Feature article
A Commodity Perspective On Recent Trends in Retailing
by R. Lussier, D. McDowell and E. Cryderman*
Introduction
The 1990s witnessed a number of important changes in the retail
industry. The “big box” phenomenon crossed the border
from the US to Canada. “Power centers”, or groupings
of big box stores, sprouted across the country, dramatically
changing the face of retailing. Numerous store types subscribed
to the one-stop shopping philosophy, expanding both their physical
size and selection of merchandise. For instance, drugstores and
general merchandisers actively sought to tap new markets: drugstores
moved into food and sundries, while general merchandisers moved
into drugs and expanded their food sections. Diversification,
however, was not universal. Department stores spun-off specialized
stores to handle furniture and household goods while reducing
these lines at their regular stores.
The Monthly Retail Trade Survey (MRTS), although extremely important,
could not always answer probing questions on retail trade. For
example, for years the trend of food shipments by manufacturers
and retail sales of supermarkets and other food stores was very
close (Figure 1). But they diverged significantly in the mid-1990s, with shipments
of food continuing to grow while retail sales of food slowed and
actually dropped in 1995-96. This trend baffled analysts, with
no apparent explanation in the available data (although it was
clear that people had not stopped buying food and manufacturers
had to be shipping it somewhere). Analysts believed that a shift
in food sales by store type was a possible reason, one that could
not be detected by trade group sales estimates but would be by
a commodity-based survey.
Figure 1
All of the above emphasized the need for an ongoing commodity-based survey.
Previous commodity surveys were irregular, with gaps of up to 15 years between surveys. Data from the new Retail Commodity Program provide
timely answers to a myriad of questions that were hitherto unavailable. What
were Canadians buying from retail stores? From what store types were they buying
it? Have personal spending patterns changed? When do Canadians buy their goods?
Where do Canadians buy given commodities? What do certain store types sell?
What is happening to market share?
The Retail Commodity Program
In the mid-1990s, a goal was set to obtain commodity-based estimates
for both total retail trade and for each of the existing trade
groups. First, a workable and useful commodity classification was
developed. Second, the survey was designed so that the aggregate
industry and commodity estimates were consistent.
The resulting program consists of two components: the Quarterly
Retail Commodity Survey and the Monthly Commodity Survey of Large
Retailers. (The former includes the latter). The same commodity
detail is collected in both surveys.
The Quarterly survey covers about 8,000 of the 14,000 business in the MRTS
sample. The objective of the Monthly Survey of Large Retailers is to provide
the most timely commodity estimates possible. To do so, the survey is based
on a select group of 80 large retail enterprises that effectively form a longitudinal
panel. These enterprises represent Canada’s largest retailers of food,
clothing, home furnishings, electronics, sporting goods, and general merchandise.
Together they represent about 38% of total retail sales (excluding recreational
and motor vehicle dealers).
What do consumers buy – the supply perspective
It is critical for retailers to know what consumers are spending
their money on, in order to respond to shifting consumer demands.
The Retail Commodity Program is able to track the sales share of
over one hundred commodities. In 2002, sales of new and used motor
vehicles, parts and labour represented 29% of total retail sales.
To this, one can add sales of automotive fuels, oils and additives
(7% of total retail sales) to get a picture of transportation-related
spending made in retail stores. Second in size is food and beverage
sales, some 22% of all sales. Next are clothing and accessories
with 9% and home furnishings and electronics with 8%.
Have spending patterns changed?
The Retail Commodity Program sheds light on the changes in the
importance of each commodity in the consumer’s retail basket.
In 1997, food and beverage sales represented 24.3% of retail sales.
Although food and beverages has increased between 1.4% and 4.0%
annually from 1997 to 2002, their share dropped significantly to
21.7% of retail sales in 2002.
Evidently something else has taken a bigger share of the consumer dollar. Table
1 indicates that health and personal care products account for a larger portion
of what consumers spend. In 1997 they represented 6.4% of retail sales, but
this surged to 7.5% in 2002, largely due to rising drug sales. Drugs include
prescription drugs, as well as over-the-counter drugs, vitamins, herbal remedies,
and health supplements.
Home furnishings and electronics were also a big winner, increasing from 7.0%
to 7.9% of retail sales over the 5-year period.
Finally, automotive fuel, oil and additives is another commodity
that took a larger share of the retail dollar, partly due to large
price increases for gasoline.
Table 1: Shift in Commodity Sales Share
|
1997 |
2002 |
|
% |
% |
Food and Beverages |
24.3 |
21.7 |
Health and Personal Care |
6.4 |
7.5 |
Clothing |
9.6 |
8.8 |
Home Furnishings and Electronics |
7.0 |
7.9 |
Housewares |
1.9 |
2.0 |
Hardware, Lawn and Garden |
2.8 |
2.7 |
Sporting and Leisure Goods |
3.6 |
3.8 |
Motor Vehicles, Parts, Service and Labour |
29.0 |
29.3 |
Automobile Fuel, Oil and Additives |
6.8 |
7.4 |
Tobacco Products |
2.3 |
2.6 |
Other Goods and Services |
6.3 |
6.3 |
When do Canadians buy goods?
Seasonality is an important factor when analyzing retail trade
data. However, trade group data often mask more distinct seasonality
at the commodity level. The influence of holidays, long weekends,
back to school events, and other events (Mother’s Day,
Valentine’s, Halloween) can have a much greater impact
at a specific commodity level than at the trade group level.
Take for example candy sales around Easter or Halloween. Supermarket
sales may be up slightly in October due to Thanksgiving, or in
March or April due to Easter. However the spike in candy sales
around this time is lost when lumped together with all other
products sold at a food retailer. Commodity level seasonality
provides much better information.
Although almost every commodity has a seasonal pattern, commodities that seem
similar on the surface can have different seasonal patterns. Clothing is
a very seasonal commodity. However, within clothing, seasonality varies from
commodity to commodity.
Taking a closer look at the seasonal pattern for men’s
and women’s clothing (Figure 2), the primary peaks in December,
although in the same direction, differ greatly in strength. The
seasonal factor for men’s clothing is significantly stronger
in December than for women’s, presumably because men receive
a greater proportion of their clothing as Christmas gifts.
Figure 2
Women’s clothing has a secondary peak in May, while men’s
clothing has a secondary peak in June. One explanation is clothing
purchases around Mother’s Day and Father’s Day. On
the other hand, there does not seem to be much of an Easter effect.
Boy’s and girl’s clothing sales follow similar seasonal
patterns (Figure 3). However, infant’s clothing does not
have the same back to school peak as boy’s and girl’s.
Figure 3
Where do Canadians buy commodities?
It is often assumed that consumers have relatively stable buying
patterns and that given commodities are bought from certain store
types. With the fierce competition between store types, the same
commodity can now be found in a variety of different stores.
Where do people shop for certain everyday products? Where are
they most likely to buy certain commodities?
Table 2 shows that in 2002 the majority of food and non-alcoholic
beverage sales were made by supermarkets. But general merchandise
stores surpassed speciality food stores with 9.7% of all food and
non-alcoholic beverage sales, while drug stores sold 1.4%. This
may not seem large, but every percentage point represents $666
million of food sales.
Table 2: Share of Food and Non-alcoholic Beverage Sales
in 2002
|
Sales in 2002 |
|
% |
Supermarkets |
80.1 |
General merchandise stores |
9.7 |
Speciality food stores |
7.3 |
Drug stores |
1.4 |
Gas station |
1.0 |
Other |
0.3 |
What do stores sell?
It is revealing to see the various commodities sold by a trade
group. To illustrate the point, Table 3 presents the different
commodities sold by motor and recreational vehicle dealers. Around
55% of the sales are accounted for by new cars and trucks (including
mini-vans and SUVs). Used automobiles represent 26%, while the
rest is spread across parts, oil, labour receipts, new and used
recreational vehicles.
Table 3: Share of Motor and Recreational Vehicle Dealers Sales
in 2002
|
Sales in 2002 |
|
% |
New cars |
25.9 |
New trucks |
29.0 |
Used autos |
26.0 |
Auto parts and oil |
6.1 |
Labour |
4.8 |
New recreational vehicles |
4.9 |
Used recreational vehicles |
0.4 |
Other |
2.8 |
Are some trade groups gaining market share?
Market share is a very important measure of success for most retailers.
With over $307 billion in retail sales in 2002, every retailer
and industry analyst wants to know who has the biggest piece
of that pie or who is growing faster.
In addition, understanding market share is an important step
towards understanding the often fickle consumer. Clothing store
sales illustrate how market share can change. Table 4 shows that
between 1997 and 2002, general merchandise stores (including department
stores) lost clothing share. Gains were made by specialised clothing
stores and sporting goods stores, with the latter increasing their
market share by over half.
Table 4: Share of Clothing Sales by Trade Group
|
1997 |
2002 |
|
% |
% |
General merchandise stores |
34.2 |
30.3 |
Clothing stores |
59.4 |
60.9 |
Men's |
8.7 |
6.1 |
Women's |
24.0 |
22.2 |
Other |
26.1 |
32.0 |
Sporting goods stores |
3.7 |
5.6 |
Conclusion
Statistics Canada has had a long history of collecting commodity
detail for the manufacturing sector. However, until fairly recently,
its attempts for the retail sector had been sporadic. The establishment
of the Retail Commodity Program in 1997 has proven to be a useful
analytical tool for the retail industry. The information generated
can be used to track commodity sales within and across retail industries,
to calculate commodity market share of various types of retail
stores, and to gain a better understanding of the rapidly changing
retail industry. The data show the type of outlets where consumers
prefer to buy certain commodities, and shifts in the different
types of commodities retailers decide to sell. Analysis of this
data assists in establishing trends in commodity sales over time
and in detecting and analysing seasonal factors in the retail industry.
In addition, various levels of government use the data to monitor
the economy and consumer confidence. The authors are not aware
of any other country in the world with such an extensive commodity
program. The Retail Commodity Program appears to be a distinguished
feature of the Canadian Retail Trade Statistics Program.
Recent commodity data, for about 30 series, are available free
of charge through the Canadian Statistics website (www.statcan.ca/english/Pgdb/econ85.htm
and www.statcan.ca/english/Pgdb/trade39.htm). Approximately 120
retail commodity series are available from both the Quarterly Retail
Commodity Survey and the Monthly Commodity Survey of Large Retailers
in CANSIM table numbers 080-0009 and 080-0010.
Recent feature articles
Note
* Distributive Trade Division. For more information
contact Client Services (613) 951-3549 or retailinfo@statcan.ca.
|