Table 3
Comparison of average adjusted relative rate index to average relative rate index, Canada, 2016/2017 to 2020/2021

Table 3
Comparison of average adjusted relative rate index to average relative rate index, Canada, 2016/2017 to 2020/2021 Table summary
The information is grouped by Court outcomes (appearing as row headers), , calculated using (appearing as column headers).
Court outcomes Adjusted relative rate indexTable 3 Note 1 Relative rate index Table 3 Note 2 Percentage adjustment attributable to Crime Severity Weight Table 3 Note 3
Note 0

true zero or a value rounded to zero

Note 1

The adjusted relative rate index (ARRI) measures the likelihood of Indigenous accused encountering a court outcome relative to White accused encountering the same court outcome, controlling for the severity of the most serious offence in the case. Severity is based on the crime severity weight that is used in calculating the Crime Severity Index. ARRI is a relative measure. For example, an ARRI of 0% means that Indigenous accused have the same likelihood of encountering the same court outcome as White accused. Furthermore, an ARRI larger or smaller than zero means that Indigenous accused have a higher or lower likelihood of encountering the same court outcome than White accused.

Return to note 1 referrer

Note 2

The relative rate index measures the likelihood of Indigenous accused encountering a court outcome relative to White accused encountering the same court outcome, without controlling for the severity of the most serious offence in the case.

Return to note 2 referrer

Note 3

The crime severity weight is based on the crime severity weights used in calculating the Crime Severity Index.

Return to note 3 referrer

Note 4

The analysis of court decisions focuses on whether Indigenous accused are more or less likely than White accused to 1) be found guilty, 2) be acquitted, 3) have their case stayed, and 4) have their charges withdrawn, have their case dismissed or be discharged.

Return to note 4 referrer

Note 5

Once an individual is found guilty of an offence, they receive a sentence based on a number of factors and principles (Criminal Code s 718, s 718.1 and s 718.2). Possible sentences include custody, conditional sentence, probation and fines.

Return to note 5 referrer

Note 6

A short-term custodial sentence is defined as a sentence that is greater than 1 day and less than or equal to 3 months, a medium-term custodial sentence as greater than 3 months and less than or equal to 12 months, and a long-term custodial sentence as greater than 12 months.

Return to note 6 referrer

Notes: Only individuals who had a completed court case in the Integrated Criminal Court Survey (ICCS) and were linked to the 2016 Census of Population long-form questionnaire were retained for analysis. Calibrated weights were developed for this dataset so that the sum of these weights equalled the total population of accused before the courts. Weights were calibrated to ensure consistency between the linked ICCS population and the total ICCS population in terms of key sociodemographic characteristics (e.g., age, gender and criminal history). Calibrated weights were developed independently for each fiscal year of ICCS data. Results for each year were produced using these calibrated weights.
Source: Statistics Canada, Canadian Centre for Justice and Community Safety Statistics, Linked 2016 Census of Population long-form questionnaire and Integrated Criminal Court Survey.
Decisions Table 3 Note 4  
Guilty 0 2 -2
Acquitted -62 -63 1
Stay of proceedings 72 79 -7
Withdrawn, dismissed or discharged -21 -24 3
Sentences Table 3 Note 5  
Custody 45 39 6
Conditional sentence 30 27 4
Probation -16 -21 6
Fine -24 -21 -4
Length of Custodial Sentence Table 3 Note 6  
Short-term 8 8 0
Medium-term -12 -13 1
Long-term -30 -32 1
Date modified: