Blinder–Oaxaca decomposition of the difference in the probability of holding an RESP between economic families in the top and bottom income quintiles
Table 3
Archived Content
Information identified as archived is provided for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It is not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards and has not been altered or updated since it was archived. Please "contact us" to request a format other than those available.
1999 | 2012 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
coefficient | bootstrap standard error | coefficient | bootstrap standard error | |
Top after-tax income quintile | 0.318Note *** | 0.028 | 0.679Note *** | 0.023 |
Bottom after-tax income quintile | 0.098Note *** | 0.011 | 0.253Note *** | 0.025 |
Top after-tax income quintile minus bottom after-tax income quintile | 0.219Note *** | 0.030 | 0.426Note *** | 0.035 |
Explained portion of difference | 0.136Note *** | 0.028 | 0.302Note *** | 0.051 |
Unexplained portion of difference | 0.083Table 3 Note † | 0.044 | 0.123Table 3 Note † | 0.070 |
Detailed explained components | ||||
Net worth (less RESPs) | 0.077Note ** | 0.025 | 0.184Note *** | 0.044 |
Parental education | 0.052Note ** | 0.017 | 0.103Note *** | 0.023 |
Parental age | 0.007 | 0.009 | -0.008 | 0.017 |
Parental marital status | 0.007 | 0.006 | 0.031Note * | 0.015 |
Number of children | -0.008 | 0.005 | -0.012 | 0.008 |
Age of youngest child | 0.004 | 0.007 | 0.003 | 0.018 |
Age of oldest child | -0.011Table 3 Note † | 0.006 | -0.009 | 0.013 |
Region | 0.008Table 3 Note † | 0.005 | 0.005 | 0.005 |
Urban/rural status | -0.001 | 0.005 | 0.005 | 0.003 |
Sources: Statistics Canada, 1999 and 2012 Survey of Financial Security. |
- Date modified: