Information identified as archived is provided for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It is not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards and has not been altered or updated since it was archived. Please "contact us" to request a format other than those available.
The Daily. Wednesday, December 20, 2000
In a period of impressive growth in real domestic demand and in labour hours, labour productivity in the Canadian business sector grew at an annual pace of 2.1% from the third quarter of 1999 to the third quarter of 2000.
The labour productivity increase in the third quarter follows annual increases of 3.0% in the second quarter and 1.7% in the first quarter. In 1999, the average annual increase was 1.4%. The annualized rates of growth for the first three quarters of 2000 largely exceed the average growth of 1.0% observed since 1988.
Calculated on an annual basis, Canadian business productivity has been positive for the last 17 quarters - since early 1996. During the period, productivity growth was highest in 1997. After slowing down in 1998, productivity growth increased steadily in 1999 and 2000.
|
Quarterly growth rates are sometimes quite volatile. Between 1995 and the third quarter of 1998, labour productivity growth fluctuated more than it did in the last two years. The quarterly growth rates alternated between declines or only small increases in most quarters of 1995, the whole of 1996 and the first three quarters of 1998 and dramatic growth during the second quarter of 1995 and the whole year of 1997. In the short run, productivity is pro-cyclical. Productivity grows more slowly when economic growth is low and it frequently declines during a recession; it increases during a recovery and the subsequent period of expansion.
The growth in unit labour cost is derived by comparing the pace of growth in hourly compensation with the increase in labour productivity. Unit labour cost grows when hourly compensation grows faster than the rise in labour productivity. The growth in unit labour cost is frequently used as an indicator of inflationary pressure that arises when wage increases are growing faster than labour productivity growth. These wage increases can increase the labour costs of businesses and, eventually, prices.
In the third quarter of 2000, the growth of hourly compensation was 3.1% relative to the third quarter of 1999. But, over the same time period, unit labour cost increased by only 1.0%, owing to the substantial increase of labour productivity (+2.1%). Since the first quarter of 1999, unit labour cost has been relatively stable, growing in a range of 0.5% to 1.5%. This is considerably below the rates of increase seen in 1997 and 1998.
Available on CANSIM: matrix 9484.
For more information, or to enquire about the concepts, methods or data quality of this release, contact John Baldwin (613-951-8588; fax: 613-951-5403; baldjoh@statcan.gc.ca) or Jean-Pierre Maynard, (613-951-3654; fax: 613-951-5403; maynard@statcan.gc.ca); Micro-economic Analysis Division.
Business sector: Labour productivity and related variables
| Quarters | Labour productivity | Real value added | Hours worked | Average hours | All jobs | Hourly compensation | Unit labour cost | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| seasonally adjusted | ||||||||
| year-over-year % change | ||||||||
| 1995 | First | 0.5 | 4.6 | 4.1 | 0.2 | 3.9 | 1.1 | 0.5 |
| Second | 1.2 | 2.6 | 1.4 | -0.5 | 1.8 | 2.7 | 1.4 | |
| Third | 0.7 | 1.5 | 0.8 | -0.7 | 1.5 | 3.6 | 2.9 | |
| Fourth | -0.5 | 0.2 | 0.6 | -1.0 | 1.6 | 3.2 | 3.7 | |
| 1996 | First | -1.0 | 1.2 | 2.3 | 0.4 | 1.9 | 0.9 | 1.9 |
| Second | -1.1 | 1.7 | 2.8 | 0.4 | 2.3 | 0.5 | 1.5 | |
| Third | 0.6 | 2.6 | 1.9 | 0.3 | 1.6 | 2.0 | 1.3 | |
| Fourth | 0.6 | 3.6 | 3.0 | 1.1 | 1.9 | 2.3 | 1.7 | |
| 1997 | First | 2.3 | 4.2 | 1.8 | -0.1 | 2.0 | 5.2 | 2.8 |
| Second | 2.5 | 5.3 | 2.7 | 0.2 | 2.4 | 6.5 | 3.9 | |
| Third | 2.6 | 5.8 | 3.1 | -0.4 | 3.5 | 5.9 | 3.3 | |
| Fourth | 2.4 | 5.8 | 3.3 | 0.0 | 3.3 | 4.7 | 2.2 | |
| 1998 | First | 0.5 | 4.5 | 4.0 | 0.0 | 4.0 | 3.9 | 3.3 |
| Second | 0.4 | 3.5 | 3.2 | -0.3 | 3.5 | 3.7 | 3.3 | |
| Third | 0.1 | 2.3 | 2.2 | -0.5 | 2.7 | 3.1 | 3.0 | |
| Fourth | 0.9 | 2.8 | 1.9 | -0.9 | 2.8 | 4.2 | 3.3 | |
| 1999 | First | 1.4 | 3.7 | 2.2 | -0.7 | 2.9 | 2.9 | 1.5 |
| Second | 1.1 | 4.3 | 3.2 | 0.2 | 3.1 | 1.7 | 0.6 | |
| Third | 1.7 | 5.7 | 3.9 | 0.9 | 3.0 | 2.2 | 0.5 | |
| Fourth | 1.5 | 5.4 | 3.8 | 0.4 | 3.3 | 2.0 | 0.5 | |
| 2000 | First | 1.7 | 6.1 | 4.3 | 1.1 | 3.2 | 2.6 | 0.9 |
| Second | 3.0 | 6.1 | 3.0 | 0.2 | 2.8 | 3.5 | 0.5 | |
| Third | 2.1 | 5.2 | 3.0 | 0.4 | 2.6 | 3.1 | 1.0 | |
| Note: | The year-over-year change is the growth rate of a given quarter compared with the same quarter in the previous year. |