Statistical table 3
Comparison of revised and unrevised population estimates by family type for 2006 and 2009, Prince Edward Island

Warning View the most recent version.

Archived Content

Information identified as archived is provided for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It is not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards and has not been altered or updated since it was archived. Please "contact us" to request a format other than those available.

Statistical table 3 Comparison of revised and unrevised population estimates by family type for 2006 and 2009, Prince Edward Island
Table summary
This table displays the results of Statistical table 3 comparison of revised and unrevised population estimates by family type for 2006 and 2009 2006, 2009, pre-revision, post-revision and % change, calculated using number of persons ('000) units of measure (appearing as column headers).
  2006 2009
Pre-revision Post-revision % changeNote 1 Pre-revision Post-revision % changeNote 1
Number of persons ('000) Number of persons ('000)
All family units 136 136 -0.3 139 139 0.0
Economic families, 2 persons or more 120 118 -1.8 123 120 -2.1
Elderly families 14 14 -1.9 16 16 -1.1
Elderly Married couples 10 10 -2.6 13 13 -2.1
Other elderly families Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published
Non-elderly families 106 104 -1.8 107 105 -2.3
Married couples 19 19 -4.7 21 19 -8.8
Married couples, no earner Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published
Married couples, one earner 4 4 -3.6 4 3 -9.3
Married couples, two earners 15 14 -4.9 16 14 -8.4
Two-parent families with children 52 52 -0.2 50 51 2.2
Two-parent families with children, no earner Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published
Two-parent families with children, one earner Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published
Two-parent families with children, two earners 33 33 0.8 33 34 2.2
Two-parent families with children, three or more earners 15 15 -0.7 13 14 2.7
Married couples with other relatives 14 14 -4.0 16 16 -2.5
Lone-parent families 10 10 -1.6 10 9 -10.4
Male lone-parent families Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published
Female lone-parent families 9 9 -1.4 9 8 -11.5
Female lone-parent families, no earner Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published
Female lone-parent families, one earner 7 7 -1.5 6 5 -16.0
Female lone-parent families, two or more earners Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published
All other non-elderly families 11 11 -1.9 10 9 -4.8
Unattached individuals 16 18 9.7 17 19 12.9
Elderly male Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published
Elderly male, non-earner Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published
Elderly male, earner Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published
Elderly female 4 4 8.0 4 4 11.4
Elderly female, non-earner 4 4 8.0 3 4 10.7
Elderly female, earner Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published
Non-elderly male 6 7 13.3 6 7 11.3
Non-elderly male, non-earner Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published
Non-elderly male, earner 5 5 13.6 5 6 13.6
Non-elderly female 5 5 4.8 6 7 12.7
Non-elderly female, non-earner Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published Note F: too unreliable to be published
Non-elderly female, earner 4 4 7.3 5 6 12.4
1 Percentage changes were calculated using unrounded numbers.
F Too unreliable to be published.
Date modified: