2. Controlled selection problems
Sun Woong Kim, Steven G. Heeringa and Peter W. Solenberger
Previous | Next
In order to select a
sample of
units, consider a two-way stratification
design classifying a population of
units by two criteria with
and
categories, respectively. The controlled
selection problem under two-way stratification is defined by the
tabular array
,
which consists of
cells that have nonnegative real numbers
, called
the cell expectations, representing
the expected number of units to be drawn in each cell
. The
standard two-way controlled selection problem is described as in Table 2.1.
Table 2.1
Controlled selection problem
Table summary
This table displays the results of
Controlled selection problem. The information is grouped by Category (appearing as row headers), 1, 2,
,
and Marginal expectation (appearing as column headers).
| Category |
1 |
2 |
|
|
Marginal expectation |
| 1 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Marginal expectation |
|
|
|
|
|
The marginal expectations
and
denote the sum of cell expectations in each row
category
and each column category
.
Hence
denotes the sum of all cell expectations and
equals the total sample size
Although Table 2.1 takes
a simple two-way tabular form, it should be noted that typically
,
and furthermore
can be very small (e.g., often less than
). In this case deciding how to allocate
units to cells, that is, how to obtain an
array with cells rounded to a nonnegative
integer for each
, requires
an algorithm to solve the problem.
A variety of controlled
selection problems are used as examples in the literature. The first example of
a controlled selection problem was the
array, described by Goodman and Kish (1950, page
356), for allocating 17 PSU’s to 68 cells given by 17 strata and 4 groups of
North Central States in the United States. The array may be formed as follows. Let
denote the number of population elements in
each cell
and let
denote the total number of population elements
in each stratum. Then
,
where some
are zero and
.
All
equal the integer
,
whereas
are nonintegers sums of the
in column
.
The problem is therefore one of selecting one PSU per sample stratum (
dimension) and simultaneously controlling the
distribution to state groups (
dimension). A total of
PSUs will be selected.
The following paragraphs
describe four additional problems found in the literature that will be used in
the discussion and comparative evaluations presented in this paper.
Problem 2.1: Jessen (1970)
A
problem involving two stratifying variables is
given by Jessen (1970, page 779). Each cell
corresponds to one PSU and
. A
sample of size
is drawn.
,
where
is a “measure of size” for the PSU in cell
and
.
Note that in this problem,
,
and both
and
are equal to
.
Problem 2.2: Jessen (1978)
An extended
version of Problem 2.1 comes from Jessen
(1978, page 375). In this problem,
and
.
As in Problem 2.1, both
and
are equal to
,
but
.
Problem 2.3: Causey et al. (1985)
Causey et al. (1985, page
906) describe an
two-way stratification problem designed to
select 10 PSU’s, that is,
.
Let
be some measure of size for the PSU
in cell
.
Here
,
where
and
.
Note that in this problem,
,
and most
and
are noninteger values.
Problem 2.4: Winkler (2001)
Winkler (2001) provides
the
controlled selection problem with two
stratifying variables shown in Table 2.2.
The objective in solving
this problem is to select
sample units from the population of
The problem definition begins with a
array with cell population sizes
,
where some
are quite small. The marginal row and column
expectations,
and
,
are integer-valued and are predetermined using the prior information on
precision (e.g., coefficients of variation).
Table 2.2
Controlled selection problem
Table summary
This table displays the results of
Controlled selection problem. The information is grouped by Category (appearing as row headers), 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and Marginal expectation (appearing as column headers).
| Category |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
Marginal expectation |
| 1 |
2.000 |
2.483 |
1.052 |
0.103 |
0.362 |
6 |
| 2 |
2.182 |
1.061 |
1.101 |
1.046 |
0.610 |
6 |
| 3 |
0.000 |
1.614 |
1.914 |
2.200 |
1.272 |
7 |
| 4 |
0.860 |
0.377 |
0.930 |
2.840 |
2.993 |
8 |
| 5 |
0.958 |
0.465 |
2.003 |
1.811 |
4.763 |
10 |
| Marginal expectation |
6 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
10 |
37 |
The cell expectations,
,
are obtained by applying the generalized iterative fitting procedure (GIFP) of
Dykstra (1985a, 1985b) and Winkler (1990) to the initial array. The GIFP is
used to ensure that
for the cells with small
,
when
and
are given. Note that in the Table 2.2, the
are given to 3 decimal places, and
.
The common characteristic
shared by these controlled selection problems is that, as mentioned above, the
total number of selected units is smaller than the number of cells (except for
Problem 2.4, where
) and many
are less than 1. The algorithms used to solve
these problems must enforce some strict constraints described in next section. As
described in Section 4, the solution to a controlled selection problem obtained
by any algorithm is a set of some
arrays and probabilities of selection
corresponding to each array.
Previous | Next