Table 6
Average fares, by sector and fare type group —
Canadian air carriers, Level I1 – Scheduled services (quarterly)
Archived Content
Information identified as archived is provided for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It is not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards and has not been altered or updated since it was archived. Please "contact us" to request a format other than those available.
| Fare type group | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total | Business class | Economy | Discounted | Other | |
| dollars | |||||
| Domestic | |||||
| 2010 | |||||
| First quarter | 171.40 | 1,648.10 Note E: Use with caution | 238.10 | 168.60 | Note F: too unreliable to be published |
| Second quarter | 179.10 | Note F: too unreliable to be published | 258.00 | 175.70 | Note F: too unreliable to be published |
| Third quarter | 187.90 | 2,004.20 Note E: Use with caution | 277.70 | 183.90 | Note F: too unreliable to be published |
| Fourth quarter | 190.30 | 2,307.10 Note E: Use with caution | 256.00 | 187.30 | Note F: too unreliable to be published |
| 2011 Note p: preliminary | |||||
| First quarter | 188.30 | 2,222.00 Note E: Use with caution | 238.60 | 186.00 | Note F: too unreliable to be published |
| Second quarter | 195.80 | 2,183.40 Note E: Use with caution | 264.60 | 192.60 | Note F: too unreliable to be published |
| Third quarter | 184.90 | 2,398.60 Note E: Use with caution | 240.90 | 182.20 | Note F: too unreliable to be published |
| Fourth quarter | 194.70 | Note F: too unreliable to be published | 272.30 | 191.30 | Note F: too unreliable to be published |
| Short-haul | |||||
| 2010 | |||||
| First quarter | 132.10 | 863.80 Note E: Use with caution | 193.50 | 129.60 | Note F: too unreliable to be published |
| Second quarter | 138.60 | Note F: too unreliable to be published | 203.50 | 136.10 | Note F: too unreliable to be published |
| Third quarter | 142.10 | Note F: too unreliable to be published | 201.30 | 139.70 | Note F: too unreliable to be published |
| Fourth quarter | 147.70 | Note F: too unreliable to be published | 195.60 | 145.70 | Note F: too unreliable to be published |
| 2011Note p: preliminary | |||||
| First quarter | 147.20 | Note F: too unreliable to be published | 186.60 | 145.50 | Note F: too unreliable to be published |
| Second quarter | 150.80 | Note F: too unreliable to be published | 199.50 | 148.80 | Note F: too unreliable to be published |
| Third quarter | 138.40 | Note F: too unreliable to be published | 175.60 | 136.80 | Note F: too unreliable to be published |
| Fourth quarter | 148.50 | Note F: too unreliable to be published | 209.20 | 146.20 | Note F: too unreliable to be published |
| Long-haul | |||||
| 2010 | |||||
| First quarter | Note x: suppressed to meet the confidentiality requirements of the Statistics Act | Note x: suppressed to meet the confidentiality requirements of the Statistics Act | Note x: suppressed to meet the confidentiality requirements of the Statistics Act | Note x: suppressed to meet the confidentiality requirements of the Statistics Act | Note x: suppressed to meet the confidentiality requirements of the Statistics Act |
| Second quarter | Note x: suppressed to meet the confidentiality requirements of the Statistics Act | Note x: suppressed to meet the confidentiality requirements of the Statistics Act | Note x: suppressed to meet the confidentiality requirements of the Statistics Act | Note x: suppressed to meet the confidentiality requirements of the Statistics Act | Note x: suppressed to meet the confidentiality requirements of the Statistics Act |
| Third quarter | 219.50 | 2,077.00 Note E: Use with caution | 324.70 | 214.50 | Note F: too unreliable to be published |
| Fourth quarter | 230.50 | 2,401.60 Note E: Use with caution | 308.30 | 226.80 | Note F: too unreliable to be published |
| 2011Note p: preliminary | |||||
| First quarter | 229.80 | 2,336.20 Note E: Use with caution | 291.70 | 226.90 | Note F: too unreliable to be published |
| Second quarter | 233.90 | 2,255.70 Note E: Use with caution | 315.60 | 229.90 | Note F: too unreliable to be published |
| Third quarter | 218.00 | 2,477.70 Note E: Use with caution | 282.40 | 214.80 | Note F: too unreliable to be published |
| Fourth quarter | 239.10 | Note F: too unreliable to be published | 327.20 | 235.00 | Note F: too unreliable to be published |
| International | |||||
| 2010 | |||||
| First quarter | 315.40 | 3,389.50 Note E: Use with caution | 406.40 | 310.10 | Note F: too unreliable to be published |
| Second quarter | 319.40 | 3,394.50 Note E: Use with caution | 355.00 | 316.20 | Note F: too unreliable to be published |
| Third quarter | 364.70 | 3,475.60 Note E: Use with caution | 346.80 | 362.20 | Note F: too unreliable to be published |
| Fourth quarter | 326.10 | 3,810.30 Note E: Use with caution | 378.60 | 322.10 | Note F: too unreliable to be published |
| 2011 Note p: preliminary | |||||
| First quarter | 303.80 | 3,711.40 Note E: Use with caution | 400.20 | 300.00 | Note F: too unreliable to be published |
| Second quarter | 318.30 | 4,018.50 Note E: Use with caution | 365.80 | 315.70 | Note F: too unreliable to be published |
| Third quarter | 358.90 | 4,186.90 Note E: Use with caution | 349.20 | 356.80 | Note F: too unreliable to be published |
| Fourth quarter | 326.40 | 3,882.40 Note E: Use with caution | 389.80 | 323.10 | Note F: too unreliable to be published |
| Domestic and international | |||||
| 2010 | |||||
| First quarter | 235.50 | 3,223.20 Note E: Use with caution | 293.30 | 232.10 | Note F: too unreliable to be published |
| Second quarter | 234.80 | 3,246.70 Note E: Use with caution | 280.60 | 232.30 | Note F: too unreliable to be published |
| Third quarter | 257.20 | 3,297.50 Note E: Use with caution | 289.20 | 255.00 | Note F: too unreliable to be published |
| Fourth quarter | 245.00 | 3,576.80 Note E: Use with caution | 292.00 | 242.10 | Note F: too unreliable to be published |
| 2011 Note p: preliminary | |||||
| First quarter | 244.90 | 3,375.40 Note E: Use with caution | 300.60 | 242.30 | Note F: too unreliable to be published |
| Second quarter | 248.60 | 3,587.00 Note E: Use with caution | 291.20 | 246.30 | Note F: too unreliable to be published |
| Third quarter | 255.30 | 3,795.30 Note E: Use with caution | 261.10 | 254.10 | Note F: too unreliable to be published |
| Fourth quarter | 249.10 | 3,570.00 Note E: Use with caution | 308.30 | 246.20 | Note F: too unreliable to be published |
| percent change from 2010 to 2011 | |||||
| Domestic | |||||
| First quarter | 9.9 | 34.8 | 0.2 | 10.3 | Note F: too unreliable to be published |
| Second quarter | 9.3 | Note F: too unreliable to be published | 2.6 | 9.6 | Note F: too unreliable to be published |
| Third quarter | -1.6 | 19.7 | -13.3 | -0.9 | Note F: too unreliable to be published |
| Fourth quarter | 2.3 | Note F: too unreliable to be published | 6.4 | 2.1 | Note F: too unreliable to be published |
| Short-haul | |||||
| First quarter | 11.4 | Note F: too unreliable to be published | -3.6 | 12.3 | Note F: too unreliable to be published |
| Second quarter | 8.8 | Note F: too unreliable to be published | -2.0 | 9.3 | Note F: too unreliable to be published |
| Third quarter | -2.6 | Note F: too unreliable to be published | -12.8 | -2.1 | Note F: too unreliable to be published |
| Fourth quarter | 0.5 | Note F: too unreliable to be published | 7.0 | 0.3 | Note F: too unreliable to be published |
| Long-haul | |||||
| First quarter | Note x: suppressed to meet the confidentiality requirements of the Statistics Act | Note x: suppressed to meet the confidentiality requirements of the Statistics Act | Note x: suppressed to meet the confidentiality requirements of the Statistics Act | Note x: suppressed to meet the confidentiality requirements of the Statistics Act | Note x: suppressed to meet the confidentiality requirements of the Statistics Act |
| Second quarter | Note x: suppressed to meet the confidentiality requirements of the Statistics Act | Note x: suppressed to meet the confidentiality requirements of the Statistics Act | Note x: suppressed to meet the confidentiality requirements of the Statistics Act | Note x: suppressed to meet the confidentiality requirements of the Statistics Act | Note x: suppressed to meet the confidentiality requirements of the Statistics Act |
| Third quarter | -0.7 | 19.3 | -13.0 | 0.1 | Note F: too unreliable to be published |
| Fourth quarter | 3.7 | Note F: too unreliable to be published | 6.1 | 3.6 | Note F: too unreliable to be published |
| International | |||||
| First quarter | -3.7 | 9.5 | -1.5 | -3.3 | Note F: too unreliable to be published |
| Second quarter | -0.3 | 18.4 | 3.0 | -0.2 | Note F: too unreliable to be published |
| Third quarter | -1.6 | 20.5 | 0.7 | -1.5 | Note F: too unreliable to be published |
| Fourth quarter | 0.1 | 1.9 | 3.0 | 0.3 | Note F: too unreliable to be published |
| Domestic and international | |||||
| First quarter | 4.0 | 4.7 | 2.5 | 4.4 | Note F: too unreliable to be published |
| Second quarter | 5.9 | 10.5 | 3.8 | 6.0 | Note F: too unreliable to be published |
| Third quarter | -0.7 | 15.1 | -9.7 | -0.4 | Note F: too unreliable to be published |
| Fourth quarter | 1.7 | -0.2 | 5.6 | 1.7 | Note F: too unreliable to be published |
|
p preliminary x suppressed to meet the confidentiality requirements of the Statistics Act E use with caution F too unreliable to be published |
|||||
For 2010 and 2011, the air carriers
included are the Canadian Level I carriers, which are comprised of the Air
Canada Family (Air Canada, Jazz and regional code-share partners), Air Transat
and WestJet.
Note(s):
Due to the confidentiality or the unreliability of data, the results
for the fare type group "first class" cannot be disclosed.
All estimates shown above (except those marked with the codes E and F) have a coefficient of variation of less than 10% and can be considered reliable from a sampling point of view. An E indicates a coefficient between 10% and 25%. The estimates with a coefficient of variation greater than 25% cannot be released and are shown with the code F.
Estimates are subject to periodic revisions to reflect carrier updates and further refinement of the fare code assignment system.
All estimates shown above (except those marked with the codes E and F) have a coefficient of variation of less than 10% and can be considered reliable from a sampling point of view. An E indicates a coefficient between 10% and 25%. The estimates with a coefficient of variation greater than 25% cannot be released and are shown with the code F.
Estimates are subject to periodic revisions to reflect carrier updates and further refinement of the fare code assignment system.
- Date modified: