Relative performance of methods based on model-assisted survey regression estimation: A simulation study
Section 5. Estimation under non-probability sampling

In this section, we study the effect of selection bias on the survey regression estimators under non-probability sampling. For this purpose, we studied two types of selection bias possibly present in non-probability samples. In particular, we considered a scenario in which the probability of selection depends only on the auxiliary data available for all units in the population, and a scenario in which the probability of selection depends on the survey variable of interest. In both scenarios, we evaluated the absolute relative bias (ARB), | t ^ y t y |/ t y , MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aqatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiFu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9 vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=x fr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaaeaaaaaaaaa8 qadaWcgaqaamaaemqabaGaaGjcVlqadshapaGbaKaadaWgaaWcbaWd biaadMhaa8aabeaak8qacqGHsislcaWG0bWdamaaBaaaleaapeGaam yEaaWdaeqaaOGaaGjcVdWdbiaawEa7caGLiWoacaaMe8oabaGaaGjb VlaadshapaWaaSbaaSqaa8qacaWG5baapaqabaaaaOWdbiaacYcaaa a@486A@  for each estimator of the total. Following Chen, Valliant and Elliott (2018), we treat the non-probability sample as a simple random sample and set the design weights equal to d i =N/n MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aqatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiFu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9 vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=x fr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaaeaaaaaaaaa8 qacaWGKbWdamaaBaaaleaapeGaamyAaaWdaeqaaOGaaGjbV=qacqGH 9aqpcaaMe8+aaSGbaeaacaWGobaabaGaamOBaaaaaaa@3E4E@  for the estimation of total t y MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aqatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiFu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9 vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=x fr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaaeaaaaaaaaa8 qacaWG0bWdamaaBaaaleaapeGaamyEaaWdaeqaaaaa@3858@  as the selection process for non-probability samples is unknown in practice.

5.1   Selection probabilities depend on auxiliary data

We drew repeated samples using the same stratified SRS design as in Section 4. Table 5.1 displays the ARB of each estimator of the total amount of trade credit requested assuming d i =N/n , MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aqatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiFu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9 vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=x fr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaaeaaaaaaaaa8 qacaWGKbWdamaaBaaaleaapeGaamyAaaWdaeqaaOGaaGjbV=qacqGH 9aqpcaaMe8+aaSGbaeaacaWGobaabaGaamOBaaaacaGGSaaaaa@3EFE@  when the sample is in fact selected using disproportionate stratified random sampling.

As expected, the wholly designed-based HT estimator has the largest bias, and this bias does not decrease as the sample size increases. The ARB of model-assisted estimators decreases as the sample size n MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aqatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiFu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9 vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=x fr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaGaamOBaaaa@36DA@  increases. The GREG estimator has the smallest bias, particularly for small sample sizes. Furthermore, the GREG estimator is approximately unbiased if revenue is included as one of the auxiliary variables for calibration. However, if stepwise variable selection is used, the GREG estimator is no longer unbiased for small sample sizes. On the other hand, if revenue is not included as a calibration variable, the GREG estimator is slightly biased. The lasso-based and, to a smaller extent, the regression tree estimators suffer from small sample bias for n=200 MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aqatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiFu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9 vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=x fr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaGaamOBaiaays W7cqGH9aqpcaaMc8UaaGjbVlaaikdacaaIWaGaaGimaaaa@3EB5@  when revenue is correctly included as an auxiliary variable. This is most apparent for the standard lasso estimators that do not include calibration to known population totals. For n MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aqatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiFu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9 vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=x fr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaGaamOBaaaa@36DA@  equal to 500 or 1,000, including revenue as an auxiliary variable, substantially decreases the bias for the regression tree and calibrated lasso estimators but only slightly decreases the bias for the lasso estimators without calibration. This indicates that the additional calibration step is important for diminishing the effect of selection bias, especially if the sample size is small.


Table 5.1
Percent ARB of each estimator under stratified sampling with revenue and without revenue included as an auxiliary variable
Table summary
This table displays the results of Percent ARB of each estimator under stratified sampling with revenue and without revenue included as an auxiliary variable Revenue and Without Revenue (appearing as column headers).
Revenue Without Revenue
n= MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aqatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqk0Jf9crFfpeea0xh9v8qiW7rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9 vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=x fr=xb9adbeqabeWacmGabiqabeqabmqabeabbaGcbaGaamOBaiaays W7cqGH9aqpcaaMc8oaaa@3D25@ 200 n= MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aqatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqk0Jf9crFfpeea0xh9v8qiW7rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9 vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=x fr=xb9adbeqabeWacmGabiqabeqabmqabeabbaGcbaGaamOBaiaays W7cqGH9aqpcaaMc8oaaa@3D25@ 500 n= MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aqatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqk0Jf9crFfpeea0xh9v8qiW7rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9 vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=x fr=xb9adbeqabeWacmGabiqabeqabmqabeabbaGcbaGaamOBaiaays W7cqGH9aqpcaaMc8oaaa@3D25@ 1,000 n= MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aqatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqk0Jf9crFfpeea0xh9v8qiW7rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9 vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=x fr=xb9adbeqabeWacmGabiqabeqabmqabeabbaGcbaGaamOBaiaays W7cqGH9aqpcaaMc8oaaa@3D25@ 200 n= MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aqatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqk0Jf9crFfpeea0xh9v8qiW7rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9 vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=x fr=xb9adbeqabeWacmGabiqabeqabmqabeabbaGcbaGaamOBaiaays W7cqGH9aqpcaaMc8oaaa@3D25@ 500 n= MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aqatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqk0Jf9crFfpeea0xh9v8qiW7rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9 vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=x fr=xb9adbeqabeWacmGabiqabeqabmqabeabbaGcbaGaamOBaiaays W7cqGH9aqpcaaMc8oaaa@3D25@ 1,000
GREG 0.31 0.06 0.06 4.84 5.12 4.71
FSTEP 2.67 0.44 0.06 9.20 5.18 4.92
TREE 4.15 1.04 0.50 17.40 10.20 8.94
LASSO (1-way) 17.42 5.10 2.32 16.32 8.88 6.49
CLASSO (1-way) 7.99 0.83 0.20 9.04 5.22 4.59
LASSO (2-way) 25.36 14.28 8.40 26.31 15.16 9.89
CLASSO (2-way) 10.72 1.44 1.02 14.19 5.56 3.84
ALASSO 14.95 5.63 3.00 14.35 8.64 6.51
CALASSO 9.63 2.54 1.25 9.27 5.77 4.92
HT 49.45 48.84 48.81 49.08 49.29 48.60

These results indicate that when the selection probability depends on a known auxiliary variable, including it in the working model for the GREG estimator effectively diminishes the effect of selection bias. This was not the case for the model-assisted estimators that involved variable selection. Performing variable selection may increase bias as auxiliary variables that are predictive in terms of selection probability may not be selected and properly accounted for. The lasso estimators can be constructed such that user-specified variables are always included in the working regression model. These user-specified variables can be added to x i * MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aqatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiFu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9 vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=x fr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaGaamiEamaaDa aaleaacaWGPbaabaGaaiOkaaaaaaa@38AD@  in equation (2.5) to force calibration to corresponding population totals. Unfortunately, the underlying selection mechanism is unknown in practice and, therefore, correctly identifying variables which impact selection probability is challenging.

5.2   Selection probabilities depend on the study variable

Next, we drew repeated samples using Poisson sampling where the sampling probabilities depends on the survey variable of interest. We assume the Poisson sampling probabilities are given by:

logit( p i )= β 0 + β 1 y i MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiFu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9 vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=x fr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaaeaaaaaaaaa8 qacaqGSbGaae4BaiaabEgacaqGPbGaaeiDaiaaysW7daqadaWdaeaa peGaamiCa8aadaWgaaWcbaWdbiaadMgaa8aabeaaaOWdbiaawIcaca GLPaaacaaMe8Uaeyypa0JaaGjbVlabek7aI9aadaWgaaWcbaWdbiaa icdaa8aabeaakiaaysW7peGaey4kaSIaaGjbVlabek7aI9aadaWgaa WcbaWdbiaaigdaa8aabeaak8qacaWG5bWdamaaBaaaleaapeGaamyA aaWdaeqaaaaa@5041@

where y i MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aqatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiFu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9 vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=x fr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaaeaaaaaaaaa8 qacaWG5bWdamaaBaaaleaapeGaamyAaaWdaeqaaaaa@384D@  is the amount of trade credit requested in millions of dollars, β 1 =0.5 MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aqatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiFu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9 vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=x fr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaaeaaaaaaaaa8 qacqaHYoGypaWaaSbaaSqaa8qacaaIXaaapaqabaGccaaMe8+dbiab g2da9iaaysW7caaMc8Uaaeimaiaab6cacaqG1aaaaa@409E@  and β 0 =3.80,2.85,2.10. MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aqatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiFu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9 vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=x fr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaaeaaaaaaaaa8 qacqaHYoGypaWaaSbaaSqaa8qacaaIWaaapaqabaGccaaMe8+dbiab g2da9iaaykW7caaMe8UaeyOeI0Iaae4maiaab6cacaqG4aGaaeimai aacYcacaaMe8UaeyOeI0IaaeOmaiaab6cacaqG4aGaaeynaiaacYca caaMe8UaeyOeI0IaaeOmaiaab6cacaqGXaGaaeimaiaac6caaaa@4EEF@  The intercept values, β 0 , MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aqatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiFu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9 vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=x fr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaaeaaaaaaaaa8 qacqaHYoGypaWaaSbaaSqaa8qacaaIWaaapaqabaGccaGGSaaaaa@3976@  were chosen such that we obtained sample sizes of approximately 200, 500 and 1,000 units, averaged over the simulated samples. Under this sampling design, units with larger amounts requested for trade credit have a higher probability of being sampled and, therefore, are over-represented. Table 5.2 displays the ARB of each estimator of the total amount of trade credit requested assuming d i =N/n , MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aqatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiFu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9 vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=x fr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaaeaaaaaaaaa8 qacaWGKbWdamaaBaaaleaapeGaamyAaaWdaeqaaOGaaGjbV=qacqGH 9aqpcaaMe8+aaSGbaeaacaWGobaabaGaamOBaaaacaGGSaaaaa@3EFE@  when the sample is selected using the above informative Poisson sampling. Here, all the estimators are heavily biased because the population model does not hold due to informative sampling. The magnitude of the bias is very similar across estimators and does not substantially decrease as the sample size increases. The inclusion or exclusion of revenue as an auxiliary variable does not impact the bias.


Table 5.2
Percent ARB of each estimator under Poisson sampling with revenue and without revenue included as an auxiliary variable
Table summary
This table displays the results of Percent ARB of each estimator under Poisson sampling with revenue and without revenue included as an auxiliary variable Revenue and Without Revenue (appearing as column headers).
Revenue Without Revenue
β 0 = MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aqatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqk0Jf9crFfpeea0xh9v8qiW7rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9 vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=x fr=xb9adbeqabeWacmGabiqabeqabmqabeabbaGcbaaeaaaaaaaaa8 qacqaHYoGypaWaaSbaaSqaa8qacaaIWaaapaqabaGccaaMe8+dbiab g2da9iaaykW7aaa@3F21@ -3.8 β 0 = MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aqatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqk0Jf9crFfpeea0xh9v8qiW7rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9 vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=x fr=xb9adbeqabeWacmGabiqabeqabmqabeabbaGcbaaeaaaaaaaaa8 qacqaHYoGypaWaaSbaaSqaa8qacaaIWaaapaqabaGccaaMe8+dbiab g2da9iaaykW7aaa@3F21@ -2.85 β 0 = MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aqatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqk0Jf9crFfpeea0xh9v8qiW7rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9 vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=x fr=xb9adbeqabeWacmGabiqabeqabmqabeabbaGcbaaeaaaaaaaaa8 qacqaHYoGypaWaaSbaaSqaa8qacaaIWaaapaqabaGccaaMe8+dbiab g2da9iaaykW7aaa@3F21@ -2.1 β 0 = MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aqatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqk0Jf9crFfpeea0xh9v8qiW7rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9 vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=x fr=xb9adbeqabeWacmGabiqabeqabmqabeabbaGcbaaeaaaaaaaaa8 qacqaHYoGypaWaaSbaaSqaa8qacaaIWaaapaqabaGccaaMe8+dbiab g2da9iaaykW7aaa@3F21@ -3.8 β 0 = MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aqatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqk0Jf9crFfpeea0xh9v8qiW7rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9 vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=x fr=xb9adbeqabeWacmGabiqabeqabmqabeabbaGcbaaeaaaaaaaaa8 qacqaHYoGypaWaaSbaaSqaa8qacaaIWaaapaqabaGccaaMe8+dbiab g2da9iaaykW7aaa@3F21@ -2.85 β 0 = MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aqatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqk0Jf9crFfpeea0xh9v8qiW7rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9 vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=x fr=xb9adbeqabeWacmGabiqabeqabmqabeabbaGcbaaeaaaaaaaaa8 qacqaHYoGypaWaaSbaaSqaa8qacaaIWaaapaqabaGccaaMe8+dbiab g2da9iaaykW7aaa@3F21@ -2.1
GREG 23.53 22.27 20.45 24.74 22.91 21.21
FSTEP 24.54 22.55 20.58 25.16 23.24 21.15
TREE 24.07 22.73 20.15 24.93 22.47 20.55
LASSO (1-way) 24.29 22.73 20.65 25.45 23.29 21.38
CLASSO (1-way) 23.02 22.30 20.47 24.74 22.99 21.23
LASSO (2-way) 23.15 22.06 20.17 24.66 22.73 20.62
CLASSO (2-way) 20.11 20.18 19.01 22.62 21.63 19.98
ALASSO 24.44 22.72 20.66 25.50 23.21 21.36
CALASSO 23.91 22.46 20.53 25.10 23.01 21.25
HT 29.12 27.95 25.57 29.36 27.53 25.45

Date modified: