Information identified as archived is provided for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It is not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards and has not been altered or updated since it was archived. Please "contact us" to request a format other than those available.
Labour productivity note to readers
In the first quarter of 2008, the labour productivity of Canadian businesses
declined for a second consecutive quarter, in a context of inclement
weather, reduced working hours, and a widespread drop in manufacturing
output, especially in the motor vehicle industry.
Productivity of Canadian businesses edged down 0.3% in the first quarter of 2008,
slowing from the upward revised 0.7% decline in the fourth quarter of 2007. The
back-to-back declines followed four quarters of growth.
Chart F.1
Productivity in Canadian businesses declines
for a second straight quarter

After reaching a plateau in the final quarter of 2007, gross domestic product (GDP) experienced its first quarterly decline in nearly five years in the first quarter of 2008.
At the same time, employment continued to expand, despite job losses in manufacturing. Total hours worked remained almost unchanged, however, as the sustained growth in employment was completely offset by a drop in average hours worked (hours worked per job).
The quarterly decrease in average hours worked was partly due to the particularly harsh winter and production cutbacks in the automotive sector as some assembly lines underwent retooling and others were affected by a labour dispute involving a major auto parts supplier in the United States. Overall, twelve of the fifteen industries composing the business sector registered a decline in hours worked per job during the first quarter of 2008.
With a decline in the value of the Canadian dollar against its U.S. counterpart after three quarters of strong gains, Canadian businesses saw their unit labour costs in U.S. dollars edge downward for the first time in a year. The unit labour costs for Canadian businesses in U.S. dollars have been trending upward since the second quarter of 2002. In spite of the 0.7% decline in the first quarter of 2008, unit labour costs in U.S. dollars were over 90% compare to the first quarter of 2002.
Although the volume of hours worked remained the same for Canadian businesses in the first quarter, their output declined and consequently their productivity fell. GDP of Canadian businesses fell 0.3% in the first quarter, after remaining flat in the fourth quarter of last year. This contrasts with the first two quarters of 2007, when GDP grew at a steady pace.
A sharp slowdown in inventory buildup by businesses, as a result of the combined effect of higher consumer spending and lower imports, was a major contributor to the decline in Canada’s GDP in the first quarter.
Employment in the Canadian business sector maintained its upward trend, climbing 0.5% in the first quarter, but the volume of hours worked remained unchanged as a result of a decline in hours worked per job. Over the previous nine quarters, the total volume of hours worked had risen at a fairly steady pace, averaging 0.5% growth per quarter.
Chart F.2
Hours worked remains almost unchanged
in Canada, while it continues to decline in the U.S.

In the first quarter, hourly compensation in Canada increased while productivity decreased and as a result, the cost of labour per unit of output in the Canadian business sector was up 1.6%. This increase was similar to the previous quarter and more than twice the average pace observed during the first three quarters of 2007.
Chart F.3
Canadian unit labour costs (ULC) in
US dollars declines sharply
However, Canadian businesses saw a slight improvement in competitive position when the unit labour cost is adjusted for the exchange rate. In the first quarter, the Canadian dollar depreciated by 2.2% against the U.S. currency, which pushed Canada’s unit labour costs in U.S. dollars down 0.7%. This was the first quarterly decline in a year of this indicator. Unit labour costs for the U.S. business sector increased 0.6% in the quarter.
In the United States, labour productivity growth in the business sector rebounded to 0.6% in the first three months of 2008, after posting a 0.2% increase in the fourth quarter of 2007. This upturn was mostly attributable to the largest decline in the volume of hours worked since the second quarter of 2003, as GDP growth in the United States was low.
The slow growth in the U.S.’s GDP in the last two quarters is largely due to continued sluggishness in consumer spending on durable goods and the persistence of the housing slump.
Chart F.4
U.S. productivity rebounds slightly

Hours worked in American businesses declined for the third quarter in a row, dropping 0.4% in the first quarter.
| Empty cell | Canada | United States | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Before revision | After revision | ||
| annual % change | |||
| 1981-2007 | 1.4 | 1.4 | 2.1 |
| 1981-2000 | 1.6 | 1.6 | 1.9 |
| 2000-2007 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 2.6 |
| 2004 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 2.9 |
| 2005 | 2.5 | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| 2006 | 1.1 | 1.6 | 1.0 |
| 2007 | 0.5 | 0.6 | 1.9 |
| Source: U.S. data are from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, Productivity and Costs - First quarter 2008, published in NEWS, June 4. | |||
In general, the revisions tended to cancel each other out. Consequently, the size of the revisions has had no impact on the average difference in productivity between Canada and the United States since 2000.
Labour productivity in Canadian businesses edged down for a second consecutive quarter, falling 0.3% in the first quarter. Manufacturing, construction as well as transportation and warehousing accounted for virtually all the decrease.
Chart F.5
Main industries’ contribution
to percent change in labour productivity in the business sector, first
quarter 2008

As in the previous quarter, the productivity decline in Canadian businesses in the first quarter 2008 was mainly due to goods producing industries. On a quarterly basis, productivity in the goods sector fell by 1.3%, while it increased by 0.4% for service producing businesses.
In the first quarter of 2008, manufacturing productivity fell 1.6%, almost twice the decline observed in the previous quarter. The combined effects of a labour conflict at a U.S. auto parts plant, lower U.S. demand, and a shift in consumer preference towards more fuel-efficient models, contributed to the decrease in motor vehicle production in the quarter. Real GDP in manufacturing decreased for the third consecutive quarter, falling by 3.0% in the first quarter 2008. In a similar fashion, hours worked in manufacturing decreased by 1.4% in the first quarter, the largest drop since the fourth quarter 2006.
Chart F.6
Productivity in manufacturing sector
slips once more

Modest increases in construction activity (real GDP up 0.3%) combined with a continued strong upward trend in the number of hours worked, induced productivity to decrease in this industry for the fourth consecutive quarter.
Productivity in the services-producing industries improved in the first quarter, helped by a continued expansion in economic activity in this sector.
After declining by 0.1% in the fourth quarter of 2007, labour productivity increased by 0.4% in the first quarter 2008. Within the services sector, wholesale and retail trade continue to contribute the most. However, these increases occurred in a very different context for these two industries. While it came largely on the strength of positive GDP growth for retail trade, it was due to an important decline in the volume of hours worked for wholesale. Wholesalers were also affected by the slowdown in imports and exports of automotive products.
In contrast, transportation and warehousing as well as administration and support services registered important productivity declines in the first three months of 2008. The efficiency of transportation was particularly affected by the exceptional amount of snowfall this winter.
In the context of inclement weather, hours worked per job declined in almost all industries of the business sector in the first quarter. Wholesale trade, accommodation and food services, communication and cultural services and construction industries were particularly affected.
However, the number of jobs continued to increase at a steady pace during the first quarter of 2008 (+0.5%). The number of jobs increased in most industries. The only industries to register job decreases were manufacturing, wholesale trade, public utilities and arts, leisure and culture. Construction, administrative and remediation services as well as transportation and warehousing registered employment increases higher than one percent for the quarter.
Unit labour cost in the business sector (an indicator of inflationary pressure) jumped 1.6% for the second consecutive quarter. Most of this increase comes from the goods sector which saw its unit labour cost climb an additional 2.5% after recording a 3.0% increase in the previous quarter. All industries of the goods sector registered important increases in their cost per unit of output, except agriculture, forestry, fishing and trapping,
Unit labour cost in manufacturing climbed 3.0% in the first quarter, compared with 2.6% in the previous quarter, the highest increase registered since 2002. This was due to strong growth in hourly compensation.
Mirroring the trend observed for the total economy, inflationary pressure from wages increased in mining, oil and gas extraction, even after the six year high registered during the fourth quarter of 2007. During the first quarter of 2008, unit labour cost registered an additional increase of 3.9%.
In transportation and warehousing, an industry that was particularly hit by the harsh winter and the increases in fuel prices, the unit labour cost increased by 2.4% during the first quarter of 2008. This was the largest quarter over quarter increase since 2002.
Information on methods and data quality available in the Integrated Meta Data Base: 5042.