Survey Methodology
Growth Rates Preservation (GRP) temporal benchmarking: Drawbacks and alternative solutions

Warning View the most recent version.

Archived Content

Information identified as archived is provided for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It is not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards and has not been altered or updated since it was archived. Please "contact us" to request a format other than those available.

by Jacco Daalmans, Tommaso Di Fonzo, Nino Mushkudiani and Reinier BikkerNote 1

  • Release date: June 21, 2018

Abstract

Benchmarking monthly or quarterly series to annual data is a common practice in many National Statistical Institutes. The benchmarking problem arises when time series data for the same target variable are measured at different frequencies and there is a need to remove discrepancies between the sums of the sub-annual values and their annual benchmarks. Several benchmarking methods are available in the literature. The Growth Rates Preservation (GRP) benchmarking procedure is often considered the best method. It is often claimed that this procedure is grounded on an ideal movement preservation principle. However, we show that there are important drawbacks to GRP, relevant for practical applications, that are unknown in the literature. Alternative benchmarking models will be considered that do not suffer from some of GRP’s side effects.

Key Words:      Benchmarking; Growth rate preservation; Data reconciliation; Macro integration.

Table of contents

How to cite

Daalmans, J., Di Fonzo, T., Mushkudiani, N. and Bikker, R. (2018). Growth Rates Preservation (GRP) temporal benchmarking: Drawbacks and alternative solutions. Survey Methodology, Statistics Canada, Catalogue No. 12-001-X, Vol. 44, No. 1. Paper available at https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/pub/12-001-x/2018001/article/54927-eng.htm.

Note


Date modified: