Survey Methodology
Authors’ response to comments on “Exploring the assumption that commercial online nonprobability survey respondents are answering in good faith”

by Courtney Kennedy, Andrew Mercer and Arnold LauNote 1

  • Release date: June 25, 2024

Abstract

Our comments respond to discussion from Sen, Brick, and Elliott. We weigh the potential upside and downside of Sen’s suggestion of using machine learning to identify bogus respondents through interactions and improbable combinations of variables. We join Brick in reflecting on bogus respondents’ impact on the state of commercial nonprobability surveys. Finally, we consider Elliott’s discussion of solutions to the challenge raised in our study.

Key Words:  Commercial nonprobability surveys; Survey panels; Benchmarking studies.

How to cite

Kennedy, C., Mercer, A. and Lau, A. (2024). Authors’ response to comments on “Exploring the assumption that commercial online nonprobability survey respondents are answering in good faith”. Survey Methodology, Statistique Canada,  12‑001‑X au catalogue, vol. 50,  1. Paper available at http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/12-001-x/2024001/article/00009-eng.htm.

Note

Date modified: