rancourt, E. (2025). Comments on “Progress in survey science and practice: yesterday-today-tomorrow”. Survey Methodology, 51(1), 49-53. Paper available at http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/12-001-x/2025001/article/00017-eng.pdf.
Note
- Date modified: