Filter results by

Search Help
Currently selected filters that can be removed

Keyword(s)

Year of publication

2 facets displayed. 0 facets selected.

Author(s)

2 facets displayed. 1 facets selected.
Sort Help
entries

Results

All (2)

All (2) ((2 results))

  • Articles and reports: 12-001-X201000111247
    Description:

    In this paper, the problem of estimating the variance of various estimators of the population mean in two-phase sampling has been considered by jackknifing the two-phase calibrated weights of Hidiroglou and Särndal (1995, 1998). Several estimators of population mean available in the literature are shown to be the special cases of the technique developed here, including those suggested by Rao and Sitter (1995) and Sitter (1997). By following Raj (1965) and Srivenkataramana and Tracy (1989), some new estimators of the population mean are introduced and their variances are estimated through the proposed jackknife procedure. The variance of the chain ratio and regression type estimators due to Chand (1975) are also estimated using the jackknife. A simulation study is conducted to assess the efficiency of the proposed jackknife estimators relative to the usual estimators of variance.

    Release date: 2010-06-29

  • Articles and reports: 12-001-X19970023617
    Description:

    Much research has been conducted into the modelling of ordinal responses. Some authors argue that, when the response variable is ordinal, inclusion of ordinality in the model to be estimated should improve model performance. Under the condition of ordinality, Campbell and Donner (1989) compared the asymptotic classification error rate of the multinominal logistic model to that of the ordinal logistic model of Anderson (1984). They showed that the ordinal logistic model had a lower expected asymptotic error rate than the multinominal logistic model. This paper also aims to compare the performance of ordinal and multinomial logistic models for ordinal responses. However, rather than focussing on classification efficiency, the assessment is made in the context of an application where the objective is to estimate small area proportions. More specifically, using multinominal and ordinal logistic models, the empirical Bayes approach proposed by Farrell, MacGibbon and Tomberlin (1997a) for estimating small area proportions based on binomial outcome data is extended to response variables consisting of more than two outcome categories. The properties of estimators based on these two models are compared via a simulation study in which the empirical Bayes methods proposed here are applied to data from the 1950 United States Census with the objective of predicting, for a small area, the proportion of individuals who belong to the various categories of an ordinal response variable representing income level.

    Release date: 1998-03-12
Stats in brief (0)

Stats in brief (0) (0 results)

No content available at this time.

Articles and reports (2)

Articles and reports (2) ((2 results))

  • Articles and reports: 12-001-X201000111247
    Description:

    In this paper, the problem of estimating the variance of various estimators of the population mean in two-phase sampling has been considered by jackknifing the two-phase calibrated weights of Hidiroglou and Särndal (1995, 1998). Several estimators of population mean available in the literature are shown to be the special cases of the technique developed here, including those suggested by Rao and Sitter (1995) and Sitter (1997). By following Raj (1965) and Srivenkataramana and Tracy (1989), some new estimators of the population mean are introduced and their variances are estimated through the proposed jackknife procedure. The variance of the chain ratio and regression type estimators due to Chand (1975) are also estimated using the jackknife. A simulation study is conducted to assess the efficiency of the proposed jackknife estimators relative to the usual estimators of variance.

    Release date: 2010-06-29

  • Articles and reports: 12-001-X19970023617
    Description:

    Much research has been conducted into the modelling of ordinal responses. Some authors argue that, when the response variable is ordinal, inclusion of ordinality in the model to be estimated should improve model performance. Under the condition of ordinality, Campbell and Donner (1989) compared the asymptotic classification error rate of the multinominal logistic model to that of the ordinal logistic model of Anderson (1984). They showed that the ordinal logistic model had a lower expected asymptotic error rate than the multinominal logistic model. This paper also aims to compare the performance of ordinal and multinomial logistic models for ordinal responses. However, rather than focussing on classification efficiency, the assessment is made in the context of an application where the objective is to estimate small area proportions. More specifically, using multinominal and ordinal logistic models, the empirical Bayes approach proposed by Farrell, MacGibbon and Tomberlin (1997a) for estimating small area proportions based on binomial outcome data is extended to response variables consisting of more than two outcome categories. The properties of estimators based on these two models are compared via a simulation study in which the empirical Bayes methods proposed here are applied to data from the 1950 United States Census with the objective of predicting, for a small area, the proportion of individuals who belong to the various categories of an ordinal response variable representing income level.

    Release date: 1998-03-12
Journals and periodicals (0)

Journals and periodicals (0) (0 results)

No content available at this time.

Date modified: