Appendix Table A5
Number of self-contained labour areas classified in two dimensions of the degree of rurality, Canada, 2006

Warning View the most recent version.

Archived Content

Information identified as archived is provided for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It is not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards and has not been altered or updated since it was archived. Please "contact us" to request a format other than those available.

Appendix Table A5
Number of self-contained labour areas classified in two dimensions of the degree of rurality, Canada, 2006
Table summary
This table displays the results of number of self-contained labour areas classified in two dimensions of the degree of rurality. This information is grouped by Self-contained labour areas (SLA) classified by "highest ranking component census subdivision (CSD)" according to the Statistical Area Classification (appearing as row headers), less than 10%, 10% to 19%, 20% to 29%, 30% to 39%, 40% to 49%, 50% to 59%, 60% to 69%, 70% to 79%, 80% to 89%, 90% to 99%, 100%, mainly-census-rural SLAs (subtotal) and all SLAs (appearing as column headers), calculated using number of self-contained labour areas (SLAs) and percentage as a unit of measure.
Self-contained labour areas (SLA) classified by "highest ranking component census subdivision (CSD)" according to the Statistical Area Classification Self-contained labour areas (SLA) classified by share of population residing in census rural areas
Less than 10% 10% to 19% 20% to 29% 30% to 39% 40% to 49% 50% to 59% 60% to 69% 70% to 79% 80% to 89% 90% to 99% 100% Mainly-census-rural SLAs (subtotal) All SLAs
  number of self-contained labour areas (SLAs)
CMA SLA 7 12 6 6 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 34
Larger CA SLA 0 1 7 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12
Smaller CA SLA 3 3 17 18 20 10 3 0 0 0 0 13 74
Strictly-RST SLAs (subtotal) 2 3 10 11 21 33 18 21 9 2 99 182 229
Strong MIZ SLA 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 1 1 1 0 7 7
Moderate MIZ SLA 0 1 2 7 9 15 11 13 5 1 38 83 102
Weak MIZ SLA 2 2 7 4 12 14 7 7 3 0 48 79 106
No MIZ SLA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 12 12
RST Territories SLA 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 2
All SLAs 12 19 40 37 44 45 21 21 9 2 99 197 349
  percent distribution within each row
CMA SLA 21 35 18 18 3 6 0 0 0 0 0 6 100
Larger CA SLA 0 8 58 17 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100
Smaller CA SLA 4 4 23 24 27 14 4 0 0 0 0 18 100
Strictly-RST SLAs (subtotal) 1 1 4 5 9 14 8 9 4 1 43 79 100
Strong MIZ SLA 0 0 0 0 0 57 0 14 14 14 0 100 100
Moderate MIZ SLA 0 1 2 7 9 15 11 13 5 1 37 81 100
Weak MIZ SLA 2 2 7 4 11 13 7 7 3 0 45 75 100
No MIZ SLA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 100 100
RST Territories SLA 0 0 50 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50 50 100
All SLAs 3 5 11 11 13 13 6 6 3 1 28 56 100
  percent distribution within each column
CMA SLA 58 63 15 16 2 4 0 0 0 0 0 1 10
Larger CA SLA 0 5 18 5 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3
Smaller CA SLA 25 16 43 49 45 22 14 0 0 0 0 7 21
Strictly-RST SLAs (subtotal) 17 16 25 30 48 73 86 100 100 100 100 92 66
Strong MIZ SLA 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 5 11 50 0 4 2
Moderate MIZ SLA 0 5 5 19 20 33 52 62 56 50 38 42 29
Weak MIZ SLA 17 11 18 11 27 31 33 33 33 0 48 40 30
No MIZ SLA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 6 3
RST Territories SLA 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1
All SLAs 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100
Source: Authors' computation based on 2006 Census of Population data.
Date modified: