Two local diagnostics to evaluate the efficiency of the empirical best predictor under the Fay-Herriot model
Section 7. Conclusion
Users of small area estimates are usually interested in
only one domain. Therefore, they seek a quality indicator that applies to their
domain and not an overall indicator. The design MSE of small area estimators is
a conceptually attractive quality indicator since it conditions on the
unexplained local effect. However, it is known that design-unbiased estimators
of the design MSE are generally unstable when the domain sample size is small.
To circumvent this problem, we proposed two diagnostics that are intended to
identify domains where the design MSE of the direct estimator is smaller than
that of the EB estimator. Our simulation results seem promising and allow us to
envision the implementation of a useful indicator for choosing between the
direct and EB estimators for a particular domain. In future research, it would
be interesting to evaluate the efficiency of a hybrid estimator that would
leverage these diagnostics.
Appendix
A. Proof of equivalence between equations (4.1)
and (4.2)
Using equation (4.1) and the conditional distribution of
given in Section 4.1, we have:
Replacing
with
results in:
Since for any value
we have
then
We notice that
is a symmetric function of
around 0, i.e.
Therefore, we can rewrite
as in equation (4.2):
B.
-value associated with the test statistic
First,
recall that
We define the
-value as the maximum of
and
Since
we can then write:
Using the standardized error distribution (4.3), we
obtain:
Using the expression
we have:
Under the null hypothesis
or
and in both cases the above equation reduces
to:
We will now show that if we reject
(with a threshold smaller than 0.5 such as
0.1) then we would reject even more strongly the null hypothesis
for any value
First, if
i.e.,
we observe that
and we never reject the null hypothesis
Second, if
we can easily show that the function
is increasing in
over the interval
We also note that it is a function of
that is symmetrical around
since
Consequently,
is decreasing on the interval
is minimum when
and maximum when
and
Therefore, when
we have:
References
Fay, R.E., and Herriot, R.A. (1979). Estimation of
income from small places: An application of James-Stein procedures to census
data. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74, 269-277.
Hidiroglou, M.A., Beaumont, J.-F. and Yung, W. (2019). Development
of a small area estimation system at Statistics Canada. Survey
Methodology, 45, 1, 101-126. Paper available at
https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/en/pub/12-001-x/2019001/article/00009-eng.pdf.
Pfeffermann, D., and Ben-Hur, D. (2019). Estimation of
randomisation mean square error in small area estimation. International
Statistical Review, 87, S1, S31-S49.
Rao, J.N.K., and Molina, I. (2015). Small Area
Estimation. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey.
Rao, J.N.K., Rubin-Bleuer, S. and Estevao, V.M. (2018). Measuring
uncertainty associated with model-based small area estimators. Survey Methodology, 44, 2, 151-166. Paper available at
https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/en/pub/12-001-x/2018002/article/54958-eng.pdf.
Rivest, L.-P., and Belmonte, E. (2000). A
conditional mean squared error of small area estimators. Survey
Methodology, 26, 1, 67-78. Paper available at https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/en/pub/12-001-x/2000001/article/5179-eng.pdf.
ISSN : 1492-0921
Editorial policy
Survey Methodology publishes articles dealing with various aspects of statistical development relevant to a statistical agency, such as design issues in the context of practical constraints, use of different data sources and collection techniques, total survey error, survey evaluation, research in survey methodology, time series analysis, seasonal adjustment, demographic studies, data integration, estimation and data analysis methods, and general survey systems development. The emphasis is placed on the development and evaluation of specific methodologies as applied to data collection or the data themselves. All papers will be refereed. However, the authors retain full responsibility for the contents of their papers and opinions expressed are not necessarily those of the Editorial Board or of Statistics Canada.
Submission of Manuscripts
Survey Methodology is published twice a year in electronic format. Authors are invited to submit their articles in English or French in electronic form, preferably in Word to the Editor, (statcan.smj-rte.statcan@canada.ca, Statistics Canada, 150 Tunney’s Pasture Driveway, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, K1A 0T6). For formatting instructions, please see the guidelines provided in the journal and on the web site (www.statcan.gc.ca/SurveyMethodology).
Note of appreciation
Canada owes the success of its statistical system to a long-standing partnership between Statistics Canada, the citizens of Canada, its businesses, governments and other institutions. Accurate and timely statistical information could not be produced without their continued co-operation and goodwill.
Standards of service to the public
Statistics Canada is committed to serving its clients in a prompt, reliable and courteous manner. To this end, the Agency has developed standards of service which its employees observe in serving its clients.
Copyright
Published by authority of the Minister responsible for Statistics Canada.
© His Majesty the King in Right of Canada as represented by the Minister of Industry, 2022
Use of this publication is governed by the Statistics Canada Open Licence Agreement.
Catalogue No. 12-001-X
Frequency: Semi-annual
Ottawa