Notes
Zhang, X., R. Brown, L. Vincent, W. Skinner, Y. Feng and E. Mekis, 2011,
“Canadian climate trends, 1950-2007,” Canadian Biodiversity:
Ecosystem Status and Trends 2010, Technical Thematic Report No. 5,
Canadian Councils of Resource Ministers, www.biodivcanada.ca/default.asp?lang=En&n=137E1147-0 (accessed
April 15, 2014).
Hewitt, J., T. Brierley, K. Chen, and H. Hill, 2008, Assessment of Climate Change Impacts on Agricultural Land-Use Suitability:
Spring Seeded Small Grains on the Prairie, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada
and Environment Canada, http://www4.agr.gc.ca/resources/prod/doc/pfra/pdf/assess_clim_chang_prairies_e.pdf (accessed April 15, 2014).
OURANOS, n.d. (no date), Vers l'adaptation aux changements climatiques, http://adaptation.ouranos.ca/en/ (accessed April 16, 2014).
Natural Resources
Canada, 1981, “Canada – Growing Degree-Days,” The
National Atlas of Canada, 5thEdition, http://geogratis.gc.ca/api/en/nrcan-rncan/ess-sst/610cd0b8-4791-5374-8245-a12a053bcd4a.html (accessed April 16, 2014).
Zhang, X., R. Brown, L. Vincent, W. Skinner, Y. Feng and E. Mekis, 2011,
“Canadian climate trends, 1950-2007,” Canadian Biodiversity:
Ecosystem Status and Trends 2010, Technical Thematic Report No. 5,
Canadian Councils of Resource Ministers, www.biodivcanada.ca/default.asp?lang=En&n=137E1147-0 (accessed
April 15, 2014).
Statistics
Canada, 2010, “Freshwater supply and demand in Canada,” Human Activity and the Environment, Catalogue no. 16-201-X.
Statistics Canada, 2010.
DSS Management Consultants Inc, 2010, Valuation of Ecological Goods
& Services in Canada’s Natural Resources Sectors, Technical
report submitted to Ecosystems and Biodiversity Priorities Division, Environment
Canada.
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, 2013, FAOSTAT, Resources, Fertilizers, http://faostat3.fao.org/faostat-gateway/go/to/home/E (accessed
April 16, 2014).
An industrial process to produce ammonia from nitrogen
and hydrogen.
The interaction between two different
organisms living in close physical association, typically to the advantage
of both.
Cordell, D. and T.-S.S. Neset, 2014, “Phosphorus vulnerability:
A qualitative framework for assessing the vulnerability of national and regional
food systems to the multi-dimensional stressors of phosphorus scarcity,” Global Environmental Change, Vol. 24, pages 108 to 122.
Statistics Canada, 2012, Agricultural Ecumene Boundary File: Reference Guide, 2011 Census
of Agriculture, Catalogue no. 92-639-G.
The Canada Land Inventory (CLI) assessed the
climate and soil characteristics of mineral soils in order to evaluate the
limitations for field crop production. The potential capability of soils was
emphasized over the existing land use. Note that the CLI Soil Capability Classification
for Agriculture does not cover the entirety of the country.
Environment Canada, 1972, Canada Land Inventory: Soil Capability Classification for Agriculture, Report
no. 2, Catalogue no. F063-2/1972.
Dependable agricultural land (Class 1 to 3)
represents land with a high capability for sustained cultivated crop production.
Class 4 land is marginal for crop production and requires the use
of additional management or conservation practices, Class 5 is capable
of permanent pasture and hay, Class 6 is suitable for natural pasture,
and Class 7 is not suitable for cropping or permanent pasture. Environment
Canada, 1972, Canada Land Inventory: Soil Capability Classification
for Agriculture, Report no. 2, Catalogue no. F063-2/1972.
Settled area is based on Agriculture
and Agri-Food Canada's (AAFC) 30 m land cover code for developed
areas. Some northern areas only partially covered by the AAFC land cover (see
Map 1, Appendix C in Statistics Canada, 2013, “Measuring
ecosystem goods and services in Canada," Human Activity and the Environment, Catalogue no. 16-201-X for geographic coverage)
were supplemented with estimates derived from Statistics Canada’s settlements
data and AAFC’s 30 m land cover.
Wang, J., 2004, “They’re tilling that field behind the mall,” Canadian Agriculture at a Glance, Statistics Canada Catalogue no. 96-325-X.
Naturalizing landscapes have previously been modified from their
natural state, but have been left undisturbed and are transitioning to a more
natural land cover (e.g., cleared land reverting to wooded land). The new
natural state may or may not be similar to the original land cover.
Report a problem on this page
Is something not working? Is there information outdated? Can't find what you're looking for?
Please contact us and let us know how we can help you.
- Date modified: