View the most recent version.Information identified as archived is provided for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It is not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards and has not been altered or updated since it was archived. Please "contact us" to request a format other than those available.
Sense of belonging to local community, by age group and sex, household population aged 12 and over, Canada, 2005
| Very strong or somewhat strong | Somewhat weak | Very weak | Not stated | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| number | number | number | number | ||||||
| Total, 12 years and over | |||||||||
| Males | |||||||||
| Females | |||||||||
| 12 to 19 years | |||||||||
| Males | |||||||||
| Females | |||||||||
| 12 to 14 years | |||||||||
| Males | |||||||||
| Females | |||||||||
| 15 to 19 years | |||||||||
| Males | |||||||||
| Females | |||||||||
| 20 to 34 years | |||||||||
| Males | |||||||||
| Females | |||||||||
| 20 to 24 years | |||||||||
| Males | |||||||||
| Females | |||||||||
| 25 to 34 years | |||||||||
| Males | |||||||||
| Females | |||||||||
| 35 to 44 years | |||||||||
| Males | |||||||||
| Females | |||||||||
| 45 to 64 years | |||||||||
| Males | |||||||||
| Females | |||||||||
| 45 to 54 years | |||||||||
| Males | |||||||||
| Females | |||||||||
| 55 to 64 years | |||||||||
| Males | |||||||||
| Females | |||||||||
| 65 years and over | |||||||||
| Males | |||||||||
| Females | |||||||||
| 65 to 74 years | |||||||||
| Males | |||||||||
| Females | |||||||||
| 75 years and over | |||||||||
| Males | |||||||||
| Females | |||||||||
| 1. | Population aged 12 and over who describe their sense of belonging to their local community as very strong, somewhat strong, somewhat weak or very weak. Research shows a high correlation of sense of community-belonging with physical and mental health. | ||
| 2. | When comparing estimates, it is important to use confidence intervals to determine if differences between values are statistically significant. Confidence intervals describe sampling variability and give an indication of the precision of a given estimate. | ||
| 3. | Bootstrapping techniques were used to produce the coefficient of variation (CV) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). | ||
| 4. | Data with a coefficient of variation (CV) from 16.6% to 33.3% are identified as follows: (E) use with caution. | ||
| 5. | Data with a coefficient of variation (CV) greater than 33.3% were suppressed due to extreme sampling variability and are identified as follows: (F) too unreliable to be published. | ||
| Source: | Statistics Canada, Canadian Community Health Survey (CCHS 3.1), 2005 (CANSIM table 105-0490). | ||