Table A.3.1.3
Percentage of the population aged 20 to 24 in low income,Note 1 by type of living arrangement, Canada and provinces, 1990, 1995, 2000 and 2005 to 2009

Warning View the most recent version.

Archived Content

Information identified as archived is provided for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It is not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards and has not been altered or updated since it was archived. Please "contact us" to request a format other than those available.

Archived

This page has been archived on the Web.

Standard table symbols

Table A.3.1.3
Percentage of the population aged 20 to 24 in low income,Note 1 by type of living arrangement, Canada and provinces, 1990, 1995, 2000 and 2005 to 2009
 Table summary
 This table displays the results of percentage of the population aged 20 to 24 in low income. This information is grouped by age group 20 to 24, all living arrangements, living with two parents, living with lone parent and not living with any parent (appearing as column headers), calculated using percent as a unit of measure.
  Ages 20 to 24
All living arrangements Living with two parents Living with lone parent Not living with any parent
percent
Canada  
1990 17 3 7 30
1995 23 6 16 41
2000 19 5 7 36
2005 19 4 9 37
2006 17 4 6 34
2007 15 2 10 31
2008 16 3 12 31
2009 16 4 14 31
Newfoundland and Labrador  
1990 16 2 23 30
1995 23 10 F 47
2000 19 5 F 44
2005 20 F F 42
2006 17 F .. 41
2007 12 .. F 30
2008 13 .. F 30
2009 10 .. F 26
Prince Edward Island  
1990 10 2 F 18
1995 12 F .. 24
2000 18 F .. 32
2005 9 .. .. 16
2006 11 .. .. 21
2007 9 .. .. 20
2008 9 .. F 24
2009 3 .. .. 7
Nova Scotia  
1990 14 3 F 25
1995 22 5 14 38
2000 16 2 F 29
2005 19 3 F 32
2006 15 2 F 28
2007 15 F F 28
2008 18 F F 33
2009 22 F .. 40
New Brunswick  
1990 13 1 18 22
1995 17 1 F 31
2000 13 1 F 28
2005 12 .. F 24
2006 13 2 .. 26
2007 13 0 F 29
2008 13 .. F 26
2009 13 .. F 24
Quebec  
1990 20 6 8 34
1995 29 6 24 51
2000 18 3 6 39
2005 22 3 9 42
2006 18 3 8 36
2007 17 2 9 36
2008 18 2 13 37
2009 17 1 6 39
Ontario  
1990 13 1 4 26
1995 17 4 15 35
2000 15 4 2 36
2005 15 2 12 35
2006 15 3 5 39
2007 13 3 13 32
2008 16 3 14 38
2009 17 6 16 38
Manitoba  
1990 20 1 19 32
1995 28 6 F 51
2000 19 5 F 35
2005 22 3 F 47
2006 15 7 F 27
2007 13 2 F 23
2008 11 1 .. 24
2009 13 1 .. 30
Saskatchewan  
1990 20 5 21 29
1995 19 F F 28
2000 20 .. .. 32
2005 22 1 F 35
2006 17 3 .. 28
2007 15 .. F 25
2008 13 .. F 20
2009 8 .. F 12
Alberta  
1990 21 3 F 32
1995 32 5 36 46
2000 20 3 F 32
2005 20 3 F 32
2006 15 1 .. 25
2007 13 2 F 21
2008 10 2 F 15
2009 12 3 F 20
British Columbia  
1990 23 6 F 36
1995 24 13 F 36
2000 28 15 26 41
2005 23 10 F 43
2006 22 8 F 38
2007 18 3 F 37
2008 20 7 F 33
2009 17 8 39 21
.. not available for a specific reference period
0 true zero or a value rounded to zero
F too unreliable to be published
1. Based on after-tax low-income cutoffs (LICOs), which indicate when a family may be in "straitened circumstances." This means that the family is likely to spend 20% more of its net income on basic items such as food, shelter and clothing compared with the average family, which leaves less money available for other expenses such as health, education, transportation and recreation.
Note: For a brief description of this indicator, including the methodology, please see the Handbook for the Pan-Canadian Education Indicators Program.
Sources: Statistics Canada, Survey of Consumer Finances, 1990 and 1995, and Survey of Labour and Income Dynamics, 2000, 2005 to 2009.
Updated December 14, 2011.
Date modified: