View the most recent version.
Archived Content
Information identified as archived is provided for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It is not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards and has not been altered or updated since it was archived. Please "contact us" to request a format other than those available.
35-251-XIE
Manufacturing, Construction and Energy
Division

THE INCREDIBLE RISE IN THE FURNITURE
AND FIXTURE INDUSTRIES
Étienne Saint-Pierre
INTRODUCTION
After having experienced very lean years at the beginning of the
decade, the Furniture and Fixture Industries have been
experiencing an exceptional period in the past few years due, in part, to exports. The
growth rate of the gross domestic product in constant dollars between 1992 and 1997 was
much greater in the Furniture and Fixture Industries than in
manufacturing industries as a whole (Chart 1 Gross Domestic
Production at Factor Cost (in
constant 1992 dollars)). The most outstanding factor for industries in this major
group since the beginning of the decade has been, without doubt, the Free Trade Agreement
with the United States. In fact, since January 1, 1993, customs tariffs between Canada and
the United States have been eliminated. To meet increased competition, even though in an
expanded market, the companies invested in more modern equipment and have developed new
products to profit from competitive advantages and increase their productivity. Therefore,
there has been a restructuring in the Furniture and Fixture
Industries. There are fewer establishments than at the beginning of the decade,
but those that remained have grown. The value of shipments outside Canada has now
surpassed the value of domestic shipments. Those establishments that did not restructure
to move towards exporting or to increase their efficiency have known more difficult times.
A series of economic factors have also permitted establishments in this
major group to benefit from an environment that favours expansion. Low interest rates and
strong demand in North America, and the weak Canadian dollar compared to the U.S. dollar,
help to explain the exceptional results these industries have had during the last few
years.
Results regarding manufacturing shipments, drawn from the Annual
Survey of Manufactures, trade and capital expenditures confirm the extraordinary
growth that these industries are currently experiencing.
Furniture and Fixture Industries
In 1996, there were 1,406 establishments in this major group which
employed 49,300 people. These industries employed 3% of persons working in Canadas
manufacturing sector. Although there are furniture manufacturers across the country, the
majority of this sectors activity is in Quebec and Ontario. In fact, 82% of
manufacturing shipments originate in these two provinces and 80% of the employees work
there. Chart 2 (Percentage of the Furniture and Fixture Industries in
the Manufacturing Sector, 1996) illustrates the importance of this major group in the
Canadian manufacturing sector. Compared to other manufacturing sectors, this one is rather
small. In fact, of the 22 major groups, this one ranks 17th in terms of
manufacturing shipments.
Of the industrial groups that constitute this major group, Household
Furniture Industries dominated the market in 1996, with 36% of manufacturing shipments of
the major group. The Office Furniture Industries were next with 27% of the market.
SHIPMENTS ARE INCREASING
For the fourth consecutive year, manufacturing shipments for the Furniture and Fixture Industries were on the rise in 1996. They
totalled $5.6 billion, which means 11.7% more than the previous year. Contrary to 1995,
this increase is strongly due to a demand for these industries products rather than
due to price effect. In constant dollars, manufacturing shipments rose by 10.6% in 1996.
When we compare this increase to that of the manufacturing sector as a
whole, it is evident that this major groups performance in 1996 was excellent. The
increase in manufacturing shipments in the manufacturing sector as a whole was 2.6%, which
is much lower than the growth rate of shipments of furniture and fixtures. Of the
manufacturing sectors, only refined petroleum products and coal industries had a higher
growth rate.
As shown in Chart 3 (Shipments, Manufacturing
Sector and Furniture and Fixture Industries), the Furniture
and Fixture Industries had an even better year in 1997. In fact, data from the Monthly
Survey of Manufacturing shows an increase in manufacturing shipments of approximately
17%(1). This is the major group that has known the greatest growth in
1997. These results explain the fact that, at 87.6% in 1997, the industrial
capacity utilization rate reached its highest level since 1973(2).
After having been severely affected by the recession at the beginning of the decade, the Furniture and Fixture Industries surpassed the growth of all
manufacturing industries for the period 1990 to 1997 due to the exceptional years in 1996
and 1997.
The intensity of growth varies at the industrial group level
At the level of industrial groups, all increased the value of their
manufacturing shipments in 1996. Shipments in Office Furniture Industries rose by 17.4%.
The Monthly
Survey of Manufacturing shows that the growth of shipments for these same
manufacturers was spectacular in 1997. In fact, with a 29% increase in manufacturing
shipments in 1997, the value of office furniture shipments doubled in four years. As for
other industrial groups, the growth of manufacturing shipments is between 9% and 12% for
1996 (Table 1 Industry Groups, Furniture and Fixture
Industries, 1992 1996), with the exception of the Bed springs and Mattress
Industries whose increase in the value of shipments was approximately 5% in 1996. This
group had also been least affected by the recession in the Furniture
and Fixture Industries.
The large establishments increased their market share
One of the aspects of structural changes in the Furniture and Fixture Industries is reflected in the increase
in market share of large establishments. It seems that they have more easily adapted to
the new trading environment that has developed as a result of the Free Trade Agreement. As
for the small establishments, some of them could not adapt and had to shut down whereas
others grew to satisfy increased demand (the number of establishments with fewer than 100
employees decreased from 1,819 to 1,298 between 1990 and 1996).
While the market share of medium-sized establishments remained
relatively constant since 1990, that of larger establishments (500 employees and more)
rose from 11% to 22%. This increase occurred to the detriment of smaller establishments
(fewer than 100 employees) whose share of manufacturing shipments of furniture and
fixtures dropped from 55% to 44% (Chart 4 Market Share by Size
of Establishment (by number of employees)). With additional resources for research and
the development of new products, for investment in improved machinery, to attract the best
workers and to get information, it is understandable that the large establishments had a
greater impact on market globalisation than the smaller establishments.
Exports of Canadian furniture manufacturers increase at a steady pace (see also International Trade)
The elimination of customs tariffs between Canada and the United States
as a result of the Free Trade Agreement between the two countries brought about a marked
increase in shipments to the United States. Export levels in the Furniture
and Fixture Industries reached $4.5 billion in 1997(3). The average
growth rate of the value of export shipments was greater than 24% between 1993 and 1997.
As a matter of fact, since 1992, the growth rate of exports in these industries has been
in the double digits.
As for imports, they were approximately $1.8 billion in 1997, which
means an increase of 21.7% compared to 1996(4). In spite of this
increase, the level of imports was still 10% lower than in 1993.
For a better understanding of the inputs and outputs of furniture and
fixtures, it is useful to use the relative balance of
shipments. This is expressed as a percentage of the trade surplus or deficit of furniture
and fixtures compared to the sum of exports and imports of these products. From the
5% that it was in 1992, the relative balance was
43% in 1997, which illustrates the importance of foreign markets to sell the products of
Canadian furniture manufacturers. One can see from these results that Canadian furniture
manufacturers have become very competitive both internationally and domestically.
Investments: a key factor in growth
To succeed in this new trade environment, Furniture
and Fixture Industries had to invest in capital assets to become more efficient in the
production of goods. The low interest rates that Canada has had these past years have
facilitated these investments. In 1997, capital expenditures were $174.1 million, an
increase of more than 40% compared to the $123.8 million spent in 1996(5).
The average rate of growth of capital expenditures between 1993 and 1997 was slightly
higher than 22%. Because of the development of new products and better production cost
control, these expenditures allow the Furniture and Fixtures
Inductries to be more competitive in international markets.
Workers productivity
A direct consequence of the increase in investments is the increase in
productivity of production workers(6). As shown in Chart
5 (Productivity of Production Workers in Constant Dollars (1992)), apart from a
slight decrease in 1993, the productivity of production workers has not stopped growing
since the beginning of this decade. In fact, productivity has evolved at the same rate as
salaries, which means that labour costs (measured as the ratio of the productivity of
these workers to the salary of these same workers) has remained stable. In fact, labour
costs have even decreased slightly. For every dollar paid in salary in 1996, every worker
produced $2.73 of value added,
an increase from $2.67 in 1991. The Furniture and Fixture
Industries controlled their labour costs in 1996 even more than the manufacturing
sector as a whole. Whereas for every dollar paid in salary the value added was similar in 1995
and 1996 in the furniture industries, the increase in salaries was not offset by a similar
increase in value added in the
manufacturing sector as a whole in 1996. The value added per dollar paid in
salary decreased by 5% in the manufacturing sector as a whole in 1996.
Controlling labour costs is important to ensure the competitiveness of
the Furniture and Fixture Industries. The high level of
investment in 1997 and the intentions for 1998, which foresee an increase similar to that
in 1997, lead us to believe that the productivity of workers will continue to increase and
the cost of labour will continue to decrease.
Conclusion
As a result of the Free Trade Agreement and the globalisation of
markets, the Furniture and Fixture Industries have been able
to expand their markets. To do this, and to remain competitive against foreign
competition, large sums have had to be invested to obtain better equipment and to create
economies of scale. Large establishments adapted best. The opening of borders and the sums
invested, combined with a very favourable economic situation for the Furniture and Fixture Industries have made for spectacular
growth in this industry.
Definitions
Major Group 26 Furniture and
Fixture Industries:
SIC |
Title |
2610 |
Household Furniture Industries |
2640 |
Office Furniture Industries |
2691 |
Bed Spring and Mattress Industries |
2692 |
Hotel, Restaurant and Institutional Furniture and Fixture
Industries |
Miscellaneous goods such as safety cabinets and frames for
mirrors and photographs (other than plastic) or curtain rods are part of this major group
under the industrial group called Other Furniture and Fixture Industries (SIC 2699).
Relative Balance: Shown as
a percentage of the trade surplus or deficit for furniture and fixture products in
relation to the sum of their exports and imports.
References
(1) Monthly Survey of Manufacturing, March 1998,
Catalogue no. 31-001-XPB. The 1997 figures on manufacturing shipments in the text and in
the charts were determined using the Monthly Survey of Manufacturing.
(2) Statistics Canada, Industrial Capacity Utilization Rates in
Canada, Catalogue no. 31-003
(3) Statistics Canada, International Trade Division.
(4) Industry Canada, based on Statistics Canada data.
(5) Statistics Canada, Private and Public Investment in Canada,
Catalogue 61-205.
(6) The measure of productivity is defined here as the quotient of
the census value added produced by production workers and the number of production
workers.
Sources
Statistics Canada. Industrial Capacity Utilization Rates.
Catalogue no. 31-003.
Statistics Canada. Monthly Survey of Manufacturing. March 1998. Catalogue No.
31-001-XPB.
Statistics Canada. Private and Public Investment in Canada. Catalogue no.
61-205.
This article was written by Étienne Saint-Pierre. Étienne is a
Statistics Canada economist of the Manufacturing, Construction and Energy Division.
Further information on Canadian manufacturing can be found in the
publications Manufacturing Industries of
Canada: National and Provincial Areas (Catalogue 31-203-XPB), available annually
for $68 per issue in Canada and for $68 U.S. outside Canada, and Products Shipped by Canadian Manufacturers
(Catalogue 31-211-XPB), available annually for $67 per issue in Canada and for $67 U.S.
outside Canada. Order this publication and other Statistics Canada publications by
telephone, dial 1-800-267-6677, by fax: 1-800-889-9734, or by Internet.
For more information about manufacturing data or time-series, call the
Disclosure and Dissemination Unit, Manufacturing, Construction and Energy Division at
(613) 951-9497 or by Internet: manufact@statcan.gc.ca.
For information from International Trade Division telephone 1-800-294-5583 or by
Internet: trade@statcan.gc.ca.
|