7 Some concluding remarks

Jae Kwang Kim and Changbao Wu

Previous

Replication methods offer an asymptotically equivalent alternative to linearization methods but are operationally more convenient and flexible. We focused on population parameters that are smooth functions of means or totals. Our theoretical results and limited simulation studies showed that the proposed strategies for constructing sparse and efficient replication weights work well for variance estimation and confidence intervals. Nevertheless, there are a number of issues which require further investigation. First, for complex parameters such as population correlation coefficients, sparse replication variance estimators are not very stable. Second, further evidences on the effectiveness of the proposed strategies for large complex surveys in conjunction to the use of general bootstrap or jackknife weights are needed. Third, it is not clear whether the sparse replication weights will be efficient for parameters that are not smooth functions of means or totals, such as population quantiles, for which normal theory confidence intervals are known to be inefficient (Sitter and Wu 2001).

Another important issue is the potential application of the proposed methods for parameters and estimators defined through estimating equations. Let θ MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aqatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9LqFf0x e9q8qqvqFr0dXdHiVc=bYP0xb9sq=fFfeu0RXxb9qr0dd9q8qi0lf9 Fve9Fve9vapdbaqaaeGacaGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaacceGae8 hUdehaaa@3B54@  be defined as the solution to

U N (θ)= i=1 N u i ( y i , x i ;θ) =0. MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aqatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9LqFf0x e9q8qqvqFr0dXdHiVc=bYP0xb9sq=fFfeu0RXxb9qr0dd9q8qi0lf9 Fve9Fve9vapdbaqaaeGacaGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaGaamyvam aaBaaaleaacaWGobaabeaakiaacIcaiiqacqWF4oqCcaGGPaGaeyyp a0ZaaabCaeaacaWG1bWaaSbaaSqaaiaadMgaaeqaaOGaaiikaiaadM hadaWgaaWcbaGaamyAaaqabaGccaGGSaacbmGaa4hEamaaBaaaleaa caWGPbaabeaakiaacUdacqWF4oqCcaGGPaaaleaacaWGPbGaeyypa0 JaaGymaaqaaiaad6eaa0GaeyyeIuoakiabg2da9Gqabiaa9bdacaGG Uaaaaa@52B6@ (7.1)

Let θ ^ MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aqatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9LqFf0x e9q8qqvqFr0dXdHiVc=bYP0xb9sq=fFfeu0RXxb9qr0dd9q8qi0lf9 Fve9Fve9vapdbaqaaeGacaGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaacceGaf8 hUdeNbaKaaaaa@3B64@  be obtained by solving a sample-based version of (7.1) given by

U n (θ)= iS w i u i ( y i , x i ;θ) =0. MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aqatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9LqFf0x e9q8qqvqFr0dXdHiVc=bYP0xb9sq=fFfeu0RXxb9qr0dd9q8qi0lf9 Fve9Fve9vapdbaqaaeGacaGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaGaamyvam aaBaaaleaacaWGUbaabeaakiaacIcaiiqacqWF4oqCcaGGPaGaeyyp a0ZaaabuaeaacaWG3bWaaSbaaSqaaiaadMgaaeqaaOGaamyDamaaBa aaleaacaWGPbaabeaakiaacIcacaWG5bWaaSbaaSqaaiaadMgaaeqa aOGaaiilaGqadiaa+HhadaWgaaWcbaGaamyAaaqabaGccaGG7aGae8 hUdeNaaiykaaWcbaGaamyAaiabgIGioprr1ngBPrwtHrhAXaqeguuD JXwAKbstHrhAG8KBLbacfaGae0NeXpfabeqdcqGHris5aOGaeyypa0 dcbeGaaWhmaiaac6caaaa@5F29@ (7.2)

Regression or logistic regression analyses using complex survey data can both be viewed special cases of the general forms given by (7.1) and (7.2). The usual sandwich-type variance of θ ^ MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aqatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9LqFf0x e9q8qqvqFr0dXdHiVc=bYP0xb9sq=fFfeu0RXxb9qr0dd9q8qi0lf9 Fve9Fve9vapdbaqaaeGacaGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaacceGaf8 hUdeNbaKaaaaa@3B64@  is given by

V( θ ^ ) { U N (θ) θ } 1 V{ U n (θ)} { U N (θ) θ } 1     (7.3) MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aqatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9LqFf0x e9q8qqvqFr0dXdHiVc=bYP0xb9sq=fFfeu0RXxb9qr0dd9q8qi0lf9 Fve9Fve9vapdbaqaaeGacaGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaGaamOvai aacIcaiiqacuWF4oqCgaqcaiaacMcacqWIqjIqdaGadaqaamaalaaa baGaeyOaIyRaamyvamaaBaaaleaacaWGobaabeaakiaacIcacqWF4o qCcaGGPaaabaGaeyOaIyRae8hUdehaaaGaay5Eaiaaw2haamaaCaaa leqabaGaeyOeI0IaaGymaaaakiaadAfacaGG7bGaamyvamaaBaaale aacaWGUbaabeaakiaacIcacqWF4oqCcaGGPaGaaiyFamaacmaabaWa aSaaaeaacqGHciITcaWGvbWaaSbaaSqaaiaad6eaaeqaaOGaaiikai ab=H7aXjaacMcaaeaacqGHciITcqWF4oqCaaaacaGL7bGaayzFaaWa aWbaaSqabeaacqGHsislcaaIXaaaaaaa@61CF@

A variance estimator v( θ ^ ) MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aqatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9LqFf0x e9q8qqvqFr0dXdHiVc=bYP0xb9sq=fFfeu0RXxb9qr0dd9q8qi0lf9 Fve9Fve9vapdbaqaaeGacaGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaGaamODai aacIcaiiqacuWF4oqCgaqcaiaacMcaaaa@3DB8@  can now be obtained if we substitute U N (θ)/θ MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aqatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9LqFf0x e9q8qqvqFr0dXdHiVc=bYP0xb9sq=fFfeu0RXxb9qr0dd9q8qi0lf9 Fve9Fve9vapdbaqaaeGacaGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaGaeyOaIy RaamyvamaaBaaaleaacaWGobaabeaakiaacIcaiiqacqWF4oqCcaGG PaGaai4laiabgkGi2kab=H7aXbaa@43C0@  by U n (θ)/θ MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aqatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9LqFf0x e9q8qqvqFr0dXdHiVc=bYP0xb9sq=fFfeu0RXxb9qr0dd9q8qi0lf9 Fve9Fve9vapdbaqaaeGacaGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaGaeyOaIy RaamyvamaaBaaaleaacaWGUbaabeaakiaacIcaiiqacqWF4oqCcaGG PaGaai4laiabgkGi2kab=H7aXbaa@43E0@  at θ= θ ^ MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aqatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9LqFf0x e9q8qqvqFr0dXdHiVc=bYP0xb9sq=fFfeu0RXxb9qr0dd9q8qi0lf9 Fve9Fve9vapdbaqaaeGacaGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaacceGae8 hUdeNae8xpa0Jaf8hUdeNbaKaaaaa@3E14@  and estimate V{ U n (θ)} MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aqatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9LqFf0x e9q8qqvqFr0dXdHiVc=bYP0xb9sq=fFfeu0RXxb9qr0dd9q8qi0lf9 Fve9Fve9vapdbaqaaeGacaGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaGaamOvai aacUhacaWGvbWaaSbaaSqaaiaad6gaaeqaaOGaaiikaGGabiab=H7a XjaacMcacaGG9baaaa@418B@  by applying replication variance estimation method to U ^ n = iS w i u i MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aqatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9LqFf0x e9q8qqvqFr0dXdHiVc=bYP0xb9sq=fFfeu0RXxb9qr0dd9q8qi0lf9 Fve9Fve9vapdbaqaaeGacaGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaGabmyvay aajaWaaSbaaSqaaiaad6gaaeqaaOGaeyypa0ZaaabeaeaacaWG3bWa aSbaaSqaaiaadMgaaeqaaGqadOGaa8xDamaaBaaaleaacaWGPbaabe aaaeaacaWGPbGaeyicI48efv3ySLgznfgDOfdaryqr1ngBPrginfgD ObYtUvgaiuaacqGFse=uaeqaniabggHiLdaaaa@509B@  with u i = u i ( y i , x i ; θ ^ ). MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aqatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9LqFf0x e9q8qqvqFr0dXdHiVc=bYP0xb9sq=fFfeu0RXxb9qr0dd9q8qi0lf9 Fve9Fve9vapdbaqaaeGacaGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaacbmGaa8 xDamaaBaaaleaacaWGPbaabeaakiabg2da9iaadwhadaWgaaWcbaGa amyAaaqabaGccaGGOaGaamyEamaaBaaaleaacaWGPbaabeaakiaacY cacaWF4bWaaSbaaSqaaiaadMgaaeqaaOGaai4oaGGabiqb+H7aXzaa jaGaaiykaiaac6caaaa@4866@  For detailed discussions on estimating equations and survey sampling, see, for instance, Binder (1983), Skinner (1989), and Godambe and Thompson (2009), among others.

Achieving efficient variance estimation using a limited number of sets of replication weights is an important research problem with both theoretical and practical significance. The fully efficient replication weights constructed using the procedure described in Section 2 can be treated as initial sets of weights if the sample size n MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aqatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9LqFf0x e9q8qqvqFr0dXdHiVc=bYP0xb9sq=fFfeu0RXxb9qr0dd9q8qi0lf9 Fve9Fve9vapdbaqaaeGacaGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaGaamOBaa aa@3A8B@  is large. In principle, our proposed strategies in Section 3 for producing sparse and efficient replication weights can be combined with other initial sets of replication weights, including bootstrap weights (Shao 1996) or delete-a-group jackknife (Kott 2001). One should also include as many relevant variables as possible in the calibration step, so that the final calibrated replication weights are not only sparse but also efficient in providing variance estimators for a large class of estimators. Extensions of the proposed methods to handle calibration weights or nonresponse adjustment are currently under investigation.

Acknowledgements

We thank two anonymous referees and the associate editor for their very helpful comments. This work started with initial discussions between the first author J.K. Kim and Professor Randy Sitter of Simon Fraser University who was tragically lost at sea during a kayak trip in 2007. The authors would like to dedicate this paper to the memory of Professor Sitter who was also the PhD thesis supervisor of the second author C. Wu. The research of J.K. Kim was partially supported by a Cooperative Agreement between the US Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service and Iowa State University. The research of C. Wu was supported by grants from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada and Mathematics of Information Technology and Complex Systems.

Appendix

A  Proof of Theorem 2

By assumption (4.2), we have

max 1kL c k ( t ^ y (k) t ^ y ) 2 = O p ( L 1 n 1 N 2 ), MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aqatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9LqFf0x e9q8qqvqFr0dXdHiVc=bYP0xb9sq=fFfeu0RXxb9qr0dd9q8qi0lf9 Fve9Fve9vapdbaqaaeGacaGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaWaaCbeae aaciGGTbGaaiyyaiaacIhaaSqaaiaaigdacqGHKjYOcaWGRbGaeyiz ImQaamitaaqabaGccaWGJbWaaSbaaSqaaiaadUgaaeqaaOGaaiikai qadshagaqcamaaDaaaleaacaWG5baabaGaaiikaiaadUgacaGGPaaa aOGaeyOeI0IabmiDayaajaWaaSbaaSqaaiaadMhaaeqaaOGaaiykam aaCaaaleqabaGaaGOmaaaakiabg2da9iaad+eadaWgaaWcbaGaamiC aaqabaGccaGGOaGaamitamaaCaaaleqabaGaeyOeI0IaaGymaaaaki aad6gadaahaaWcbeqaaiabgkHiTiaaigdaaaGccaWGobWaaWbaaSqa beaacaaIYaaaaOGaaiykaiaacYcaaaa@5AF6@

which, combined with (4.3), implies that

max 1kL ( μ ^ y (k) μ ^ y )= o p (1), MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aqatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9LqFf0x e9q8qqvqFr0dXdHiVc=bYP0xb9sq=fFfeu0RXxb9qr0dd9q8qi0lf9 Fve9Fve9vapdbaqaaeGacaGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaWaaCbeae aaciGGTbGaaiyyaiaacIhaaSqaaiaaigdacqGHKjYOcaWGRbGaeyiz ImQaamitaaqabaGccaGGOaGafqiVd0MbaKaadaqhaaWcbaGaamyEaa qaaiaacIcacaWGRbGaaiykaaaakiabgkHiTiqbeY7aTzaajaWaaSba aSqaaiaadMhaaeqaaOGaaiykaiabg2da9iaad+gadaWgaaWcbaGaam iCaaqabaGccaGGOaGaaGymaiaacMcacaGGSaaaaa@5302@ (A.1)

where μ ^ y (k) = N 1 t ^ y (k) MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aqatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9LqFf0x e9q8qqvqFr0dXdHiVc=bYP0xb9sq=fFfeu0RXxb9qr0dd9q8qi0lf9 Fve9Fve9vapdbaqaaeGacaGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaGafqiVd0 MbaKaadaqhaaWcbaGaamyEaaqaaiaacIcacaWGRbGaaiykaaaakiab g2da9iaad6eadaahaaWcbeqaaiabgkHiTiaaigdaaaGcceWG0bGbaK aadaqhaaWcbaGaamyEaaqaaiaacIcacaWGRbGaaiykaaaaaaa@4711@  and μ ^ y = N 1 t ^ y . MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aqatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9LqFf0x e9q8qqvqFr0dXdHiVc=bYP0xb9sq=fFfeu0RXxb9qr0dd9q8qi0lf9 Fve9Fve9vapdbaqaaeGacaGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaGafqiVd0 MbaKaadaWgaaWcbaGaamyEaaqabaGccqGH9aqpcaWGobWaaWbaaSqa beaacqGHsislcaaIXaaaaOGabmiDayaajaWaaSbaaSqaaiaadMhaae qaaOGaaiOlaaaa@4339@  Let g( μ y )=f(N μ y ). MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aqatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9LqFf0x e9q8qqvqFr0dXdHiVc=bYP0xb9sq=fFfeu0RXxb9qr0dd9q8qi0lf9 Fve9Fve9vapdbaqaaeGacaGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaGaam4zai aacIcacqaH8oqBdaWgaaWcbaGaamyEaaqabaGccaGGPaGaeyypa0Ja amOzaiaacIcacaWGobGaeqiVd02aaSbaaSqaaiaadMhaaeqaaOGaai ykaiaac6caaaa@4680@  We can write

θ ^ (k) θ ^ =g( μ ^ y (k) )g( μ ^ y )= g ˙ ( μ ^ y )( μ ^ y (k) μ ^ y )+ Q nk ( μ ^ y (k) μ ^ y ), MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aqatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9LqFf0x e9q8qqvqFr0dXdHiVc=bYP0xb9sq=fFfeu0RXxb9qr0dd9q8qi0lf9 Fve9Fve9vapdbaqaaeGacaGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaGafqiUde NbaKaadaahaaWcbeqaaiaacIcacaWGRbGaaiykaaaakiabgkHiTiqb eI7aXzaajaGaeyypa0Jaam4zaiaacIcacuaH8oqBgaqcamaaDaaale aacaWG5baabaGaaiikaiaadUgacaGGPaaaaOGaaiykaiabgkHiTiaa dEgacaGGOaGafqiVd0MbaKaadaWgaaWcbaGaamyEaaqabaGccaGGPa Gaeyypa0Jabm4zayaacaGaaiikaiqbeY7aTzaajaWaaSbaaSqaaiaa dMhaaeqaaOGaaiykaiaacIcacuaH8oqBgaqcamaaDaaaleaacaWG5b aabaGaaiikaiaadUgacaGGPaaaaOGaeyOeI0IafqiVd0MbaKaadaWg aaWcbaGaamyEaaqabaGccaGGPaGaey4kaSIaamyuamaaBaaaleaaca WGUbGaam4AaaqabaGccaGGOaGafqiVd0MbaKaadaqhaaWcbaGaamyE aaqaaiaacIcacaWGRbGaaiykaaaakiabgkHiTiqbeY7aTzaajaWaaS baaSqaaiaadMhaaeqaaOGaaiykaiaacYcaaaa@6F23@

where g ˙ (μ)=g(μ)/μ, Q nk = g ˙ ( μ k * ) g ˙ ( μ ^ y ), MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aqatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9LqFf0x e9q8qqvqFr0dXdHiVc=bYP0xb9sq=fFfeu0RXxb9qr0dd9q8qi0lf9 Fve9Fve9vapdbaqaaeGacaGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaGabm4zay aacaGaaiikaiabeY7aTjaacMcacqGH9aqpcqGHciITcaWGNbGaaiik aiabeY7aTjaacMcacaGGVaGaeyOaIyRaeqiVd0Maaiilaiaadgfada WgaaWcbaGaamOBaiaadUgaaeqaaOGaeyypa0Jabm4zayaacaGaaiik aiabeY7aTnaaDaaaleaacaWGRbaabaGaaiOkaaaakiaacMcacqGHsi slceWGNbGbaiaacaGGOaGafqiVd0MbaKaadaWgaaWcbaGaamyEaaqa baGccaGGPaGaaiilaaaa@5935@  and μ k * MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aqatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9LqFf0x e9q8qqvqFr0dXdHiVc=bYP0xb9sq=fFfeu0RXxb9qr0dd9q8qi0lf9 Fve9Fve9vapdbaqaaeGacaGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaGaeqiVd0 2aa0baaSqaaiaadUgaaeaacaGGQaaaaaaa@3D19@  is an inner point on the line segment between μ ^ (k) MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aqatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9LqFf0x e9q8qqvqFr0dXdHiVc=bYP0xb9sq=fFfeu0RXxb9qr0dd9q8qi0lf9 Fve9Fve9vapdbaqaaeGacaGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaGafqiVd0 MbaKaadaahaaWcbeqaaiaacIcacaWGRbGaaiykaaaaaaa@3DD4@  and μ ^ . MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aqatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9LqFf0x e9q8qqvqFr0dXdHiVc=bYP0xb9sq=fFfeu0RXxb9qr0dd9q8qi0lf9 Fve9Fve9vapdbaqaaeGacaGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaGafqiVd0 MbaKaacaGGUaaaaa@3C10@  By (A.1), we have

max 1kL ( μ k * μ ^ y )= o p (1). MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aqatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9LqFf0x e9q8qqvqFr0dXdHiVc=bYP0xb9sq=fFfeu0RXxb9qr0dd9q8qi0lf9 Fve9Fve9vapdbaqaaeGacaGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaWaaCbeae aaciGGTbGaaiyyaiaacIhaaSqaaiaaigdacqGHKjYOcaWGRbGaeyiz ImQaamitaaqabaGccaGGOaGaeqiVd02aa0baaSqaaiaadUgaaeaaca GGQaaaaOGaeyOeI0IafqiVd0MbaKaadaWgaaWcbaGaamyEaaqabaGc caGGPaGaeyypa0Jaam4BamaaBaaaleaacaWGWbaabeaakiaacIcaca aIXaGaaiykaiaac6caaaa@514B@ (A.2)

Define

D δ ={ μ| max k μ k * μ <δand max k g ˙ ( μ k * ) g ˙ (μ) >ϵ }. MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aqatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9LqFf0x e9q8qqvqFr0dXdHiVc=bYP0xb9sq=fFfeu0RXxb9qr0dd9q8qi0lf9 Fve9Fve9vapdbaqaaeGacaGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaGaamiram aaBaaaleaacqaH0oazaeqaaOGaeyypa0ZaaiWaaeaadaabcaqaaiab eY7aTbGaayjcSdWaaCbeaeaaciGGTbGaaiyyaiaacIhaaSqaaiaadU gaaeqaaOWaauWaaeaacqaH8oqBdaqhaaWcbaGaam4AaaqaaiaacQca aaGccqGHsislcqaH8oqBaiaawMa7caGLkWoacqGH8aapcqaH0oazca aMe8Uaaeyyaiaab6gacaqGKbGaaGjbVpaaxababaGaciyBaiaacgga caGG4baaleaacaWGRbaabeaakmaafmaabaGabm4zayaacaGaaiikai abeY7aTnaaDaaaleaacaWGRbaabaGaaiOkaaaakiaacMcacqGHsisl ceWGNbGbaiaacaGGOaGaeqiVd0MaaiykaaGaayzcSlaawQa7aiabg6 da+mrr1ngBPrwtHrhAXaqeguuDJXwAKbstHrhAG8KBLbacfaGae8x9 dipacaGL7bGaayzFaaGaaiOlaaaa@7845@

By construction, we have, for any ϵ>0 MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aqatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9LqFf0x e9q8qqvqFr0dXdHiVc=bYP0xb9sq=fFfeu0RXxb9qr0dd9q8qi0lf9 Fve9Fve9vapdbaqaaeGacaGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaWefv3ySL gznfgDOfdaryqr1ngBPrginfgDObYtUvgaiuaacqWF1pG8cqGH+aGp caaIWaaaaa@4753@  and δ>0, MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aqatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9LqFf0x e9q8qqvqFr0dXdHiVc=bYP0xb9sq=fFfeu0RXxb9qr0dd9q8qi0lf9 Fve9Fve9vapdbaqaaeGacaGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaGaeqiTdq MaeyOpa4JaaGimaiaacYcaaaa@3DAF@

P{ max k g ˙ ( μ k * ) g ˙ ( μ ^ y ) >ϵ }P( μ ^ y D δ )+P( max k μ k * μ ^ y δ ). MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aqatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9LqFf0x e9q8qqvqFr0dXdHiVc=bYP0xb9sq=fFfeu0RXxb9qr0dd9q8qi0lf9 Fve9Fve9vapdbaqaaeGacaGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaGaamiuam aacmqabaWaaCbeaeaaciGGTbGaaiyyaiaacIhaaSqaaiaadUgaaeqa aOWaauWaaeaaceWGNbGbaiaacaGGOaGaeqiVd02aa0baaSqaaiaadU gaaeaacaGGQaaaaOGaaiykaiabgkHiTiqadEgagaGaaiaacIcacuaH 8oqBgaqcamaaBaaaleaacaWG5baabeaakiaacMcaaiaawMa7caGLkW oacqGH+aGptuuDJXwAK1uy0HwmaeHbfv3ySLgzG0uy0Hgip5wzaGqb aiab=v=aYdGaay5Eaiaaw2haaiabgsMiJkaadcfacaGGOaGafqiVd0 MbaKaadaWgaaWcbaGaamyEaaqabaGccqGHiiIZcaWGebWaaSbaaSqa aiabes7aKbqabaGccaGGPaGaey4kaSIaamiuamaabmqabaWaaCbeae aaciGGTbGaaiyyaiaacIhaaSqaaiaadUgaaeqaaOWaauWaaeaacqaH 8oqBdaqhaaWcbaGaam4AaaqaaiaacQcaaaGccqGHsislcuaH8oqBga qcamaaBaaaleaacaWG5baabeaaaOGaayzcSlaawQa7aiabgwMiZkab es7aKbGaayjkaiaawMcaaiaac6caaaa@7DDF@

By the continuity of g ˙ (μ) MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aqatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9LqFf0x e9q8qqvqFr0dXdHiVc=bYP0xb9sq=fFfeu0RXxb9qr0dd9q8qi0lf9 Fve9Fve9vapdbaqaaeGacaGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaGabm4zay aacaGaaiikaiabeY7aTjaacMcaaaa@3D9C@  at μ= μ y MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aqatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9LqFf0x e9q8qqvqFr0dXdHiVc=bYP0xb9sq=fFfeu0RXxb9qr0dd9q8qi0lf9 Fve9Fve9vapdbaqaaeGacaGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaGaeqiVd0 Maeyypa0JaeqiVd02aaSbaaSqaaiaadMhaaeqaaaaa@3F34@  and the fact that μ ^ y = μ y + o p (1), MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aqatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9LqFf0x e9q8qqvqFr0dXdHiVc=bYP0xb9sq=fFfeu0RXxb9qr0dd9q8qi0lf9 Fve9Fve9vapdbaqaaeGacaGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaGafqiVd0 MbaKaadaWgaaWcbaGaamyEaaqabaGccqGH9aqpcqaH8oqBdaWgaaWc baGaamyEaaqabaGccqGHRaWkcaWGVbWaaSbaaSqaaiaadchaaeqaaO GaaiikaiaaigdacaGGPaGaaiilaaaa@4647@  we have that, for any ϵ>0, MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aqatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9LqFf0x e9q8qqvqFr0dXdHiVc=bYP0xb9sq=fFfeu0RXxb9qr0dd9q8qi0lf9 Fve9Fve9vapdbaqaaeGacaGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaWefv3ySL gznfgDOfdaryqr1ngBPrginfgDObYtUvgaiuaacqWF1pG8cqGH+aGp caaIWaGaaiilaaaa@4803@  there exists a δ=δ(ϵ)>0 MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aqatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9LqFf0x e9q8qqvqFr0dXdHiVc=bYP0xb9sq=fFfeu0RXxb9qr0dd9q8qi0lf9 Fve9Fve9vapdbaqaaeGacaGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaGaeqiTdq Maeyypa0JaeqiTdqMaaiikamrr1ngBPrwtHrhAXaqeguuDJXwAKbst HrhAG8KBLbacfaGae8x9diVaaiykaiabg6da+iaaicdaaaa@4CFC@   such that P( μ ^ y D δ )=o(1). MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aqatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9LqFf0x e9q8qqvqFr0dXdHiVc=bYP0xb9sq=fFfeu0RXxb9qr0dd9q8qi0lf9 Fve9Fve9vapdbaqaaeGacaGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaGaamiuai aacIcacuaH8oqBgaqcamaaBaaaleaacaWG5baabeaakiabgIGiolaa dseadaWgaaWcbaGaeqiTdqgabeaakiaacMcacqGH9aqpcaWGVbGaai ikaiaaigdacaGGPaGaaiOlaaaa@47A8@  This, together with (A.2), implies that

max k g ˙ ( μ k * ) g ˙ ( μ ^ y ) = o p (1). MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9LqFf0x e9q8qqvqFr0dXdHiVc=bYP0xb9sq=fFfeu0RXxb9qr0dd9q8qi0lf9 Fve9Fve9vapdbaqaaeGacaGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaWaaCbeae aaciGGTbGaaiyyaiaacIhaaSqaaiaadUgaaeqaaOWaauWaaeaaceWG NbGbaiaacaGGOaGaeqiVd02aa0baaSqaaiaadUgaaeaacaGGQaaaaO GaaiykaiabgkHiTiqadEgagaGaaiaacIcacuaH8oqBgaqcamaaBaaa leaacaWG5baabeaakiaacMcaaiaawMa7caGLkWoacqGH9aqpcaWGVb WaaSbaaSqaaiaadchaaeqaaOGaaiikaiaaigdacaGGPaGaaiOlaaaa @52BE@ (A.3)

Now, we have

k=1 L c k ( θ ^ (k) θ ^ ) 2 = A n + B n +2 C n , MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aqatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9LqFf0x e9q8qqvqFr0dXdHiVc=bYP0xb9sq=fFfeu0RXxb9qr0dd9q8qi0lf9 Fve9Fve9vapdbaqaaeGacaGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaWaaabCae aacaWGJbWaaSbaaSqaaiaadUgaaeqaaaqaaiaadUgacqGH9aqpcaaI XaaabaGaamitaaqdcqGHris5aOGaaiikaiqbeI7aXzaajaWaaWbaaS qabeaacaGGOaGaam4AaiaacMcaaaGccqGHsislcuaH4oqCgaqcaiaa cMcadaahaaWcbeqaaiaaikdaaaGccqGH9aqpcaWGbbWaaSbaaSqaai aad6gaaeqaaOGaey4kaSIaamOqamaaBaaaleaacaWGUbaabeaakiab gUcaRiaaikdacaWGdbWaaSbaaSqaaiaad6gaaeqaaOGaaiilaaaa@54AA@ (A.4)

where

A n = k=1 L c k { g ˙ ( μ ^ y )( μ ^ y (k) μ ^ y ) } 2 , B n = k=1 L c k { Q nk ( μ ^ y (k) μ ^ y ) } 2 , and C n = k=1 L c k g ˙ ( μ ^ y ) ( μ ^ y (k) μ ^ y ) 2 Q nk . MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9LqFf0x e9q8qqvqFr0dXdHiVc=bYP0xb9sq=fFfeu0RXxb9qr0dd9q8qi0lf9 Fve9Fve9vapdbaqaaeGacaGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGceaabbeaaca WGbbWaaSbaaSqaaiaad6gaaeqaaOGaeyypa0ZaaabmaeaacaWGJbWa aSbaaSqaaiaadUgaaeqaaOGaai4EaiqadEgagaGaaiaacIcacuaH8o qBgaqcamaaBaaaleaacaWG5baabeaakiaacMcacaGGOaGafqiVd0Mb aKaadaqhaaWcbaGaamyEaaqaaiaacIcacaWGRbGaaiykaaaakiabgk HiTiqbeY7aTzaajaWaaSbaaSqaaiaadMhaaeqaaOGaaiykaaWcbaGa am4Aaiabg2da9iaaigdaaeaacaWGmbaaniabggHiLdGccaGG9bWaaW baaSqabeaacaaIYaaaaOGaaiilaaqaaiaadkeadaWgaaWcbaGaamOB aaqabaGccqGH9aqpdaaeWaqaaiaadogadaWgaaWcbaGaam4Aaaqaba GccaGG7bGaamyuamaaBaaaleaacaWGUbGaam4AaaqabaaabaGaam4A aiabg2da9iaaigdaaeaacaWGmbaaniabggHiLdGccaGGOaGafqiVd0 MbaKaadaqhaaWcbaGaamyEaaqaaiaacIcacaWGRbGaaiykaaaakiab gkHiTiqbeY7aTzaajaWaaSbaaSqaaiaadMhaaeqaaOGaaiykaiaac2 hadaahaaWcbeqaaiaaikdaaaGccaGGSaGaaeiiaiaabccacaqGHbGa aeOBaiaabsgaaeaacaWGdbWaaSbaaSqaaiaad6gaaeqaaOGaeyypa0 ZaaabmaeaacaWGJbWaaSbaaSqaaiaadUgaaeqaaOGabm4zayaacaGa aiikaiqbeY7aTzaajaWaaSbaaSqaaiaadMhaaeqaaOGaaiykaiaacI cacuaH8oqBgaqcamaaDaaaleaacaWG5baabaGaaiikaiaadUgacaGG PaaaaOGaeyOeI0IafqiVd0MbaKaadaWgaaWcbaGaamyEaaqabaGcca GGPaWaaWbaaSqabeaacaaIYaaaaaqaaiaadUgacqGH9aqpcaaIXaaa baGaamitaaqdcqGHris5aOGaamyuamaaBaaaleaacaWGUbGaam4Aaa qabaGccaGGUaaaaaa@9615@

Note that (4.4) implies

k=1 L c k ( μ ^ y (k) μ ^ y ) 2 /V( μ ^ y )=1+ o p (1). MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aqatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9LqFf0x e9q8qqvqFr0dXdHiVc=bYP0xb9sq=fFfeu0RXxb9qr0dd9q8qi0lf9 Fve9Fve9vapdbaqaaeGacaGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaWaaabCae aacaWGJbWaaSbaaSqaaiaadUgaaeqaaaqaaiaadUgacqGH9aqpcaaI XaaabaGaamitaaqdcqGHris5aOGaaiikaiqbeY7aTzaajaWaa0baaS qaaiaadMhaaeaacaGGOaGaam4AaiaacMcaaaGccqGHsislcuaH8oqB gaqcamaaBaaaleaacaWG5baabeaakiaacMcadaahaaWcbeqaaiaaik daaaGccaGGVaGaamOvaiaacIcacuaH8oqBgaqcamaaBaaaleaacaWG 5baabeaakiaacMcacqGH9aqpcaaIXaGaey4kaSIaam4BamaaBaaale aacaWGWbaabeaakiaacIcacaaIXaGaaiykaiaac6caaaa@5A3F@ (A.5)

By standard linearization arguments, we have A n /V( θ ^ )1 MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aqatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9LqFf0x e9q8qqvqFr0dXdHiVc=bYP0xb9sq=fFfeu0RXxb9qr0dd9q8qi0lf9 Fve9Fve9vapdbaqaaeGacaGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaGaamyqam aaBaaaleaacaWGUbaabeaakiaac+cacaWGwbGaaiikaiqbeI7aXzaa jaGaaiykaiabgkziUkaaigdaaaa@42DC@  in probability. Furthermore, by (A.3) and (A.5), we have B n /V( θ ^ )= o p (1) MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9LqFf0x e9q8qqvqFr0dXdHiVc=bYP0xb9sq=fFfeu0RXxb9qr0dd9q8qi0lf9 Fve9Fve9vapdbaqaaeGacaGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaGaamOqam aaBaaaleaacaWGUbaabeaakiaac+cacaWGwbGaaiikaiqbeI7aXzaa jaGaaiykaiabg2da9iaad+gadaWgaaWcbaGaamiCaaqabaGccaGGOa GaaGymaiaacMcaaaa@456D@  and C n /V( θ ^ )= o p (1). MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aqatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9LqFf0x e9q8qqvqFr0dXdHiVc=bYP0xb9sq=fFfeu0RXxb9qr0dd9q8qi0lf9 Fve9Fve9vapdbaqaaeGacaGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaGaam4qam aaBaaaleaacaWGUbaabeaakiaac+cacaWGwbGaaiikaiqbeI7aXzaa jaGaaiykaiabg2da9iaad+gadaWgaaWcbaGaamiCaaqabaGccaGGOa GaaGymaiaacMcacaGGUaaaaa@4621@  This establishes (4.5).

B  Proof of Theorem 3

Combining (3.10) and (3.11) and ignoring terms of smaller order, we have

v 0 ( t ^ y ) v C ( t ^ y ) β ^ v 0 ( t ^ z ) β ^ β ^ v 1 ( t ^ z ) β ^ β v 0 ( t ^ z )β β v 1 ( t ^ z )β. MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9LqFf0x e9q8qqvqFr0dXdHiVc=bYP0xb9sq=fFfeu0RXxb9qr0dd9q8qi0lf9 Fve9Fve9vapdbaqaaeGacaGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaGaamODam aaBaaaleaacaaIWaaabeaakiaacIcaceWG0bGbaKaadaWgaaWcbaGa amyEaaqabaGccaGGPaGaeyOeI0IaamODamaaBaaaleaacaWGdbaabe aakiaacIcaceWG0bGbaKaadaWgaaWcbaGaamyEaaqabaGccaGGPaGa eSiuIiecceGaf8NSdiMbaKGbauaacaWG2bWaaSbaaSqaaiaaicdaae qaaOGaaiikaiqadshagaqcamaaBaaaleaaieWacaGF6baabeaakiaa cMcacuWFYoGygaqcaiabgkHiTiqb=j7aIzaafyaajaGaamODamaaBa aaleaacaaIXaaabeaakiaacIcaceWG0bGbaKaadaWgaaWcbaGaa4NE aaqabaGccaGGPaGaf8NSdiMbaKaacqWIqjIqcuWFYoGygaqbaiaadA hadaWgaaWcbaGaaGimaaqabaGccaGGOaGabmiDayaajaWaaSbaaSqa aiaa+PhaaeqaaOGaaiykaiab=j7aIjabgkHiTiqb=j7aIzaafaGaam ODamaaBaaaleaacaaIXaaabeaakiaacIcaceWG0bGbaKaadaWgaaWc baGaa4NEaaqabaGccaGGPaGae8NSdiMaaiOlaaaa@6E05@

where β MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aqatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9LqFf0x e9q8qqvqFr0dXdHiVc=bYP0xb9sq=fFfeu0RXxb9qr0dd9q8qi0lf9 Fve9Fve9vapdbaqaaeGacaGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaacceGae8 NSdigaaa@3B3F@  is the probability limit of β ^ . MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aqatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9LqFf0x e9q8qqvqFr0dXdHiVc=bYP0xb9sq=fFfeu0RXxb9qr0dd9q8qi0lf9 Fve9Fve9vapdbaqaaeGacaGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaacceGaf8 NSdiMbaKaacaGGUaaaaa@3C01@  By (4.6), we have

E * { v 0 ( t ^ z )}= v 1 ( t ^ z ), MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aqatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9LqFf0x e9q8qqvqFr0dXdHiVc=bYP0xb9sq=fFfeu0RXxb9qr0dd9q8qi0lf9 Fve9Fve9vapdbaqaaeGacaGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaGaamyram aaCaaaleqabaGaaiOkaaaakiaacUhacaWG2bWaaSbaaSqaaiaaicda aeqaaOGaaiikaiqadshagaqcamaaBaaaleaaieWacaWF6baabeaaki aacMcacaGG9bGaeyypa0JaamODamaaBaaaleaacaaIXaaabeaakiaa cIcaceWG0bGbaKaadaWgaaWcbaGaa8NEaaqabaGccaGGPaGaaiilaa aa@4A06@ (B.1)

where E * () MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aqatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9LqFf0x e9q8qqvqFr0dXdHiVc=bYP0xb9sq=fFfeu0RXxb9qr0dd9q8qi0lf9 Fve9Fve9vapdbaqaaeGacaGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaGaamyram aaCaaaleqabaGaaiOkaaaakiaacIcacqGHflY1caGGPaaaaa@3EEA@  denotes expectation under random selection of the L 0 MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aqatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9LqFf0x e9q8qqvqFr0dXdHiVc=bYP0xb9sq=fFfeu0RXxb9qr0dd9q8qi0lf9 Fve9Fve9vapdbaqaaeGacaGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaGaamitam aaBaaaleaacaaIWaaabeaaaaa@3B4F@  sets of weights conditional on the L MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aqatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9LqFf0x e9q8qqvqFr0dXdHiVc=bYP0xb9sq=fFfeu0RXxb9qr0dd9q8qi0lf9 Fve9Fve9vapdbaqaaeGacaGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaGaamitaa aa@3A69@  sets of weights. Similarly, by (3.11), we have

v 1 ( t ^ y ) v C ( t ^ y ) v 1 ( t ^ e ) v 0 ( t ^ e ). MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aqatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9LqFf0x e9q8qqvqFr0dXdHiVc=bYP0xb9sq=fFfeu0RXxb9qr0dd9q8qi0lf9 Fve9Fve9vapdbaqaaeGacaGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaGaamODam aaBaaaleaacaaIXaaabeaakiaacIcaceWG0bGbaKaadaWgaaWcbaGa amyEaaqabaGccaGGPaGaeyOeI0IaamODamaaBaaaleaacaWGdbaabe aakiaacIcaceWG0bGbaKaadaWgaaWcbaGaamyEaaqabaGccaGGPaGa eSiuIiKaamODamaaBaaaleaacaaIXaaabeaakiaacIcaceWG0bGbaK aadaWgaaWcbaGaamyzaaqabaGccaGGPaGaeyOeI0IaamODamaaBaaa leaacaaIWaaabeaakiaacIcaceWG0bGbaKaadaWgaaWcbaGaamyzaa qabaGccaGGPaGaaiOlaaaa@5355@

By (4.6) again, we have

E * { v 0 ( t ^ e )}= v 1 ( t ^ e ). MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aqatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9LqFf0x e9q8qqvqFr0dXdHiVc=bYP0xb9sq=fFfeu0RXxb9qr0dd9q8qi0lf9 Fve9Fve9vapdbaqaaeGacaGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaGaamyram aaCaaaleqabaGaaiOkaaaakiaacUhacaWG2bWaaSbaaSqaaiaaicda aeqaaOGaaiikaiqadshagaqcamaaBaaaleaacaWGLbaabeaakiaacM cacaGG9bGaeyypa0JaamODamaaBaaaleaacaaIXaaabeaakiaacIca ceWG0bGbaKaadaWgaaWcbaGaamyzaaqabaGccaGGPaGaaiOlaaaa@49DA@ (B.2)

Let d ^ 1 = v C ( t ^ y ) v 1 ( t ^ y ), MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aqatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9LqFf0x e9q8qqvqFr0dXdHiVc=bYP0xb9sq=fFfeu0RXxb9qr0dd9q8qi0lf9 Fve9Fve9vapdbaqaaeGacaGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaGabmizay aajaWaaSbaaSqaaiaaigdaaeqaaOGaeyypa0JaamODamaaBaaaleaa caWGdbaabeaakiaacIcaceWG0bGbaKaadaWgaaWcbaGaamyEaaqaba GccaGGPaGaeyOeI0IaamODamaaBaaaleaacaaIXaaabeaakiaacIca ceWG0bGbaKaadaWgaaWcbaGaamyEaaqabaGccaGGPaGaaiilaaaa@4936@  we have E( d ^ 1 )=0 MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aqatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9LqFf0x e9q8qqvqFr0dXdHiVc=bYP0xb9sq=fFfeu0RXxb9qr0dd9q8qi0lf9 Fve9Fve9vapdbaqaaeGacaGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaGaamyrai aacIcaceWGKbGbaKaadaWgaaWcbaGaaGymaaqabaGccaGGPaGaeyyp a0JaaGimaaaa@3F65@  by (B.2), which proves (4.7). Furthermore, by (B.2) again, we have Cov{ d ^ 1 , v 1 ( t ^ y )}=0. MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aqatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9LqFf0x e9q8qqvqFr0dXdHiVc=bYP0xb9sq=fFfeu0RXxb9qr0dd9q8qi0lf9 Fve9Fve9vapdbaqaaeGacaGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaGaae4qai aab+gacaqG2bGaai4EaiqadsgagaqcamaaBaaaleaacaaIXaaabeaa kiaacYcacaWG2bWaaSbaaSqaaiaaigdaaeqaaOGaaiikaiqadshaga qcamaaBaaaleaacaWG5baabeaakiaacMcacaGG9bGaeyypa0JaaGim aiaac6caaaa@48D7@  Thus, we have

V{ v C ( t ^ y )}=V{ v 1 ( t ^ y )}+V( d ^ 1 )V{ v 1 ( t ^ y )}. MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aqatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9LqFf0x e9q8qqvqFr0dXdHiVc=bYP0xb9sq=fFfeu0RXxb9qr0dd9q8qi0lf9 Fve9Fve9vapdbaqaaeGacaGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaGaamOvai aacUhacaWG2bWaaSbaaSqaaiaadoeaaeqaaOGaaiikaiqadshagaqc amaaBaaaleaacaWG5baabeaakiaacMcacaGG9bGaeyypa0JaamOvai aacUhacaWG2bWaaSbaaSqaaiaaigdaaeqaaOGaaiikaiqadshagaqc amaaBaaaleaacaWG5baabeaakiaacMcacaGG9bGaey4kaSIaamOvai aacIcaceWGKbGbaKaadaWgaaWcbaGaaGymaaqabaGccaGGPaGaeyyz ImRaamOvaiaacUhacaWG2bWaaSbaaSqaaiaaigdaaeqaaOGaaiikai qadshagaqcamaaBaaaleaacaWG5baabeaakiaacMcacaGG9bGaaiOl aaaa@5B3A@ (B.3)

Similarly, we can also prove that V{ v 0 ( t ^ y )}V{ v C ( t ^ y )}. MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aqatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9LqFf0x e9q8qqvqFr0dXdHiVc=bYP0xb9sq=fFfeu0RXxb9qr0dd9q8qi0lf9 Fve9Fve9vapdbaqaaeGacaGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaGaamOvai aacUhacaWG2bWaaSbaaSqaaiaaicdaaeqaaOGaaiikaiqadshagaqc amaaBaaaleaacaWG5baabeaakiaacMcacaGG9bGaeyyzImRaamOvai aacUhacaWG2bWaaSbaaSqaaiaadoeaaeqaaOGaaiikaiqadshagaqc amaaBaaaleaacaWG5baabeaakiaacMcacaGG9bGaaiOlaaaa@4CD6@

References

Binder, D.A. (1983). On the variances of asymptotically normal estimators from complex surveys. International Statistical Review, 51, 279-292.

Breidt, F.J., and Chauvet, G. (2011). Improved variance estimation for balanced samples drawn via the cube method. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 141, 411-425.

Campbell, C. (1980). A different view of the finite population estimation. Proceedings of the Section on Survey Research Methods, American Statistical Association, 319-324.

Deville, J.-C. (1999). Variance estimation for complex statistics and estimators: Linearization and residual techniques. Survey Methodology, 25, 2, 193-203.

Deville, J.-C., and Tillé, Y. (2005). Variance approximation under balanced sampling. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 128, 411-425.

Dippo, C.S., Fay, R.E. and Morganstein, D.H. (1984). Computing variances from complex samples with replicate weights. Proceedings of the Section on Survey Research Methods, American Statistical Association, Washington, DC, 489-494.

Fay, R.E. (1984). Some properties of estimators of variance based on replication methods. Proceedings of the Section on Survey Research Methods, American Statistical Association, Washington, DC, 495-500.

Fay, R.E., and Dippo, C.S. (1989). Theory and application of replicate weighting for variance calculations. Proceedings of the Section on Survey Research Methods, American Statistical Association, Washington, DC, 212-217.

Fuller, W.A. (1998). Replication variance estimation for two phase samples. Statistica Sinica, 8, 1153-1164.

Fuller, W.A. (2009a). Sampling Statistics. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Fuller, W.A. (2009b). Some design properties of a rejective sampling procedure. Biometrika, 96, 933-944.

Godambe, V.P., and Thompson, M.E. (2009). Estimating functions and survey sampling. In Handbook of Statistics, (Eds., D. Pfeffermann and C.R. Rao), Sample Surveys: Inference and Analysis, North Holland, Vol. 29B, 83-101.

Gross, S. (1980). Median estimation in sample surveys. Proceedings of the Section on Survey Research Methods, American Statistical Association, Washington, DC, 181-184.

Isaki, C.T., and Fuller, W.A. (1982). Survey design under the regression superpopulation model. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 77, 89-96.

Jang, D., and Eltinge, J.L. (2009). Use of within-primary-sample-unit variances to assess the stability of a standard design-based variance estimator. Survey Methodology, 35, 2, 235-245.

Kim, J.K., Navarro, A. and Fuller, W.A. (2006). Replication variance estimation for two-phase stratified sampling. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 101, 312-320.

Kott, P.S. (2001). The delete-a-group jackknife. Journal of Official Statistics, 17, 521-526.

Krewski, D., and Rao, J.N.K. (1981). Inference from stratified samples: Properties of the linearization, jackknife and balanced repeated replication methods. Annals of Statistics, 9, 1010-1019.

Lu, W.W., Brick, J.M. and Sitter, R.R. (2006). Algorithms for constructing combining strata variance estimators. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 101, 1680-1692.

Lu, W.W., and Sitter, R.R. (2008). Disclosure risk and replication-based variance estimation. Statistica Sinica, 18, 1669-1687.

McCarthy, P.J., and Snowden, C.B. (1985). The Bootstrap and Finite Population Sampling. Vital and Health Statistics, Ser. 2, No. 95, Public Health Service Publication 85-1369, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.

Preston, J. (2009). Rescaled bootstrap for stratified multistage sampling. Survey Methodology, 35, 2, 227-234.

Rao, J.N.K. (1965). On two simple schemes of unequal probability sampling without replacement. Journal of the Indian Statistical Association, 3, 173-180.

Rao, J.N.K., and Wu, C.F.J. (1988). Resampling inference with complex survey data. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 83, 231-241.

Rust, K.F., and Kalton, G. (1987). Strategies for collapsing strata for variance estimation. Journal of Official Statistics, 3, 69-81.

Rust, K.F., and Rao, J.N.K. (1996). Variance estimation for complex surveys using replication techniques. Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 5, 283-310.

Sampford, M.R. (1967). On sampling without replacement with unequal probabilities of selection. Biometrika, 54, 499-513.

Shao, J. (1996). Resampling methods in sample surveys (with discussion). Statistics, 27, 203-254.

Shao, J. (2003). Impact of the bootstrap on sample surveys. Statistical Science, 18, 191-198.

Shao, J., and Tu, D. (1995). The Jackknife and Bootstrap. New York: Springer.

Sitter, R.R. (1992). A resampling procedure for complex survey data. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 87, 755-765.

Sitter, R.R., and Wu, C. (2001). A note on Woodruff confidence intervals for quantiles. Statistics and Probability Letters, 52, 353-358.

Skinner, C.J. (1989). Domain means, regression and multivariate analysis. In Analysis of Complex Surveys, (Eds., C.J. Skinner, D. Holt and T.M. Smith), New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 59-88.

Tillé, Y. (2006). Sampling Algorithms. Springer Science + Business Media, Inc.

Wolter, K.M. (2007). Introduction to Variance Estimation (2nd Edition). New York: Springer-Verlag.

Wu, C. (2004). Some algorithmic aspects of the empirical likelihood method in survey sampling. Statistica Sinica, 14, 1057-1067.

Wu, C. (2005). Algorithms and R codes for the pseudo empirical likelihood method in survey sampling. Survey Methodology, 31, 2, 239-243.

Previous

Date modified: