Information identified as archived is provided for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It is not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards and has not been altered or updated since it was archived. Please "contact us" to request a format other than those available.
7.1 The Canadian Consumer Price Index (CPI) aims to measure pure price change, thus excluding price changes that are due to differences in the quality of
products bought by consumers. It achieves this mostly through the matched-model approach which tracks unchanging
products in the same outlets,
thus holding all variables constant except for the month when prices are
observed.
7.2 The universe of products bought and sold in the marketplace
changes over time. Updating the sample for any given elementary aggregate is inevitable
in order to maintain its representativeness. As products in the market change, observed product
offers (POs) may change.
This means that the matched-model framework at times does not hold, and therefore price
changes could reflect a mixture of price and quality differences. In order to measure pure price change, quality adjustments are
performed.
7.3 There are multiple techniques, implicit
(indirect) and explicit (direct), available to account for quality differences between exiting
and entering POs. This
chapter will present the different methods used in the CPI.Note
7.4 It
is not always necessary or possible to adjust for quality change when a PO must
be replaced in the CPI sample. There are various reasons why adjusting for
quality change may not be required and a direct price comparison between entering and
exiting POs is the best option. Direct price comparison, an implicit method of
quality adjustment, is the simplest approach used in the CPI.
7.5 The
CPI employs the direct price comparison method when there is no perceived
difference in quality between entering and exiting POs. This method assumes that
POs are equivalent in terms of quality.
7.6 The
use of the direct price comparison method for these elementary indices is not likely
to lead to any systematic bias
in the CPI because the majority of these indices fall under one of the
following categories.
7.6.1 No appreciable quality change: Many items like
gasoline, electricity or natural gas are essentially of the same quality over
long periods of time.
7.6.2 Non-market services: Most government-regulated
services, such as university education, local transportation or passports, do
not receive any treatment for quality change. While it could be argued that the
quality of these services may change through time, this is likely to happen
very slowly and is difficult to measure. These services are also not available
in a competitive market so little can be said about the market valuation of the
quality features that are implied.
7.6.3 Bestsellers method: In the case of popular media,
such as books, movies or DVDs, it is common international practice to simply aggregate the
prices of the top bestsellers and compare the result to that for the previous
period’s bestsellers, even if these best sellers are different in the two
periods. This is because the novelty of the product’s content is what is being
sought out by consumers, rather than any tangible physical characteristic such
as number of pages or quality of the binding, to take books as an example.
7.6.4 The use of the unit value index method also
eliminates the need for any further quality adjustment. This index calculation method is rarely used
in the CPI and can only be applied in cases where it is assumed that the average quality
represented remains constant through time.Note
7.7 The
use of overlap pricing
can also eliminate or significantly reduce the need to make explicit quality adjustments.
This implicit method allows for the reduction of unexpected disappearances of
sampled POs and ensures that new representative
products can be introduced into the sample before the replaced ones
disappear from the market or become unrepresentative. The overlap pricing
method is most commonly used in conjunction with the profiles method, enabling the collection of a
replacement profile before the obsolescence of an existing one.
7.8 Overall
mean imputation is
another implicit method used in the CPI to make quality adjustments between the
prices of POs entering and exiting the sample. With this method, the price
movement applied to entering POs is based on the observed average price
movement of all other POs for the same representative product. Overall mean
imputation relies on the assumption that the donor POs are comparable to the PO
being imputed.
7.9 The
link-to-show-no-change method for quality adjustment, another indirect method,
involves forcing a price relative of unity (equals no price change) when
replacement POs enter the sample. Currently, this practice is being reduced
across the CPI because it introduces a degree of undue price stability in the
index.Note
7.10 Quantity
adjustment entails accounting for changes in the quantity (e.g. package size,
number of tissue ply, etc.) of observed POs. This is another implicit method of
quality adjustment because it is assumed that the quality per standardized unit
is the same over time.
7.11 Quantity
adjustment is the default treatment for nearly all of the POs in the food major
aggregate as well as some of the products in the household operations, and personal
care supplies and equipment aggregates.
7.12 For
the majority of elementary indices, not covered by the implicit methods
described above, it is necessary to make explicit quality adjustments when POs
enter or exit the sample.
7.13 To
make the appropriate quality comparison, Statistics Canada is usually guided by
market valuations of the two POs. Where possible, the two POs are compared in
terms of the quality features they offer to consumers. A PO is thought to
provide a range of features to the consumer which, grouped together, determine
the market price.Note
This general framework is the basis for many of the explicit quality adjustment methods described
below.
7.14 The
CPI relies on the hedonic quality adjustment technique for certain elementary aggregates, notably in the case of
high-technology goods or services. Currently, the CPI uses hedonic quality
adjustment for the computer equipment, software and supplies, Internet access
services and rent indices. The hedonic method of quality adjustment is most appropriate
for products whose markets are competitive and experience rapid turnover, and
where the characteristics of these products change quickly but are readily and
consistently observable.
7.15 The
hedonic method is applied in the case of forced replacements. This approach
assumes that a relationship exists between the price of a PO and its
characteristics. Hedonic specifications have to be defined using standard
regression techniques.Note In
period t (when a previously observed
PO is no longer available) a regression is used to estimate the unobserved
price for the entering PO in period t-1.
The estimation of the t-1 price is based on quality differences
between the entering and exiting POs, as well as the t-1 price of the exiting PO.
7.16 A semi-log hedonic regression is used for the
computer equipment, software and supplies index. It takes the general form:
where:
is a range of effects for a set
of characteristics , , that are used to explain variations
in the natural log of the price.
7.17 Coefficients of the semi-log hedonic regression are estimated once
a year using product characteristics data and retail prices obtained from the Internet
and third party databases. All other things being equal, a coefficient represents the impact of a given
product characteristic on the price level.
7.18 For
the Internet access services elementary (IAS) index, a pure matched-sample
cannot properly account for the rapid technological change and marketing
practices that characterize the Internet access industry in Canada. Therefore,
a symmetric hedonic method is used to adjust the prices of both entering and
exiting Internet access services plans.Note
For the regression model specification, characteristics are transformed as
appropriate. Unlike the method for Computer equipment, software and
supplies index, coefficients are
estimated at every collection period from sets of plans that are used to
calculate the index and Internet plan weights.
7.19 For
IAS, rather than estimating a single multiple regression, three separate simple
regressions are estimated at every collection period. In each of these
regressions, the dependent variable, log price, is regressed on the intercept
term and a single explanatory variable consisting of either log download speed,
log upload speed or log usage cap.
7.20 Least
squares are used to solve for the
vector
of parameters in the following formulation:
where
is the price of plan from period ,
is a
random error term with an expected value of zero, and
is plan
’s
characteristic (either log download speed, log upload speed or log usage cap).Note
7.21 Once
all three regressions have been estimated, results from each of the regressions
are used to predict a price for each plan, leading to three predicted prices. A
weighted average of these three predicted prices is calculated as a single
predicted price; the weights are defined such that a regression with a higher
value of the coefficient of determination R squared will have more weight. The
missing prices of entering and exiting plans are imputed. The missing price of
plan i in period from
Internet Service Provider (ISP) is
calculated as
. Here
is an
adjustment factor calculated from the plans available in period from
ISP while
is the
imputed average predicted price.Note
7.22 For the rent index, a hedonic model is estimated using monthly cross-sections
of the Labour Force Survey (LFS) data at the national level. The lowest
geographical level indices are constructed using average characteristics as
quantities and estimated coefficients as prices, while the higher level indices
use weighted averages of lower level estimated expenditures.
7.23 The hedonic model for the rent index is a log-linear regression in
which the explanatory variables include observed unit characteristics, such as
the number of bedrooms, as well as locational characteristics captured by
postal codes. The regression specification is as follows:
where
is the log of observed rent,
represents whether the rent cost
includes furniture, a washing machine, refrigerator, cable, or heat,
represents the age of building,
represents the number of
bedrooms,
represents the type of the
building, and
is a vector of dummies defined
from the first three digits of the postal code that corresponds to a
neighborhood (in urban areas) or a region (in rural areas).
7.24 The option cost method is another explicit approach for making
quality adjustments to entering POs in the CPI sample. This technique relies on having
data about the specific costs for adding options or quality characteristics to a product. In this
explicit method, an adjustment to the last observed price of the exiting PO is made so that it can be compared with the
observed price of the entering PO. The option cost method is most commonly used for products where the
manufacturer or retailer provides pricing details for the available product characteristics. The CPI uses the
option cost method in the elementary aggregates corresponding to the purchase
of passenger vehicles index.
7.25 Expert judgment has, in the past, been a predominant practice for
explicit quality adjustment in the CPI. This relies upon an employee with expertise in a
particular product market to assess and give a valuation to differences in quality between exiting and
entering POs. However, the practice of quality adjustment by expert judgment is not arbitraryNote and follows procedural
guidelines for choosing the most plausible quality ratio between exiting and entering POs. The expert
judgment method is primarily used for elementary indices under the clothing and footwear major
aggregate.
The option
cost and expert judgment explicit approaches to quality adjustment are used in
the CPI for cases where a complex decision has to be made, and
where it is not appropriate to apply an implicit method such as overall mean imputation.